π§ Enterprise Architect Agent Specification¶
π― Purpose¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent is the strategic architectural orchestrator within the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory.
Its primary purpose is to transform product visions into enterprise-grade, clean, modular, scalable, event-driven, cloud-native architectures that are aligned with long-term business goals, security compliance, operational scalability, and multi-tenant SaaS optimization.
It ensures that all software ecosystems autonomously generated by ConnectSoft:
- Follow a rigorous architecture blueprint grounded in Domain-Driven Design (DDD) and Clean Architecture.
- Enable elastic scalability, resilience, and observability-first operation at industrial SaaS scale.
- Align business strategy, technology stack evolution, and compliance mandates cohesively.
- Maximize extensibility and future adaptability across all software products created.
π In short:
The Enterprise Architect Agent builds the foundation layer that makes ConnectSoft-generated SaaS ecosystems scalable, governed, future-proof, and compliant β by enforcing best-in-class architectural principles autonomously at massive scale.
ποΈ Strategic Positioning in ConnectSoft Factory¶
flowchart TD
VisionArchitectAgent --> VisionDocument
VisionDocument --> EnterpriseArchitectAgent
EnterpriseArchitectAgent --> SystemArchitectureBlueprint
SystemArchitectureBlueprint --> SolutionArchitectAgent
SystemArchitectureBlueprint --> EventDrivenArchitectAgent
SystemArchitectureBlueprint --> APIDesignerAgent
SystemArchitectureBlueprint --> TechLeadAgent
-
Upstream:
Receives a Vision Document from the Vision Architect Agent β containing business intent, user personas, success metrics, and early feature decomposition. -
Downstream:
Produces a System Architecture Blueprint, which triggers detailed design and development by:- Solution Architect (functional decomposition)
- Event-Driven Architect (EDA modeling)
- API Designer (service interfaces)
- Tech Leads (implementation planning)
π·οΈ What the Enterprise Architect Agent Guarantees¶
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| Business-Technology Alignment | Architecture fully maps back to business goals and vision KPIs. |
| Scalable and Modular Systems | Systems are built to elastically scale and evolve across regions, tenants, workloads. |
| Security and Compliance by Design | Privacy, compliance, and cybersecurity principles are embedded at architecture level. |
| Cloud-Native Excellence | Architectures are designed for cloud-native operation β Kubernetes, service mesh, serverless patterns. |
| Observability-First Systems | Tracing, logging, metrics, and telemetry are natively embedded from architecture stage. |
| Governance and Risk Management | Architectural decisions are traceable, versioned, auditable, and risk-assessed. |
π£ Example Mission Statements¶
"Given a vision for a global veterinary SaaS platform, define an event-driven, microservices-based, multi-tenant, secure architecture with clean domain boundaries, Azure-native infrastructure, OpenTelemetry observability, and GDPR/HIPAA compliance layers."
"Given a startup's vision for a real-time collaborative design tool, architect a serverless, resilient, event-driven cloud-native backend with cost optimization strategies and WebSocket scalable architectures."
π οΈ Why This Agent is Critical¶
Without the Enterprise Architect Agent:
- Systems risk inconsistent scalability, fragile architectures, and costly redesigns.
- Autonomous system generation would lack traceable, governable technical structures.
- Compliance with critical frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2 could not be guaranteed.
- Product evolution would be manual, error-prone, and non-extensible.
With the Enterprise Architect Agent:
- ConnectSoft can autonomously generate entire SaaS platforms that are ready for production, scalable across geographies, and evolution-ready β without human architects bottlenecking the process.
ποΈ Scope of Influence¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent has a broad and strategic influence across all major architectural dimensions inside ConnectSoft's autonomous software production lifecycle.
Its sphere of governance extends beyond technical design β shaping the business-technology interface, long-term scalability, compliance alignment, and cross-platform interoperability.
Hereβs a structured breakdown of the Enterprise Architect Agent's Scope of Influence:
ποΈ 1. Business-Technology Alignment¶
| Area | Description |
|---|---|
| Vision Realization | Ensures that every systemβs architecture maps directly back to business goals, success metrics, and market positioning described in the Vision Document. |
| Strategic Technology Roadmaps | Guides technology evolution decisions (e.g., when to migrate to serverless, when to adopt service mesh, when to re-architect for new markets). |
| Edition-Aware Architectures | Designs flexible architectures that support multi-edition SaaS products, where different editions require varying capabilities and scaling parameters. |
ποΈ 2. Clean Modular System Design¶
| Area | Description |
|---|---|
| Bounded Context Definition | Decomposes domains using Domain-Driven Design (DDD) into bounded contexts and subdomains. |
| Microservices Architecture | Structures services into cohesive, autonomous, independently deployable units based on business capabilities. |
| Clear Layering (Clean Architecture) | Enforces strict separation of concerns between layers: Domain β Application β Infrastructure β Presentation. |
| Service Mesh & API Gateway Enablement | Prepares architecture for seamless service-to-service communication, secure API exposure, and observability integration. |
ποΈ 3. Event-Driven Architecture Enablement¶
| Area | Description |
|---|---|
| Domain Events Modeling | Models event types that represent critical business occurrences, supporting event-sourcing, CQRS, and saga orchestration. |
| Event Choreography Planning | Designs loose coupling between services using event-driven patterns rather than tight REST coupling. |
| Cross-Domain Event Communication | Ensures that multi-domain collaboration (e.g., Billing + CRM + Notifications) is event-driven and decoupled. |
ποΈ 4. Cloud-Native and Multi-Tenant SaaS Architecture¶
| Area | Description |
|---|---|
| Cloud-Native Platform Readiness | Designs architectures optimized for Kubernetes, serverless platforms, and managed cloud services. |
| Multi-Tenancy Design | Incorporates multi-tenant isolation strategies (database-per-tenant, shared database with tenant IDs, hybrid models). |
| Resiliency and Auto-Scaling | Ensures fault-tolerance, automatic scaling, load balancing, self-healing patterns by design. |
| Cost Optimization Foundations | Embeds cloud cost management strategies (e.g., horizontal vs vertical scaling, spot instances usage, function orchestration) into architecture decisions. |
ποΈ 5. Security, Compliance, and Governance¶
| Area | Description |
|---|---|
| Security by Design | Applies Secure Design Patterns β authentication, authorization, encryption, zero-trust network segmentation. |
| Regulatory Compliance Enablement | Ensures architecture complies with frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2, PCI DSS by design. |
| Risk Identification and Mitigation | Predicts, models, and documents architectural risks (scaling risks, data risks, operational risks) early. |
| Governance Embedding | All designs, decisions, and versions are logged, auditable, traceable through ConnectSoft governance modules. |
ποΈ 6. Observability and Operational Excellence¶
| Area | Description |
|---|---|
| Telemetry By Default | Every architecture embeds tracing, logging, metrics hooks at the blueprint level (using OpenTelemetry standards). |
| Service Health and SLAs | Designs services with proactive health monitoring and SLA tracking mechanisms. |
| Failure Injection and Chaos Engineering Readiness | Prepares architecture to support chaos experiments to ensure system resilience. |
π Visual Map of Influence¶
flowchart TD
BusinessGoals --> EnterpriseArchitect
EnterpriseArchitect --> ArchitectureBlueprint
ArchitectureBlueprint -->|Domain Modeling| Microservices
ArchitectureBlueprint -->|Event Models| EventDrivenArchitecture
ArchitectureBlueprint -->|Security| ComplianceFrameworks
ArchitectureBlueprint -->|Observability| TelemetryInfrastructure
ArchitectureBlueprint -->|Cloud Native| KubernetesDesign
ArchitectureBlueprint -->|MultiTenancy| SaaSIsolationPatterns
ArchitectureBlueprint -->|Governance| TraceabilityAndAuditability
π‘οΈ Key Summary¶
- Spans strategic business mapping and deep technical structuring.
- Orchestrates modularity, observability, resilience, and regulatory compliance simultaneously.
- Empowers the rest of the Architecture and Engineering clusters with clean, scalable blueprints.
π§© Without the Enterprise Architect Agent, ConnectSoft would risk fragmented, siloed, non-resilient systems incapable of autonomous large-scale evolution.
π Core Responsibilities¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent is responsible for a comprehensive range of deliverables that ensure software systems generated by ConnectSoft are aligned, scalable, compliant, observable, and evolvable.
