Skip to content

πŸ“¦ Frontend Library Blueprint

πŸ“˜ Purpose, Scope, and Placement in the Factory

This blueprint governs the autonomous generation of frontend UI libraries and component systems across the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory. It defines how agents scaffold, validate, test, and publish reusable, accessible, and observable frontend components.


🎯 Purpose

To provide a declarative contract that drives:

  • UI component scaffolding (e.g., Button, Card, Modal)
  • Full-featured frontend modules (e.g., BookingForm, Dashboard)
  • Static and dynamic page generation (e.g., HomePage, SettingsPage)
  • Integration with:

  • Styling systems (Tailwind, SCSS)

  • UI frameworks (React, Angular, Blazor)
  • L10n and i18n engines
  • Observability and telemetry
  • Storybook and visual regression tools
  • Secure, testable, versioned, and sharable artifacts

🧱 Scope

Domain Included
Component Design βœ… Structure, slots, inputs/outputs, props
Styling βœ… CSS, tokens, responsive rules
Accessibility βœ… WCAG, ARIA roles, keyboard navigation
Localization βœ… i18n hooks, string injection
Observability βœ… Frontend telemetry, performance spans
Testing βœ… Unit, snapshot, E2E, a11y tests
Docs βœ… Storybook, usage, MDX
CI/CD βœ… Linting, previews, deploy pipelines

🧠 Blueprint's Role in the Factory

flowchart TD
    idea[Product Idea or Epic]
    --> vision["Vision β†’ UX Agent"]
    --> blueprint["πŸ“˜ Frontend Blueprint"]
    --> component[🧱 Generated UI Components]
    --> tests[πŸ§ͺ Auto-Generated Tests]
    --> docs[πŸ“š Storybook + Docs]
    --> pipeline[πŸ” CI/CD + Deploy Previews]
Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

πŸͺ„ Example Use Case

Input:

name: ConnectSoft.UI.UserCard
framework: react
style: tailwind
slots:
  - avatar
  - username
  - actions

Output:

  • UserCard.tsx
  • UserCard.test.tsx
  • UserCard.stories.tsx
  • README.md
  • Tailwind + ARIA + test coverage hooks
  • Azure pipeline for deployment preview

🧠 Agents Triggered by This Blueprint

Agent Role
Component Scaffolder Agent Generates JSX/TSX, slots, state bindings
Style Agent Injects theme-based Tailwind or SCSS
Accessibility Agent Ensures WCAG/ARIA compliance
Test Generator Agent Builds tests with coverage targets
Docs Agent Storybook stories, props table
CI/CD Agent Preview site and visual diff pipelines
Localization Agent String extraction and translation stubs

πŸ“˜ Files and Artifacts Produced

/src/components/UserCard.tsx
/src/components/UserCard.styles.ts
/tests/UserCard.test.tsx
/stories/UserCard.stories.tsx
/docs/UserCard.md
/ci/frontend-preview.yml
/package.json

βœ… Summary

  • This blueprint governs the entire lifecycle of frontend libraries
  • Ensures all components are:
    • Generated
    • Localized
    • Tested
    • Documented
    • Versioned
    • Observable
  • Supports multi-framework (React, Angular, Blazor) generation
  • Enables end-to-end integration with CI/CD, design tokens, and UX agents

πŸ“¦ Output Types: Components, Modules, Pages

This section defines the types of frontend artifacts that can be generated using the blueprint, how they differ in purpose, complexity, structure, and agent responsibilities. Each output type has its own generation pattern, testing scope, and documentation logic.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Field: type

type: component  # or module | page

This field drives branching in the scaffold logic and output structure.


🧱 Output Type Definitions

Type Description
component A reusable UI element, such as a Button, Card, or Avatar, meant to be composed inside larger modules
module A self-contained UI unit with local state, multiple child components, service calls, etc. (e.g., BookingForm, UserProfilePanel)
page A top-level route/view, possibly combining multiple modules and full layout responsibility (e.g., DashboardPage, HomePage)

πŸ—‚οΈ Folder Structures by Type

# Component
/components/
  └── UserCard/
        β”œβ”€β”€ UserCard.tsx
        β”œβ”€β”€ UserCard.styles.ts
        β”œβ”€β”€ UserCard.test.tsx
        └── UserCard.stories.tsx

# Module
/modules/
  └── BookingForm/
        β”œβ”€β”€ BookingForm.tsx
        β”œβ”€β”€ hooks.ts
        β”œβ”€β”€ useBooking.ts
        β”œβ”€β”€ BookingForm.test.tsx
        └── index.ts

