🧠 Knowledge Memory Indexes in an AI Software Factory¶
🧠 Purpose of the Memory System¶
In the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory, intelligent agents autonomously generate, evolve, and deploy complete SaaS platforms. This spans:
- ⚙️ Backend services
- 🖼 Frontend UI & UX
- 📜 Infrastructure & pipelines
- 🔐 Security & compliance
- 📚 Documentation & business artifacts
To operate effectively, these agents must access and reason over shared knowledge — structured and unstructured, design-time and runtime — across all factory domains.
The Memory System is the nervous system of the platform, enabling agents to:
- 🧠 Reuse: existing code, templates, APIs, stories, diagrams
- 🔁 Align: features with editions, blueprints with user stories
- 🧪 Validate: runtime behavior, security policies, test coverage
- ✍️ Document: code, flows, specs, decisions
- 📊 Trace: lineage from business goal to running microservice
🧩 What the Memory System Contains¶
The system ingests, indexes, and semantically maps:
| Knowledge Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Templates | Microservice, frontend layout, component scaffolds |
| Libraries | NuGet packages, internal SDKs, UI kits |
| Code | .cs, .ts, .razor, .scss, .html, adapters, DI config |
| APIs & Events | OpenAPI, gRPC, contracts, commands |
| Tests | BDD specs, unit tests, UI validations |
| Design Assets | Figma exports, SVGs, visual flow diagrams |
| UX & Accessibility | Flows, ARIA roles, WCAG validations |
| Business Models | Editions, feature flags, pricing rules |
| Infrastructure | Bicep/Terraform, pipeline YAMLs, environments |
| Agent Prompts & Outputs | System prompts, generated docs, DSLs |
| Runtime Observability | Logs, metrics, spans, chaos scenarios |
Each of these is indexed under a memory index (e.g., index-ui-components, index-blueprints, index-security-policies).
🔄 A Shared, Evolving Knowledge Graph¶
The memory system is not static — it continuously evolves:
- 🔁 On push or merge: Agents re-ingest changed files and update embeddings
- 🚀 On release: New templates, test cases, security specs are captured
- 🤖 On generation: Agent-generated artifacts are stored as memory entries
- 🧪 On execution: Observability, test logs, feedback enrich context
Think of memory as a living software knowledge graph, enriched by agents, engineers, documents, and runtime behavior.
🧠 What Makes It Agent-Usable?¶
Each memory record supports:
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| ✅ Semantic Retrieval | Embedded with vector representation (OpenAI, Azure AI Search) |
| ✅ Metadata Filtering | Tags, source, agent, domain, skill, project |
| ✅ Prompt Injection Ready | Memory decorators feed into planner + kernel prompt templates |
| ✅ Traceable | memoryId, sourcePath, traceId |
| ✅ Agent Scoped | Each record is linked to relevant agentType or agentCluster |
🔐 Why It Enables Autonomous Engineering¶
Without memory:
- Agents would generate conflicting, redundant, or insecure outputs
- Frontend wouldn't align with backend contract
- DevOps wouldn’t know what services exist
- QA wouldn’t know what to validate
- Releases would be unstable or incomplete
With memory: ✅ Agents communicate through shared knowledge ✅ Features are reused, traced, enriched ✅ The factory compounds intelligence over time
🧭 What’s Next in This Document¶
In upcoming cycles, you’ll explore:
- 🧱 The architecture of the memory system (Cycle 2)
- 🔎 Types of memory: semantic, metadata, visual, structural (Cycle 3)
- 🧬 Index definitions across 35+ domains
- ⚙️ Real-time ingestion and retrieval flows
- 🔁 Agent-to-index mapping tables
- 📄 Sample JSON entries and ingestion patterns
🧱 Memory System Architecture Overview¶
The ConnectSoft Memory System is a multi-layered, cloud-native knowledge architecture composed of:
- 📦 Metadata DB — stores structured records and relationships
- 🧠 Vector DB — enables semantic retrieval via embeddings
- 📂 Blob Storage — preserves source files, prompts, visual artifacts
- 🧮 Agent Ingestors & Retrievers — populate and query memory at runtime
- 🔁 Ingestion Pipelines — keep memory updated on Git push or release
🗂️ Memory Architecture Diagram (Mermaid)¶
flowchart TD
subgraph Memory System
A[Metadata DB<br/>(CosmosDB or PostgreSQL)]
B[Vector DB<br/>(Azure AI Search, Qdrant)]
C[Blob Storage<br/>(Azure Blob)]
end
subgraph Sources
R1[Git Repos<br/>Templates, Code, Docs]
R2[CI/CD Pipelines<br/>Artifacts, Logs]
R3[Runtime Logs<br/>Metrics, Spans, Events]
R4[Figma, SVG, Images]
R5[Agent Outputs<br/>Prompts, Plans, DSLs]
end
subgraph Agents
A1[Ingestor Agents]
A2[Retriever Agents]
A3[Planners & Kernel]
end
R1 --> A1 --> A
R1 --> A1 --> B
R1 --> A1 --> C
R2 --> A1
R3 --> A1
R4 --> A1
R5 --> A1
A & B & C --> A2 --> A3
A3 -->|Prompt Memory Decorators| B
A3 -->|Metadata Filters| A
🧩 Architectural Components¶
| Component | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Metadata DB | Stores index records for each knowledge entry, searchable by type, tags, projectId, agentId, etc. |
| Vector DB | Provides high-performance semantic search (cosine similarity) on embedded content |
| Blob Storage | Stores raw files, screenshots, prompt artifacts, diagrams |
| Ingestor Agents | Extract metadata and embeddings from files, templates, runtime signals |
| Retriever Agents | Search and return memory entries by type, embedding, or filters |
| Planner + Kernel | Use memory decorators and retrieved content to enrich generation |
🛠️ Deployment Technologies (Reference)¶
| Component | Azure-Recommended Stack |
|---|---|
| Metadata Store | Azure Cosmos DB (NoSQL or PostgreSQL mode) |
| Vector Store | Azure AI Search (Vector Index), or Qdrant / Weaviate |
| Blob Storage | Azure Blob Storage |
| Agent Runtime | Containerized (.NET 8), deployed on AKS or Azure Container Apps |
| CI/CD Ingestion Triggers | Azure Pipelines, GitHub Actions, Webhooks |
🧠 Memory Entry Structure¶
All memory entries conform to a core record structure:
{
"memoryId": "mem-lib-001",
"type": "library",
"projectId": "connectsoft.sdk.logging",
"agentId": "bootstrap-ingestor",
"traceId": "init-load-202506",
"tags": ["logging", "sdk", "backend"],
"filePaths": ["src/Logging.cs", "README.md"],
"description": "Reusable logging abstraction for .NET microservices",
"embedding": [0.24, -0.11, ...],
"createdAt": "2025-06-06T12:00:00Z"
}
🔄 Query Flow at Prompt-Time¶
- Planner detects task (e.g. “generate frontend component with ARIA”)
- Memory decorators activated
- Retriever Agent filters memory (e.g.
type = ui-component,tags = accessibility) - Vector similarity match retrieves relevant examples
- Results injected into Semantic Kernel prompt
🔁 Update Flow at Runtime¶
- Git push triggers
library.yamlchange - Bootstrap Ingestor Agent pulls new commit
- Extracts metadata + embedding
- Stores in DBs
- Emits
MemoryUpdatedevent (used by planner logs and agent decisions)
✅ Summary¶
The ConnectSoft Memory System is:
- 🌐 Distributed: separates concerns across DBs, blobs, and vectors
- 🔁 Dynamic: keeps memory updated in real-time
- 🧠 Agent-Optimized: supports planner and prompt retrieval modes
- 📊 Traceable: every memory item has metadata, embeddings, and linkage
🧠 Types of Memory: Metadata, Semantic, Structural, Visual¶
The ConnectSoft Memory System supports multi-dimensional representations of knowledge — enabling intelligent agents to search, reason, generate, and validate across all software domains.
Each memory record may include:
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| 🗂️ Metadata | Structured fields for filtering, tracing, organizing |
| 🧠 Semantic | Embedded vector content for similarity search |
| ⚙️ Structural | Parsed symbolic information (code, YAML, JSON schemas) |
| 🖼 Visual | Image-based or layout representations (e.g., Figma, SVG) |
These layers can coexist in a single memory entry or vary by index type.
🗂️ 1. Metadata Memory¶
Purpose:¶
Used for structured querying, traceability, filtering, and agent scoping.
Key Fields:¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type |
Memory type (e.g., template, test, blueprint) |
tags |
Domain labels (e.g., frontend, accessibility, security) |
agentId |
Agent that ingested or produced the item |
projectId |
Logical or Azure DevOps project name |
sourcePath |
File or folder from which data was ingested |
traceId |
Execution trace or orchestration step identifier |
createdAt |
Ingestion timestamp |
🧠 Used heavily by: RetrieverAgent, KernelPlanner, QA agents, Release agents
🧠 2. Semantic Memory¶
Purpose:¶
Used for natural language similarity search, multi-agent coordination, and RAG-style generation.
Characteristics:¶
- Embedded using OpenAI Ada, Azure AI Embeddings, or custom model
- Vector field is called
embedding: [float, float, …] - Stored in Vector DB (e.g. Azure AI Search)
Retrieval Examples:¶
Returns similar entries from index-recipes, index-tests, index-chaos-scenarios.
🧠 Used heavily by: Generator agents, Planning agents, Code reviewers, Test suggesters
⚙️ 3. Structural Memory¶
Purpose:¶
Used for symbolic reasoning, code rewrites, type checking, code linking.
Common Representations:¶
| Format | Example |
|---|---|
| AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) | For C# adapters, handlers, UI components |
| YAML or JSON Schema | For pipeline templates, OpenAPI, configuration |
| Graph Models | For event flows, dependency trees, microservice maps |
Examples:¶
index-apisstores parsed OpenAPI specsindex-blueprintsincludes extracted event contractsindex-pipelinesparses all jobs, steps, triggers
🧠 Used heavily by: Infrastructure agents, Validator agents, Architecture agents
🖼 4. Visual Memory¶
Purpose:¶
Used for diagram-aware reasoning, UI layout alignment, visual QA, and UX generation.
Supported Visual Types:¶
| Format | Use Case |
|---|---|
.svg / .png |
Architecture diagrams, UI mockups |
Figma .json or API export |
Design systems, spacing, layout rules |
| Mermaid / PlantUML | System flows, bounded context diagrams |
| Annotated screenshots | Error feedback, bug localization |
Example Use Cases:¶
index-visual-assetssupportssvg:SearchBox.svg,figma:UserFlow.jsonindex-accessibility-specslinks to color contrast overlaysindex-design-systemembeds Figma tokens as JSON vectors
🧠 Used heavily by: UX Designer Agent, UI Developer Agent, Accessibility Agent
🔄 Hybrid Records¶
Many memory items combine multiple types:
{
"type": "ui-component",
"tags": ["form", "accessibility", "frontend"],
"description": "Email input with validation and ARIA",
"embedding": [0.19, 0.22, ...],
"componentCode": "src/components/EmailInput.razor",
"figmaLink": "https://figma.com/designs/email-input",
"accessibilitySpec": "aria-required, label-for, tab-index"
}
This allows the same record to be used by:
- Code Generator
- UI Designer
- Accessibility Checker
- Test Generator
✅ Summary¶
| Type | Power |
|---|---|
| ✅ Metadata | Organize, filter, trace |
| ✅ Semantic | Retrieve by meaning |
| ✅ Structural | Parse, validate, graph |
| ✅ Visual | See, test, generate layout |
Together, they form a multi-modal memory substrate for fully autonomous agent reasoning and coordination across all SaaS development phases.
🚀 Memory Ingestion: First-Time Bootstrap¶
First-time bootstrap is the process by which the ConnectSoft Memory System performs a complete ingestion of knowledge from all available internal repositories and assets. This is the foundation layer that allows all agents to begin operating on a rich, consistent, and indexed knowledge base.
Without bootstrap, the factory is blind. With it, agents gain immediate reasoning ability across 3000+ microservices, templates, pipelines, and documentation sets.
📂 Sources for Bootstrap Ingestion¶
| Source | Description |
|---|---|
| 📁 Azure DevOps Git Repos | Templates, microservices, shared libraries, documentation |
| 📚 Markdown Repositories | MkDocs sites, blueprints, architecture docs |
| 🧱 Infrastructure Repos | IaC: Bicep, Terraform, environment configs |
| 📜 CI/CD Pipelines | Reusable YAML jobs, steps, stages |
| 🧩 NuGet Packages | Internal SDKs with .nuspec and readme metadata |
| 🎨 Figma, SVG, Design Assets | UI kits, screenflows, component visual specs |
| 📎 DSLs & Prompt Templates | AdapterDSL, EventDSL, prompt skeletons |
| 🧪 Testing Artifacts | SpecFlow scenarios, test suites, test plans |
🧠 What Gets Created During Bootstrap¶
For each file or logical unit processed, the system creates:
-
✅ A memory record with:
-
memoryId,type,tags,projectId,traceId - Embedded semantic vector (if enabled)
-
Linked source files and derived metadata
-
✅ An entry in:
-
Metadata DB (Cosmos/Postgres)
- Vector DB (Azure AI Search, Qdrant, etc.)
- Blob storage (for raw file/archive reference)
⚙️ Bootstrap Agent Behavior¶
Agent: BootstrapMemoryIngestorAgent¶
| Responsibility | Details |
|---|---|
| Detect Files | Traverse folders by known path patterns |
| Classify | Determine memory type (e.g., template, pipeline) |
| Extract | Parse metadata, tags, domains, descriptions |
| Embed | Generate semantic vectors using embedding model |
| Persist | Store in DBs and emit MemoryItemCreated event |
Multiple versions of the agent exist:
.NET CLI,Docker container, andAzure Pipelines step.
🛠️ Sample CLI Usage¶
dotnet run --project ConnectSoft.BootstrapIngestor \
--source ./templates/MicroserviceTemplate \
--type template \
--projectId ConnectSoft.Templates \
--traceId bootstrap-init-202506
🧪 YAML Ingestion Step (Pipeline)¶
- task: Bash@3
inputs:
targetType: 'inline'
script: |
docker run --rm \
-e MODULE_TYPE=template \
-e FILE_PATH=templates/MicroserviceTemplate \
-e OUTPUT_DIR=memory/bootstrap \
connectsoft/bootstrap-ingestor:latest
🧩 Domain-Specific Directories to Scan¶
| Index Type | Folder Patterns |
|---|---|
index-templates |
/templates/*Template/ |
index-ui-components |
/src/components/ or /frontend/shared/ |
index-design-system |
/tokens/*.json, /styles/theme/ |
index-recipes |
/snippets/, /config/, /samples/ |
index-tests |
/features/, /tests/, /specs/ |
index-blueprints |
/docs/blueprints/ |
index-apis |
/contracts/openapi.yaml |
index-security-policies |
/security-policies/*.yaml |
📦 Output Artifacts¶
Each ingestion run generates:
.jsonmemory files ready for:- Insertion into metadata + vector store
- Manual QA or test validation
- Trace logs of what was indexed
- Summary files (
index-summary.yaml)
✅ Summary¶
| Feature | Value |
|---|---|
| 📥 Fully automated initial ingestion | Yes |
| 🔗 Multi-format support | .cs, .md, .yaml, .svg, .figma, .json |
| 🔄 Domain-aware classification | Templates, pipelines, APIs, designs, etc. |
| 🔎 Search-ready embedding | Yes, with vector similarity |
| 📚 Agent-usable records | Immediately usable in planning, generation, validation |
🔁 Memory Ingestion: Real-Time Sync¶
Once the initial bootstrap is complete, the ConnectSoft Memory System must stay continuously up to date as code, templates, documentation, and infrastructure evolve.
Agents depend on fresh, version-aligned memory to:
- Avoid stale references or outdated components
- Validate changes against live blueprints or contracts
- Trigger regeneration or propagation tasks (e.g., update tests after OpenAPI change)
- Maintain full traceability and temporal understanding of the system
🔄 Triggers for Real-Time Sync¶
| Trigger Source | Description |
|---|---|
| 🟦 Azure DevOps Git Push | Any commit to main, dev, or release/* triggers smart ingestion |
| 🔁 CI/CD Pipeline Events | post-build, post-release, template-publish events notify ingestors |
| 🔔 File System Watchers (local/dev) | Dev agents detect file saves for immediate memory preview |
| 📤 Manual Publish | Engineers can push knowledge using CLI/REST (e.g., after generating docs) |
| 🧠 Agent Output Hooks | When an agent creates a new DSL, blueprint, or prompt, it posts memory directly |
📋 Real-Time Ingestion Flow¶
sequenceDiagram
participant DevOps as Azure DevOps Repo
participant Ingestor as RealTimeIngestor Agent
participant Metadata as Metadata DB
participant Vector as Vector DB
participant Blob as Blob Store
DevOps->>Ingestor: Push detected to /templates/api/*
Ingestor->>Ingestor: Classify as type: template
Ingestor->>Vector: Embed semantic vector
Ingestor->>Metadata: Store structured metadata
Ingestor->>Blob: Archive file for trace
Ingestor-->>DevOps: Emit `MemoryItemUpdated` event
🧩 Change Detection Patterns¶
| Change Type | Resulting Action |
|---|---|
.csproj, .nuspec modified |
Reindex library metadata (index-libraries) |
openapi.yaml updated |
Update index-apis, regenerate sample client |
.md file edited in /docs/ |
Reindex documentation (index-documentation) |
*.razor or *.scss updated in /components/ |
Refresh index-ui-components and accessibility mappings |
security-policies.yaml added |
New entry in index-security-policies |
*.feature file added or changed |
Reindex index-tests |
Any .json, .yml with template config |
Update index-templates or index-pipelines |
⚙️ Real-Time Ingestor Agent Behavior¶
Agent: RealTimeMemoryIngestorAgent¶
| Responsibility | Details |
|---|---|
| Diff-Aware Scan | Only updates changed files |
| Auto-Tagging | Reuses domain classifiers (e.g., frontend, security, chaos) |
| Auto-Embedding | Updates vector field in parallel with metadata |
| Versioned Memory Items | Keeps full history of change unless TTL or deduping is active |
| Event-Driven Output | Emits MemoryItemUpdated, BlueprintVersionChanged, PromptUpdated events to message bus |
🔧 Azure DevOps Pipeline Hook Example¶
- task: Bash@3
name: SyncMemory
inputs:
targetType: 'inline'
script: |
dotnet run --project ConnectSoft.RealTimeIngestor \
--source . \
--traceId post-release-$(Build.BuildId)
🧪 Dev-Local Sync Option¶
Agents can be configured to auto-ingest when local
.cs,.md,.dsl, or.blueprint.yamlfiles are saved (for live preview and memory debugging).