Hereβs a structured list of its primary responsibilities:
ποΈ 1. System Architecture Blueprint Creation¶
| Responsibility | Description |
|---|---|
| Enterprise Architecture Blueprint | Create detailed, modular system architecture blueprints based on Vision Documents, reflecting clean layering, bounded contexts, event-driven boundaries, and operational scalability. |
| Context Mapping (DDD) | Produce bounded context maps to structure domain decomposition across services and subsystems. |
| Cloud-Native Infrastructure Mapping | Embed cloud-native deployment strategies, Kubernetes cluster layouts, serverless function integrations, and resilience blueprints. |
ποΈ 2. Strategic Technology Roadmapping¶
| Responsibility | Description |
|---|---|
| Technology Stack Recommendations | Define technology stacks per service/solution based on strategic goals, scalability needs, and compliance constraints. |
| Evolution Roadmaps | Produce roadmaps suggesting when/how to introduce event sourcing, micro-frontends, service mesh, ML integrations based on product maturity stages. |
| Migration Planning | Architect paths for legacy system modernization (if applicable), future multi-cloud expansion, and internationalization (multi-region, multi-cloud readiness). |
ποΈ 3. Compliance-Embedded Architecture Design¶
| Responsibility | Description |
|---|---|
| Security Architecture Layering | Enforce Zero Trust principles, encryption standards, and IAM patterns at the architecture blueprint level. |
| Regulatory Compliance Patterns | Integrate GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS compliance by design β across storage, processing, APIs, and user interactions. |
| Auditability and Traceability | Ensure all major components, interactions, and events are traceable, versioned, and auditable using observability and governance frameworks. |
ποΈ 4. Event-Driven Domain Modeling¶
| Responsibility | Description |
|---|---|
| Event Taxonomy Design | Create structured event types β domain events, integration events, system events β with versioning, contract enforcement, and schemas. |
| Event Choreography Planning | Define event flows between services, supporting loose coupling, eventual consistency, and asynchronous communication patterns. |
| Saga and Workflow Orchestration Hints | Identify areas where sagas or orchestration patterns (e.g., BPMN-based orchestrators) should be considered at system design level. |
ποΈ 5. Observability by Design¶
| Responsibility | Description |
|---|---|
| Telemetry Planning | Ensure every service, API, and event flow integrates OpenTelemetry hooks by default (traces, metrics, logs). |
| SLA-SLO-SLI Definition Support | Define initial Service Level Objectives (SLOs), Service Level Indicators (SLIs), and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for major services during architecture phase. |
| Failure Mode Design | Architect failure paths (fallbacks, retries, circuit breakers, chaos experimentation readiness) into service design. |
ποΈ 6. Governance and Risk Management¶
| Responsibility | Description |
|---|---|
| Governance Anchoring | Attach architecture artifacts to governance repositories, ensuring each blueprint, decision, and roadmap is version-controlled and traceable. |
| Risk Catalog Creation | Create a preliminary catalog of identified architectural risks (e.g., scaling bottlenecks, external API dependencies, compliance risks) along with initial mitigation strategies. |
| Architecture Review Checkpoints | Define governance gates that downstream Solution Architects and Tech Leads must comply with before progressing to development. |
ποΈ 7. Collaboration Enablement with Other Agents¶
| Responsibility | Description |
|---|---|
| Output Standardization | Produce artifacts in formats consumable by downstream agents (Solution Architect, Cloud Architect, API Designer, Event-Driven Architect). |
| Event-Driven Handoff | Emit system events (SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated) that allow next-stage architecture agents to automatically continue their reasoning and blueprint specialization. |
| Cross-Agent Alignment Recommendations | Provide alignment hints (e.g., Domain β Microservice β API β Event β Observability Mapping) to enable orchestration across all architectural agents. |
π Responsibilities Table (Quick Reference)¶
| Area | Key Deliverables |
|---|---|
| System Architecture Blueprint | Context maps, service decomposition, clean layering |
| Strategic Roadmapping | Tech stacks, scalability evolution, cloud-native practices |
| Compliance Embedding | Security design, compliance frameworks, governance mapping |
| Event-Driven Modeling | Event schemas, event flows, choreography patterns |
| Observability Planning | Tracing hooks, SLA/SLO/SLI blueprints, resilience patterns |
| Risk Management | Risk catalogs, mitigation strategies, escalation plans |
| Cross-Agent Collaboration | Standardized outputs, event emissions, alignment recommendations |
π₯ Core Inputs¶
To perform its responsibilities effectively,
the Enterprise Architect Agent requires a structured intake of key information artifacts and metadata.
Inputs must be traceable, versioned, and validated before architectural reasoning begins.
Here's a breakdown of the main inputs the agent consumes:
ποΈ 1. Vision Documents¶
| Input | Description |
|---|---|
| Vision Document | The structured output from the Vision Architect Agent: including business goals, user personas, success metrics, initial feature decomposition, software type (e.g., SaaS, API-first, mobile app). |
| Traceability Metadata | Embedded trace IDs, project IDs, business domain classifications, urgency levels, etc. linked to the Vision Document. |
π§© Without the Vision Document, architectural alignment to business needs would be impossible.
ποΈ 2. Business and Functional Requirements¶
| Input | Description |
|---|---|
| High-Level Business Goals | What outcomes the system must achieve (e.g., scalability to 1M users, GDPR compliance, integration with existing CRM). |
| Core Functional Capabilities | Key functional groups: billing, scheduling, notifications, user management, analytics, etc. (even if very high-level). |
| Success Metrics (KPIs) | Measurable business indicators that architecture must support (e.g., 99.9% uptime, 2s API latency, 10ms messaging lag, <1% failure rate). |
ποΈ 3. Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs)¶
| Input | Description |
|---|---|
| Performance Requirements | Latency expectations, concurrency handling, throughput targets. |
| Scalability Expectations | Projected user growth, data expansion rates, multi-region deployment expectations. |
| Security Requirements | Data protection needs, authentication and authorization models, regulatory requirements (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS). |
| Availability and Resilience Requirements | Required SLAs for uptime, RTO (Recovery Time Objective), RPO (Recovery Point Objective). |
| Cost Constraints | Operational cost ceilings, optimization goals for cloud resource usage. |
ποΈ 4. Compliance and Regulatory Constraints¶
| Input | Description |
|---|---|
| Applicable Regulations | Explicit regulatory obligations: GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2, ISO27001, CCPA, etc. |
| Industry Standards | Industry-specific constraints (e.g., PCI DSS for financial apps, HL7/FHIR for healthcare systems). |
| Data Residency Requirements | Restrictions about data storage, processing locations (e.g., EU-only for GDPR compliance). |
ποΈ 5. Semantic Memory (Knowledge Base Retrieval)¶
| Input | Description |
|---|---|
| Prior Architecture Blueprints | Past examples from ConnectSoft's internal knowledge base: similar systems, reusable patterns, validated architecture modules. |
| ConnectSoft Best Practices | Internal templates for Clean Architecture, Event-Driven design, Cloud-Native SaaS, Secure API design. |
| Architecture Pattern Libraries | Access to modular event-driven, microservice, serverless, and resiliency patterns from prior successful projects. |
ποΈ 6. Environmental and Organizational Context¶
| Input | Description |
|---|---|
| Edition Management Context | If the SaaS supports multiple editions (e.g., Basic, Pro, Enterprise), this influences architecture modularity and feature flagging strategies. |
| Cloud Provider Constraints | Predefined provider (e.g., Azure, AWS) influences service selections and infrastructure blueprints. |
| Internal Platform Services | Existing ConnectSoft platform components (e.g., shared observability services, internal authentication mechanisms) that must be integrated. |
π Inputs Table (Quick Overview)¶
| Input Source | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Vision Document | Understand business intent and initial scope |
| Business Requirements | Map to functional and technical needs |
| Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs) | Architect for performance, scalability, resilience |
| Compliance Constraints | Build secure, compliant architectures |
| Semantic Memory | Leverage prior knowledge and validated patterns |
| Environmental Context | Integrate within ConnectSoft's cloud, governance, and platform landscape |
π‘οΈ Important Notes on Inputs¶
-
Early Validation Phase:
Upon task assignment, the Enterprise Architect Agent validates input completeness.
Missing or inconsistent inputs trigger early correction requests before reasoning begins. -
Traceability Enforcement:
Every input artifact must carry its trace ID, project ID, and version stamp to guarantee auditability throughout the architecture lifecycle. -
Semantic Memory Usage:
Even when vision inputs are novel, the agent proactively retrieves related prior blueprints to enrich reasoning and avoid reinventing patterns.
π€ Core Outputs¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent produces structured, modular, production-grade artifacts that serve as the foundational blueprints for all downstream architecture, engineering, and operational activities inside ConnectSoft's AI Software Factory.
Each output is machine-consumable, versioned, observable, and aligned with ConnectSoftβs modular clean architecture standards.