# Page
/pages/
  └── DashboardPage/
        β”œβ”€β”€ DashboardPage.tsx
        β”œβ”€β”€ DashboardPage.test.tsx
        β”œβ”€β”€ route.ts
        └── layout.tsx

🧠 Agent Behavior Differences

Agent component module page
Component Scaffolder βœ… JSX/TSX + props βœ… Multiple child components βœ… Layout with routing
Test Agent βœ… Unit tests βœ… State & validation tests βœ… Full render + route guards
Docs Agent βœ… Storybook βœ… Storybook + usage docs βœ… Page MDX
CI Agent βœ… Lint/test βœ… + coverage βœ… + visual regression

πŸ“˜ DSL Differences (Example)

Component DSL:

name: UserCard
slots: [avatar, username, footer]

Module DSL:

name: BookingForm
state:
  - bookingDate: Date
  - selectedService: string
validation:
  - required: [bookingDate]

Page DSL:

name: DashboardPage
layout: MainLayout
route: /dashboard
modules:
  - BookingForm
  - UpcomingAppointments

πŸ” Composability

  • Pages include multiple modules
  • Modules include multiple components
  • All can be generated separately or as part of a larger hierarchy

🧩 Prompt Injection Logic

Agents inject "type": "component" or "type": "module" into generation prompts, enabling multi-purpose skill templates.


βœ… Summary

  • The blueprint supports 3 major frontend artifact types:
    • UI components
    • Logical modules
    • Top-level pages
  • Each type affects:
    • File layout
    • Prompt shape
    • Test scope
    • Documentation expectations
  • The type field in the blueprint determines how agents scaffold the full artifact lifecycle

🎨 Styling Integration: CSS, Tailwind, Theme Tokens

This section defines how frontend blueprints handle styling strategies, including support for utility-first CSS frameworks, design tokens, component theming, and scoped CSS management. It ensures every generated artifact is visually consistent, configurable, and brandable.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Styling Field

style:
  engine: tailwind      # or css-modules | scss | tokens
  tokens: true
  responsive: true
  darkMode: supported

🎨 Supported Styling Engines

Engine Description
tailwind Utility-first CSS with JIT and configuration file (tailwind.config.js)
css-modules Locally scoped styles with .module.css or .module.scss
scss Sass-based hierarchical styles with optional global and scoped blocks
tokens Design token-driven styling (e.g., spacing, color, border, typography) via JSON or CSS Variables

🧩 Blueprint β†’ Styles Mapping

UserCard/
β”œβ”€β”€ UserCard.tsx
β”œβ”€β”€ UserCard.styles.ts       ← Tailwind or tokens helpers
β”œβ”€β”€ user-card.module.css     ← If css-modules
β”œβ”€β”€ theme.tokens.json        ← Optional per-token styles

🎯 Design Token Injection

Blueprints with tokens: true trigger agents to reference shared or module-specific design token libraries.

Example:

{
  "fontSize": "var(--font-body-sm)",
  "padding": "var(--spacing-xs)"
}

Injected as:

<div className="p-xs text-sm text-token-body">
  {username}
</div>

βš™οΈ Tailwind Configuration DSL

Blueprints may auto-generate scoped configuration files:

tailwind:
  extend:
    colors:
      primary: '#0060df'
      background: '#f7f8fa'
    spacing:
      xs: '4px'
      sm: '8px'
      md: '16px'

πŸŒ’ Dark Mode Support

Blueprints support dark mode modes:

style:
  darkMode: supported

Agents wrap generated code with:

<div className="bg-white dark:bg-gray-900 text-black dark:text-white">

Or create useDarkModeTokens() helpers.


🧠 Style Agent Responsibilities

Task Output
Inject Tailwind classes .tsx markup scaffolding
Create *.styles.ts files Theme + token wrappers
Inject css-modules or SCSS Based on engine
Apply tokens From shared or module-local palette
Validate theme compliance Token usage and override hooks

🧠 Prompt Context Injection

{
  "style": {
    "engine": "tailwind",
    "tokens": true,
    "responsive": true,
    "darkMode": "supported"
  }
}

This shapes how the generator agent constructs output HTML/JSX/CSS.


πŸ“˜ Docs Snippet (README.md)

## 🎨 Styling

- Styling engine: Tailwind CSS (JIT)
- Design tokens enabled: βœ…
- Responsive and dark mode supported
- Token usage from `theme.tokens.json`

βœ… Summary

  • Blueprints allow rich styling strategy configuration
  • Support multiple styling engines + tokens and themes
  • Auto-wire design systems into generated components
  • Enforce consistency across modules and platforms

🧱 Blueprint Structure and Required Metadata

This section defines the core structure, required fields, and metadata layout for every frontend blueprint. It ensures agents receive a predictable, traceable, and extensible specification that drives code, tests, styles, and documentation.