📥 Auto-Generated Sync Output¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-template-1098",
"type": "template",
"projectId": "ConnectSoft.Templates.API",
"filePaths": ["templates/api-microservice/openapi.yaml"],
"tags": ["backend", "http", "openapi", "template"],
"description": "HTTP-based microservice with OpenAPI and outbox pattern",
"lastUpdated": "2025-06-06T17:30:00Z",
"embedding": [0.19, -0.02, ...],
"traceId": "release-11567"
}
🔄 Emitted Events for System Coordination¶
| Event | Trigger |
|---|---|
MemoryItemUpdated |
Any changed record |
BlueprintVersionChanged |
Core design updated (e.g. contract, adapter) |
TestPlanOutdated |
Test needs regeneration |
PromptTemplateChanged |
DSL or agent prompt changed |
EditionDefinitionChanged |
SaaS model modified |
✅ Summary¶
| Capability | Enabled |
|---|---|
| Git-aware diff scanning | ✅ |
| Per-index classification and routing | ✅ |
| Agent-generated output auto-injection | ✅ |
| Semantic embedding and tagging | ✅ |
| Cross-index event propagation | ✅ |
Real-time ingestion ensures the AI Software Factory remains in sync with reality, allowing agents to operate continuously and confidently on the latest ground truth.
📂 Memory Sources and File Types¶
A memory source is any location, artifact, or data structure in the ConnectSoft ecosystem from which knowledge can be extracted and transformed into agent-usable memory.
These sources span:
- 🧱 Code repositories (backend, frontend, infra)
- 📚 Documentation and Markdown sites
- 🎨 Design files and UI specs
- 🔧 Configuration and orchestration layers
- 🧪 Test and validation systems
- 🧠 AI-generated artifacts (DSLs, prompts, agent plans)
📁 Source Categories¶
1. Git-Based Sources¶
| Source Type | Purpose |
|---|---|
/templates/ |
Microservice, library, orchestrator, API templates |
/src/ |
Microservice code, adapters, handlers |
/frontend/ |
UI components, layouts, modules |
/contracts/ |
OpenAPI, events, policies |
/features/ |
BDD test specs (SpecFlow, Gherkin) |
/docs/ |
MkDocs documentation, blueprints, READMEs |
2. Documentation & MkDocs¶
| File Type | Description |
|---|---|
*.md |
Markdown documentation |
mkdocs.yml |
Navigation and structure |
blueprint.yaml |
Architecture or module spec |
index-summary.yaml |
Ingestion summary and memory metadata |
Each page is embedded semantically and metadata-tagged by path, domain, and document type.
3. Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC)¶
| File Type | Description |
|---|---|
*.bicep |
Azure IaC definition |
*.tf, *.tfvars |
Terraform definitions |
*.yaml |
Pipeline templates |
variables.json |
Pipeline parameterization |
These populate index-iac and index-pipelines.
4. Frontend, UI, UX Sources¶
| File Type | Purpose |
|---|---|
.razor, .ts, .html, .scss |
UI layout and behavior |
theme.tokens.json, variables.scss |
Design tokens |
accessibility-checks.yaml |
WCAG or ARIA linting rules |
*.figma.json, *.svg, .png |
Visual design assets and diagrams |
Frontend knowledge is indexed across:
index-ui-componentsindex-design-systemindex-visual-assetsindex-accessibility-specs
5. Runtime and Observability Sources¶
| File Type / Format | Description |
|---|---|
log.json |
Structured logs (OpenTelemetry, Serilog) |
span.json, metrics.json |
Performance traces |
event.json, error.yaml |
Runtime events (failures, retries) |
resiliency-score.yaml |
Resiliency test results |
Used by index-runtime-metrics, index-chaos-scenarios, index-runtime-events.
6. Agent-Generated Artifacts¶
| Source Type | Description |
|---|---|
.prompt, .skill.json |
AI system and input prompts |
.dsl, .blueprint.yaml |
AI-generated design structures |
code-review-suggestions.md |
Outputs from analyzer agents |
user-story.generated.yaml |
User stories and epic mappings |
observability-plan.yaml |
Agent-generated telemetry schemas |
These are auto-pushed into:
index-blueprintsindex-promptsindex-skillsindex-agent-outputs
🧩 Ingested File Types by Index¶
| Index | File Types |
|---|---|
index-templates |
.csproj, .yaml, Program.cs, .template.config |
index-libraries |
.csproj, README.md, .nuspec, .dll |
index-frontend-templates |
.razor, .html, .scss, .ts |
index-ui-components |
.razor, .tsx, .svg, .json |
index-accessibility-specs |
.yaml, .json, .md |
index-pipelines |
.yml, .yaml, pipeline.config.json |
index-iac |
.bicep, .tf, .tfvars, .json |
index-tests |
.feature, .cs, testplan.yaml |
index-security-policies |
security-policies.yaml, rbac.json |
index-runtime-events |
event.json, log.json, span.json |
📌 Naming Conventions¶
Each index record can trace its origin with these fields:
| Field | Example |
|---|---|
sourcePath |
templates/MicroserviceTemplate/Program.cs |
projectId |
ConnectSoft.MicroserviceTemplate |
agentId |
bootstrap-ingestor |
memoryId |
mem-template-0012 |
traceId |
initial-load-2025-06 |
✅ Summary¶
| Source Class | Supported? |
|---|---|
| Git-based repositories | ✅ |
| Markdown documentation | ✅ |
| UI layout & tokens | ✅ |
| IaC & pipelines | ✅ |
| Runtime metrics & logs | ✅ |
| Agent outputs | ✅ |
| DSLs & test blueprints | ✅ |
Memory ingestion covers every artifact involved in fullstack software delivery, ensuring AI agents reason across code, design, infrastructure, and business layers in real time.
📦 index-libraries: SDKs, Packages, Shared Code¶
The index-libraries collection contains all reusable code libraries and NuGet packages used across the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory. These include both backend and frontend shared logic, spanning infrastructure, utilities, cross-cutting concerns, and domain SDKs.
This index allows agents to:
- 🔁 Reuse shared abstractions when generating code
- 🧠 Learn API surfaces and intended usage patterns
- 🧪 Validate whether custom code should reuse or extend existing packages
- 🔍 Search by functionality (e.g., logging, caching, serialization)
Think of this index as the foundation for dependency injection and reuse intelligence.
📂 Examples of Ingested Libraries¶
| Library | Purpose |
|---|---|
ConnectSoft.Logging |
Logging abstraction across microservices |
ConnectSoft.Messaging.MassTransit |
Shared bus configuration |
ConnectSoft.Orleans.SiloSetup |
Orleans-hosting glue for actors |
ConnectSoft.Localization |
I18N and string resource helper |
ConnectSoft.Extensions.Http.OAuth2 |
Secure API client with token support |
ConnectSoft.UI.Kit |
Reusable Blazor/Razor UI components |
ConnectSoft.Testing.SpecFlowBase |
Shared test hooks and context |
📄 File Types Ingested¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
*.csproj |
Name, dependencies, conditional flags |
README.md |
Descriptions and usage guidance |
.nuspec (if available) |
Version, description, tags |
public/*.cs |
Public interfaces, contracts |
CHANGELOG.md |
Versioning and semantic changes |
samples/*.cs, examples/ |
Usability showcase for generators |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-lib-logging-2025",
"type": "library",
"projectId": "ConnectSoft.Logging",
"tags": ["logging", "backend", "structured-logging"],
"description": "Cross-platform logging SDK with Serilog and OpenTelemetry support.",
"filePaths": ["src/Logging.csproj", "README.md"],
"embedding": [0.111, -0.021, ...],
"traceId": "bootstrap-init-20250601"
}
🧩 Key Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Notes |
|---|---|
type |
Always library |
tags |
Functional tags + domains (frontend, backend, infra, observability, etc.) |
agentId |
Typically bootstrap-ingestor, or real-time-ingestor |
projectId |
Canonical name, e.g., ConnectSoft.Extensions.Http.OAuth2 |
embedding |
Descriptive vector from README + API names |
🔍 Retrieval Use Cases¶
| Agent | Query Example |
|---|---|
| Code Generator Agent | “Use the standard OAuth2 HttpClient abstraction” → finds ConnectSoft.Extensions.Http.OAuth2 |
| Test Generator Agent | “Use test context for SpecFlow” → resolves to ConnectSoft.Testing.SpecFlowBase |
| Code Reviewer Agent | “Why was a custom logging adapter used here?” → Suggest reuse from ConnectSoft.Logging |
🛠️ Ingestion Rules¶
| Rule | Logic |
|---|---|
Must have public folder or exported interfaces |
✅ |
Must include a README or description tag |
✅ |
Preferably versioned in .nuspec or .csproj |
✅ |
| Optional: sample folder, markdown usage guides | ✅ |
🧠 Frontend Support¶
The same structure applies to frontend and UI libraries:
| Example | Use |
|---|---|
ConnectSoft.UI.Kit |
Blazor input components |
ConnectSoft.Components.Modals |
Shared modal logic |
ConnectSoft.Localization |
Frontend string helpers |
Agents generating frontend logic or scaffolds can semantically search for UI packages and usage examples.
📊 Memory Health Metrics¶
| Metric | Goal |
|---|---|
| Libraries indexed | >300 |
| With valid embeddings | 100% |
| With usage examples | ≥ 70% |
| Cross-agent references | Tracked across prompts, blueprints, DSLs |
✅ Summary¶
The index-libraries index enables intelligent code reuse by exposing all internal and third-party shared libraries as agent-readable, semantically searchable memory records.
- 📚 Source of truth for reuse
- 🔁 Prevents reinvention
- 🧠 Enhances context for generation, review, and refactoring
🧱 index-templates: Project Scaffolds and Code Generation Blueprints¶
The index-templates catalog contains all reusable project and module templates that are used by ConnectSoft agents to:
- 🚀 Scaffold new microservices, libraries, APIs, or orchestration modules
- 📦 Ensure consistent structure, patterns, and observability
- 🔁 Align with clean architecture, event-driven, and multi-tenant SaaS standards
- 🧠 Accelerate generation through embedded examples and annotations
This is a core knowledge base for generation, mutation, and regeneration workflows.
📂 Examples of Indexed Templates¶
| Template | Description |
|---|---|
MicroserviceTemplate |
Domain-aligned microservice with MassTransit, NHibernate, DDD layers |
ApiGatewayTemplate |
YARP-based gateway with routing rules and tenant support |
AuthServerTemplate |
OpenIddict-based authentication and token issuing server |
FrontendServiceTemplate |
Razor/Blazor-based UI scaffold |
LibraryTemplate |
Shared SDK or abstraction with optional DI and test base |
TestProjectTemplate |
MSTest + SpecFlow test project with hooks, mocks, context |
AzureFunctionTemplate |
Worker microservice with queue/event triggers |
DSLBasedGeneratorTemplate |
Specialized for semantic kernel + DSL input scaffolding |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
.template.config/template.json |
Template metadata (name, symbols, tags) |
Program.cs, Startup.cs |
Entry points, DI, host setup |
*.csproj, Directory.Build.props |
Package references, conditional logic |
README.md, usage.md |
Developer usage instructions |
.blueprint.yaml (if present) |
Declarative template structure for planning agents |
openapi.yaml, events.yaml |
Sample contracts, if scaffolded |
Each of these components contributes to structured memory records with embeddings + metadata.
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-template-microservice-2025",
"type": "template",
"projectId": "ConnectSoft.Templates.Microservice",
"tags": ["backend", "microservice", "clean-architecture", "event-driven"],
"description": "DDD-aligned microservice template with NHibernate and MassTransit",
"embedding": [0.147, -0.033, ...],
"filePaths": ["templates/MicroserviceTemplate/Program.cs", "README.md"],
"traceId": "bootstrap-init-202506"
}
📌 Key Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Notes |
|---|---|
type |
Always template |
tags |
Tags extracted from template.json + folder name |
projectId |
Canonical logical ID |
traceId |
Ingestion or sync identifier |
embedding |
Semantic vector from README + usage text |
🧠 Semantic Usage Patterns¶
Templates are frequently retrieved using embedded intent such as:
| Prompt | Resolved Template |
|---|---|
| “Create API service with retry and outbox” | MicroserviceTemplate |
| “Build OpenIddict server with DI, login, and consent” | AuthServerTemplate |
| “Scaffold UI service for tenant dashboard” | FrontendServiceTemplate |
| “Add library with test harness and options validation” | LibraryTemplate |
🔄 Versioning & Specialization¶
Templates can include:
- 🧬 DSL-aware parameters (for prompt expansion)
- 🏷 Feature flags (e.g.,
UseMassTransit,UseNHibernate) - 🔁 Variants per domain (e.g.,
MicroserviceTemplate.Email,MicroserviceTemplate.Tracking)
This flexibility is captured in metadata and indexed for planner use.
🧠 Integration with Prompt Expansion¶
When agents initiate generation flows, the planner uses:
- ✅
index-templatesto retrieve candidate scaffolds - ✅ Embedding to match intent with example usages
- ✅ Metadata filters to enforce domain or tech stack (e.g.,
frontend + blazor)
✅ Summary¶
The index-templates knowledge base enables agents to generate entire working solutions in seconds by leveraging:
- 🧱 Pre-built, observability-ready scaffolds
- 🧠 Semantically embedded usage guides
- 📦 Tagged features and configurations
- 🔁 Automatic alignment with factory principles
🎨 index-frontend-templates: UI & Web App Scaffolds¶
The index-frontend-templates catalog provides all frontend and UI project templates used to generate web-based user experiences — from dashboards to admin panels and public websites.
These templates empower agents to:
- ⚙️ Scaffold complete frontend solutions aligned with design systems
- 🧠 Understand and reuse layout structure, theming, and interaction flows
- 🌐 Ensure accessibility (ARIA, contrast, keyboard navigation)
- 🔁 Align with backend contracts and event flows
This index powers all AI-generated UI, including onboarding flows, feature dashboards, and i18n-enabled experiences.
📂 Examples of Indexed Frontend Templates¶
| Template | Description |
|---|---|
BlazorAppTemplate |
Full-featured Razor-based SaaS web application shell |
DashboardTemplate |
Modular dashboard layout with responsive grid |
SettingsPanelTemplate |
Common settings page with form fields and save logic |
TenantSwitchTemplate |
Identity-aware multi-tenant layout |
LandingPageTemplate |
Hero section, CTA, testimonials, and newsletter |
UIComponentPackTemplate |
Library of common controls (button, input, modal, tabset) |
OnboardingWizardTemplate |
Step-based guided experience for new users |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
.razor, .cshtml |
UI structure and rendering |
.html, .scss, .css |
Static templates and styling |
.ts, .js |
Client-side interactivity |
.theme.json, design.tokens.json |
Color, spacing, layout tokens |
README.md, usage.md |
Example usage and guidance |
.blueprint.yaml |
Agent-aware scaffolding instructions (optional) |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-template-dashboard-2025",
"type": "template",
"projectId": "ConnectSoft.Templates.Dashboard",
"tags": ["frontend", "ui", "blazor", "dashboard", "responsive"],
"description": "Modular responsive dashboard with header, sidebar, widget zones",
"embedding": [0.171, -0.025, ...],
"filePaths": ["templates/DashboardTemplate/MainLayout.razor", "theme.tokens.json"],
"traceId": "bootstrap-init-202506"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Notes |
|---|---|
type |
Always template |
tags |
Includes UI tech (blazor, angular, react) + layout intent (wizard, form, panel) |
projectId |
Logical ID for retrieval |
embedding |
Captures semantic layout usage from README + layout code |
🧠 Common Retrieval Intents¶
| Agent Prompt | Matching Template |
|---|---|
| “Generate onboarding wizard with three steps” | OnboardingWizardTemplate |
| “Add settings page to SaaS portal” | SettingsPanelTemplate |
| “Create tenant-aware sidebar layout” | TenantSwitchTemplate |
| “Add hero + signup call to action” | LandingPageTemplate |
🧪 Accessibility and Design System Awareness¶
Templates in this index must follow:
- ✅ WCAG 2.1 guidelines
- ✅ Design system color/spacing tokens
- ✅ ARIA roles and landmarks
- ✅ Contrast checks via
accessibility-checks.yaml(linked)
Agents like the Accessibility Engineer Agent and UI Developer Agent reference this index when scaffolding compliant UI.
🧠 i18n Support¶
Each frontend template may include:
i18n/en.json,i18n/fr.json– localized stringslocalization.config.yaml– string resource structure- Usage of
@Localizer["key"]or similar semantic markers
This ensures the Language Adapter Agent can inject multilingual support directly from indexed patterns.