ποΈ 1. System Architecture Blueprint¶
| Output | Description |
|---|---|
| Enterprise-Level System Blueprint | A comprehensive system architecture design, including service decomposition, cloud-native deployment models, cross-service communication plans, observability layers, and security frameworks. |
| Layered Architecture Diagrams | Clean Architecture visual models showing separation between domain, application, infrastructure, and presentation layers. |
| Context Maps (Bounded Contexts) | DDD-based diagrams outlining business domain decomposition into bounded contexts and service ownership boundaries. |
| Service Interaction Maps | Diagrams showing how microservices, APIs, external systems, and event flows interact across the ecosystem. |
ποΈ 2. Event-Driven Architecture Plans¶
| Output | Description |
|---|---|
| Domain Event Models | Catalogs of business-relevant domain events with descriptions, schemas, source/consumer mappings, and versioning policies. |
| Event Choreography Diagrams | Visual flows showing event propagation between services to achieve loose coupling and eventual consistency. |
| Saga Orchestration Guidelines | Identification of business processes requiring saga orchestration and high-level patterns (e.g., compensating transactions, workflow orchestration). |
ποΈ 3. Compliance-Embedded Architecture Documentation¶
| Output | Description |
|---|---|
| Security Architecture Layer | Security models integrated into the system blueprint: authentication flows, authorization mechanisms, encryption policies, identity management. |
| Compliance Matrix | Mapping of system components and data flows to applicable regulatory standards (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS), highlighting controls and validations. |
| Auditability and Traceability Maps | Documentation of trace IDs, observability points, data retention strategies for compliance auditing. |
ποΈ 4. Strategic Technology Roadmaps¶
| Output | Description |
|---|---|
| Technology Stack Decisions | Documented selection of programming languages, frameworks, cloud services, data storage technologies, integration middleware β with justification based on scalability, maintainability, and compliance. |
| Evolutionary Architecture Paths | Recommendations for future system evolution (e.g., serverless transitions, multi-cloud expansion, regional scaling). |
| Risk Catalog and Mitigation Plans | Identification of architectural risks (e.g., single points of failure, external service dependencies) and associated risk mitigation strategies. |
ποΈ 5. Observability Blueprints¶
| Output | Description |
|---|---|
| Telemetry Injection Points | Definition of where tracing, metrics, and logs must be captured inside services, APIs, event handlers, storage layers. |
| SLA-SLO-SLI Baseline Models | Initial Service Level Agreements, Objectives, and Indicators per critical system component (e.g., API Gateway availability, Database query response times). |
| Failure Mode Catalog | Expected failure modes, fallback behaviors, retry strategies, circuit breaker integration points. |
ποΈ 6. Governance and Collaboration Artifacts¶
| Output | Description |
|---|---|
| SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated Event | Emission of a standardized event into the system bus (Azure Event Grid/Kafka) containing metadata, artifact URIs, trace IDs β triggering downstream agents (Solution Architect, Cloud Architect, etc.). |
| Architecture Compliance Checklists | Lists for downstream agents ensuring Solution Architects, Developers, and DevOps Engineers adhere to the architectural decisions during implementation. |
| Artifact Storage Metadata | All outputs are versioned, categorized, and stored into ConnectSoftβs Artifact Management Service for traceability and historical retrieval. |
π Outputs Table (Quick Overview)¶
| Output Area | Main Deliverables |
|---|---|
| System Architecture Blueprint | Context maps, service diagrams, cloud deployment models |
| Event-Driven Architecture Plans | Event catalogs, choreography flows, saga hints |
| Compliance-Embedded Documents | Security layers, regulatory mappings, audit traces |
| Technology Roadmaps | Stack choices, evolutionary paths, risk mitigation plans |
| Observability Blueprints | Telemetry points, SLO definitions, failure mode catalogs |
| Governance & Handoffs | System event emissions, compliance checklists, artifact metadata |
π Output Format and Serialization Standards¶
| Aspect | Standard |
|---|---|
| Documents | Markdown and/or JSON depending on target consumer agent |
| Diagrams | Mermaid.js syntax for portability + optional PlantUML export |
| Event Payloads | JSON, with strict ConnectSoft event schema conformance |
| Metadata | YAML or JSON metadata attached for artifact versioning and traceability |
π‘οΈ Output Guarantees¶
- Consistency: All outputs conform to ConnectSoft Architecture Standards.
- Extensibility: Blueprints allow downstream specialization (e.g., adding CQRS, Serverless, Mesh as needed).
- Traceability: Every artifact carries trace IDs, project IDs, and version stamps.
- Machine-Consumable: Outputs are structured to be easily parsed by other agents, automation scripts, or governance systems.
π Knowledge Base¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent operates based on a deep, structured, modular internal knowledge base designed to ensure:
- Consistent architectural quality across thousands of autonomous software factory outputs.
- Compliance with ConnectSoftβs internal standards, Clean Architecture, and regulatory requirements.
- Acceleration of design reasoning by reusing and adapting proven architecture patterns, roadmaps, and templates.
Hereβs a detailed breakdown of what knowledge the agent βalready knowsβ and uses during its reasoning and execution:
ποΈ 1. ConnectSoft Architecture Standards¶
| Knowledge Area | Description |
|---|---|
| Clean Architecture Templates | Canonical layered architectures for microservices, API gateways, event brokers, domain services, orchestration layers. |
| Domain-Driven Design (DDD) Playbooks | Guidelines for identifying aggregates, bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, and modeling rich versus anemic domains. |
| Event-Driven Architecture Patterns | Best practices for event modeling, event-driven microservices, pub/sub models, eventual consistency designs. |
| Cloud-Native SaaS Reference Architectures | Modular templates for multi-tenant SaaS solutions, elastic scaling designs, hybrid region expansions, cloud cost optimization strategies. |
| Security-First Architecture Patterns | Zero Trust, API gateway protections, encryption at rest and in transit, least privilege IAM models, secure event-driven communication. |
| Observability-First Guidelines | Standard placement of telemetry hooks (OpenTelemetry traces, metrics, structured logging) into architecture outputs. |
| Governance and Compliance Enforcement | Document templates, traceability metadata requirements, compliance matrices (GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS), audit trace patterns. |
ποΈ 2. ConnectSoft Artifact Templates and Standards¶
| Knowledge Area | Description |
|---|---|
| System Blueprint Templates | Predefined structure for System Architecture Blueprint documents (Markdown, JSON) β including context maps, service decomposition tables, event flows. |
| Event Catalog Structures | Standard event schema definitions for domain events, integration events, internal system events, including versioning policies. |
| Technology Stack Reference Lists | Recommended technology choices per component type (e.g., Messaging = Azure Service Bus, Kafka; Storage = Azure Cosmos DB, PostgreSQL). |
| Compliance-by-Design Checklists | Predefined checklists for ensuring compliance is embedded at the design phase across security, data handling, and observability. |
| Risk Catalog Archetypes | Known architectural risks and how to detect, categorize, and mitigate them in early blueprint stages. |
ποΈ 3. Industry and Regulatory Knowledge¶
| Knowledge Area | Description |
|---|---|
| GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS Architecture Integration | Best practices for securing sensitive data, cross-border data flows, encryption, audit trails, user consent management. |
| Cloud Provider Architecture Models | Azure, AWS, GCP architectural blueprints for multi-region scaling, resiliency patterns, serverless orchestration, hybrid cloud integration. |
| Microservices, Serverless, Mesh, and Edge Architecture Patterns | When and how to apply service mesh (e.g., Istio), edge computing designs, hybrid cloud-native orchestrations. |
| Resiliency and Chaos Engineering | Design strategies to tolerate service failures, regional outages, latency spikes β embedding circuit breakers, retry policies, chaos injection readiness. |
ποΈ 4. Internal Semantic Memory (ConnectSoft Production Knowledge)¶
| Knowledge Area | Description |
|---|---|
| Prior Vision to Architecture Transformations | Indexed examples of past projects where vision β architecture transformations succeeded β reusable decomposition strategies. |
| Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) | Versioned records of architectural decisions, tradeoffs, and reasoning captured during prior autonomous agent runs. |
| Architecture Evolution Histories | Case studies of how architectures evolved from MVP β Enterprise editions across multiple products (lessons learned). |
| Failure Case Studies | Historical examples where architecture patterns failed β used to proactively reason about risk mitigation. |
π Knowledge Base Table (Quick Overview)¶
| Knowledge Source | Purpose |
|---|---|
| ConnectSoft Standards | Ensure architectural consistency and excellence |
| Artifact Templates | Structure outputs for machine consumption |
| Industry and Regulatory Knowledge | Embed compliance and best practices automatically |
| Internal Semantic Memory | Learn from historical success and failure patterns |
π‘οΈ Key Guarantees¶
- Preloaded Internal Models: The agent does not start βfrom scratchβ for any new project β it reasons on top of ConnectSoftβs production-proven architectures.