πŸ“˜ Minimal Valid Blueprint Structure

name: ConnectSoft.UI.UserCard
type: component
framework: react
style:
  engine: tailwind
  tokens: true
slots:
  - avatar
  - username
  - footer

πŸ”– Required Fields

Field Type Required Description
name string βœ… Fully qualified component/module/page name
type string βœ… component, module, or page
framework string βœ… Target UI framework (e.g., react, angular, blazor)
style.engine string βœ… Styling strategy (e.g., tailwind, scss)
slots list βœ… for components Dynamic content placeholders
state object ⛔️ (module only) Local state management blueprint
route string ⛔️ (page only) Routing path for pages

🧩 Optional Metadata Fields

Field Description
tags UI, shared, auth, dashboard (used for doc grouping)
group Logical grouping of related components
description Short human-readable summary
author Blueprint author or originating agent
createdAt ISO timestamp or system-populated
version Starting semantic version (e.g., 1.0.0)
repo Link to Git repo (if external component)
priority Optional generation priority for multi-agent execution plans

πŸ“˜ Metadata Example

metadata:
  tags: [shared, user, profile]
  group: Profile
  description: A card displaying user profile info
  author: ui-designer-agent
  createdAt: 2025-06-07T14:00Z
  version: 1.0.0

🧠 Metadata Use by Agents

Agent Usage
Doc Agent Groups and categorizes docs
Component Agent Names output file/folder structure
Prompt Agent Injects tags, type, and name into generation context
Pipeline Agent Adds build metadata and badges
Observability Agent Tags spans and events with metadata context

πŸ“˜ Internal Normalization Flow

Agents apply enrichment defaults if fields are omitted:

type: component            β†’ default = "component"
style.engine: tailwind    β†’ default = "tailwind"
framework: react          β†’ default = "react"

This ensures minimal blueprints can still execute fully.


πŸ“˜ Validation Example

Invalid blueprint:

type: module
slots: [title]       # ❌ Modules should define state, not slots

Validator Agent Output:

{
  "status": "invalid",
  "errors": [
    "Modules should not define slots. Use `state` instead."
  ]
}

βœ… Summary

  • Blueprint structure is cleanly divided into required and optional metadata
  • Used across prompt generation, validation, grouping, doc rendering, and runtime context
  • Enables modular, traceable, and multi-agent-compatible execution
  • Simplifies onboarding new agents and scaffolding consistent frontend libraries

πŸ“ Folder and File Structure Conventions

This section defines the standardized output layout for all frontend blueprints, including how files are named, grouped, and exported for components, modules, and pages. This structure ensures predictable integration, testability, and reusability.


πŸ“˜ Base Output Folder

name: ConnectSoft.UI.UserCard

This produces a folder under /src/components/UserCard/ (or /src/modules/ or /src/pages/ based on type).


πŸ“ Standard Folder Structure (by Type)

πŸ”Ή Component

/src/components/UserCard/
β”œβ”€β”€ UserCard.tsx
β”œβ”€β”€ UserCard.styles.ts
β”œβ”€β”€ UserCard.test.tsx
β”œβ”€β”€ UserCard.stories.tsx
β”œβ”€β”€ index.ts

πŸ”Ή Module

/src/modules/BookingForm/
β”œβ”€β”€ BookingForm.tsx
β”œβ”€β”€ useBookingForm.ts
β”œβ”€β”€ BookingForm.test.tsx
β”œβ”€β”€ BookingForm.stories.tsx
β”œβ”€β”€ validation.schema.ts
β”œβ”€β”€ index.ts

πŸ”Ή Page

/src/pages/DashboardPage/
β”œβ”€β”€ DashboardPage.tsx
β”œβ”€β”€ DashboardPage.test.tsx
β”œβ”€β”€ DashboardPage.route.ts
β”œβ”€β”€ DashboardPage.layout.tsx
β”œβ”€β”€ index.ts

βœ… All folders include a default index.ts for barrel exports


πŸ“¦ Additional Folder Layers

Purpose Location Example
Global styles /styles/theme.tokens.ts, /styles/base.css
Hooks /hooks/useBooking.ts
i18n /i18n/en/user-card.json, /i18n/es/user-card.json
Types /types/UserCard.types.ts
Docs /docs/components/UserCard.md
Visual tests /tests/visual/UserCard.spec.ts

🧩 File Purpose by Suffix

Suffix Purpose
.tsx Main implementation
.styles.ts Utility + Tailwind + tokens
.test.tsx Unit or functional test
.stories.tsx Storybook story file
.layout.tsx Page layout template (for pages only)
.route.ts Routing definition (pages only)
.schema.ts Optional validation schema
.i18n.json Localized string bundles