💡 Blueprint Extension Example¶
A dashboard template can include a companion .blueprint.yaml:
templateId: dashboard
layout:
header: true
sidebar: true
widgets:
- name: UserActivity
- name: SubscriptionSummary
- name: AlertLog
defaultRoutes:
- /dashboard
- /settings
This blueprint is semantically indexed for plan-to-UI alignment.
✅ Summary¶
The index-frontend-templates index provides the base for:
- 🔁 Reusable, accessible UI scaffolds
- 🧠 Intelligent layout alignment with user journeys
- 🌍 Multilingual UI support with design system fidelity
- 👩🦯 Accessibility-compliant frontend generation
It powers all agent-generated frontend entrypoints, interfaces, and interaction flows.
🧬 index-codebase: Domain Code, Adapters, and Implementations¶
The index-codebase provides agents with deep knowledge of all production source code that powers ConnectSoft-generated SaaS solutions.
Unlike index-templates (scaffolds) and index-libraries (shared SDKs), this index captures:
- ⚙️ Real domain code from active microservices
- 🔌 Adapter, handler, and use-case implementations
- 🔁 Integration points (e.g., HTTP, message bus, ORM)
- 🧪 Validated business logic used in production
This index is critical for reuse, mutation, validation, and testing across agent-driven feature delivery.
📂 What Gets Indexed¶
| Code Element | Description |
|---|---|
Adapters |
Inbound/Outbound boundaries (HttpAdapter, Consumer, Producer) |
Handlers |
Use case logic tied to a command, query, or event |
Entities |
Domain objects with persistence, validation, events |
Services |
Domain services (e.g., retry scheduler, notifier, translator) |
Extensions |
Logging, options, DI, validators |
Configuration |
DI containers, MassTransit setup, NHibernate mapping |
Constants/Enums |
Shared enum types used in events, APIs, DB |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Description |
|---|---|
*.cs |
C# source files from /src/, /Domain/, /Application/, /Infrastructure/ |
*.ts / *.js |
Frontend-specific logic in /frontend/ |
*.razor.cs |
Blazor components with C# code-behind |
*.scss, *.css |
UI styles only if paired with functional logic |
*.json, *.yaml |
Adapter metadata, config, or route maps (if co-located) |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-codebase-adapter-notification",
"type": "adapter",
"projectId": "NotificationService",
"tags": ["adapter", "email", "command", "http"],
"description": "HttpAdapter to receive email notification requests and enqueue SendEmailCommand",
"filePaths": [
"src/NotificationService/Adapters/Http/SendEmailAdapter.cs"
],
"embedding": [0.212, -0.033, ...],
"traceId": "real-time-sync-20250606"
}
🧠 Use Cases for Retrieval¶
| Agent | Scenario |
|---|---|
| Code Generator Agent | Extend SendEmailAdapter with retry metadata |
| QA Agent | Generate test suite for all handlers with IEmailService dependency |
| Release Coordinator | Ensure all CreateUserHandler implementations conform to DDD rule |
| Observability Agent | Verify each Adapter emits correct span events |
| Code Reviewer Agent | Validate that all commands follow validation contract rules |
🧩 Code Intelligence Features¶
| Feature | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Parsed class/interface names | Enable symbol search and graphing |
| Method signature extraction | Feed prompts with realistic API hints |
| Reference map generation | Map usage across services and libraries |
| Cross-index linking | Connect to index-events, index-tests, index-templates |
🔄 Real-Time Ingestion¶
Agents ingest source files:
- On every Git commit
- When a file is modified inside
/src/,/Application/,/Frontend/ - Based on commit diff analysis (
modified,added,renamed) - Auto-generating a
type:adapter,handler,entity,ui-component, etc.
📊 Coverage Metrics¶
| Metric | Goal |
|---|---|
| Adapters indexed | ≥ 95% |
| Handlers with embedding | 100% |
| Entities with relationships mapped | Yes |
| Test coverage traceability | Enabled (linked to index-tests) |
🤖 Cross-Agent Impact¶
| Agent | Use |
|---|---|
| Product Manager Agent | Suggests stories by comparing codebase vs requirements |
| Test Automation Agent | Builds test cases directly from indexed handlers |
| Documentation Writer Agent | Describes adapter logic using embedded function names |
| Runtime Verification Agent | Maps telemetry spans back to code source |
✅ Summary¶
The index-codebase provides semantic, structural, and referential knowledge of all working software implementations. It enables agents to:
- 🔁 Reuse and extend real-world logic
- 🔍 Validate architectural, observability, and DDD compliance
- 🧪 Generate tests and docs with contextual precision
- 🔄 Track live evolution of production code over time
🗺️ index-blueprints: Architecture, Design, DSLs¶
The index-blueprints serves as the structural knowledge layer for the entire AI Software Factory. It stores:
- 📐 Architecture and system design specifications
- 🧬 Domain-driven design (DDD) contexts, aggregates, and boundaries
- 🔌 Event contracts, message flows, service topologies
- 📜 DSL-generated service and module plans
- 📦 Feature-to-code mappings (agent output → microservice)
This is the highest-level declarative index, guiding all generation, validation, and orchestration decisions.
📂 Types of Blueprints¶
| Blueprint Type | Description |
|---|---|
architecture-blueprint.yaml |
High-level system design across services/modules |
bounded-context-blueprint.yaml |
DDD-aligned context map |
microservice-blueprint.yaml |
Defines one service’s contracts, adapters, events, commands |
dsl-service-blueprint.dsl |
DSL-generated description of a component (e.g. adapter, handler) |
feature-blueprint.yaml |
Maps a business feature to files, domains, and tests |
prompt-blueprint.yaml |
Defines prompt structure for kernel agents |
test-blueprint.yaml |
Associates tests with features, events, errors |
Each blueprint is treated as a first-class semantic and structural memory object.
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Description |
|---|---|
*.blueprint.yaml |
Core format used for manual or agent-defined plans |
*.dsl |
DSL-based blueprints (AdapterDSL, EventDSL, etc.) |
*.md (annotated) |
Markdown blueprint specs with YAML frontmatter |
*.drawio.svg, .png, .mermaid |
Optional visual overlays |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-blueprint-user-service",
"type": "microservice-blueprint",
"projectId": "UserService",
"tags": ["architecture", "ddd", "events", "bounded-context"],
"description": "Blueprint for user identity microservice with OpenIddict integration and audit trail",
"filePaths": ["docs/blueprints/UserService.blueprint.yaml"],
"embedding": [0.091, -0.148, ...],
"traceId": "vision-architecture-202506"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Notes |
|---|---|
type |
blueprint, bounded-context, feature-blueprint, dsl-blueprint, etc. |
tags |
Domains like ddd, events, frontend, adapter, resiliency |
embedding |
Derived from YAML structure, description, and relationships |
projectId |
Targeted project or logical module |
agentId |
Often EnterpriseArchitectAgent, DSLPlannerAgent, etc. |
🧠 Retrieval Scenarios¶
| Agent | Example Use |
|---|---|
| Solution Architect Agent | Retrieve blueprint for "AuditService" to align new event |
| Microservice Generator Agent | Find DSL blueprint for NotificationHandler |
| Test Generator Agent | Map test paths from feature-blueprint.yaml |
| Observability Agent | Ensure blueprint.observability.spans[] match runtime spans |
| DevOps Agent | Build pipeline based on deployment.strategies in blueprint |
✍️ Blueprint DSL Format (Example)¶
service:
name: AuditTrailService
ports:
- command: WriteAuditLog
- event: AuditLogCreated
adapters:
- HttpWriteAdapter
- EventLogConsumer
events:
- AuditLogCreated
- AuditLogFailed
observability:
spans:
- write_audit_log
- persist_event
🔁 Real-Time Blueprint Update Flow¶
- Agent defines or modifies a
.blueprint.yaml - RealTimeIngestor re-indexes the file
- Emits
BlueprintVersionChanged - Downstream agents (e.g. QA, Observability) react and align accordingly
- Updated embedding + metadata stored in vector + metadata DBs
🧠 Cross-Index Linkage¶
blueprints→index-codebase: references to actual handlers/adaptersblueprints→index-events: links to events, commands, contractsblueprints→index-tests: required scenarios or test mappingsblueprints→index-observability: expected spans, alerts, KPIs
✅ Summary¶
The index-blueprints forms the semantic backbone of ConnectSoft, enabling agents to:
- 🧱 Generate microservices based on structured intent
- 🧭 Align to architectural boundaries and events
- 🔍 Validate design → code → observability correctness
- 🔁 React to blueprint changes in real-time
📡 index-events: Domain Events, Commands, and Contracts¶
The index-events is the canonical source of truth for all event-driven artifacts in the ConnectSoft platform. It includes:
- 🔔 Domain events
- 📩 Integration events
- 📤 Commands
- 📥 Message contracts
- 🧪 Event schemas for validation and simulation
This index powers event-driven generation, trace validation, contract testing, and agent choreography.
📂 Event Artifact Types¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
domain-event |
Core business signals (e.g. UserRegistered, InvoicePaid) |
integration-event |
External-facing events (e.g. Vetspire.ClientSynced) |
command |
Directed actions (e.g. SendEmailCommand, RetryPaymentCommand) |
event-contract |
YAML or JSON schema of fields and types |
event-blueprint |
Agent-generated metadata for routing, retries, DLQ, etc. |
Each record in this index supports both semantic (what it means) and structural (how it looks) memory.
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Description |
|---|---|
events/*.cs |
Strongly typed event/command classes |
contracts/*.yaml, *.json |
JSON schema / OpenAPI contracts |
*.event.yaml |
Event metadata including retries, routing, consumers |
*.proto (optional) |
If gRPC/Protobuf contracts are used |
event-blueprint.dsl |
DSL describing flow and transformation |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-event-user-registered",
"type": "domain-event",
"projectId": "UserService",
"tags": ["event", "user", "identity", "email", "notification"],
"description": "Triggered after new user registration. Contains email, userId, and timestamp.",
"filePaths": ["contracts/events/UserRegistered.cs"],
"embedding": [0.202, -0.074, ...],
"traceId": "bootstrap-init-202506"
}
🧩 Key Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type |
domain-event, command, integration-event, etc. |
projectId |
Owning service or domain |
eventName |
Auto-extracted symbol or declared name |
tags |
Derived from fields, path, usage context |
consumers[] |
Derived from blueprint or adapter analysis |
publishingService |
Originating bounded context |
embedding |
Semantic embedding of intent and payload |
schema |
Parsed JSON schema, if available |
🔍 Retrieval Use Cases¶
| Agent | Query |
|---|---|
| Code Generator Agent | “Find command for retrying email” → RetryEmailCommand |
| QA Agent | “What test cases must fire UserRegistered?” |
| Blueprint Agent | “Show all consumers of Vetspire.ClientUpdated” |
| Observability Agent | “Ensure span exists for event:UserDeleted → audit-log:WriteAuditLog” |
| Chaos Engineer Agent | “Inject PaymentFailed with invalid payload” |
🧠 Structural Awareness¶
Each indexed event includes:
- 🧾 Full schema (from
.cs,.json, or.yaml) - 📍 Relationships (what publishes, what consumes)
- 🕸️ Reference graph across services
- 🧠 Embedding for similarity, discovery, and planning
🔁 Event Update & Coordination¶
- Event definition modified in source repo
- Real-time ingestor re-parses schema, regenerates embedding
- Emits:
EventContractChangedBlueprintVersionChangedTestPlanOutdated
- Triggers:
- Test re-validation
- Blueprint reconnection
- Event-driven UI or API regeneration
📡 Event Mapping Example¶
event: UserRegistered
schema:
userId: Guid
email: string
timestamp: datetime
consumedBy:
- WelcomeEmailService.SendEmailCommand
- AuditTrailService.LogUserSignup
publishedBy: UserService.RegisterUserHandler
tags: [user, identity, welcome, audit]
✅ Summary¶
The index-events empowers ConnectSoft agents to work seamlessly across event-driven architectures, enabling:
- 🔁 End-to-end event orchestration
- 🔍 Accurate event testing, tracing, and validation
- 🔌 Automatic service choreography and adapter generation
- 📜 Schema-aware contract enforcement
It is a core semantic + structural index used across nearly every agent cluster.
🧪 index-tests: Feature, BDD, Integration, and Unit Testing Knowledge¶
The index-tests is the primary index for all test-related memory artifacts in the ConnectSoft platform. It gives agents structured, retrievable access to:
- ✅ SpecFlow BDD feature files
- 🧪 Integration, contract, and unit tests
- 🧭 Coverage mappings to blueprints and codebase
- 🧠 Test plan declarations and validations
- 💥 Chaos and resiliency test scenarios
This index ensures that AI agents validate, maintain, and generate tests for every delivered feature or blueprint.
📂 Types of Tests Indexed¶
| Test Type | Description |
|---|---|
bdd-feature |
Gherkin .feature files (SpecFlow/Cucumber) |
unit-test |
Logic-level tests, often in *.Tests projects |
integration-test |
End-to-end service or message-based tests |
resiliency-test |
Timeout, retry, chaos, and circuit breaker tests |
contract-test |
Schema validations, e.g. for openapi.yaml or event contracts |
test-plan |
Declarative test plans per service or feature |
test-blueprint |
Agent-generated mapping of what → where → how tested |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Description |
|---|---|
*.feature |
BDD specs (Given, When, Then) |
*.Tests/*.cs |
Test project source files |
testplan.yaml |
Test coverage plan and linked features |
test-blueprint.dsl |
DSL describing coverage and agents |
resiliency/*.yaml |
Failure injection and chaos scenarios |
test-matrix.md |
Optional markdown test tracking tables |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-test-feature-create-user",
"type": "bdd-feature",
"projectId": "UserService.Tests",
"tags": ["test", "bdd", "create-user", "feature"],
"description": "SpecFlow test for user creation via HTTP with invalid email validation",
"filePaths": ["tests/UserService.Tests/Features/CreateUser.feature"],
"embedding": [0.167, -0.042, ...],
"traceId": "real-time-sync-202506"
}
📌 Key Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Notes |
|---|---|
type |
bdd-feature, unit-test, test-plan, etc. |
tags |
Derived from filename, Gherkin scenario title, blueprint link |
relatedFeatureId |
Links to a feature-blueprint memory entry |
coverageType |
positive, negative, resiliency, edge-case, happy-path |
embedding |
Semantic intent from scenario text or test method name |
outputMetrics |
Optional: test pass/fail %, run history, duration |
🧠 Use Cases for Retrieval¶
| Agent | Use |
|---|---|
| Test Automation Agent | Generate new tests using missing coverage from blueprint |
| QA Engineer Agent | Align test coverage with requirements, show traceability |
| Code Reviewer Agent | Ensure new handlers have corresponding tests |
| Chaos Engineer Agent | Retrieve test scenarios that inject RetryException |
| Release Coordinator Agent | Verify regression coverage before production cutover |
🧬 Mapping to Other Indices¶
| Link From | Link To |
|---|---|
bdd-feature → feature-blueprint |
Test for specific user story |
test-plan.yaml → index-blueprints |
Test map for one microservice |
unit-test → index-codebase |
Verifies handler or adapter logic |
resiliency-test → index-events |
Injects and validates behavior during message failure |
🧪 Example Gherkin Snippet (Embedded)¶
Feature: Create User
Scenario: Create user with invalid email
Given a JSON payload with invalid email
When I POST to /users
Then the response status should be 400 Bad Request
And the error message should contain "invalid email"
This gets embedded with intent: create user, email validation, negative test, etc.
📊 Metrics Captured per Test¶
| Metric | Description |
|---|---|
lastRunStatus |
✅ / ❌ |
lastRunTime |
Time in ms |
stability |
Pass/fail ratio over last N runs |
linkedAgent |
If created by agent, which one |
✅ Summary¶
The index-tests ensures that all testable artifacts:
- Are semantically searchable and traceable
- Are linked to features, services, and events
- Can be validated, regenerated, or extended by agents
- Are treated as living specs, not static scripts
It is foundational to AI-driven quality assurance and coverage validation.
🚀 index-pipelines: CI/CD, Workflows, Release Logic¶
The index-pipelines captures all CI/CD pipeline templates, workflow definitions, and deployment orchestrations across the ConnectSoft ecosystem.
This index allows agents to:
- ⚙️ Automatically generate or update build and release pipelines
- 📦 Understand the promotion lifecycle (dev → staging → prod)
- 🔁 Enforce consistency across microservices
- 🔍 Validate pipeline coverage for tests, scanning, observability, and approvals
It’s the source of operational flow intelligence for the AI Factory.