- Continuous Learning: As new projects succeed (or fail), outputs are ingested into semantic memory to continuously refine future architectural reasoning.
- Multi-Domain Awareness: The agent knows how to reason differently for SaaS platforms, APIs, mobile-first architectures, ML pipelines, IoT systems, etc.
π Process Flow¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent follows a structured, modular, multi-phase execution pipeline to ensure that every generated architecture is:
- Business-aligned
- Production-grade
- Extensible and evolvable
- Fully traceable and observable
- Ready for downstream autonomous consumption
This modular process allows ConnectSoft to scale architectural generation across hundreds of simultaneous projects without quality degradation.
π Step-by-Step Internal Execution Flow¶
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Intake and Validation | Validate presence and integrity of inputs (Vision Document, Business Goals, NFRs, Compliance Constraints). Trigger semantic memory retrieval for similar projects. |
| 2. Business Domain Analysis | Decompose the business into domains, subdomains, and bounded contexts using DDD practices. |
| 3. Target System Decomposition | Define core modules: microservices, APIs, databases, queues, external integrations, based on business and technical analysis. |
| 4. Architectural Modeling | Create clean, layered architectures: domain core, application services, adapters, infrastructure layers. |
| 5. Event-Driven Architecture Design | Model events, pub/sub topics, service interactions, saga orchestrations, and asynchronous flow patterns. |
| 6. Cloud-Native Deployment Mapping | Map service deployments to cloud resources (e.g., Kubernetes clusters, serverless functions, managed databases, API gateways). |
| 7. Security, Compliance, and Governance Embedding | Inject security architecture layers, compliance validation points, observability telemetry points. |
| 8. Resiliency and Observability Strategy Design | Embed fault tolerance, chaos readiness, distributed tracing, monitoring plans. |
| 9. Technology Stack Selection | Choose and document appropriate tech stacks for each service/component based on business and technical criteria. |
| 10. Risk Identification and Mitigation | Build risk catalog and suggest mitigation strategies for potential architectural risks. |
| 11. Blueprint Assembly and Documentation | Assemble complete System Architecture Blueprint, context maps, event catalogs, SLA definitions, risk logs. |
| 12. Validation and Self-Review | Validate blueprint structure, compliance enforcement, event structure, resilience features. Perform self-correction if gaps are detected. |
| 13. Artifact Generation and Storage | Store all architecture artifacts in ConnectSoft's Artifact Storage with full traceability metadata. |
| 14. Emission of Completion Event | Emit SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated event with references to artifacts and metadata for downstream agent consumption. |
| 15. Observability and Audit Logging | Log all critical reasoning steps, failures, retries, human intervention points (if any), ensuring end-to-end traceability. |
π οΈ Diagram: Enterprise Architect Agent Process Flow¶
flowchart TD
IntakeValidation --> SemanticMemoryQuery
SemanticMemoryQuery --> BusinessDomainAnalysis
BusinessDomainAnalysis --> SystemDecomposition
SystemDecomposition --> ArchitectureModeling
ArchitectureModeling --> EventDrivenModeling
EventDrivenModeling --> CloudNativeMapping
CloudNativeMapping --> SecurityComplianceEmbedding
SecurityComplianceEmbedding --> ObservabilityResilienceDesign
ObservabilityResilienceDesign --> TechnologyStackSelection
TechnologyStackSelection --> RiskCataloging
RiskCataloging --> BlueprintAssembly
BlueprintAssembly --> ValidationSelfReview
ValidationSelfReview --> ArtifactGeneration
ArtifactGeneration --> CompletionEventEmission
CompletionEventEmission --> ObservabilityLogging
π‘οΈ Key Principles Embedded in the Process¶
| Principle | Application |
|---|---|
| Early Validation and Semantic Memory Query | Avoid reasoning with missing or inconsistent data. Reuse prior knowledge. |
| Modular, Skill-Based Reasoning Chains | Break down architecture creation into atomic skills, ensuring composability and retry resilience. |
| Compliance and Security First-Class | Embed compliance layers at design time β not retrofitted later. |
| Governed, Traceable Outputs | Every reasoning step is logged, every artifact versioned, every decision traceable back to the original vision. |
| Observability by Default | Every service and communication path designed for traceability and health monitoring from day one. |
π οΈ Core Skills and Semantic Kernel Functions¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent is designed to operate as a modular orchestrator of specialized skills, each responsible for a key portion of the architecture generation pipeline.
Each skill is modeled as a Semantic Kernel Function or composite skill,
allowing the agent to reason flexibly, retry selectively, and compose complex flows dynamically.
π Primary Skills (Atomic and Composite)¶
| Skill Name | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Vision Intake Validator Skill | Validate that required inputs (Vision Document, Business Goals, NFRs, Compliance Constraints) are present and structured correctly. |
| Semantic Memory Retrieval Skill | Query prior architecture blueprints and patterns similar to the current domain and system type. |
| Business Domain Decomposer Skill | Analyze business goals and decompose them into bounded contexts, subdomains, and core capabilities (DDD modeling). |
| System Decomposition Planner Skill | Break down system into services, APIs, events, databases, external integrations based on domain decomposition. |
| Layered Architecture Modeler Skill | Build Clean Architecture diagrams and assign components to domain/application/infrastructure layers. |
| Event-Driven Modeler Skill | Define key domain events, pub/sub topics, event-driven flows, choreography points, and saga orchestration needs. |
| Cloud-Native Deployment Mapper Skill | Map services to cloud-native deployment models (e.g., Kubernetes microservices, serverless functions, managed messaging systems). |
| Security and Compliance Embedder Skill | Embed authentication, authorization, encryption, compliance checks (GDPR, HIPAA) into the blueprint architecture. |
| Observability Designer Skill | Define where to inject telemetry, metrics, traces, health checks, SLA monitors into the system architecture. |
| Technology Stack Selector Skill | Recommend technology stacks for services, APIs, messaging layers, databases based on ConnectSoft standards and domain-specific needs. |
| Risk Catalog Builder Skill | Identify potential architectural risks and define mitigation strategies (e.g., resiliency patterns, redundancy needs). |
| Blueprint Assembler Skill | Synthesize all partial outputs into a full System Architecture Blueprint document, diagrams, and event catalogs. |
| Self-Validation and Correction Skill | Validate internal outputs; detect missing elements (e.g., unassigned events, unconnected services) and self-correct before finalizing. |
| Artifact Publisher Skill | Store blueprints and documentation into ConnectSoft Artifact Storage with full traceability metadata. |
| Completion Event Emitter Skill | Emit SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated event with references to artifacts for downstream agent activation. |
π οΈ Skill Composition Overview¶
flowchart TD
VisionIntakeValidator --> SemanticMemoryRetrieval
SemanticMemoryRetrieval --> BusinessDomainDecomposer
BusinessDomainDecomposer --> SystemDecompositionPlanner
SystemDecompositionPlanner --> LayeredArchitectureModeler
LayeredArchitectureModeler --> EventDrivenModeler
EventDrivenModeler --> CloudNativeDeploymentMapper
CloudNativeDeploymentMapper --> SecurityComplianceEmbedder
SecurityComplianceEmbedder --> ObservabilityDesigner
ObservabilityDesigner --> TechnologyStackSelector
TechnologyStackSelector --> RiskCatalogBuilder
RiskCatalogBuilder --> BlueprintAssembler
BlueprintAssembler --> SelfValidationCorrection
SelfValidationCorrection --> ArtifactPublisher
ArtifactPublisher --> CompletionEventEmitter
π Skills Classification¶
| Type | Skills |
|---|---|
| Validation Skills | Vision Intake Validator, Self-Validation and Correction |
| Modeling Skills | Domain Decomposer, System Decomposer, Layered Modeler, Event Modeler |
| Deployment Mapping Skills | Cloud-Native Mapper, Technology Stack Selector |
| Compliance and Observability Skills | Security Embedder, Compliance Mapper, Observability Designer |
| Governance Skills | Risk Catalog Builder, Artifact Publisher, Event Emitter |
π‘οΈ Key Principles for Skill Execution¶
| Principle | Description |
|---|---|
| Atomicity | Each skill focuses on a single bounded concern (e.g., "build event model" β "decompose system"). |
| Retryability | Failed or incomplete skills can be retried individually without restarting the whole process. |
| Observability-First | Every skill execution is logged and traced using OpenTelemetry. |
| Chainable Outputs | Outputs from one skill are structured to be immediately consumable by the next skill in the reasoning chain. |
π οΈ Technology Stack Overview¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent leverages a modern, cloud-native, AI-augmented technology stack to autonomously execute its architectural reasoning, modeling, validation, and artifact generation processes.