πŸ” Blueprint-to-Files Mapping Logic

flowchart TD
    blueprint["πŸ“ frontend-library-blueprint.yaml"]
    --> ComponentAgent
    --> StylesAgent
    --> TestAgent
    --> DocsAgent
    --> Files["UserCard.tsx, UserCard.test.tsx, UserCard.stories.tsx"]
Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

🧠 Agents That Use File Convention

Agent Output
Component Generator .tsx, index.ts
Style Agent .styles.ts, tokens
Test Agent .test.tsx
Documentation Agent .stories.tsx, .md
CI Agent Visual regression tests and coverage mappings

πŸ“˜ Example index.ts Export

export { UserCard } from './UserCard';
export type { UserCardProps } from './UserCard.types';

Used to support clean imports:

import { UserCard } from 'ConnectSoft.UI';

βœ… Summary

  • Standard folder layout ensures consistent agent output
  • Naming conventions drive test discovery, doc rendering, and barrel exports
  • Supports clear boundaries between logic, styles, tests, stories, and schemas
  • Enables seamless usage across Storybook, design systems, CI, and downstream consumers

πŸ”Œ Dependency and UI Toolkit References

This section explains how frontend blueprints declare UI toolkit dependencies, shared libraries, and third-party packages. It enables agent-generated components to seamlessly integrate with design systems, shared UI kits, and external packages like Material UI, Radix UI, or Fluent.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Dependency Field

dependencies:
  uiToolkit: material-ui
  sharedLibraries:
    - ConnectSoft.UI.Base
    - ConnectSoft.Theme.Tokens
  external:
    - react-hook-form
    - zod
    - date-fns

🧩 UI Toolkit Options

Toolkit Description
material-ui Prebuilt MUI components, theming system
radix-ui Low-level primitives with full accessibility
fluent-ui Microsoft Fluent Design components
bootstrap Basic grid and form layout components
tailwind-ui Styled Tailwind component sets
none (default) Pure atomic component generation

πŸ” Agent Behavior with uiToolkit

Toolkit Agent Behavior
material-ui Uses <Button />, <Card />, <ThemeProvider />
radix-ui Composes from primitives with ARIA attributes
fluent-ui Wraps Fluent components, applies Fluent tokens
tailwind-ui Uses Tailwind + pattern presets
none Generates raw components from blueprint DSL + design tokens

πŸ“‚ File Injection Patterns

// With Material UI
import { Button, Typography } from '@mui/material';

export function UserCard() {
  return (
    <Card>
      <Typography>{username}</Typography>
      <Button>Send</Button>
    </Card>
  );
}
// With Radix UI
import * as Avatar from '@radix-ui/react-avatar';

<Avatar.Root>
  <Avatar.Image src="/user.jpg" />
  <Avatar.Fallback>JD</Avatar.Fallback>
</Avatar.Root>

πŸ“¦ sharedLibraries References

Used for:

  • Importing shared UI components (Avatar, Divider, etc.)
  • Composing utilities or themes (useTheme(), spacing())

Agents resolve the shared component blueprint first, then inject usage.


πŸ“˜ Dependency Resolution in Prompts

Agents auto-inject into context:

{
  "uiToolkit": "material-ui",
  "usesThemeProvider": true,
  "sharedLibraries": ["ConnectSoft.UI.Base", "ConnectSoft.Theme.Tokens"]
}

This alters the generation prompt to wrap generated components accordingly.


πŸ“˜ Output: package.json Snippet

{
  "dependencies": {
    "@mui/material": "^5.15.0",
    "react-hook-form": "^7.45.0",
    "zod": "^3.22.2",
    "date-fns": "^2.30.0"
  }
}

Injected by the Dependency Agent based on blueprint.


πŸ“˜ CI/CD Linting for Declared vs Used

$ yarn lint:deps
# βœ… All declared deps are used
# βœ… No undeclared imports

Helps detect stale or missing sharedLibraries and enforces alignment.