📂 Types of Pipelines and Workflows¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
build-pipeline |
Compiles, restores, tests, lints, and packs artifacts |
release-pipeline |
Deploys to environments with gating and approvals |
template-pipeline |
Reusable YAML templates (e.g., build-service.yaml) |
infra-pipeline |
Deploys infrastructure (e.g., via Bicep or Terraform) |
agent-workflow |
Pipelines for agents (e.g., VisionAgentWorkflow) |
blueprint-trigger |
Event-triggered flow (e.g., on blueprint change) |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
.azure-pipelines.yml |
Full or partial pipeline definitions |
templates/*.yaml |
Reusable fragments |
.github/workflows/*.yml |
GitHub Actions support (optional) |
pipeline.config.json |
Factory-specific metadata for agents |
trigger-map.yaml |
Events → pipeline relationships |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-pipeline-build-microservice",
"type": "build-pipeline",
"projectId": "NotificationService",
"tags": ["build", "dotnet", "nuget", "test"],
"description": "Build pipeline with restore, lint, test, and publish stages",
"filePaths": ["pipelines/azure-pipelines.build.yml"],
"embedding": [0.193, -0.057, ...],
"traceId": "bootstrap-202506"
}
🧩 Key Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type |
build-pipeline, release-pipeline, template, etc. |
agentId |
Can be DevOpsAgent, ReleaseCoordinatorAgent, etc. |
environment |
dev, staging, prod, or dynamic |
triggers |
push, PR, blueprint-event, manual, etc. |
usedBy[] |
List of services that import this pipeline |
embedding |
Semantic vector from YAML structure and comments |
🧠 Use Cases for Retrieval¶
| Agent | Example Query |
|---|---|
| DevOps Agent | “Find the latest reusable test + coverage template” |
| Release Coordinator Agent | “What services don’t have pipeline approvals enabled?” |
| Observability Agent | “Ensure span-export step exists in all pipelines” |
| Code Generator Agent | “Attach publish pipeline to new microservice” |
🔁 Pipeline Component Breakdown¶
| Section | Typical Tasks |
|---|---|
restore: |
Uses dotnet restore, conditionally adds cache |
build: |
Compiles and sets build number |
test: |
Runs unit + integration tests, coverage reporting |
lint: |
StyleCop, Roslyn analyzers |
pack: |
NuGet packing for libraries |
publish: |
Push to Azure Artifacts or deploy to environment |
notify: |
Emit events or trigger GitHub/Braze notifications |
trace: |
OpenTelemetry export hooks (optional) |
🧪 Observability and Guardrails¶
Each pipeline can embed or inherit steps for:
- 🟢 Health checks (
/health/live,/health/ready) - 🔐 Security scans (
dotnet verify,Trivy,Checkmarx) - 🧠 Semantic version bump (
auto-semver, changelog emitter) - 📦 Artifact signing and publishing
- 🧭 Dashboards or trace IDs for agent traceability
🧬 Example Trigger Mapping¶
triggerMap:
on: blueprint-change
do: regenerate-tests-and-redeploy
affectedProjects:
- AuditTrailService
- NotificationService
✅ Summary¶
The index-pipelines enables agents to reason about and operate on:
- 💡 Build and deployment automation logic
- 🔁 Cross-service consistency and compliance
- ⚙️ CI/CD traceability across service lifecycles
- 🧠 Dynamic generation and adjustment of pipelines
This index ensures reliable and traceable software delivery, built into the intelligence layer of the AI Software Factory.
🏗️ index-iac: Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC), Bicep, Terraform, Provisioning¶
The index-iac captures all infrastructure-as-code definitions across the ConnectSoft platform. It provides AI agents with direct, semantic access to:
- ⚙️ Bicep, Terraform, and YAML-based infrastructure scripts
- 🌐 Network, identity, compute, and service provisioning blueprints
- 🔁 Environment configurations for dev, test, staging, prod
- 🧠 Agent-plannable infrastructure orchestration
This index turns infrastructure into a fully intelligent, agent-operable layer.
📂 Types of IaC Artifacts¶
| Artifact Type | Description |
|---|---|
bicep |
Azure-native infrastructure definitions |
terraform |
Cloud-agnostic infrastructure provisioning |
iac-module |
Reusable component (e.g., aks-cluster.bicep) |
env-config |
Environment-specific variable sets |
secret-mapping |
Mappings to Key Vault or secret sources |
infra-blueprint |
DSL-based infrastructure graph |
deployment-strategy |
Blue/green, canary, region-aware strategies |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Description |
|---|---|
*.bicep |
Native Azure infra definitions |
*.tf, *.tfvars |
Terraform modules and variable sets |
infra/*.yaml |
Environment matrix, service topology |
env/*.json |
Variable declarations, secret maps |
infra-blueprint.dsl |
Agent-readable graph-style infra definitions |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-iac-aks-cluster",
"type": "iac-module",
"projectId": "Infrastructure/Environments/Production",
"tags": ["aks", "kubernetes", "cluster", "bicep", "azure"],
"description": "Bicep module for provisioning Azure Kubernetes Service with autoscaler and monitoring enabled.",
"filePaths": ["infra/modules/aks-cluster.bicep"],
"embedding": [0.104, -0.053, ...],
"traceId": "infra-bootstrap-202506"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Notes |
|---|---|
type |
bicep, terraform, iac-module, infra-blueprint, etc. |
tags |
Derived from resource types (aks, sql, vnet, keyvault) |
env |
Dev, Test, Staging, Prod |
resourceGroup, subscriptionId |
Optional for Azure-linked resources |
embedding |
Semantic vector from script, metadata, and annotations |
🧠 Retrieval Use Cases¶
| Agent | Example Query |
|---|---|
| DevOps Agent | “Provision PostgreSQL with private endpoint and logging” |
| Platform Bootstrapper Agent | “Deploy dev environment with App Gateway, Key Vault, Redis” |
| Cost Optimization Agent | “Find high-cost VM SKUs across staging environments” |
| Observability Agent | “Which IaC module deploys metrics exporters?” |
🧪 Integration with Pipelines and Environments¶
Each indexed IaC file may link to:
- ✅
index-pipelines: viadeploy-infra.yamlorstage: infra - ✅
index-blueprints: maps toinfrasection of system design - ✅
index-codebase: references infrastructure-aware code (e.g., DI for connection strings)
📜 Blueprint Example (Bicep + Metadata)¶
module aks 'modules/aks-cluster.bicep' = {
name: 'aksCluster'
params: {
name: 'connectsoft-prod-aks'
enableMonitoring: true
autoscaler: true
}
}
With companion metadata:
metadata:
environment: production
tags: [aks, azure, cluster, monitoring]
linkedPipelines:
- pipelines/azure-infra-deploy.yml
💥 Security and Secrets¶
Agents validate use of:
- 🔒 Key Vault references (
@Microsoft.KeyVault) - 🔐 Secret injection in deployment pipelines
- ✅ Role assignments and
rbac.yamlfiles (linked toindex-security-policies)
📊 Health Metrics¶
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| IaC modules with full metadata | ≥ 90% |
| Linked to valid environments | 100% |
| Blueprint-agent-parsable | 100% |
Agent-deployable via pipeline + blueprint |
Yes |
✅ Summary¶
The index-iac turns your infrastructure into:
- 📐 Machine-readable, retrievable blueprints
- 🔁 Reusable modules for multi-env deployments
- 🔒 Validated, secure, and auditable configurations
- 🧠 Agent-operable systems with environment awareness
It forms the foundation for Infrastructure-as-Knowledge (IaK) within the AI Software Factory.
🧩 index-ui-components: Frontend Controls, Layouts, and Patterns¶
The index-ui-components index captures all frontend reusable components, enabling AI agents to:
- 🧱 Reuse or extend standard UI blocks like modals, forms, lists, or cards
- 🎨 Ensure consistency with design system and accessibility standards
- 🧠 Discover behavior, bindings, and responsiveness logic
- 🌍 Enable multilingual rendering and i18n-aware scaffolding
This index gives frontend-aware agents fine-grained access to the atomic design surface of the SaaS platform.
📂 Types of UI Components Indexed¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
component |
UI widget (e.g., Modal, UserCard, Button, InputGroup) |
layout |
Higher-order layout blocks (DashboardShell, SettingsPage) |
form-control |
Form-bound controls with validation and binding |
i18n-component |
Localized variant or wrapper |
design-token |
Shared color, spacing, border-radius values |
interaction-pattern |
Click behavior, keyboard nav, responsiveness |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Description |
|---|---|
.razor, .cshtml, .vue, .tsx, .jsx |
Component markup and logic |
.razor.cs |
Blazor component C# backing |
.scss, .css, .tailwind.config.js |
Styling and theming tokens |
*.component.meta.yaml |
Optional metadata (usage, intent, props) |
i18n/*.json, strings.yaml |
Translations, accessibility labels |
*.story.js, *.story.md |
Storybook-like usage samples (optional) |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-ui-component-modal",
"type": "component",
"projectId": "ConnectSoft.UI.Components",
"tags": ["modal", "ui", "overlay", "accessibility", "focus-trap"],
"description": "Re-usable modal dialog with title, body, footer, and focus trap behavior.",
"filePaths": ["components/Modal.razor", "styles/modal.scss"],
"embedding": [0.128, -0.089, ...],
"traceId": "ui-bootstrap-202506"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type |
component, layout, form-control, etc. |
i18nSupport |
Whether localized strings exist |
accessibility |
WCAG compliance metadata |
props[] |
List of accepted parameters |
defaultSlots[] |
For content projection |
embedding |
From semantic structure and behavior |
tags |
Visual, behavioral, and accessibility hints |
📐 Design Token Awareness¶
All components are indexed alongside their token usage:
- 🎨
color.primary,spacing.lg,border.radius.md - 📏 Responsive breakpoints
- 🧠 Semantic themes (dark mode, contrast variant)
Agents use this to ensure pixel-perfect rendering with design system compliance.
🔍 Retrieval Examples¶
| Agent | Prompt | Resolved Component |
|---|---|---|
| UI Developer Agent | “Show a modal with form and Save button” | Modal, FormGroup, PrimaryButton |
| Accessibility Agent | “Which components lack ARIA labels?” | Flagged in accessibility: false |
| Language Adapter Agent | “Which components are missing i18n?” | Filter i18nSupport: false |
| UX Designer Agent | “Render a 2-column dashboard layout” | DashboardShell with CardGrid |
📎 Slot, Prop, and Interaction Mapping¶
Indexed components can include:
props:
- name: isOpen
type: boolean
default: false
- name: onClose
type: EventCallback
slots:
- header
- body
- footer
accessibility:
focusTrap: true
role: dialog
🧠 Embedded Examples¶
Markdown or .story.* files are embedded to guide behavior synthesis:
<Modal IsOpen="@show" OnClose="@Close">
<Header>Confirm Deletion</Header>
<Body>This action cannot be undone.</Body>
<Footer>
<Button>Cancel</Button>
<Button Primary>Delete</Button>
</Footer>
</Modal>
🧪 Validation and Real-Time Indexing¶
- Changes to
.razor,.vue,.jsx, or.meta.yamlauto-trigger updates - Story usage examples re-indexed for improved prompt context
- Accessibility audits linked to
index-accessibility-checks
✅ Summary¶
The index-ui-components enables:
- 🧱 Reusable UI at atomic, molecule, and layout level
- 🌍 Language- and accessibility-aware scaffolding
- 🎨 Design system enforcement with full token traceability
- 🤖 Semantic component generation by frontend agents
This index powers all frontend rendering and user interface logic within the AI Software Factory.
📊 index-observability: Metrics, Traces, Logs, Health, Dashboards¶
The index-observability provides agents with rich, structured access to all observability-related definitions and implementations across the ConnectSoft platform. It includes:
- 📈 Telemetry standards: logs, spans, metrics
- 📟 Health check endpoints and availability probes
- 📊 Dashboards: Grafana, Application Insights, Prometheus, custom JSON
- 🔍 Log enrichment fields, trace IDs, correlation headers
- 📡 Event → span → alert mappings
This index turns operational behavior into a machine-readable and agent-actionable knowledge graph.
📂 Types of Observability Artifacts¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
span-template |
OpenTelemetry-compliant trace templates (e.g., "SendEmail" span) |
metric-definition |
Custom KPIs, counters, gauges, timers |
log-pattern |
Structured log lines (Serilog, ILogger, App Insights) |
health-check |
Live and readiness endpoints |
dashboard |
Grafana, Azure Monitor, JSON dashboards |
alert-rule |
Alerting and SLO thresholds |
trace-map |
Span → event → handler relationships |
log-enrichment |
Enriched keys: tenantId, correlationId, traceId, etc. |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
spans/*.yaml |
Span definition templates |
metrics/*.json, *.yaml |
Metric configurations |
dashboards/*.json |
Grafana or App Insights visualizations |
alerts/*.yaml |
Thresholds and alert strategies |
.cs, .cshtml (marked) |
logger.Log, Activity.Start(), Measure.Timer() |
healthchecks.json, health-ui.yaml |
Health metadata |
logs/serilog.template.json |
Log template format |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-span-user-registration",
"type": "span-template",
"projectId": "UserService",
"tags": ["observability", "span", "trace", "registration"],
"description": "Span for user registration with sub-steps for validate, save, notify",
"filePaths": ["spans/UserRegistered.yaml"],
"embedding": [0.147, -0.038, ...],
"traceId": "observability-init-202506"
}
🧩 Key Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type |
span-template, dashboard, metric, health-check, etc. |
tags |
Derived from metric name, trace name, event linked |
alertLevel |
info, warning, critical (for alert rules) |
linkedBlueprints |
Referenced services/events (e.g., AuditTrail.LogEvent) |
embedding |
Semantic vector for intent, component, purpose |
unit |
For metrics (ms, %, count) |
thresholds |
For alerts or SLOs |
📡 Telemetry Graph¶
event: UserRegistered
producesSpan: User.Register
spanSteps:
- ValidateEmail
- SaveToDatabase
- PublishEvent: UserRegistered
metrics:
- user.registration.success.count
- user.registration.latency.ms
logs:
- eventId: REG_SUCCESS
fields: [userId, tenantId, correlationId]
🧠 Agent Use Cases¶
| Agent | Task |
|---|---|
| Observability Agent | Validate that all event handlers emit Activity.Start spans |
| QA Agent | Confirm test coverage for alerts in PaymentFailed workflow |
| DevOps Agent | Deploy dashboards linked to NotificationService |
| Resiliency Agent | Simulate span drop for circuit-breaker logic |
| Release Coordinator Agent | Ensure ReleaseCutSpan trace is emitted at release time |
📊 Dashboards & Alerting¶
- Grafana templates parsed, embedded, and stored
- Alert rules indexed by service and environment
- Threshold rules link to metric definitions (
95th percentile latency) - Correlated with health checks (e.g.,
/health/live,/health/ready) - Linked to
index-blueprints,index-codebase, andindex-tests
🔁 Real-Time Updates¶
- Any change to:
spans/*.yamllog pattern classesmetrics.yamltriggers:- Re-indexing
ObservabilityChangedevent- Test + pipeline sync updates
✅ Summary¶
The index-observability makes operational insight agent-operable, enabling:
- 🔍 End-to-end span, metric, and log traceability
- 🎯 Targeted alert tuning and test validations
- 📊 Dashboards and SLO tracking by AI
- 🤖 Observability-aware code and pipeline generation
This index ensures observability is not an afterthought, but a core part of AI Factory automation and feedback loops.
🧮 index-dsl: Domain-Specific Languages and Declarative Inputs¶
The index-dsl captures all DSL artifacts and templates used by the ConnectSoft platform to declaratively express:
- 🧠 Software intents (services, adapters, events)
- 🧩 Infrastructure and pipeline configuration
- 📜 Prompt input representations for AI agents
- 🔁 Reusable generation recipes and blueprints
This index acts as the semantic layer between human intent and generated assets in the Software Factory.
📂 Types of DSL Definitions¶
| DSL Type | Description |
|---|---|
service.dsl |
High-level service declaration (DDD + clean architecture) |
adapter.dsl |
Input/output boundary declarations (e.g., HTTP, Kafka) |
event.dsl |
Event contract with command/event metadata |
blueprint.dsl |
Multi-part structure for modules and flows |
test.dsl |
Expected behavior and edge cases |
pipeline.dsl |
Declarative CI/CD logic |
prompt-template.dsl |
Agent-specific input prompt logic |
recipe.dsl |
Composite reusable patterns across domains |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
*.dsl |
Custom DSL files written for service/component/test |
prompt-templates/*.md |
Prompt blueprints for Semantic Kernel |
recipes/*.yaml |
Pattern recipes that embed DSL fragments |
inputs/*.dsl.json |
DSL-translated structured representations |
dsl.meta.yaml |
Optional metadata about DSL authorship, traceability |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-dsl-adapter-notification",
"type": "adapter.dsl",
"projectId": "NotificationService",
"tags": ["dsl", "adapter", "email", "http", "command"],
"description": "DSL describing an HTTP POST adapter for sending email commands",
"filePaths": ["dsl/adapter/email-send.dsl"],
"embedding": [0.163, -0.021, ...],
"traceId": "dsl-index-202506"
}
🧩 DSL Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Notes |
|---|---|
type |
DSL purpose: adapter.dsl, service.dsl, etc. |
tags |
Derived from intent (e.g., retry, command, audit) |
embedding |
Semantically derived from DSL syntax + comments |
relatedBlueprint |
If DSL feeds a blueprint.yaml |
generatedBy |
Agent or user ID |
targetService |
Name of the microservice to apply DSL to |
🧠 DSL Snippet Example (Adapter)¶
adapter HttpEmailSend {
method: POST
path: /email/send
input: SendEmailCommand
output: AcceptedResponse
headers:
- x-tenant-id
- x-correlation-id
retryPolicy: exponentialBackoff
}
This is converted into:
- Code adapter
- Endpoint route
- Command class
- Retry policy logic
- Span + metric mapping
- Documentation artifact
🔍 Agent Use Cases¶
| Agent | Use |
|---|---|
| DSL Planner Agent | Generate adapter DSL from feature intent |
| Code Generator Agent | Convert DSL into C# scaffolds |
| Test Generator Agent | Create BDD from test.dsl |
| Prompt Builder Agent | Enrich prompt inputs using prompt-template.dsl |
| Infrastructure Agent | Deploy infra and pipelines from pipeline.dsl |
🧠 Retrieval & Matching¶
-
Agents perform semantic and symbolic lookup:
- “I need a retryable Kafka consumer adapter”
- “What is the DSL for
SendAuditLogcommand?” - “What prompt template should I use for
VisionArchitectAgent?”