Its stack is carefully curated to ensure:
- Modularity
- Extensibility
- Observability
- Industrial scalability
- Security and compliance readiness
Hereβs a detailed breakdown:
ποΈ 1. Core Agent Framework¶
| Technology | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Semantic Kernel (.NET) | Core orchestration of modular skills and pipelines; prompt templating; context management; function chaining. |
| OpenAI GPT Models | LLM-based reasoning and generation tasks: complex decomposition, blueprint drafting, self-validation heuristics. |
| Azure OpenAI Service | Enterprise-grade, secure, scalable hosted models for production agent inference, aligned to corporate security requirements. |
| ConnectSoft Skill Plugins | Internal ConnectSoft skill libraries (e.g., Clean Architecture Skill Pack, Event-Driven Skill Pack) plugged into the Semantic Kernel runtime. |
ποΈ 2. Storage and Memory Infrastructure¶
| Technology | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Azure Blob Storage | Storage of generated architecture artifacts (Markdown, JSON, YAML, Diagrams). |
| Azure Cognitive Search (optional) | Semantic search retrieval of prior architecture patterns, compliance guidelines, and reusable artifacts. |
| Vector Databases (e.g., Pinecone, Azure Cognitive Search Vector Index) | Long-term semantic memory embedding prior architectural outputs for similarity reasoning. |
ποΈ 3. Event and Messaging Infrastructure¶
| Technology | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Azure Event Grid | Emitting and consuming architecture-related events, e.g., SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated for downstream agents to activate. |
| Kafka (optional alternative) | Alternative event backbone in multi-cloud or hybrid deployments. |
| ConnectSoft Event Schema Registry | Schema registry and validation for internal system events used in multi-agent orchestration. |
ποΈ 4. Observability and Monitoring Stack¶
| Technology | Purpose |
|---|---|
| OpenTelemetry (.NET) | Full distributed tracing, custom metrics (e.g., skill execution times, retry rates), structured logging across agent execution flows. |
| Azure Application Insights | Storage, visualization, alerting based on telemetry data β for health and performance monitoring of the agent. |
| ConnectSoft Observability Layer | Unified dashboarding and alerting across the ConnectSoft AI Factory for agent executions, performance baselines, and error detection. |
ποΈ 5. Auxiliary and Support Systems¶
| Technology | Purpose |
|---|---|
| ConnectSoft Artifact Storage API | Internal API used to store, version, retrieve, and trace generated artifacts (architecture documents, diagrams, events). |
| MCP Servers (Model Context Protocol Servers) | Integration points for extended context retrieval (e.g., retrieving DDD patterns, cloud best practices, event-driven samples dynamically). Examples: Azure MCP Server |
| Mermaid.js + PlantUML | Diagram generation for clean system visualizations (context maps, system flows, event choreography diagrams). |
π Technologies Table (Quick Overview)¶
| Area | Technologies Used |
|---|---|
| Core Reasoning | Semantic Kernel (.NET), OpenAI GPT Models |
| Storage | Azure Blob Storage, Vector DBs |
| Eventing | Azure Event Grid, Kafka, ConnectSoft Event Schema Registry |
| Observability | OpenTelemetry, Azure Application Insights, ConnectSoft Observability |
| Knowledge Retrieval | Azure Cognitive Search, MCP Servers |
| Documentation and Visualization | Markdown, Mermaid.js, PlantUML |
π‘οΈ Key Technology Principles¶
| Principle | Description |
|---|---|
| Cloud-Native First | All technologies are designed for elastic cloud scaling and serverless consumption when possible. |
| Security-First | Data encryption, tokenized access to APIs, least-privilege principles embedded in Azure integrations. |
| Observability by Default | Every function, event, and artifact is fully observable, traceable, and auditable. |
| Modularity | Easy to replace, extend, or update components (e.g., swap vector DB providers, add new skill plugins). |
π System Prompt (Initialization Prompt)¶
The System Prompt defines the initial bootstrapping instructions given to the Enterprise Architect Agent when it is instantiated for a project.
It sets the goals, constraints, principles, and success criteria β
ensuring that every reasoning step is aligned with ConnectSoftβs architectural standards and autonomous production goals.
π Full System Prompt Text¶
You are the **Enterprise Architect Agent** within the **ConnectSoft AI Software Factory**.
Your mission is to **transform a business-aligned software vision** into a **full production-grade System Architecture Blueprint** that is:
- Fully aligned with the business objectives, user personas, and success metrics provided.
- Designed using **Clean Architecture**, **Domain-Driven Design (DDD)**, and **Event-Driven Architecture (EDA)** principles.
- Cloud-native, elastic, scalable, and cost-optimized for multi-tenant SaaS operations.
- Fully embedded with **security-first** and **compliance-by-design** layers (GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS as applicable).
- Natively observable with **tracing**, **metrics**, **logs**, and **health monitoring** hooks designed into the system.
- Governed, versioned, traceable, and ready for downstream autonomous engineering consumption.
You must:
1. Validate the integrity and completeness of all input artifacts (Vision Document, NFRs, Compliance Requirements).
2. Retrieve and incorporate relevant prior architectures and patterns from semantic memory.
3. Decompose the business domain into bounded contexts and services.
4. Model layered system architectures and event-driven communication flows.
5. Embed security, resiliency, observability, and regulatory compliance into every layer.
6. Generate fully structured, versioned artifacts: Architecture Blueprints, Context Maps, Event Models, Risk Catalogs.
7. Emit a `SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated` event upon completion, attaching full metadata for downstream agents.
You must operate **independently**, **modularly**, and **observably**.
All outputs must be:
- In **structured formats** (Markdown, JSON, YAML).
- Fully traceable with **project IDs**, **vision IDs**, **trace IDs**.
- Version-controlled and published to the **ConnectSoft Artifact Management System**.
Use **Semantic Kernel skills** modularly.
If any validation or reasoning failure occurs, **self-correct and retry**.
Your final blueprint must be **production-grade** β not hypothetical.
π·οΈ Prompt Style and Language¶
| Aspect | Style |
|---|---|
| Tone | Professional, precise, directive |
| Level of Detail | High β full autonomy requires full upfront instruction |
| Constraints | Mandatory adherence to ConnectSoft architectural and operational principles |
| Success Criteria | Clear delivery of structured artifacts, event emission, observability compliance |
π‘οΈ Why System Prompt is Critical¶
- Consistency: Guarantees every Enterprise Architect Agent session works toward the exact same quality standard.
- Autonomy: Removes need for manual steering β the agent can complete the full architectural generation independently.
- Compliance and Governance: Ensures outputs are auditable, security-first, and fully aligned to platform standards.
- Downstream Enablement: Prepares outputs ready for immediate consumption by Solution Architect Agents, Event-Driven Architect Agents, and others.
π Input Prompt Template¶
The Input Prompt Template defines how the Enterprise Architect Agent receives its assignment instructions at the beginning of an architecture reasoning task.
It structures user or upstream agent inputs into a consistent, machine-consumable format, ensuring that the Enterprise Architect Agent can:
- Validate the completeness of required information.
- Understand the business and technical contexts.
- Trigger the correct execution flow modularly.
π Full Input Prompt Template Structure¶
## Assignment: System Architecture Blueprint Generation
### π Vision Context
- **Vision Document Trace ID**: {vision_trace_id}
- **Project Name**: {project_name}
- **Business Domain**: {business_domain}
- **Business Objectives**: {business_goals_list}
- **Target Users / Personas**: {personas_list}
- **Success Metrics (KPIs)**: {success_metrics_list}
### π οΈ Functional Scope
- **Primary Features / Modules**: {feature_list}
- **Expected Functional Flows**: {functional_flow_description}
### π Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs)
- **Performance Expectations**: {performance_requirements}
- **Scalability Requirements**: {scalability_goals}
- **Availability / Resilience Targets**: {availability_targets}
- **Security Requirements**: {security_compliance}
- **Compliance Standards**: {regulatory_requirements}
- **Cost Optimization Constraints**: {cost_goals}
### βοΈ Deployment and Platform Context
- **Preferred Cloud Provider**: {cloud_provider}
- **Existing Platform Constraints**: {platform_constraints}
- **Edition Strategy** (if multi-edition SaaS): {edition_model_info}
### π Knowledge Augmentation
- **Related Past Projects (optional)**: {related_projects_reference_list}
- **Special Constraints or Observations**: {special_notes}
---
### π₯ Input Data Attachments
- Vision Document (Structured)
- Business Context Artifacts (optional)
- Diagrams, Models, Sketches (optional)
π Visual Schema Overview (High-Level)¶
flowchart TD
InputPrompt
InputPrompt --> VisionContext
InputPrompt --> FunctionalScope
InputPrompt --> NonFunctionalRequirements
InputPrompt --> DeploymentPlatformContext
InputPrompt --> KnowledgeAugmentation
InputPrompt --> InputAttachments
π·οΈ Key Fields Summary¶
| Section | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Vision Context | Align architecture to business goals and metrics. |
| Functional Scope | Understand system capabilities and modules. |
| NFRs | Architect for performance, security, resilience, and compliance. |
| Deployment Context | Map services to the right cloud-native environments. |
| Knowledge Augmentation | Reuse prior knowledge if available. |
| Attachments | Provide structured supplementary artifacts for richer context. |
π‘οΈ Input Validation Requirements¶
Upon receiving the input prompt:
- The Enterprise Architect Agent must validate that:
- Vision Document Trace ID exists and is retrievable.