βœ… Summary

  • Blueprints declare toolkits, shared modules, and external libraries
  • Agent output adapts scaffolding to match design systems or component kits
  • Supports both composable primitives (Radix) and higher-order libraries (MUI, Fluent)
  • Drives correct file structure, props usage, and dependency declarations
  • Enables consistency and interoperability across frontend platforms

β™Ώ Accessibility (ARIA, WCAG) Compliance Metadata

This section defines how frontend blueprints enforce accessibility (a11y) standards, such as ARIA roles, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.1 compliance. It ensures that every generated UI artifact is inclusive, navigable, and screen-reader friendly by design.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Accessibility Field

accessibility:
  enabled: true
  roles:
    - button
    - region
  keyboardNavigation: true
  labelStrategy: auto
  contrast: enforce
  auditScoreTarget: 90

βœ… Key Metadata Definitions

Field Description
enabled Enables a11y generation features
roles ARIA roles applied to outer or semantic elements
keyboardNavigation Auto-generates keyboard interaction logic
labelStrategy auto (use slot names) or manual (require label DSL)
contrast Enforce minimum color contrast
auditScoreTarget Minimum Lighthouse accessibility score (0–100)

🧠 Generated Output Examples

Button with ARIA:

<button role="button" aria-label="Submit form" onKeyDown={handleKey}>
  Submit
</button>

Keyboard Navigation:

<div tabIndex={0} onKeyDown={handleArrowKeys}>
  <Avatar />
</div>

High-contrast Mode:

.color-text {
  color: var(--text-default);
}

@media (prefers-contrast: more) {
  .color-text {
    color: black;
    background-color: white;
  }
}

πŸ§ͺ A11y Tests Example

Auto-generated by Test Agent:

it('should have correct ARIA role', () => {
  render(<UserCard />);
  const el = screen.getByRole('region');
  expect(el).toBeInTheDocument();
});

🧠 Agents Using Accessibility Metadata

Agent Action
Component Agent Injects roles, aria-labels, keyboard handlers
Test Agent Emits WCAG unit tests
Doc Agent Adds a11y notes in README/stories
A11y Validator Agent Audits Lighthouse accessibility score
Prompt Agent Shapes generation to ensure semantic HTML and navigability

🧩 Blueprint β†’ Audit Flow Diagram

flowchart TD
    blueprint --> A11yGenerator
    A11yGenerator --> A11yValidator
    A11yValidator --> Report["Accessibility Score β‰₯ 90"]
Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

πŸ“˜ README.md Section (Generated)

## β™Ώ Accessibility

- Uses semantic HTML and ARIA roles
- Keyboard navigation enabled
- Contrast meets WCAG AA
- Accessibility score target: 90+

🧠 Prompt Context

{
  "accessibility": {
    "enabled": true,
    "roles": ["button", "region"],
    "keyboardNavigation": true,
    "contrast": "enforce",
    "auditScoreTarget": 90
  }
}

βœ… Summary

  • Accessibility is first-class in all frontend blueprints
  • Metadata drives ARIA injection, keyboard navigation, contrast handling
  • Agents auto-generate a11y-focused tests and validation gates
  • Promotes inclusive, production-grade component generation

🌍 Localization and i18n/i10n Handling

This section defines how frontend blueprints handle internationalization (i18n) and localization (l10n). It ensures every generated UI element is language-ready, region-sensitive, and supports multi-language rendering from day one.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Localization Field

localization:
  enabled: true
  engine: i18next
  defaultLocale: en
  supportedLocales:
    - en
    - es
    - fr
  externalization: auto  # or manual
  fallback: true

🧩 Key Metadata Options

Field Description
enabled Enables localization for all text, labels, messages
engine Library used: i18next, ngx-translate, blazor-loc, etc.
defaultLocale Primary language fallback
supportedLocales List of locales to generate translation files for
externalization auto: agents extract hardcoded strings into JSON
fallback Use default text if no translation exists

πŸ“‚ Output: Locale Files

/i18n/
β”œβ”€β”€ en/
β”‚   └── user-card.json
β”œβ”€β”€ es/
β”‚   └── user-card.json
β”œβ”€β”€ fr/
β”‚   └── user-card.json

Each file includes:

{
  "title": "User Profile",
  "submit": "Submit",
  "cancel": "Cancel"
}

🧠 Component Integration Example (i18next)

import { useTranslation } from 'react-i18next';

export function UserCard() {
  const { t } = useTranslation('user-card');
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>{t('title')}</h2>
      <button>{t('submit')}</button>
    </div>
  );
}

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Action
Component Agent Wraps all user-facing strings with t()
i18n Agent Extracts text β†’ generates *.json bundles
Test Agent Validates fallback and missing key behavior
Localization Agent Syncs shared dictionary across modules/pages
Prompt Agent Converts hardcoded labels into t() tokens in output

πŸ§ͺ Tests for Localization

it('renders translated title in French', () => {
  i18n.changeLanguage('fr');
  render(<UserCard />);
  expect(screen.getByText('Profil Utilisateur')).toBeInTheDocument();
});

πŸ“˜ README.md Auto-Section

## 🌍 Localization

- i18next enabled with auto-externalization
- Supported locales: en, es, fr
- Fallback to default if key missing
- All user-facing strings use `t()` syntax