-
DSL entries provide traceable lineage to:
- Generated code
- Events
- Pipelines
- Prompts
- Features
🧠 DSL → Other Index Links¶
| Link To | Reason |
|---|---|
index-blueprints |
DSL usually generates or maps to blueprints |
index-codebase |
Generated classes from DSL |
index-tests |
BDD and testplan DSL |
index-templates |
DSL selects appropriate generation template |
index-pipelines |
When pipelines are DSL-generated |
✅ Summary¶
The index-dsl gives ConnectSoft AI agents:
- 📜 Declarative, minimal, domain-aware inputs
- 🧠 Embedded, context-rich planning prompts
- 🔁 Full traceability from intent → output
- 🔄 Reusability across features, prompts, recipes, and pipelines
It is the connective DSL tissue of the AI Software Factory.
🗣️ index-prompts: Agent Prompts, Templates, and Kernel Input Logic¶
🧭 Purpose of the index-prompts¶
The index-prompts captures and embeds all prompt templates, system prompts, and assistant input configurations used by agents in the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory. It enables:
- 🤖 Retrieval of optimal prompts per agent type or task
- 🧠 Semantic matching of user input to prompt templates
- 🧩 Dynamic construction of system messages and role contexts
- 🔁 Multi-agent chaining, planning, and auto-prompting
This index powers the dialogue, instruction, and orchestration logic of every AI agent in the platform.
📂 Prompt Types Indexed¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
system-prompt |
Base instruction set for each agent |
input-prompt-template |
User-facing templates with interpolated variables |
output-expectation |
Instructions for formatting replies |
planner-prompt |
Prompt used by planners or routers |
self-refinement-prompt |
Retry/improvement prompts |
function-call-template |
For OpenAI function calling or semantic kernel skills |
feedback-prompt |
Used in continuous improvement or user feedback loop |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Description |
|---|---|
*.prompt.md |
Markdown-based prompt template |
prompts/*.txt |
Legacy or plain-text prompt instructions |
*.prompt.json |
Structured prompt metadata |
semantic-kernel/*.config.json |
SK planner definitions and memory references |
kernel/functions/*.prompt.txt |
SK-native prompt functions |
input-templates/*.md |
Agent task-specific prompt with slots ({{feature}}, {{blueprint}}, etc.) |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-prompt-agent-release-coordinator",
"type": "system-prompt",
"agentId": "ReleaseCoordinatorAgent",
"tags": ["release", "agent", "strategy", "slo", "cutover"],
"description": "Initial system prompt for coordinating release plans and validation logic",
"filePaths": ["prompts/ReleaseCoordinator.prompt.md"],
"embedding": [0.204, -0.063, ...],
"traceId": "agent-bootstrap-202506"
}
📌 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type |
system-prompt, input-template, etc. |
agentId |
The agent using this prompt |
language |
Optional: language tag or localization group |
embedding |
Semantic intent embedding |
variables[] |
Interpolated keys used in input construction |
skillsUsed[] |
Kernel skills invoked via function-calling |
triggers[] |
Agent task triggers using this prompt |
linkedMemory |
Other memory references (e.g. dsl, blueprint, docs) |
🧠 Prompt Example Snippet¶
## System Prompt (for Product Manager Agent)
You are a highly skilled AI Product Manager in the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory. Your role is to:
- Interpret user feature descriptions
- Break them into clear user stories and acceptance criteria
- Suggest minimal MVP increments
- Identify dependencies and blockers
Always format output as a Markdown table. Always tag stories with feature IDs.
🔍 Retrieval Scenarios¶
| Agent | Query |
|---|---|
| Planner Agent | “What’s the prompt for AdapterDSLGenerator?” |
| QA Agent | “Retry prompt for incomplete test plan generation?” |
| Vision Architect Agent | “Prompt template for strategic goal alignment?” |
| UX Designer Agent | “System prompt for layout suggestions in dark mode?” |
🔁 Real-Time Update & Evolution¶
- When prompts change:
- Re-indexed immediately
PromptChangedevent emitted- Planning agents reevaluate routes
- Feedback loop auto-attached if in experiment mode
- Prompts versioned and linked to
index-agentsandindex-blueprints
🧠 Prompt Interpolation Structure¶
{
"template": "Generate event handlers for the following:\n{{eventBlueprint}}\n\nUse DDD folder structure and include observability.",
"variables": ["eventBlueprint"],
"outputExpectation": "Code + Markdown summary",
"language": "en-US"
}
🧠 Links to Other Indices¶
| Index | Purpose |
|---|---|
index-dsl |
Prompt templates often refer to dsl.service, dsl.adapter, etc. |
index-agents |
Every agent references one or more prompt sets |
index-tests |
Prompt-to-test generation mapping |
index-blueprints |
Prompts often embed full or partial blueprint input |
✅ Summary¶
The index-prompts gives ConnectSoft agents:
- 🧠 Consistent cognitive grounding for every agent action
- 🔄 Dynamic routing and re-prompting logic
- 📥 Semantically aligned, slot-aware user input templates
- 🤖 Multi-agent orchestration via self-prompted chains
It forms the instructional and linguistic intelligence layer of the AI Software Factory.
📚 index-docs: Documentation Sites, Markdown, and MKDocs Repos¶
The index-docs provides a semantic, agent-searchable index of all Markdown-based documentation, technical wikis, and platform knowledge authored or generated within the ConnectSoft ecosystem. This includes:
- 🧭 MkDocs-based documentation sites (architecture, usage, policies)
- 🛠️ Internal dev documentation in repos
- 📄 Rich markdown documents from agents (blueprints, runbooks, changelogs)
- 🔁 Links to prompt systems and memory graphs for traceable AI-generated docs
It ensures that all platform knowledge is accessible, version-aware, and agent-operable.
📂 Types of Documentation Indexed¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
mkdocs-page |
Rendered documentation page in MkDocs |
markdown-spec |
Markdown file from /docs, /blueprints, /wikis, etc. |
agent-generated-doc |
Prompt output from blueprinting or planning agents |
changelog.md |
Release or version documentation |
readme.md |
Project-level root documentation |
doc-template |
Reusable structure (e.g., architecture-overview.md) |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
docs/**/*.md |
Project or platform-level documentation |
mkdocs.yml |
Defines page tree, nav, site links |
*.template.md |
Templates for doc generation |
generated/*.md |
AI-created feature maps, test reports |
wikis/**/*.md |
Feature breakdowns, DevOps playbooks |
changelog/*.md |
Historical release and feature logs |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-doc-blueprint-architecture-overview",
"type": "markdown-spec",
"projectId": "NotificationService",
"tags": ["blueprint", "architecture", "overview", "docs"],
"description": "High-level Clean Architecture overview for NotificationService, includes layers, events, modules",
"filePaths": ["docs/blueprints/NotificationService/architecture-overview.md"],
"embedding": [0.211, -0.066, ...],
"traceId": "docgen-202506"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type |
mkdocs-page, readme.md, agent-generated-doc, etc. |
siteId |
Optional: for cross-site linking (e.g., platform-docs, auth-docs) |
tags |
Derived from headings and taxonomy |
embedding |
Semantic vector from section headers and content |
sourceAgent |
If created via AI generation |
navPath |
Logical page path within documentation site |
📘 Example Structure (for MkDocs)¶
nav:
- Home: index.md
- Architecture:
- Overview: architecture/overview.md
- Event-Driven Mindset: architecture/event-driven.md
- Templates:
- Microservice Template: templates/microservice-template.md
Each page is indexed individually with nav context and hierarchical depth.
🔍 Retrieval Examples¶
| Agent | Prompt | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint Agent | “Find architecture guide for NotificationService” | /blueprints/NotificationService/architecture-overview.md |
| QA Agent | “Link to feature specification of RetryPolicy” | docs/features/retry-policy.md |
| Observability Agent | “Docs for span injection strategy” | observability/spans.md |
| Product Manager Agent | “Find changelog describing MVP scope cutback” | changelog/2025-04-mvp-trim.md |
🔁 Real-Time Update Flow¶
- Any
.mdfile added or changed:- Parsed for
#,##headers - Extracts nav structure and file path context
- Indexed and embedded semantically
- Emits
DocumentationChangedevent
- Parsed for
📚 Cross-links and Embedded Memory¶
Each document may reference:
- 🔗
index-blueprints(for referenced feature maps) - 🤖
index-agents(for ownership or traceability) - 📎
index-prompts(for prompt source if agent-generated) - 🧱
index-components,index-events,index-testsfor inline code/snippet links
✅ Summary¶
The index-docs enables:
- 🔍 Semantic retrieval of all knowledge authored in markdown
- 🧠 Reasoning and reuse of AI-generated documentation
- 📚 Nav-aware awareness of doc structure and linkage
- 🔁 Continuous knowledge graph construction for ConnectSoft
It forms the core knowledge archive and memory index for all textual design artifacts.
🔐 index-security-policies: Security Rules, Trust Boundaries, and Access Controls¶
The index-security-policies stores all security-related artifacts that define:
- 🔐 Authentication, authorization, RBAC, and ABAC configurations
- 🛡️ Trust boundaries between internal, external, sandboxed components
- 🧱 Field-level data masking, encryption-at-rest policies
- 🧠 Agent-accessible access control graphs
- 🔁 Token scope definitions and API security schemas
It equips agents to design, validate, and enforce secure-by-default architectures in every software product.
📂 Types of Security Artifacts Indexed¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
rbac-policy |
Role-based access control configuration |
scope-definition |
API access scopes and permissions |
field-security |
Masking, redaction, and PII annotations |
trust-boundary |
System boundary classifications |
oauth-config |
OAuth2/OpenID Connect config mappings |
jwt-claims-map |
Token claims to feature permissions |
security-blueprint |
Agent-readable security contract file |
audit-policy |
Event log, trail, or immutable store requirements |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
security-policies/*.yaml |
Policy definitions per service/domain |
oauth/config.json |
OIDC or client credential mappings |
scopes/*.json, scopes/*.yaml |
API scopes and descriptions |
claims-map.yaml |
Maps from JWT to authorization permissions |
field-retention-map.yaml |
Field classification: sensitive, transient, encrypted |
trust-zones.md |
Documentation for boundaries and threat models |
security-blueprint.dsl |
Structured policy definitions for agents |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-security-policy-user-read-scope",
"type": "scope-definition",
"projectId": "UserService",
"tags": ["security", "scope", "read", "user"],
"description": "OAuth2 scope `user.read` allowing read-only access to user profiles",
"filePaths": ["scopes/user.read.yaml"],
"embedding": [0.199, -0.051, ...],
"traceId": "security-202506"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type |
rbac-policy, scope-definition, trust-boundary, etc. |
tags |
Roles, scopes, sensitive fields |
affectedServices |
Targeted microservices or APIs |
relatedEvent |
For audit-linked security actions |
embedding |
Vector from policy description and tags |
classification |
e.g., PII, internal, public, restricted |
🔍 Retrieval Examples¶
| Agent | Query |
|---|---|
| Auth Agent | “Find scopes for user profile read/write” |
| Gateway Agent | “Retrieve all OIDC scopes for NotificationService” |
| Code Generator Agent | “What fields in User need masking or encryption?” |
| Product Owner Agent | “What roles have access to Billing Reports?” |
| DevSecOps Agent | “Validate services crossing untrusted boundaries” |
🔐 Sample Policy Snippet¶
scope: user.read
description: Grants read-only access to user profiles
roles:
- UserViewer
- Admin
endpoints:
- GET /api/users
- GET /api/users/{id}
And associated field-level rule:
field: ssn
type: string
security:
classification: PII
access: AdminOnly
masking: last4
encryption: at-rest
🔄 Real-Time Triggers¶
Changes in:
*.scope.yaml,field-retention-map.yaml,trust-boundary.md- OAuth/OIDC discovery (
.well-known/openid-configuration) - RBAC/ABAC configs in YAML/DSL
Trigger:
- Re-indexing
- Validation by
SecurityOrchestratorAgent - Documentation updates (
index-docs) - Retesting of
index-testsfor security scenarios
🔐 Security Boundaries & Agent Awareness¶
Agents are boundary-aware and can reason about:
- 📦 Internal vs. External systems
- 🧪 Sandbox vs. Production safety layers
- 🔄 Token scope propagation and claims translation
- 🔍 Audit trail requirements per endpoint/action
✅ Summary¶
The index-security-policies enables:
- 🔐 Secure generation of APIs, handlers, and interfaces
- 🧠 Agent-enforced field-level and endpoint-level authorization
- 🎯 Traceable mappings of role, permission, token, and field
- 🔁 AI-driven security audits, test generation, and blueprinting
It ensures that security is embedded into every part of the AI Factory, not bolted on.
📨 index-events: Domain Events, Contracts, Topics, and Event-Driven Architecture¶
The index-events stores and embeds all event-driven artifacts used within the ConnectSoft platform, allowing agents to:
- 🔁 Generate or consume events across bounded contexts
- 📦 Understand message schemas, payloads, and metadata
- 🔍 Discover service-to-service communication links
- 🔐 Trace security, observability, and retry policies per event
It forms the event mesh knowledge graph of the AI Software Factory, powering reactive and decoupled system design.
📂 Types of Event Artifacts Indexed¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
domain-event |
Event raised by a domain aggregate (e.g. UserRegistered) |
integration-event |
Cross-context message (e.g. InvoicePaid) |
command |
Explicit intent to trigger behavior (e.g. SendEmailCommand) |
topic |
Messaging topic or routing key (Kafka, Azure Service Bus, etc.) |
event-contract |
Full schema definition (JSON Schema, C#, Avro, Protobuf) |
event-map |
Maps source → sink relationships |
event-handler-spec |
DSL/metadata about handling logic or retries |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
events/*.cs, *.proto, *.avsc, *.json |
Contract source code |
event-specs/*.yaml |
DSL-style specs (schema + metadata + topic) |
event-maps/*.yaml |
Source-sink flow definitions |
handlers/*.dsl |
Adapter/consumer definitions |
observability/*.span.yaml |
Related spans |
test-cases/*.event.feature |
BDD for event flows |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-event-user-registered",
"type": "domain-event",
"projectId": "UserService",
"tags": ["event", "user", "domain", "registration", "email"],
"description": "Raised when a new user completes registration. Includes userId, timestamp, and email.",
"filePaths": ["events/UserRegistered.cs", "event-specs/user-registered.yaml"],
"embedding": [0.142, -0.034, ...],
"traceId": "event-bus-index-202506"
}
🧩 Key Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type |
domain-event, integration-event, command |
topic |
Messaging bus topic or route |
producerService |
The service that emits this event |
consumerServices[] |
All services that consume it |
schemaType |
json, avro, protobuf, csharp-class |
linkedSpans[] |
Trace spans emitted during publish/handle |
retries, deadLetter, idempotency |
Event delivery policies |
embedding |
Semantic vector of payload and context |
🔁 Sample Event Spec (YAML)¶
event: UserRegistered
source: UserService
topic: users.user-registered
payload:
- userId: Guid
- email: string
- createdAt: datetime
metadata:
retries: 3
traceSpan: User.Register
correlationId: required
🔍 Retrieval Examples¶
| Agent | Query |
|---|---|
| Blueprint Agent | “What events are produced by UserService?” |
| Observability Agent | “Which spans are linked to OrderCreated?” |
| QA Agent | “Find test scenarios for InvoicePaid event” |
| DevOps Agent | “What services consume NotificationDispatched?” |
| Code Generator Agent | “Generate handler for PasswordResetRequested” |
🧬 Event Flow Graph (Traceable)¶
event: EmailDispatched
source: NotificationService
consumers:
- AuditTrailService (logs delivery result)
- AnalyticsService (captures email engagement metrics)
topic: notification.email.dispatched
Visual flow is generated and linked to index-blueprints.
🔐 Security & Observability Mapping¶
Each event is linked to:
- 🛡️
index-security-policies: PII classification, masking - 📡
index-observability: Span name, retry path, metrics - ✅
index-tests: Event-based BDD specs - 🧱
index-codebase: Producer/consumer adapters
✅ Summary¶
The index-events enables:
- 🧠 AI-native reasoning over distributed system flows
- 🔁 Reactive, event-driven modeling by agents
- 📦 Schema-aligned message generation and handler logic
- 🔍 Traceability across services, commands, topics, and actions
It is the event intelligence layer of the AI Software Factory.
🧪 index-tests: BDD, Unit Tests, Coverage, and Test Artifacts¶
The index-tests gives AI agents full visibility into the testing strategy, quality coverage, and validation artifacts of the platform. It enables:
- ✅ Test discovery and traceability to features, services, and events
- 🧠 Generation and refinement of test cases from DSLs or blueprints
- 🔁 Coverage-aware development, alerting on missing validations
- 🧪 Behavioral verification for agents generating new code or contracts
This index supports Test-First Thinking and drives agent-based quality assurance across all SDLC stages.