- Business Objectives and Success Metrics are specified.
- Functional Scope is at least partially defined (features/modules).
- NFRs include at minimum Performance, Scalability, and Security elements.
- Deployment Context specifies Cloud Provider or leaves it explicitly open.
- If any critical field is missing, the agent auto-requests a correction before proceeding to architecture reasoning.
π£ Special Notes¶
-
Edition-Aware Designs:
If the input specifies multi-edition SaaS (e.g., Basic, Pro, Enterprise editions), the architecture must embed edition isolation patterns (feature flags, config-driven APIs, edition-scoped databases). -
Compliance First:
If compliance requirements are present (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA), architecture decisions (e.g., storage, encryption, access control) must incorporate them from the earliest decomposition stages. -
Cost Constraints Awareness:
If cost optimization is a goal, prefer serverless, spot instance usage, auto-scaling, and resource pool optimization strategies during system decomposition.
π€ Output Expectations¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent produces a variety of artifacts, diagrams, events, and structured documents.
These outputs must be machine-readable, modular, governed, and ready for autonomous consumption by downstream agents, engineers, and ConnectSoftβs artifact management and observability systems.
This cycle defines the expected format, structure, and semantic rules for each generated output.
π§Ύ Structured Output Types¶
1. System Architecture Blueprint Document¶
| Format | Markdown + JSON + YAML |
|---|---|
| Required Sections | The System Architecture Blueprint document should include the following sections: |
- ## System Overview: Provides a high-level summary of the systemβs purpose, goals, and design principles. |
|
- ## Domain Decomposition: Breaks down the system into subdomains and bounded contexts to define clear boundaries. |
|
- ## Context Maps and Bounded Contexts: Illustrates the relationships between bounded contexts and the context map of the system. |
|
- ## Layered Architecture: Defines the layered architecture approach (e.g., presentation, domain, infrastructure). |
|
- ## Microservices and Responsibilities: Describes microservices, their boundaries, and domain responsibilities. |
|
- ## Event-Driven Communication Plan: Details the event-driven communication model, including events, publishers, and subscribers. |
|
- ## Security Architecture: Defines security strategies, including authentication, authorization, and data protection. |
|
- ## Compliance Embedding: Ensures that the architecture complies with necessary industry regulations (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA). |
|
- ## Deployment Mapping (Cloud-Native): Illustrates the cloud-native deployment strategy, including platforms and infrastructure setup (e.g., Kubernetes, Azure). |
|
- ## Observability Strategy: Outlines how the system will implement monitoring, logging, and distributed tracing for real-time insights. |
|
- ## Risk Catalog: Identifies potential risks (e.g., scalability, security, integration) and how they will be mitigated. |
|
- ## SLAs / SLOs / SLIs: Defines Service Level Agreements (SLAs), Service Level Objectives (SLOs), and Service Level Indicators (SLIs) for monitoring system performance. |
|
- ## Architecture Decision Records (ADRs): Documents key architecture decisions made during the design process, including rationale and trade-offs. |
|
- ## Traceability Metadata: Provides metadata for traceability across the architecture, including versioning, trace IDs, and deployment history. |
2. Context Map Diagrams¶
| Format | Mermaid.js (preferred) or PlantUML |
|---|---|
| Purpose | Visualizes domain decomposition, delineates bounded contexts, and defines ownership boundaries to clarify the relationships between different parts of the system. |
| Expected Nodes | The Context Map Diagram should include the following nodes: |
| - Domains and Subdomains: Represents high-level domains and their subdomains, capturing the key business areas. | |
| - Service Ownerships: Indicates which teams or services own which domains or subdomains, ensuring clear responsibilities. | |
| - Context Relationships: Shows how different contexts are related, such as Upstream, Downstream, or Partnership connections between services or subdomains. |
3. Event Choreography Diagrams¶
| Format | Mermaid.js sequence diagrams or flowcharts |
|---|---|
| Must Include | The Event Choreography Diagram must include the following: |
| - Event Producers: Represents the services or systems that initiate events within the system. | |
| - Event Types (versioned): Defines the event types, ensuring that they are versioned to handle backward compatibility. | |
| - Event Brokers or Topics: Shows the event brokers (e.g., Kafka, RabbitMQ) or topics that events are published to, facilitating communication across services. | |
| - Event Consumers: Represents the services or systems that consume or react to the events. | |
| - Retry / Compensating Flow (if applicable): Defines how the system handles failed events, including retry logic or compensating actions (e.g., sagas for complex workflows). |
4. Risk Catalog Output¶
| Format | Markdown + JSON |
|---|---|
| Sections | The Risk Catalog document should include the following sections: |
- Risk ID: A unique identifier for each risk (e.g., R001). |
|
- Risk Type: Categorizes the risk (e.g., security, performance, compliance, scalability). |
|
- Impacted Domain: Specifies the domain or area of the system affected by the risk (e.g., payment system, user authentication). |
|
- Severity Level: Defines the severity of the risk (e.g., high, medium, low). |
|
- Mitigation Strategy: Describes the steps or approaches to reduce or eliminate the risk. |
|
- Risk Owner (if known): Specifies the person or team responsible for managing and mitigating the risk. |
|
- Status (Tracked / Accepted / Mitigated): Indicates the current status of the risk (e.g., Tracked, Accepted, Mitigated). |
5. Emitted Event β SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated¶
| Format | JSON |
|---|---|
| Trigger | Upon successful completion of blueprint generation and artifact publishing, the event is emitted to indicate that the System Architecture Blueprint has been created and made available. |
| Payload Schema | The following is an example of the SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated event payload: |
{
"event": "SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated",
"projectId": "connectsoft-platform-2025",
"visionId": "vision-doc-abc-2025-04-27",
"blueprintUrl": "https://artifacts.connectsoft.dev/projects/.../system-architecture.md",
"timestamp": "2025-04-29T10:23:45Z",
"traceId": "arch-agent-exec-7821-xyz",
"emittedBy": "EnterpriseArchitectAgent"
}
Explanation:
- event: The name of the event being emitted (e.g.,
SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated). - projectId: The unique identifier for the project related to the blueprint (e.g.,
connectsoft-platform-2025). - visionId: The ID of the associated vision document, providing the strategic vision that the blueprint adheres to (e.g.,
vision-doc-abc-2025-04-27). - blueprintUrl: The URL to access the generated system architecture blueprint document.
- timestamp: The timestamp when the event was emitted, formatted in ISO 8601.
- traceId: A unique identifier for tracing this event across the system for observability and debugging.
- emittedBy: The agent that emitted the event (e.g.,
EnterpriseArchitectAgent), indicating the origin of the event.
6. Governance Metadata¶
| Embedded In | All top-level documents and events |
|---|---|
| Includes | The Governance Metadata should include the following key attributes for traceability and versioning: |
- trace_id: A unique identifier for tracking the event or document across systems for traceability. |
|
- project_id: The unique identifier for the project associated with the document or event. |
|
- vision_document_id: The ID of the vision document that the architecture or blueprint aligns with. |
|
- architecture_version: The version of the architecture, indicating which iteration of the blueprint or design is being referenced. |
|
- generation_timestamp: The timestamp when the document or event was generated, formatted in ISO 8601. |
|
- agent_version: The version of the agent that generated the document or event (e.g., SolutionArchitectAgent v1.2). |
|
- semantic_kernel_execution_trace_hash: A hash representing the trace of the semantic kernel execution, ensuring reproducibility and debugging. |
π§ Output Serialization Rules¶
| Aspect | Rule |
|---|---|
| Versioning | Every output document includes a version header and change log summary |
| Traceability | Every artifact embeds trace IDs to link back to input vision, prompt, session |
| Machine Readability | Outputs should be parseable by both downstream agents and the ConnectSoft Artifact API |
| Diagrams | Prefer code-based diagrams (Mermaid) over image-based exports for modular updates and version diffs |
| Events | Must conform to internal ConnectSoft Event Schema Registry (schema validation before emission) |
π‘οΈ Compliance Checks¶
Before publishing:
- β Blueprint must have no empty sections
- β All referenced events must be defined in the event catalog
- β SLAs/SLOs/SLIs must be present for all externally exposed services
- β Security mechanisms must be documented (OAuth2, RBAC, Encryption, etc.)