πŸ” i18n Context in Prompt

{
  "localization": {
    "engine": "i18next",
    "externalization": "auto",
    "defaultLocale": "en",
    "supportedLocales": ["en", "es", "fr"]
  }
}

βœ… Summary

  • Blueprints define localization policy and supported languages
  • Agents generate translation-ready components and i18n files
  • Supports i18next, Angular i18n, or Blazor localization providers
  • Enables robust multilingual UI generation with fallback logic
  • Validated by tests, doc injection, and pipeline checks

βš™οΈ Component Configuration DSLs

This section introduces how frontend blueprints reference or embed Component DSLs (Domain-Specific Languages) to declaratively define a component’s props, slots, events, state, and validation logic. These DSLs act as the blueprint schema drivers for scaffolded UI code, tests, and stories.


πŸ“˜ DSL Reference Field

dsl:
  type: component
  ref: dsl/components/user-card.dsl.yaml

OR inline:

dsl:
  type: component
  inline:
    props:
      avatarUrl: string
      username: string
      isVerified: boolean
    events:
      onClick: void
    slots:
      - avatar
      - footer

🧠 What Component DSLs Enable

Element Effect
props Generates typed props interface or @Input() decorators
slots Renders children or Angular <ng-content>
events Emits callback props or @Output() bindings
state Injects useState() / local signals
validation Adds form validation (Zod, yup, reactive forms)
defaultValues Sets initial props or state defaults

πŸ”Ž DSL-Driven Type Output (React Example)

interface UserCardProps {
  avatarUrl: string;
  username: string;
  isVerified?: boolean;
  onClick?: () => void;
}

Used to scaffold:

export function UserCard({ avatarUrl, username, isVerified, onClick }: UserCardProps) {
  return (
    <div onClick={onClick}>
      <img src={avatarUrl} />
      <h2>{username}</h2>
      {isVerified && <VerifiedBadge />}
    </div>
  );
}

πŸ“˜ Validation DSL Example

validation:
  avatarUrl: required
  username: required
  isVerified: optional

Mapped to:

const schema = z.object({
  avatarUrl: z.string().url(),
  username: z.string().min(1),
});

🧩 DSL for Angular / Blazor

framework: angular
dsl:
  props:
    inputData: string
    isEditable: boolean
  events:
    onSave: CustomEvent

Yields:

@Input() inputData!: string;
@Input() isEditable = false;
@Output() onSave = new EventEmitter<void>();

πŸ“‚ DSL Location Patterns

  • dsl/components/ β†’ for atomic UI elements
  • dsl/modules/ β†’ for forms or logic-heavy UI units
  • dsl/pages/ β†’ for layout and routing blueprints

🧠 Agent Responsibilities with DSLs

Agent Task
Component Agent Reads DSL and scaffolds props/slots/state
Test Agent Generates test data from props + validation rules
Storybook Agent Maps props into argTypes with controls
Docs Agent Injects auto-generated props tables
Schema Validator Verifies DSL structure against component type

πŸ“˜ Prompt Injection Sample

{
  "dsl": {
    "props": {
      "username": "string",
      "isVerified": "boolean"
    },
    "events": {
      "onClick": "void"
    }
  }
}

βœ… Summary

  • Component DSLs define the contract of a frontend artifact declaratively
  • Blueprints reference or embed them to enable precise agent scaffolding
  • Enables consistent generation of props, events, state, validation, and docs
  • Supported across React, Angular, and Blazor ecosystems
  • Fully integrated into testing, storybook, and documentation agents

πŸ§ͺ Test Blueprint: Unit, Snapshot, E2E

This section defines how frontend blueprints specify the testing strategy for generated components, modules, or pages β€” including unit tests, snapshot tests, and end-to-end (E2E) flows. The blueprint acts as a test plan contract for agents to generate the correct coverage, structure, and assertions.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Test Field

test:
  enabled: true
  types:
    - unit
    - snapshot
    - e2e
  coverageThreshold: 85
  scenarios:
    - "renders with minimal props"
    - "responds to click events"
    - "displays avatar and username"

πŸ”Ž Test Types Overview

Type Description
unit Validates logic, rendering, and props behavior
snapshot Captures component render output to detect drift
e2e Runs browser-based tests using Playwright or Cypress for full flow testing

🧠 Test Output File Examples

/tests/components/UserCard.test.tsx         ← unit tests
/tests/components/UserCard.snapshot.tsx     ← snapshots
/tests/e2e/UserCard.spec.ts                 ← Playwright/Cypress

πŸ§ͺ Sample Unit Test Output

test('renders with default props', () => {
  render(<UserCard username="Alice" />);
  expect(screen.getByText('Alice')).toBeInTheDocument();
});