📂 Types of Test Artifacts Indexed¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
bdd-feature |
Gherkin-style .feature files |
unit-test |
Test method or class for functional logic |
integration-test |
End-to-end or service-to-service tests |
contract-test |
Consumer/provider verification for event/API contracts |
load-test-script |
Load profiles and simulation patterns |
chaos-test |
Resiliency assertions under injected faults |
test-report |
Output summary with coverage/metrics |
assertion-map |
Blueprint-to-test mapping (e.g., Given > handler > Then) |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
*.feature |
Gherkin test specifications |
*.specflow.cs |
Step definitions in C# |
*.Tests.cs, *.Unit.cs |
MSTest/NUnit/XUnit tests |
contract-tests/*.json |
Pact, OpenAPI verifier specs |
loadtests/*.yaml |
Artillery, k6, Azure Load Testing |
chaos/*.dsl |
Failure simulation definitions |
TestReports/*.json, coverage.* |
Code coverage and metrics |
assertion-map.yaml |
Maps features to testable blueprints |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-test-feature-user-registration",
"type": "bdd-feature",
"projectId": "UserService",
"tags": ["test", "bdd", "registration", "feature"],
"description": "BDD test for user registration flow with success, failure, and email confirmation branches",
"filePaths": ["tests/features/UserRegistration.feature"],
"embedding": [0.119, -0.087, ...],
"traceId": "qa-blueprint-202506"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type |
bdd-feature, unit-test, load-test, contract-test, etc. |
linkedBlueprint |
Associated blueprint, feature, or DSL |
tags |
Features, modules, test types |
coverageScope |
Function, API, service, event |
executionStatus |
passing, failing, skipped |
embedding |
Semantic vector of test purpose and behavior |
🧠 Example BDD Snippet¶
Feature: User Registration
Scenario: Successful Registration
Given a valid new user request
When the user submits the registration form
Then a UserRegistered event is emitted
And the user receives a confirmation email
Traceable to:
SendEmailCommandUserRegisteredspanNotificationServiceblueprint
🔍 Agent Use Cases¶
| Agent | Task |
|---|---|
| QA Agent | Generate missing BDD tests for BillingService |
| Code Generator Agent | Validate OrderConfirmedHandler logic is covered |
| Chaos Agent | Link tests that validate retry under DatabaseTimeout |
| Observability Agent | Assert span emission per test outcome |
| Release Coordinator | Ensure all regression tests pass before cutover |
🧪 Coverage Linkage¶
Each test artifact links to:
- ✅
index-blueprints(feature → test assertion map) - ✅
index-events(event triggers verified) - ✅
index-pipelines(pipeline-stage test execution) - ✅
index-prompts(test-generation prompts) - ✅
index-docs(test summary pages and changelogs)
🔁 Real-Time Indexing¶
- Every new
.feature,.Tests.cs, or report triggers:- Re-indexing
- Test plan linkage validation
TestAddedorTestFailedevent for observability
✅ Summary¶
The index-tests enables:
- 🧠 Traceable, agent-reasonable test coverage
- ✅ Verification-aware prompt planning and code generation
- 🔁 Continuous quality gating via automated assertions
- 🧪 Cross-agent and cross-domain behavior validation
It transforms testing into a core memory layer of the autonomous Software Factory.
🚀 index-pipelines: CI/CD Templates, Stages, Agents, and Environments¶
The index-pipelines stores, indexes, and semantically maps all CI/CD pipelines, YAML templates, automation scripts, and build/test/deploy definitions across the ConnectSoft ecosystem. This enables:
- ⚙️ AI generation of end-to-end deployment pipelines
- 🧪 Validation of test and coverage enforcement in CI stages
- 🔁 Continuous integration and delivery automation across services
- 🧠 Reusable pipeline stages and templates across projects
It equips agents with infrastructure-as-code knowledge to automate, validate, and evolve build-release flows.
📂 Types of Pipeline Artifacts Indexed¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
pipeline-definition |
Main YAML or JSON pipeline file |
template-stage |
Shared reusable pipeline step/stage |
pre-build-step |
Linting, restore, secrets, init |
test-stage |
Unit, integration, or BDD test steps |
deploy-stage |
Release definition: environment, slot, region |
release-definition |
High-level multi-service cutover flow |
infra-pipeline |
IaC deployment: Bicep, Terraform, ARM |
agent-pool-map |
Maps jobs to runner types or hosted agents |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
azure-pipelines.yml, *.pipeline.yaml |
Top-level build/release pipelines |
.ado/templates/*.yaml |
Reusable job/stage templates |
deploy/bicep/**/*.bicep |
Deployment scripts linked to pipelines |
infra/*.tf, main.bicep |
Infra pipeline targets |
pipeline-docs/*.md |
Documentation and runbooks |
pipeline-metadata.json |
Structured representation for agents |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-pipeline-build-notification-service",
"type": "pipeline-definition",
"projectId": "NotificationService",
"tags": ["pipeline", "ci", "build", "deploy"],
"description": "Azure DevOps pipeline for building and deploying the NotificationService, with template reuse for test + deploy stages.",
"filePaths": ["azure-pipelines.yml"],
"embedding": [0.097, -0.112, ...],
"traceId": "pipeline-index-202506"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type |
pipeline-definition, template-stage, etc. |
projectId |
Source project/service |
agentPool |
Azure DevOps agent pool used |
environments[] |
Dev, QA, Staging, Production |
linkedBlueprint |
Feature or microservice triggering this pipeline |
embedding |
Semantic embedding of pipeline tasks and structure |
📘 Sample Structure (Pipeline Template)¶
stages:
- stage: Build
jobs:
- job: BuildJob
steps:
- task: DotNetRestore
- task: DotNetBuild
- stage: Test
jobs:
- job: TestJob
steps:
- task: DotNetTest
- task: PublishTestResults
- stage: Deploy
condition: succeeded()
jobs:
- deployment: DeployToQA
environment: qa
Agents parse these YAMLs into prompt-aware logical plans.
🔍 Retrieval Scenarios¶
| Agent | Task |
|---|---|
| DevOps Agent | “Find deploy template for microservice with GRPC + Redis” |
| QA Agent | “Does this pipeline run SpecFlow and report code coverage?” |
| Infrastructure Agent | “Trigger infra pipeline after successful build” |
| Release Coordinator | “Cutover template for blue/green deploy in prod?” |
| CI Optimizer Agent | “Suggest parallelization for test matrix” |
🔁 Real-Time Update Handling¶
- When a pipeline YAML or template is updated:
- Semantic re-indexing occurs
PipelineChangedevent is published- Impacts:
index-tests: test hooksindex-blueprints: linked featuresindex-observability: span + metrics traceindex-security-policies: secrets, tokens
🔄 Agent-Aware Execution Mapping¶
Each pipeline is mapped to:
- Build → Test → Lint → Security Scan → Deploy → Notify
- Environment-specific variables
- Agent pool and parallelization strategy
- Linked services, domains, and modules
Agents can reason, suggest, or refactor pipelines using this structure.
✅ Summary¶
The index-pipelines enables:
- 🚀 Autonomous CI/CD planning and code-pipeline co-generation
- 🧪 Test visibility and enforcement inside delivery flows
- 🔄 Reusable build/deploy logic across 3000+ services
- 🧠 Cross-agent infrastructure and observability traceability
It is the deployment nervous system of the AI Software Factory.
🔗 index-integrations: External APIs, SaaS Tools, SDKs, and Connectors¶
The index-integrations collects and maps all external system interfaces that ConnectSoft SaaS platforms integrate with, including:
- 🌐 Third-party SaaS APIs (e.g., Stripe, Twilio, Segment, Braze)
- 🔌 SDKs and platform-specific connectors
- 🧠 Integration blueprints and adapter DSLs
- 🔄 Webhook, polling, or API-based data sync patterns
- 🔑 OAuth/OpenID scopes, tokens, and secrets for each integration
It enables agents to orchestrate integrations at design time, validate flows, and automate secure and scalable external connectivity.
📂 Types of Integration Artifacts Indexed¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
integration-definition |
Full integration metadata (target, auth, retries, endpoints) |
api-adapter |
Connector class, HTTP client, SDK interface |
webhook-consumer |
Listener and parser for incoming webhook |
integration-test |
Contract verification or simulated API test |
oauth-config |
Token, refresh, client credentials |
sync-job |
Recurring or event-triggered sync config |
integration-pipeline |
CI/CD step to validate or deploy integration logic |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
integrations/**/*.yaml, *.json |
Integration manifest files |
adapters/**/*.cs, *.ts |
SDK wrappers or HTTP clients |
webhooks/*.dsl, *.handler.cs |
Webhook handler logic |
oauth/*.json |
OAuth2 token discovery or secrets |
test/integration/*.spec.cs |
Contract tests for external APIs |
integration-docs/*.md |
Documentation and runbooks |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-integration-braze-api",
"type": "integration-definition",
"integrationName": "Braze",
"tags": ["crm", "api", "braze", "http", "segment"],
"description": "Braze user profile sync via HTTP API with batch track and identify methods",
"filePaths": ["integrations/braze/braze.api.yaml"],
"embedding": [0.176, -0.044, ...],
"traceId": "integration-202506"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
integrationName |
Name of external platform |
authType |
OAuth2, API Key, None, HMAC |
endpoints[] |
API URLs used |
linkedAdapters[] |
SDKs or wrapper classes |
webhookEndpoints[] |
For inbound integrations |
dataSchemas[] |
JSON or object schema linked to sync |
retryPolicy |
Backoff, circuit breaker, timeout configs |
embedding |
Semantic representation of integration purpose and flow |
🔌 Sample Integration YAML¶
integration: Stripe
auth:
type: OAuth2
scopes:
- charges.read
- customers.write
endpoints:
- POST /v1/customers
- GET /v1/charges
retry:
policy: exponentialBackoff
attempts: 3
handlers:
- OnPaymentSucceeded
- OnCustomerUpdated
🔍 Retrieval Examples¶
| Agent | Task |
|---|---|
| Integration Agent | “How do I connect to Segment API?” |
| Product Manager Agent | “Find integration with Mailchimp for marketing tags” |
| QA Agent | “Which test validates retry logic for CallRailWebhookHandler?” |
| Pipeline Agent | “Include integration tests for Mixpanel before deploy” |
🔁 Real-Time Triggers¶
- New integration or modified endpoint → triggers:
IntegrationChangedevent- Security + observability validation
- Blueprint relinking (e.g.,
EventUserCreated → Braze → Segment) - Prompt and DSL regeneration if agent-driven
🤖 Agent Reasoning with Integration Index¶
- Maps integration usage across features
- Resolves SDKs and APIs to appropriate adapters
- Enforces token and credential flows
- Validates webhook and event sync reliability
- Generates automated data transformation and sync jobs
✅ Summary¶
The index-integrations allows ConnectSoft to:
- 🌐 Seamlessly plug into 100+ SaaS APIs
- 🧠 Generate, test, and manage external connectivity
- 🔁 Trace sync jobs, secrets, retry logic, and SDK use
- 🤖 Automate generation of adapters, tests, and pipelines
It enables agents to handle external ecosystem interactions autonomously, as a core part of full SaaS delivery.
🧩 #index-ui-components: Reusable Frontend Elements, Patterns, and Style Contracts¶
The index-ui-components index provides semantic access to all reusable UI components, layout patterns, design tokens, and accessibility-aware elements across ConnectSoft projects. This empowers agents to:
- 🧱 Generate accessible, consistent UIs using design system constraints
- 🎨 Align frontend code with UX rules, themes, and ARIA contracts
- 🔁 Suggest component reuse during UI feature planning
- 🤖 Collaborate with UI/UX agents to build full flows
It serves as the visual and interaction memory graph of the Software Factory’s frontend layer.
📂 Types of UI Artifacts Indexed¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
component |
Atomic or composite UI building block |
layout-pattern |
Grids, navigation bars, dashboard panels |
design-token |
Color, font, spacing, shadows |
accessibility-hook |
ARIA, screen reader, contrast compliance logic |
style-guide-rule |
Branding, spacing, naming conventions |
storybook-entry |
Sample or documented component usage |
ui-blueprint |
Agent-authored UI feature or screen spec |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
components/**/*.razor, *.tsx, *.vue |
UI component source files |
tokens/*.json |
Design system definitions |
styleguide/*.md, design-rules.yaml |
Theming and layout guidance |
storybook/**/*.stories.* |
Preview and doc metadata |
ui-specs/*.dsl |
AI- or UX-authored blueprints |
accessibility/*.lint.yaml |
ARIA/keyboard/navigation rules |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-ui-component-button-primary",
"type": "component",
"componentId": "ButtonPrimary",
"tags": ["button", "ui", "component", "accessible", "clickable"],
"description": "Primary action button component with ARIA roles, hover/focus states, and dark mode support.",
"filePaths": ["components/shared/ButtonPrimary.razor"],
"embedding": [0.145, -0.039, ...],
"traceId": "ui-catalog-202506"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
componentId |
Unique logical name |
type |
component, layout-pattern, token, storybook-entry |
tags[] |
Visual and semantic cues (e.g., modal, input, contrast) |
linkedStories[] |
Storybook usage examples |
accessibilityScore |
Optional field from auto-lint tools |
embedding |
Semantic representation of purpose and props |
usedInFeatures[] |
Downstream blueprints or UI flows using it |
📘 Sample Component Reference (Razor)¶
Linked to:
- Design token:
button.primary.backgroundColor- Accessibility contract:
aria-label,role=button
🔍 Retrieval Examples¶
| Agent | Task |
|---|---|
| UI Designer Agent | “Suggest input components with inline validation” |
| Frontend Developer Agent | “What card patterns are available for dashboard tiles?” |
| Accessibility Agent | “Which components support keyboard navigation?” |
| Code Reviewer Agent | “Validate reused components in SettingsScreen.razor” |
🧠 Agent Design Flows¶
Agents use this index to:
- Generate UI fragments aligned with factory design
- Resolve style + layout constraints
- Inject accessibility annotations
- Enforce branding tokens and naming conventions
- Plan UI test cases (
index-tests) based on layout paths
🔁 Real-Time Update Handling¶
- Component change triggers:
- Re-indexing by
UIRegistryAgent - Embedding regeneration
- ARIA validation scan (optional)
- Event:
ComponentChanged→ Blueprint agents replan
- Re-indexing by
✅ Summary¶
The index-ui-components enables:
- 🎨 Design-consistent frontend generation across agents
- ♿ Accessibility-compliant component reuse
- 🧠 Semantic understanding of UI feature needs
- 🧩 Modular UI construction aligned with DDD + clean architecture
It forms the visual construction kit of the AI Software Factory.
📡 index-observability: Spans, Metrics, Dashboards, and Logs¶
The index-observability builds a structured, agent-readable view of the entire observability layer across ConnectSoft microservices and pipelines. It captures:
- 📍 Distributed tracing spans and instrumentation contracts
- 📊 Metrics definitions, aggregation logic, and thresholds
- 📈 Grafana dashboards and Prometheus query templates
- 🧾 Structured logging schemas and correlation formats
- 🚦 Alerts, SLOs, and health check rules
It enables AI agents to validate, generate, and connect observability across code, deployments, and business workflows.
📂 Types of Observability Artifacts Indexed¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
trace-span |
OpenTelemetry or custom tracing span spec |
metric-definition |
Gauge, counter, histogram with tags |
dashboard |
Grafana JSON or YAML layouts |
log-format |
Structured log line schema |
alert-rule |
Threshold-based alert spec |
health-check |
Readiness/liveness or custom endpoint validator |
slo-policy |
Uptime, latency, or error rate targets |
📁 Files Processed¶
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
observability/spans/*.yaml |
Span names, inputs, trace propagation |
metrics/*.prom, *.yaml |
Metric definitions and queries |
dashboards/*.json, *.yml |
Grafana or dashboard templates |
logs/*.schema.json |
Log formats for service/subsystem |
alerts/*.yaml |
AlertManager rules |
slo/*.policy.yaml |
Error budgets and thresholds |
health-checks/*.cs |
Endpoint status validators |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-span-user-registration",
"type": "trace-span",
"serviceId": "UserService",
"tags": ["span", "tracing", "user", "registration"],
"description": "Span emitted during user registration with context propagation and log enrichment.",
"filePaths": ["observability/spans/UserRegistered.yaml"],
"embedding": [0.136, -0.077, ...],
"traceId": "obs-index-202506"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
type |
trace-span, metric-definition, dashboard, etc. |
serviceId |
Service emitting span or metric |
embedding |
Semantic fingerprint of observability logic |
linkedFeature |
Feature or blueprint producing signal |
alertSeverity |
If part of alert rule: info, warning, critical |
dashboardId |
Link to dashboard view if applicable |
📘 Sample Span Spec¶
span: User.Register
description: Traces full lifecycle of user registration
attributes:
- userId
- method: POST
- outcome: success | failure
logs:
- timestamp
- event: UserCreated
- event: EmailSent
🔍 Retrieval Examples¶
| Agent | Task |
|---|---|
| Observability Agent | “Which spans exist for NotificationService?” |
| QA Agent | “Does OrderCreatedHandler emit trace + log?” |
| Performance Agent | “What histogram metrics track latency for InvoiceService?” |
| Release Coordinator | “Which SLO must pass before prod deploy?” |
🔄 Cross-Index Links¶
| Target Index | Usage |
|---|---|
index-events |
Ensure span is tied to emitted/handled event |
index-tests |
Confirm test spans match real-time metrics |
index-blueprints |
Feature trace graph auto-generated |
index-pipelines |
Pre/post deploy observability gates |
🔁 Real-Time Ingestion¶
- New span or dashboard added:
- Triggers
ObservabilityChangedevent - Validated by observability agent cluster
- Linked to deployment logic and agent workflows
- Triggers
📊 Dashboards and Alerts¶
- All
*.jsondashboards semantically embedded - Metric + label indexing supports dynamic queries
- Alert thresholds extract
severity,owner,linked feature
✅ Summary¶
The index-observability enables:
- 📡 Complete tracing of user + system behavior
- 🧠 Observability-aware agent generation (e.g., logging, alerts)
- 🚦 Deployment gating by health and telemetry
- 📊 Metric reasoning, visualization, and cost-aware testing
It is the telemetry nervous system of the AI Software Factory.
🤖 index-agent-skills: Semantic Kernel Skills, Plugins, and Agent Capabilities¶
The index-agent-skills provides a semantic and functional map of all capabilities an agent can invoke, including:
- 🧠 Semantic Kernel plugins and functions
- 🔌 Tool usage (e.g., HTTP, Azure DevOps, code synthesis, CLI)
- 🗣️ Prompt engineering and rewriting utilities
- 🧰 Internal DSL interpreters, validators, and transpilers
- 🧱 Domain-specific AI tools or adapters
This index allows the Software Factory to compose agents from a graph of skills, enable intelligent routing, discover missing skills, and perform automated agent optimization.