- β Markdown and JSON outputs must pass schema validation
- β Diagrams must render without error in ConnectSoft Docs portal
π§ Memory Design¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent uses a dual-tier memory system combining:
- Short-Term Contextual Memory (within a reasoning session)
- Long-Term Semantic Memory (persistent across projects and executions)
This hybrid model ensures the agent can:
- Retain architectural state while reasoning through a system.
- Recall historical blueprints, patterns, and risks from past projects.
- Avoid redundant designs and promote best-practice reuse.
π Short-Term Memory (Context Window)¶
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Session Scope | Holds the active state during architectural reasoning for a single project, maintaining context throughout the design process. |
| Active Document Assembly | Incrementally builds the System Architecture Blueprint through modular skill chaining, where each skill contributes to the overall blueprint. |
| Vision-Aligned Reasoning | Retains the business objectives, personas, success metrics, and trace IDs throughout all reasoning steps to ensure alignment with the vision. |
| Intermediate Outputs | Temporarily stores partially built artifacts such as: - Context maps - Service decompositions - Event flows - Stack decisions - Compliance flags for re-use across skills. |
| Failure Tracebacks | Retains the last valid state if validation fails mid-process, enabling smart retries from the failed skill only, ensuring efficient error recovery. |
| Runtime Scope | Automatically cleared at the end of the architecture generation session, but may be serialized for audits, providing traceability and accountability. |
ποΈ Long-Term Memory (Semantic and Historical)¶
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Vector Embeddings of Past Blueprints | Past blueprints, events, context maps, and risk catalogs are embedded as vectors into a semantic memory system (e.g., Pinecone, Azure Vector Index) to enable fast and accurate retrieval. |
| Similarity Search and Retrieval | Enables prompt augmentation by allowing the system to reference previous similar projects. For example: "This system resembles the multi-tenant healthcare SaaS generated in 2024. Reuse relevant scaling strategies and event flows." |
| Indexed Knowledge Artifacts | Stores important knowledge artifacts for reuse across projects: - Successful clean architecture templates - Risk catalogs and failure resolutions - Domain decomposition examples - Event schemas used in similar projects - ADRs (Architecture Decision Records) from production history |
| Compliance Precedents | Stores examples of how GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS were successfully embedded into prior system architectures, helping to ensure future compliance. |
| Performance Benchmarks | Retains observability metrics and SLAs from past systems for reference, such as: "5ms p95 API latency under 10K requests per second (rps)" to guide the design of high-performance systems. |
π Memory Retrieval Examples¶
| Scenario | Retrieved Artifact |
|---|---|
| "Design for healthcare, patient data, HIPAA" | Prior blueprint with zero-trust data access, audit trails, encrypted EHR design. |
| "Multi-tenant CRM platform" | Context map with per-tenant database partitioning, config-driven tenant features. |
| "Real-time collaboration system" | Event-based architecture using WebSocket+message broker orchestration. |
| "Resilient serverless backend" | Blueprint using Azure Functions, Durable Functions, fallback strategies. |
π Memory Traceability and Governance¶
| Rule | Enforcement |
|---|---|
| Trace-Linked Memory Writes | Every write to long-term memory is tied to a trace ID, project ID, and outcome signal (success/failure). |
| Versioned Memory Snapshots | All memory embeddings are time-versioned and immutable (blueprint-v1 β blueprint-v2). |
| Memory Audit Trails | All memory reads are logged with reasoning justification and context of use. |
| Access Policy | Only this agent (or trusted internal agents) may access enterprise architecture memory; no user-facing memory usage. |
π§ Memory Infrastructure Technologies¶
| Component | Technology |
|---|---|
| Short-Term Memory | In-process session state (Semantic Kernel memory store) |
| Long-Term Vector Memory | Pinecone, Azure Cognitive Search (vector embeddings + metadata) |
| Metadata Index | Azure Table Storage / Blob Metadata with traceable identifiers |
| Memory Retrieval Plugin | SemanticMemoryRetrieverSkill with search, tag filtering, embedding match scoring |
β Validation and Correction Flow¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent incorporates multi-level validation and self-correction mechanisms to ensure every generated architectural output is:
- Technically sound
- Business-aligned
- Governance-compliant
- Machine-consumable
- Ready for downstream automation
It validates both intermediate reasoning states and final outputs, and can retry any failed skill or module autonomously.
π Validation Phases¶
| Phase | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Input Validation Phase | Before execution begins, validate all required input fields from the input prompt: - Vision Document, Goals, NFRs, and Compliance to ensure all necessary data is provided. |
| 2. Skill-Level Guardrails | Each skill includes pre/post-condition checks to ensure consistency and correctness. Examples include: - Domain decomposition must yield at least one bounded context. - Event model must link every event to a producer and at least one consumer. |
| 3. Semantic Completeness Check | After blueprint assembly: - Ensure all sections are populated. - Ensure there are no orphaned services, events, or layers. - SLA/SLOs must be defined for all externally exposed components to guarantee system reliability and performance. |
| 4. Compliance Assertion | Check if: - All declared compliance frameworks (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) are embedded in the architecture (e.g., encryption, audit trails). - Security layers (e.g., authentication, access control) are modeled for sensitive domains to ensure data protection. |
| 5. Output Schema Validation | Ensure Markdown, JSON, and event payloads conform to ConnectSoft schemas. This can be auto-validated using JSON/YAML schema validators to prevent any structural errors. |
| 6. Blueprint Test Render | Validate that: - Diagrams (e.g., Mermaid.js) render correctly. - The full markdown document compiles without structural errors, ensuring that it is correctly formatted and free of syntax issues. |
π Self-Correction and Retry Logic¶
| Trigger | Response |
|---|---|
| Missing or invalid input | Emit MissingInputDetected signal β pause execution β request correction β resume. |
| Skill failure (e.g., event model incomplete) | Automatically re-execute failed skill after reevaluating previous outputs. |
| Invalid blueprint (e.g., empty sections) | Return to Blueprint Assembler phase and trigger secondary validation chain. |
| Compliance gaps | Invoke SecurityComplianceEmbedderSkill again with adjusted context. |
| Serialization errors | Run OutputValidatorSkill β if failed, retry document generation with preserved architectural model. |
π§ Built-in Validation Skills¶
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|
InputValidatorSkill |
Checks prompt structure, completeness of inputs. |
ArchitectureCompletenessValidatorSkill |
Checks whether all required outputs exist and are populated. |
EventModelValidatorSkill |
Ensures all events are fully defined with producers/consumers. |
SecurityComplianceValidatorSkill |
Ensures declared regulations are embedded in design. |
DiagramRenderValidatorSkill |
Validates all Mermaid/PlantUML diagrams compile/render. |
SchemaConformanceCheckerSkill |
Runs schema validation against markdown, JSON, and emitted events. |
π£ Human Escalation Triggers (Optional)¶
| Situation | Action |
|---|---|
| Multiple retries failed | Emit AgentRetryFailed event with explanation and partial blueprint. |
| Ambiguity in business objectives | Escalate to Vision Architect Agent or Human Architect Reviewer. |
| Regulatory conflict | Request human intervention if conflicting compliance requirements detected (e.g., GDPR + conflicting data residency). |
π§± Observability of Validation Flow¶
- Every validation step is logged with:
validation_idstep_nameresult (pass/fail)retry_countduration_ms
- Fails are automatically traced in ConnectSoft Observability Dashboard with links to:
- Input context
- Output diffs (before/after retry)
- Event log emissions
π§ͺ Summary Flow Diagram¶
flowchart TD
A[Start Execution] --> B[Input Validation]
B --> C{Valid?}
C -- No --> D[Request Correction or Abort]
C -- Yes --> E[Skill Execution Pipeline]
E --> F[Intermediate Validation per Skill]
F --> G{Failure?}
G -- Yes --> H[Retry Skill]
G -- No --> I[Blueprint Assembly]
I --> J[Final Validation Pass]
J --> K{All Pass?}
K -- No --> L[Reassemble Blueprint]
K -- Yes --> M[Emit Completion Event]
π€ Collaboration Interfaces¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent operates within a choreographed, event-driven ecosystem of specialized agents.