πŸ“Έ Sample Snapshot Test

test('matches snapshot', () => {
  const tree = renderer.create(<UserCard username="Snapshot" />).toJSON();
  expect(tree).toMatchSnapshot();
});

🎯 E2E Test Structure

test('UserCard interaction works', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto('/components/user-card');
  await page.locator('text=Submit').click();
  await expect(page.locator('.confirmation')).toBeVisible();
});

πŸ“˜ README.md Test Section

## πŸ§ͺ Tests

- Unit, Snapshot, and E2E tests auto-generated
- Coverage target: 85%
- Scenarios:
  - renders with minimal props
  - displays avatar and username
  - responds to click events

🧠 Test Agent Responsibilities

Task Output
Scaffold basic render & assertion tests βœ…
Snapshot generation using Jest or equivalent βœ…
Auto-generate E2E flows with input + click simulation βœ…
Enforce coverage thresholds in CI pipelines βœ…
Align tests with DSL-provided props and event logic βœ…

🧠 Prompt Context Example

{
  "test": {
    "types": ["unit", "snapshot", "e2e"],
    "coverageThreshold": 85,
    "scenarios": [
      "renders with minimal props",
      "responds to click events"
    ]
  }
}

βœ… Summary

  • Blueprints define test strategies declaratively
  • Support full test stack: unit, snapshot, and E2E
  • Scenarios guide agent-generated assertions
  • Testing agents scaffold compliant and maintainable tests
  • Blueprint-driven testing ensures coverage from day one

🧠 Agent Roles in Frontend Generation

This section defines the roles of ConnectSoft AI Factory agents involved in the full lifecycle of frontend blueprint execution β€” from DSL parsing to component generation, styling, localization, testing, and publishing.


🧠 Primary Agents Involved

Agent Name Purpose
ComponentScaffolderAgent Generates JSX/TSX, props, slots, and layout based on DSL
StyleAgent Applies Tailwind, SCSS, or design tokens styling
TestAgent Builds unit, snapshot, and E2E tests
LocalizationAgent Extracts strings, builds i18n bundles
DocsAgent Generates README, Storybook, MDX
AccessibilityAgent Injects ARIA roles, keyboard navigation, and WCAG hooks
PipelineAgent Configures CI/CD pipelines for lint/test/deploy
DependencyAgent Resolves npm packages, shared lib refs
PromptShaperAgent Shapes DSL β†’ generation prompt for LLM
ValidatorAgent Ensures blueprint structure and test coverage thresholds
StorybookAgent Creates *.stories.tsx and props tables
VisualRegressionAgent Adds Playwright/Cypress visual tests
FeatureFlagAgent Wraps outputs in feature toggles if enabled

πŸ” Generation Flow with Agents

graph TD
    blueprint["πŸ“˜ frontend-library-blueprint.yaml"]
    dsl["🧩 Component DSL"]
    blueprint --> dsl
    dsl --> prompt[🧠 PromptShaperAgent]
    prompt --> scaffold[πŸ› οΈ ComponentScaffolderAgent]
    scaffold --> test[πŸ§ͺ TestAgent]
    scaffold --> style[🎨 StyleAgent]
    scaffold --> docs[πŸ“š DocsAgent]
    scaffold --> loc[🌍 LocalizationAgent]
    style --> ci[βš™οΈ PipelineAgent]
    test --> ci
    docs --> ci
Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

🎯 Agent Collaboration Summary

Lifecycle Phase Primary Agents
πŸ› οΈ Scaffold Code ComponentScaffolderAgent, StyleAgent
πŸ§ͺ Generate Tests TestAgent, VisualRegressionAgent
β™Ώ Inject Accessibility AccessibilityAgent
🌍 Localization LocalizationAgent
πŸ“¦ Package/Deploy PipelineAgent, DependencyAgent
πŸ“˜ Document UI DocsAgent, StorybookAgent
βœ… Validate ValidatorAgent, Coverage Checker Agent

πŸ”Œ Agent Interop

  • Agents publish blueprint status updates on event bus:

  • ComponentGenerated

  • TestsScaffolded
  • LocalizationBundleReady
  • All events include traceId, blueprintId, and agentId

🧠 Example Interaction Trace

{
  "event": "TestsScaffolded",
  "blueprintId": "ConnectSoft.UI.UserCard",
  "agentId": "TestAgent",
  "traceId": "abc123",
  "outputs": ["/tests/components/UserCard.test.tsx"]
}

πŸ“˜ Agent Prompt Responsibilities

  • Enrich prompts with DSL, styling, localization, and a11y contexts
  • Route blueprint fields to specialized sub-skills (e.g., form logic, list rendering)