📂 Types of Skills Indexed¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
semantic-skill |
Natural language-based functions (prompt-based or embedding-enhanced) |
function-skill |
Native code plugin callable as a Kernel function |
tool-skill |
Wraps external tools, APIs, or commands |
validation-skill |
Used to post-process or validate agent outputs |
meta-skill |
Prompt restructuring, summarization, intent detection |
interaction-skill |
Designed for direct user/agent communication |
composition-skill |
Orchestrates other skills or agents |
📁 Files and Sources¶
| File Type | Examples |
|---|---|
skills/**/*.skprompt.txt |
Prompt templates used by Semantic Kernel |
skills/*.cs, *.js |
Skill implementation logic |
plugin-manifests/*.json |
Plugin registry files |
agent-descriptors/*.yaml |
Maps agent to available skills |
function-index/*.json |
Auto-generated function metadata |
prompt-functions/*.md |
Documentation of input/output structure |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-skill-azuredevops-create-wiki",
"type": "tool-skill",
"agentId": "DocumentationWriterAgent",
"tags": ["azuredevops", "wiki", "docs", "automation"],
"description": "Creates or updates a markdown wiki page in a given Azure DevOps project.",
"filePaths": ["skills/AzureDevOps/CreateWiki.cs"],
"embedding": [0.101, -0.022, ...],
"traceId": "skill-index-202506"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
agentId |
Agent using the skill |
skillId |
Unique logical name |
type |
semantic-skill, tool-skill, etc. |
inputSchema, outputSchema |
Optional structured definitions |
embedding |
Semantic understanding of capability |
sourceFile |
Plugin, script, or template source |
usedInProjects[] |
Where this skill was used during generation |
📘 Sample Function Declaration¶
[KernelFunction]
public async Task<SkillResult> CreateRepositoryAsync(string org, string project, string repoName)
Paired with prompt:
🔍 Retrieval Examples¶
| Agent | Task |
|---|---|
| OrchestratorAgent | “What skills can handle markdown to OpenAPI transformation?” |
| Vision Architect Agent | “Show all UI sketching skills available for frontend flows” |
| Blueprint Agent | “Suggest skills for converting DSL to event contracts” |
| Validation Agent | “Run FieldRedactorValidatorSkill on User schema” |
🔁 Real-Time Ingestion¶
- New skills added:
- Registered in plugin manifest or declared with
[KernelFunction] - Automatically indexed and embedded
- Linked to:
index-codebasefor physical sourceindex-promptsif prompt-basedindex-agentsvia descriptor file
- Registered in plugin manifest or declared with
🔗 Composability & Optimization¶
The index enables:
- 📚 Dynamic skill discovery during task planning
- 🧩 Agent self-reflection: “What can I do?”
- 🔄 Feedback loop on skill success/failure
- 🪄 Runtime chaining or replacement of skills by planner agent
✅ Summary¶
The index-agent-skills provides:
- 🔎 Intelligent discovery of agent capabilities
- 🧠 Semantic fingerprinting of all agent tools and plugins
- 🔁 Observability-aware execution and logging of agent functions
- 🔌 Reusable, swappable skill libraries across personas
It forms the actionable capability graph of the Agentic AI Software Factory.
🧠 index-memory-graphs: Agent Memories, Embeddings, Traces, and Long-Term Storage¶
The index-memory-graphs captures the structural, temporal, and semantic layout of all memories generated, updated, or referenced by agents during software generation. It includes:
- 🗂️ Embedding memory stores (vector DBs)
- 🕸️ Traceable links between memories (e.g., "UserService → EmailSent span → prompt → test → log")
- 📍 Memory scopes: short-term (context), long-term (vector store), persistent (blob/table)
- 🔄 Memory update policies and TTLs
- 🔄 Memory-sharing graphs across agents, prompts, and tools
It allows agents to retrieve, reason, update, and share knowledge across cycles, projects, and personas.
📂 Types of Memory Entities Indexed¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
embedding-store |
Vector DB storage for long-term semantic memories |
conversation-context |
In-memory or session-bound token contexts |
memory-trace |
Link between memory entries (e.g., blueprint → test → span) |
memory-scope |
TTL-based grouping (session, project, global) |
pinned-memory |
Fixed artifacts kept across projects (e.g., DSL syntax, template base) |
memory-update-hook |
Observers, rewriters, validators of evolving memories |
memory-access-policy |
Role or agent-based access scoping |
📁 Files and Data Sources¶
| Source | Description |
|---|---|
vector-db/embeddings/*.json |
Vector DB memory entries |
memory-graphs/*.yaml |
Agent-generated memory traces |
context/*.token.json |
Session-bound prompt memory |
longterm-store/*.md, .json, .blobref |
Files, wiki, storage |
memory-hooks/*.cs |
Code-based update or access logic |
🧠 Sample Memory Entry¶
{
"memoryId": "mem-longterm-user-service-blueprint",
"type": "embedding-store",
"scope": "project",
"embedding": [0.109, 0.301, ...],
"tags": ["blueprint", "user", "microservice"],
"linkedArtifacts": ["feature:UserLogin", "event:UserLoggedIn", "span:User.Authenticate"],
"pinned": false,
"expiresInDays": 90,
"traceId": "memgraph-202506"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
scope |
session, project, global, agent |
type |
embedding-store, memory-trace, access-policy |
linkedArtifacts[] |
Index IDs or memoryIds that reference this node |
embedding |
High-dimensional representation |
createdByAgentId |
Originator agent |
pinned |
true if this memory is permanent |
expiresInDays |
TTL if applicable |
🔍 Retrieval Examples¶
| Agent | Task |
|---|---|
| Vision Architect Agent | “Recall all vision docs and blueprints from this session” |
| QA Agent | “Find all test memory entries linked to EmailService” |
| Planning Agent | “Follow memory path: Feature → Event → Test → Span → Metric” |
| Optimization Agent | “Find stale or unused memories across past 10 projects” |
🧠 Memory Traces Example¶
traceId: blueprint-user-registration
nodes:
- mem-user-blueprint
- mem-event-user-registered
- mem-test-user-registration.feature
- mem-span-user.register
- mem-dashboard-user-metrics
🔁 Memory Evolution and Hooks¶
Agents may attach:
onCreateMemory: Summarize or rewrite artifactonExpireMemory: Archive or emit analyticsonRecall: Merge into active contextonUpdate: Re-embed or replace semantic vector
🛡️ Access & Scoping¶
Each memory has a policy:
- 🔒 Only accessible to creator agent (
session,sandbox, etc.) - 🔄 Shared with specific agent roles (e.g.,
all-agents-on-project) - 🌍 Global pinning for factory-wide skills, templates, DSLs
✅ Summary¶
The index-memory-graphs provides:
- 🧠 A semantic knowledge map across all factory processes
- 🔄 Agent memory reuse, transfer, and evolution
- 🕸️ Traceability from code to span to prompt to outcome
- 🔒 Scoped and secure memory access models
It is the neural substrate of the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory’s collective intelligence.
🧠 index-agent-error-feedback: Categorization of Agent & LLM Failures¶
The index-agent-error-feedback captures structured feedback about agent misbehavior, prompt misunderstandings, and generation failures during AI-driven software production cycles.
It helps the system to:
- 🚫 Identify root causes of failed outputs
- 🔄 Improve prompt planning and retries
- 📚 Feed learning loops with error context
- 🧠 Adapt memory or DSLs based on failure trends
- ⚠️ Track recurring misunderstanding patterns
It’s the self-correction index for ConnectSoft’s AI agent collective.
📂 Types of Error Feedback Tracked¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
prompt-misunderstanding |
LLM misunderstood or hallucinated instruction |
output-malformed |
Output structure was invalid, unparseable, or non-compliant |
missing-context |
Prompt lacked required memory or DSL context |
agent-crash |
Execution failure within agent pipeline (code or orchestration) |
retry-success |
Initial failure recovered successfully via retry or self-correction |
invalid-dsl-injection |
Wrong DSL injected into prompt pipeline |
trace-break |
Output could not be traced back to DSL, span, or memory correctly |
📁 Files and Data Sources¶
| Source | Description |
|---|---|
feedback-agent/*.yaml |
Structured agent error logs |
llm-output-validator/*.json |
Validator or schema checker failures |
retry-orchestrator/logs/*.trace.json |
Retry metadata, resolution status |
agent-audit-logs/*.trace.failure.json |
Composite trace failure reports |
prompt-failure-reports/*.md |
Annotated hallucination or deviation |
🧠 Sample Feedback Entry¶
{
"feedbackId": "err-agent-v1-invite-prompt",
"agentId": "PromptPlannerAgent",
"projectId": "connectsoft-notification",
"promptTemplate": "prompt-user-invite-handler",
"errorType": "prompt-misunderstanding",
"symptoms": [
"Generated response ignored DSL",
"Omitted required span link",
"Introduced field not in model"
],
"resolvedBy": "retry-cycle-2",
"linkedMemoryIds": ["mem-blueprint-invite", "mem-span-user.invite"],
"timestamp": "2025-06-06T10:42:17Z"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
feedbackId |
Unique ID of the feedback event |
agentId |
Agent who produced the faulty or rejected output |
promptTemplate |
Name of the prompt template used |
errorType |
Standardized type (see table above) |
symptoms[] |
Natural language observations |
linkedMemoryIds[] |
Related memory or DSL contexts |
resolvedBy |
Retry method, correction path, or N/A |
timestamp |
UTC datetime of the error occurrence |
🔍 Usage Examples¶
| Agent | Task |
|---|---|
GovernanceAgent |
Flag DSLs or prompts that cause high hallucination rates |
PromptPlannerAgent |
Refine template paths to reduce misunderstandings |
RetryOrchestrator |
Select best retry strategy based on past outcomes |
KnowledgeGraphAgent |
Visualize agent failure clusters by domain or role |
ObservabilityAgent |
Emit incident spans if error exceeds threshold |
📉 Aggregated Signals¶
- 🔁 Retry frequency: per agent, per prompt, per DSL
- ❌ Failure rate: % of failed traces vs. valid completions
- 📚 Correction accuracy: Retry → success ratio
- 🧠 Prompt drift alerts: significant hallucination compared to baseline
- 🪵 Failure trace trees: output → DSL → span → feedback
✅ Summary¶
The index-agent-error-feedback provides:
- 🔬 Detailed introspection into AI failures
- 📊 Statistical signal for governance and improvement
- 🧠 Self-healing retries, smarter prompt planning
- 🚦 Early detection of DSL or prompt misalignment
- 🔁 Foundational loop for continuous prompt-agent refinement
It’s a diagnostic nervous system for the ConnectSoft AI Factory, enabling adaptive intelligence at scale.
🧠 index-dsl-dependency-graph: Structural Relationships Between DSL Elements¶
The index-dsl-dependency-graph captures explicit and inferred dependencies between DSL units, enabling agents to understand how one DSL concept or artifact links to others in the software generation flow.
This graph forms the logical backbone of:
- Multi-step generation chains (e.g., Event depends on Command)
- DSL-driven prompt planning
- Scope-limited change propagation
- Reusability and impact analysis
It serves as the semantic DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) of all DSL assets.
📂 Types of DSL Dependencies Captured¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
command -> event |
A command triggers or emits an event |
event -> span |
Event instrumentation DSL tied to observability span |
event -> blueprint |
Event requires or references logic blueprint for implementation |
span -> test |
A span is validated via a specific test DSL or assertion |
dsl -> dsl |
Generic DSL-to-DSL link (e.g., state machine → transitions) |
dsl-extension |
One DSL semantically or syntactically extends another (extends, base) |
dsl-input-output |
DSL defines transformation or mapping (e.g., input DTO → domain model) |
📁 Files and Data Sources¶
| Source | Description |
|---|---|
dsl/*.dsl.yaml |
Structured DSL files with declared links |
graph-generated/*.edges.yaml |
Agent-inferred semantic DSL relationships |
memory-trace/*.mem.json |
Memories that reveal transitive dependencies |
dsl-tests/*.features |
Behavior-based link discovery (e.g., triggers) |
prompt-plans/*.dsl-plan.json |
Planner-resolved DSL link flows |
🧠 Sample Dependency Entry¶
{
"linkId": "link-user-register-command-to-event",
"fromDslId": "dsl-user-register-command-v1",
"toDslId": "dsl-user-registered-event-v1",
"type": "command -> event",
"traceId": "trace-3428",
"agentId": "DslDependencyResolverAgent",
"confidence": 0.94,
"inferred": false,
"origin": "dsl/user/dsl-user-register-command.yaml"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
linkId |
Unique ID for this dependency edge |
fromDslId |
Source DSL (e.g., command) |
toDslId |
Target DSL (e.g., event, span) |
type |
Human-readable or standardized edge label |
confidence |
Confidence score (esp. for inferred links) |
traceId |
DSL usage trace that proves or observes this link |
inferred |
true if not explicitly declared but observed or derived |
origin |
Path to original DSL or source that defined the relationship |
agentId |
Agent who recorded or verified the dependency |
🔍 Retrieval Examples¶
| Agent | Task |
|---|---|
PromptPlannerAgent |
Determine which DSLs must be included when emitting Command |
DslImpactAgent |
Assess which DSLs are affected by changes in Event definitions |
QA Agent |
Generate tests for all spans linked to given Command |
GovernanceAgent |
Freeze all dependent DSLs when parent DSL is deprecated |
KnowledgeGraphAgent |
Visualize domain-wide DSL chains and interactions |
🌐 Graph Shapes and Examples¶
Example: Microservice User Registration Flow¶
nodes:
- dsl-user-register-command
- dsl-user-registered-event
- dsl-user.register.span
- dsl-user-register.feature
edges:
- { from: command, to: event, type: "command -> event" }
- { from: event, to: span, type: "event -> span" }
- { from: span, to: test, type: "span -> test" }
🧠 Use Cases for Agents¶
- Impact Analysis: Understand what to regenerate after a DSL change.
- Traceability: Show full generation lineage and DSL links per output.
- Incremental Planning: Skip recomputation for unaffected DSL paths.
- Optimization: Find minimal regeneration sets for large DSL graphs.
✅ Summary¶
The index-dsl-dependency-graph enables:
- 📊 Fine-grained, multi-level DSL relationship reasoning
- 🔁 Smart propagation during changes, forks, or template evolution
- 🕸️ Graph-style generation workflows and optimization
- 🧠 Foundation for end-to-end semantic tracing of software artifacts
It is a knowledge-aware DSL linkage engine, powering traceability and precision.
🧠 index-semantic-paths: Precomputed DSL → Artifact → Span → Outcome Chains¶
The index-semantic-paths captures linear or graph-based semantic chains that represent how a single feature or concept flows through the AI Software Factory — from DSL to execution, test, and telemetry.
These paths are essential for:
- 📊 Root cause analysis
- 🔄 Regeneration scoping
- 🔍 Agent navigation and backtracking
- 🔁 Prompt routing and fallback reasoning
Think of this as the supply chain of meaning in the factory.
🔗 Path Examples¶
| Example Path | Meaning |
|---|---|
dsl-feature → blueprint → test → span → log |
A feature DSL’s full runtime trace |
command → event → handler → test → metric |
Full propagation chain across DSL and observability layers |
dsl-user-delete → span:User.Delete → test:UserDeletion.feature |
DSL mapped directly to runtime and validation artifacts |
dsl → prompt → llm-output → feedback → retry → correction |
End-to-end generation+correction cycle |
📂 Stored Path Types¶
| Path Type | Description |
|---|---|
dsl-trace-path |
DSL to output trace (blueprint, handler, etc.) |
test-validation-path |
Feature to test spans to assertion results |
telemetry-path |
DSL → Span → Metric or Error path |
prompt-failure-path |
Prompt → Output → Feedback → Retry → Fix |
drift-detection-path |
DSL → memory snapshot → semantic drift → replacement |
📁 Files and Data Sources¶
| Source | Description |
|---|---|
semantic-paths/*.yaml |
Manually or agent-generated semantic chains |
trace-graphs/*.json |
Graph-format representation of chains |
agent-memory/*.path.json |
Embedded memory chain data |
prompt-runs/*.trace.json |
Prompt-to-output lineage |
feedback-corrections/*.json |
Retry and self-healing context links |
🧠 Sample Path Entry¶
{
"pathId": "path-feature-user-registration",
"pathType": "dsl-trace-path",
"nodes": [
"dsl-user-registration.feature",
"blueprint-user-registration",
"span-user.create",
"test-user-registration.feature",
"log-span-user.create.success"
],
"tags": ["feature", "registration", "span", "trace"],
"agentId": "SemanticPathBuilderAgent",
"projectId": "connectsoft-user-core",
"createdAt": "2025-06-06T08:12:00Z"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
pathId |
Unique identifier for the semantic path |
pathType |
One of predefined types (see table above) |
nodes[] |
Ordered list of DSL, blueprint, test, span, memory, etc. |
tags[] |
Optional semantic categories |
agentId |
Agent that constructed or validated the path |
projectId |
Scoped project or context |
createdAt |
UTC timestamp of path creation or last validation |
🔍 Usage Examples¶
| Agent | Purpose |
|---|---|
ImpactAnalyzerAgent |
Regenerate only what’s in the same semantic path |
PromptPlannerAgent |
Load the exact span/test for context-aware generation |
ObservabilityAgent |
Navigate from test failures to span and blueprint origins |
OptimizationAgent |
Collapse unused or repeated paths for memory reuse |
FeedbackLoopAgent |
Learn which generation paths led to retries or hallucinations |
📈 Path Evolution Patterns¶
Paths may:
- 🔁 Drift when a DSL changes or test gets deleted
- 🧠 Fork when a tenant overrides a DSL or adds a branch span
- ⏱️ Expire when the memory TTL invalidates part of the path
- 🔄 Heal after agent retry flows reconstruct or replace broken edges
✅ Summary¶
The index-semantic-paths provides:
- 🧠 Contextual flow understanding across agents and DSL layers
- 🔁 Backtracing and repair assistance for failed generations
- 🔍 Impact zone targeting during updates or governance actions
- 📊 Optimization signal for factory-scale memory reuse and generation scope
It enables precision-guided orchestration of the full lifecycle of AI-generated software artifacts.