It uses standardized interfaces, event emissions, and governed shared artifacts to coordinate with:
- Upstream vision and business agents
- Downstream architecture agents (e.g., Solution Architect, Event-Driven Architect)
- Infrastructure agents (e.g., Cloud Architect, Security Architect)
- Observability and DevOps agents
This cycle defines how it communicates, synchronizes, and delegates tasks in the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory.
π§ Upstream Collaboration¶
| Collaborator | Interaction |
|---|---|
| Vision Architect Agent | β
Consumes a structured Vision Document (VisionDocumentCreated event) containing business goals, personas, KPIs, and domain summaries. |
| Product Manager Agent | (Optional) May query this agent to validate if architectural direction supports roadmap-level delivery models (e.g., MVP, Pro, Enterprise editions). |
π§± Downstream Handoff Interfaces¶
| Target Agent | Output |
|---|---|
| Solution Architect Agent | - Consumes: SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated event - Uses: Context map, domain-to-service mapping, NFR models - Triggers downstream decomposition into APIs, flows, and use cases. |
| Event-Driven Architect Agent | - Reads: Domain event catalog and choreography diagrams - Continues modeling sagas, event brokers, and message schemas to build the event-driven architecture. |
| API Designer Agent | - Extracts: Service responsibilities and interaction maps - Begins REST/gRPC API contract generation to define API surface and interactions. |
| Cloud Architect Agent | - Uses: Deployment mapping section - Translates system design into Infrastructure as Code (IaC) (e.g., Bicep, Terraform), Kubernetes specs, and serverless deployments. |
| Security Architect Agent | - Consumes: Security architecture layers and compliance matrix - Finalizes threat modeling, IAM structures, and key vault integration to ensure system security. |
| Observability Architect Agent | - Uses: Observability blueprint - Extends telemetry instrumentation, SLOs, and dashboard wiring to enable monitoring and alerting. |
π¨ Event-Based Communication¶
| Event Name | Direction | Payload |
|---|---|---|
SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated |
Outbound (β multiple agents) | Contains artifact URLs, trace ID, project ID, blueprint version |
BlueprintValidationFailed |
Optional failure path | Emitted if architecture fails compliance or schema validation |
ArchitectureDesignReadyForImplementation |
Coordinated checkpoint | Signals architecture is reviewed, approved, and ready for tech leads |
π¦ Artifact Publishing and Discovery¶
| Interface | Purpose |
|---|---|
| ConnectSoft Artifact Storage API | - Stores versioned blueprints, diagrams, event catalogs, and checklists for traceability and reuse. - Allows other agents to GET, LIST, or QUERY by trace_id, vision_id, or domain_tag for easy retrieval. - Includes access control (role-based) and schema validation on upload to ensure data integrity and security. |
| ConnectSoft Observability Dashboard (AgentOps View) | - Exposes execution summaries, architecture metrics, and validation logs to provide visibility into system operations. - Allows downstream agents to trace architectural decisions and skill chains, helping to understand decision-making processes and how architecture evolves. |
π§© Collaboration Protocol Style¶
| Style | Description |
|---|---|
| Choreographed (not orchestrated) | - The Enterprise Architect Agent emits events and produces outputs. - It does not explicitly call other agents; instead, each downstream agent reacts to its outputs. - This promotes modularity, decoupling, and fault isolation, allowing each agent to work independently and reducing system interdependencies. |
| Contract-Based | - Shared output formats (e.g., Blueprint, Context Maps, Event Catalog) are versioned and schema-governed to ensure consistency across agents. - Other agents rely on semantic guarantees of these contracts, ensuring clear expectations and reducing potential integration issues. |
| Observable and Traceable | - Every collaboration step emits telemetry and trace events, ensuring the systemβs observability. - This enables explainability, debugging, rollback, and auditability, making it easier to trace decisions and monitor the system in real-time. |
π Summary Diagram: Agent Collaboration Flow¶
flowchart TD
VisionArchitectAgent -->|VisionDocumentCreated| EnterpriseArchitectAgent
EnterpriseArchitectAgent -->|SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated| SolutionArchitectAgent
EnterpriseArchitectAgent -->|SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated| EventDrivenArchitectAgent
EnterpriseArchitectAgent -->|SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated| APIArchitectAgent
EnterpriseArchitectAgent -->|SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated| CloudArchitectAgent
EnterpriseArchitectAgent -->|SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated| SecurityArchitectAgent
EnterpriseArchitectAgent -->|SystemArchitectureBlueprintCreated| ObservabilityAgent
EnterpriseArchitectAgent -->|Telemetry, Traces| ObservabilityPlatform
EnterpriseArchitectAgent -->|Artifacts| ConnectSoftArtifactStorage
π‘οΈ Observability of Collaboration¶
Each collaboration event is:
- Logged with metadata (
trace_id,event_id,target_agent) - Versioned in an event store
- Linked in dashboards for monitoring collaboration health (e.g., dropped events, retry needs)
π°οΈ Observability Hooks¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent emits real-time telemetry, structured logs, and OpenTelemetry-compliant traces during every execution phase.
This ensures that every action, decision, retry, and output is:
- Fully traceable
- Audit-ready
- Debuggable
- Correlated with project and vision lineage
π Key Observability Features¶
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| OpenTelemetry Integration | All major skills, validations, corrections, and event emissions are traced using OTel standards. |
| Structured Logging | Logs include contextual metadata: trace_id, project_id, skill_name, execution_time_ms, status. |
| Metric Emission | Emits counters and histograms such as: |
- blueprint_generation_time |
|
- retry_count_by_skill |
|
- validation_failure_rate |
|
- architecture_output_size_kb |
|
| Execution Spans | Every phase (e.g., Domain Modeling, Event Planning, Validation) emits start-end spans with status and links to logs/artifacts. |
| Error Signals | On failure or retries, emits AgentRetryTriggered, ValidationFailed, or ArtifactRejected events. |
π Traceability Diagram¶
flowchart TD
A[Agent Execution Start] --> B[Input Validation]
B --> C[Reasoning Skill Spans]
C --> D[Output Assembly]
D --> E[Validation Spans]
E --> F{Success?}
F -- Yes --> G[Emit Blueprint + Event]
F -- No --> H[Emit Retry / Escalation Event]
G --> I[Store Telemetry in Observability Platform]
π§ Human Intervention Hooks¶
While the agent operates fully autonomously in 95%+ cases, it provides safety valves for ambiguous or critical edge cases:
| Trigger | Human Hook |
|---|---|
| Input Ambiguity Detected | Emits ClarificationRequired event β routed to Product Manager or Vision Architect Agent |
| Multiple Auto-Correction Failures | Emits AgentEscalationRequired event with links to validation logs and partial blueprint |
| Compliance Conflict Detected | Pauses execution and alerts Security Architect or Legal Analyst agent |
| Design Tradeoff Requiring Governance Decision | Offers an optional human checkpoint before downstream publication (e.g., choosing between multi-region vs single-region deployment for compliance vs latency tradeoff) |
All intervention events include:
- Link to execution trace
- Summary of failure point
- Downloadable current state of the blueprint
- Agent suggestion for next step
π¦ Observability Integration¶
| Tool | Use |
|---|---|
| Azure Application Insights | Aggregated logs, metrics, traces |
| ConnectSoft Observability Dashboard | |
| - Blueprint trace viewer | |
| - Retry diagnostics | |
| - Skill execution heatmaps | |
| - Risk visibility matrix |
β Conclusion¶
The Enterprise Architect Agent is a cornerstone agent within the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory. It is:
π― Strategically Positioned To:¶
- Bridge the business vision β system architecture gap autonomously
- Deliver cloud-native, modular, event-driven SaaS blueprints
- Enforce compliance, observability, and security at architecture level
- Enable fully autonomous downstream engineering with contract-based, traceable outputs
βοΈ Architected With:¶
- Modular semantic skills (Semantic Kernel functions)
- Memory-driven intelligence (vector retrieval of prior blueprints)
- Governed handoffs (events, APIs, traceable artifacts)
- Observability-first execution (OpenTelemetry, dashboards, audit logs)
π‘οΈ Guarantees:¶
- Validated, production-grade outputs
- Zero-trust, compliance-embedded design
- Recovery-ready retries and fallback flows
- Interoperability with all downstream architecture agents (Solution, Event, API, Cloud, Security)