🧠 index-agent-quality-score: Output Precision, Effectiveness, and Reliability Metrics¶
The index-agent-quality-score captures quantitative and qualitative signals reflecting each agent’s output success, resilience, prompt mastery, and impact on software correctness.
It provides a unified scoring layer used to:
- 📊 Compare agent runs across projects and time
- 🔄 Tune retry and fallback orchestration
- 🧠 Train agents by reinforcing top-performing patterns
- 🧬 Feed adaptive planner decisions and skill routing
It’s the fitness function of ConnectSoft's agentic evolution system.
🧪 Quality Signals Tracked¶
| Signal Name | Description |
|---|---|
passRate |
% of outputs accepted without retry or correction |
retryRecoveryScore |
How well agent recovers from initial failures |
validationSuccessRate |
Tests, linters, analyzers passed post-output |
promptFidelityScore |
How closely output matched original prompt intent |
feedbackRating |
Manual or automatic feedback score from other agents or users |
semanticConsistency |
Vector similarity between output and target memory / DSL goal |
tokenEfficiency |
Output quality / total token usage ratio |
📁 Sources and Data¶
| Source File / Stream | Description |
|---|---|
agent-output-log/*.trace.json |
All output lifecycle traces |
feedback/*.feedback.json |
Agent-generated or human feedback records |
validation-results/*.score.json |
Lint/test pass rates and assertions |
retry-orchestrator/*.recovery.yaml |
Retry success, prompt rewrites, output changes |
semantic-metrics/*.embedding.json |
Similarity scores, hallucination deltas |
🧠 Sample Entry¶
{
"agentId": "BlueprintBuilderAgent",
"projectId": "connectsoft-notification",
"runId": "run-20392",
"timestamp": "2025-06-06T10:14:33Z",
"passRate": 0.92,
"retryRecoveryScore": 0.8,
"validationSuccessRate": 0.95,
"promptFidelityScore": 0.91,
"feedbackRating": 4.7,
"semanticConsistency": 0.88,
"tokenEfficiency": 0.63,
"qualityScore": 0.89
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
agentId |
Identifier of the evaluated agent |
runId |
Unique agent run instance |
projectId |
Contextual project (if scoped) |
timestamp |
UTC time of score calculation |
qualityScore |
Final normalized score across all metrics (0–1) |
feedbackRating |
Optional average human/star or peer agent rating |
🔍 Use Cases¶
| Agent | Purpose |
|---|---|
RetryOrchestratorAgent |
Prefer highest-scoring prompt branch when retrying |
PromptPlannerAgent |
Rank DSL-prompt-template combos by past score per agent |
GovernanceAgent |
Identify degraded agent performance over time |
SkillSelectorAgent |
Route planning task to agent with highest domain-quality score |
ObservabilityAgent |
Raise alerts if agent quality dips below SLA threshold |
📈 Time Series / Long-Term Views¶
Tracked via agent-version scoped metrics:
- 📉 Quality decay across iterations or factory upgrades
- 🔁 Impact of memory changes on output quality
- 🧠 Skill retraining events and score delta tracking
🧠 Agent Learning Actions¶
Agents may:
- 🔄 Replace prompt templates or DSL variants for low-scoring paths
- 🧠 Merge high-scoring outputs into reusable memory chunks
- 🧪 A/B test DSL rewrites to improve future
promptFidelityScore
✅ Summary¶
The index-agent-quality-score enables:
- 📊 Measurable quality benchmarking per agent and run
- 🔁 Informed fallback, retry, and planner routing decisions
- 🧠 Closed-loop learning, DSL refinement, and prompt optimization
- 🚦 Performance monitoring and observability across software cycles
It powers the evolutionary intelligence behind ConnectSoft's agentic orchestration.
🧠 index-pipeline-snippets: Reusable CI/CD, DevOps, and Workflow Fragments¶
The index-pipeline-snippets captures reusable, modular pipeline steps — such as build blocks, test jobs, publish scripts, and deployment plans — used by agents to assemble full CI/CD workflows for generated microservices, libraries, and documentation.
This index allows:
- ⚙️ Dynamic pipeline generation per project/template
- ♻️ Reuse and versioning of DevOps steps
- 📦 Agent-driven publishing to NuGet, Docker, etc.
- 📋 DSL-to-YAML mapping for pipeline-as-code
It is the DevOps DNA registry of the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory.
🧩 Snippet Types¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
build-snippet |
.NET, Node, Python, Blazor, Angular build jobs |
test-snippet |
Unit, integration, BDD (SpecFlow), load test fragments |
publish-snippet |
NuGet, Docker, Azure Artifacts, GitHub Release pipelines |
deploy-snippet |
Helm, Bicep, Terraform, Azure Web App deploy jobs |
infrastructure-step |
Resource provisioning, Key Vault, Redis, Service Bus |
doc-snippet |
MkDocs, Swagger generation, Mermaid export jobs |
conditional-snippet |
Matrix conditions, flag-based logic paths |
📁 Files and Data Sources¶
| Source Path | Description |
|---|---|
pipelines/snippets/*.yaml |
Canonical reusable pipeline steps |
pipeline-dsl/*.pipeline.yaml |
Agent-constructed pipelines using these blocks |
agent-generated/ci-template.graph |
Snippet graph usage across services/templates |
knowledge-memory/*.pipeline.json |
Embedded snippet reference memory |
dsl-blueprints/*.yaml |
Maps DSL to pipeline inclusion requirements |
🧠 Sample Snippet Entry¶
snippetId: build-dotnet-microservice
type: build-snippet
language: dotnet
tags: [build, dotnet, msbuild, csproj, microservice]
version: v1.2.0
usedInTemplates:
- microservice-api
- auth-service
ciPlatform: azure-devops
agentGenerated: true
steps:
- task: UseDotNet@2
inputs:
packageType: 'sdk'
version: '8.x'
- script: dotnet build --no-restore --configuration Release
displayName: Build Solution
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
snippetId |
Unique ID or canonical name of the snippet |
type |
Category (build, test, deploy, etc.) |
version |
Snippet version (semver-style) |
language |
Language or stack supported (dotnet, js, python, etc.) |
ciPlatform |
Target platform (azure-devops, github-actions, etc.) |
usedInTemplates[] |
Microservice templates or projects referencing this |
tags[] |
Keywords or DSL tags triggering this snippet |
agentGenerated |
True if assembled or templated by agents |
🔍 Usage by Agents¶
| Agent | Purpose |
|---|---|
PipelineAssemblerAgent |
Compose pipelines for new projects using DSL + snippets |
DevOpsBlueprintAgent |
Insert snippets into Bicep/Terraform workflows |
TemplateBuilderAgent |
Inject snippets into .template.config pipelines |
RetryOrchestratorAgent |
Resume failed pipelines using known snippets and diagnostics |
DocumentationAgent |
Include job descriptions and diagrams in DevOps documentation |
🔄 Versioning and Reuse Strategies¶
- ✅ Snippets support semantic versioning with changelog memory
- 🔁 Shared across templates using tags like
build:dotnetordeploy:azure-appservice - ⚠️ Agents check for deprecated or insecure steps during planning
- 🔐 Snippets may include secrets policies, parameter injection, and environment matrix logic
🧠 Path Inclusion Example (Semantic Path)¶
pathId: pipeline-notification-deploy
nodes:
- dsl-service:notification
- snippet:build-dotnet-microservice
- snippet:test-specflow
- snippet:publish-nuget
- snippet:deploy-azure-webapp
✅ Summary¶
The index-pipeline-snippets enables:
- ⚙️ Smart pipeline construction per project, DSL, or template
- 📦 Modular, reusable, and secure DevOps logic blocks
- 🤖 Agent-friendly workflows with traceable steps and feedback
- 📋 Consistent CI/CD generation aligned to factory principles
It is the connective tissue between DSLs and software delivery pipelines.
🧠 index-infra-component-templates: Reusable Infrastructure Modules for Agents¶
The index-infra-component-templates captures agent-discoverable, reusable infrastructure building blocks such as databases, queues, caches, and secrets stores. These templates are referenced by DSLs, microservices, and deployment pipelines to assemble cloud-native environments on demand.
They power:
- ⚙️ Infrastructure-as-code (IaC) composition
- 🧱 Repeatable environment scaffolding
- 🔁 Shared provisioning logic across services
- 🌐 Tenant-aware multi-environment orchestration
It enables modular, agent-driven provisioning of platform components with traceable DSL-to-IaC mappings.
🧩 Types of Infra Components Indexed¶
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
database |
Templates for SQL Server, PostgreSQL, Cosmos DB |
message-bus |
Azure Service Bus, RabbitMQ, Kafka |
cache |
Redis, distributed memory, sidecar caching |
secrets |
Azure Key Vault, Vault.io, config maps |
storage |
Azure Blob, File Storage, S3 |
auth-provider |
IdentityServer, OpenIddict, Azure AD |
ingress |
API Gateway, NGINX, Azure Front Door |
monitoring-agent |
Grafana, Application Insights, Prometheus |
📁 Files and Data Sources¶
| Source Path | Description |
|---|---|
infra-templates/components/*.bicep |
Component-level IaC modules |
dsl-blueprints/*.infra.yaml |
DSL-to-component mappings |
agent-output/infra-resources/*.json |
Resolved resource definitions |
devops-scripts/provision/*.sh |
Custom shell scripts or CLI templates |
terraform/modules/*.tf |
Terraform-based reusable infra blocks |
🧠 Sample Entry¶
{
"componentId": "redis-cache-v1",
"type": "cache",
"cloudProvider": "azure",
"templatePath": "infra-templates/components/redis.bicep",
"usedIn": ["template-notification-service", "template-realtime-hub"],
"parameters": {
"sku": "Standard",
"capacity": 1
},
"agentGenerated": false,
"version": "1.0.3"
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
componentId |
Canonical unique name for the infra component |
type |
One of predefined types (cache, bus, db, etc.) |
cloudProvider |
e.g., azure, aws, gcp |
templatePath |
File or script used to provision the component |
parameters |
Default or required configuration inputs |
usedIn[] |
Templates or services that reference this component |
agentGenerated |
Whether generated by the AI Software Factory |
version |
Semantic version (e.g., v1.0.0) |
🔍 Agent Use Cases¶
| Agent | Purpose |
|---|---|
DeploymentPlannerAgent |
Inject required infra based on DSL or blueprint |
DevOpsBlueprintAgent |
Merge infra templates into Helm/Bicep/Terraform stacks |
GovernanceAgent |
Enforce consistency across tenants/environments |
RetryOrchestratorAgent |
Restore failed resources using known component template |
CostEstimationAgent |
Estimate resource costs from reusable infra component memory |
🔄 Composition & Reuse Strategy¶
- 📦 Modular templates reference one another using submodules
- 🔁 Parameterizable via factory config DSL or prompts
- ⛳ Scoped to
project,environment, ortemplate - 🔐 Supports secrets and secure identity injection
🧠 Example: Blueprint-Triggered Provisioning¶
dsl-feature: "Notification.Email.Sender"
requiredInfra:
- componentId: redis-cache-v1
- componentId: azure-service-bus-queue-v2
- componentId: app-insights-logger
✅ Summary¶
The index-infra-component-templates enables:
- 📦 Provisioning of reusable, cloud-native infrastructure modules
- 🔁 DSL-aware resource injection during microservice generation
- ⚙️ Seamless DevOps integration with IaC tools and pipelines
- 🔍 Traceable, versioned, and modular infrastructure composition
It is the foundation layer for automated environment creation and deployment in ConnectSoft’s agentic platform.
🧠 index-cross-project-reuse: Factory-Wide Reuse of DSLs, Templates, and Components¶
The index-cross-project-reuse captures where and how DSLs, libraries, templates, infrastructure components, test suites, and pipelines are reused across multiple projects, tenants, or product lines in the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory.
This index powers:
- 📈 Reuse scoring and marketplace publication
- 🔄 Dependency tracking across boundaries
- 🛠️ Template optimization and consolidation
- 🔍 Change impact analysis across consumers
It is the reuse and propagation map of the factory’s evolving knowledge base.
🔁 Types of Reuse Tracked¶
| Reuse Type | Description |
|---|---|
dsl-reuse |
DSLs (e.g., Command, Event, Span) used in multiple microservices |
template-reuse |
Templates used across editions or verticals |
pipeline-reuse |
Shared CI/CD pipeline snippets or flows |
infra-reuse |
Shared infrastructure components across projects |
test-suite-reuse |
Common SpecFlow features reused across similar bounded contexts |
prompt-strategy-reuse |
Reused prompt scaffolds, correction flows, and retry tactics |
📁 Data Sources¶
| Source File | Description |
|---|---|
reuse-map/*.json |
Canonical mapping of reusable elements |
memory-index/project-usage/*.yaml |
Agent-inferred cross-project references |
blueprints/*.dsl.yaml |
DSLs linked to multiple project IDs |
pipeline-dsl/*.reuse.yaml |
Shared CI/CD usage tracked across repo roots |
templates/*.template.yaml |
Shared templates with usage metadata |
🧠 Sample Reuse Entry¶
{
"reuseId": "reuse-dsl-user-auth-event",
"elementId": "dsl-user-authenticated-event",
"elementType": "dsl-reuse",
"usedInProjects": ["auth-service", "notification-service", "session-tracker"],
"timesUsed": 3,
"firstUsed": "2025-03-10",
"lastUsed": "2025-06-05",
"agentId": "ReuseIndexAgent",
"linkedTemplates": ["template-auth-service", "template-notification-service"]
}
🧩 Metadata Fields¶
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
reuseId |
Unique identifier of the reuse record |
elementId |
DSL/template/component being reused |
elementType |
One of: dsl-reuse, template-reuse, infra-reuse, etc. |
usedInProjects[] |
List of project IDs referencing this element |
linkedTemplates |
Templates using or exporting the reusable element |
timesUsed |
Count of usage across unique projects |
firstUsed |
Earliest known usage timestamp |
lastUsed |
Most recent project reference |
agentId |
Agent that recorded the reuse relationship |
🔍 Use Cases¶
| Agent | Purpose |
|---|---|
GovernanceAgent |
Detect and score reusable DSLs for promotion or validation |
OptimizationAgent |
Collapse duplications into common modules |
TemplateBuilderAgent |
Suggest generalization of overused project templates |
MarketplaceAgent |
Surface top reused components for publishing to the factory marketplace |
TenantDiffAgent |
Detect drift or inconsistency across tenant forks |
📈 Reuse Graph Example¶
reuseGraph:
nodes:
- dsl-user-authenticated-event
- template-auth-service
- template-notification-service
edges:
- from: dsl-user-authenticated-event
to: template-auth-service
type: dsl-reuse
- from: dsl-user-authenticated-event
to: template-notification-service
type: dsl-reuse
🧠 Insights Enabled¶
- 📊 Which components are foundational or overloaded
- 🚨 Where change in one template could cascade to others
- 🧱 When to abstract DSL into common domain (e.g., identity-core)
- 💡 What reusable elements deserve documentation or badges
✅ Summary¶
The index-cross-project-reuse enables:
- 🔁 Factory-wide visibility into software reuse and modularity
- 📦 Consolidation of scattered DSLs, pipelines, and infra into canonical components
- 🧠 Smart agent recommendations and generation patterns across domains
- 📊 KPIs for reuse, duplication, and template optimization
It is the semantic reuse ledger that makes the AI Software Factory scalable and efficient at enterprise scale.
📌 Planned Knowledge & Memory Indices (Backlog)¶
The following indices are in the design or backlog stage and will extend memory, traceability, and reuse across software generation workflows:
| Index ID | Purpose |
|---|---|
index-token-usage |
Tracks token count, cost estimation, and efficiency per agent/prompt |
index-agent-effort-matrix |
Quantifies effort, retries, and time per agent per task |
index-prompt-template-links |
Maps DSLs and artifacts to reusable prompt templates |
index-template-lineage |
Captures derivation and versioning trees of microservice templates |
index-retry-patterns |
Catalogs retry logic, failure types, and prompt rewrites |
index-feedback-loop |
Connects prompt → feedback → retry → success cycles |
index-agent-version-diff |
Tracks agent prompt/skill differences across versions |
index-project-drift-signals |
Flags divergence of projects from their base templates |
index-validation-outcomes |
Logs pass/fail results of generated output across validators/tests |
index-skill-invocation-log |
Tracks which agent skills were invoked and their success rate |
index-agent-scope-boundary |
Defines boundaries of what each agent is allowed to generate/edit |
index-memory-hotspots |
Highlights frequently used, rewritten, or stale memories |
index-dsl-usage-statistics |
Records how often DSL elements are used, forked, or versioned |
index-agent-specialization-map |
Maps agents to DSL clusters where they perform best |
index-template-quality-profile |
Aggregates test, feedback, and quality scores for templates |
index-agent-dependency-graph |
Shows how agents depend on each other’s output or memory |
index-agent-training-snapshots |
Captures agent behaviors and skills at specific training epochs |
index-observability-coverage |
Tracks which spans, metrics, and logs are linked to which artifacts |
index-compliance-checks |
Tracks security, accessibility, PII, and other policy validations |
index-governance-flags |
Records violations, overrides, or exceptions across projects |
🧩 These indices will be introduced incrementally to cover blind spots, optimize prompt cycles, enhance governance, and improve agent self-awareness.