βœ… Summary

  • Frontend blueprint execution involves a cooperative agent cluster
  • Each agent handles a modular, observable stage in the lifecycle
  • All agents publish events and trace IDs to ensure orchestrated output
  • Agentic separation ensures maintainability, parallelism, and extensibility

πŸ“Š Observability and Client-Side Telemetry

This section defines how frontend blueprints embed observability hooks, such as telemetry spans, event logging, and performance metrics. This ensures all generated components are production-grade, debuggable, and traceable in real-world usage.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Observability Field

observability:
  enabled: true
  tracing: true
  metrics: true
  events:
    - render
    - click
    - loadComplete
  provider: "@connectsoft/telemetry"

πŸ“¦ What Gets Instrumented?

Event Type Behavior
render Logs a trace span when component mounts
click Logs a custom event on button interactions
loadComplete Marks performance timing when async data is resolved

🧠 Output Code Example (React)

import { useTelemetry } from '@connectsoft/telemetry';

export function UserCard({ username }: Props) {
  const telemetry = useTelemetry();

  useEffect(() => {
    telemetry.trace('UserCard.render');
  }, []);

  return (
    <div onClick={() => telemetry.event('UserCard.click')}>
      <h2>{username}</h2>
    </div>
  );
}

πŸ“˜ Custom Metrics Injection

Blueprints can also define domain-specific metrics:

metrics:
  enabled: true
  values:
    - name: avatarLoadTime
      type: performance
    - name: userCardClicks
      type: counter

Emitted by the agent via:

telemetry.metric('userCardClicks', 1);

πŸ” Performance Timing Snippet

const start = performance.now();
// ... render logic
telemetry.metric('UserCard.RenderTime', performance.now() - start);

πŸ“˜ README.md – Observability Section

## πŸ“Š Observability

- Tracing enabled: `UserCard.render`, `UserCard.click`
- Custom metrics: `avatarLoadTime`, `userCardClicks`
- Events auto-wired to ConnectSoft Telemetry SDK

🧠 Observability Agent Responsibilities

Task Output
Wire telemetry provider usage import { useTelemetry } from ...
Inject tracing spans telemetry.trace(...)
Emit custom metrics telemetry.metric(...)
Define test coverage for event emission expect(telemetry.event).toHaveBeenCalled()
Enable opt-out via observability.enabled: false Scaffold clean variant

πŸ“˜ Prompt Context Example

{
  "observability": {
    "enabled": true,
    "events": ["render", "click"],
    "metrics": [
      { "name": "userCardClicks", "type": "counter" }
    ]
  }
}

βœ… Summary

  • Observability-first design enables traceable, diagnosable UIs
  • Supports custom events, spans, metrics, and performance logs
  • Integrated into all generated components automatically if enabled
  • Agents follow blueprint instructions and inject telemetry accordingly
  • Powered by a pluggable SDK (ConnectSoft or external)

πŸ” Feature Flags and Conditional Rendering

This section explains how frontend blueprints integrate with feature flag systems to support conditional logic, phased rollouts, A/B testing, and canary deployment of components. Agents use blueprint instructions to wrap logic and visuals with toggle checks or client-side experiments.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Feature Flag Field

featureFlags:
  enabled: true
  provider: "@connectsoft/feature-flags"
  flags:
    - name: userCardRedesign
      default: false
      description: Enable redesigned layout with new avatar styling

🧠 Feature Flag Output Example

import { useFeatureFlag } from '@connectsoft/feature-flags';

export function UserCard({ username }: Props) {
  const showRedesign = useFeatureFlag('userCardRedesign');

  return showRedesign ? (
    <div className="rounded shadow bg-slate-100">
      <Avatar size="xl" />
      <h2 className="text-xl">{username}</h2>
    </div>
  ) : (
    <div>
      <Avatar size="md" />
      <span>{username}</span>
    </div>
  );
}

πŸ“¦ Flag Declaration Snippet

If provider = LaunchDarkly, ConfigCat, or ConnectSoft SDK, agents generate required setup files and flag contracts:

export const FEATURE_FLAGS = {
  userCardRedesign: 'userCardRedesign',
};

πŸ“˜ Test Output (Toggle Awareness)

test('renders redesign layout when flag is enabled', () => {
  mockFeatureFlag('userCardRedesign', true);
  render(<UserCard />);
  expect(screen.getByRole('heading')).toHaveTextContent('Alice');
});

🧠 Prompt Context Injection

{
  "featureFlags": {
    "enabled": true,
    "flags": [
      {
        "name": "userCardRedesign",
        "default": false,
        "description": "Enable redesigned layout"
      }
    ]
  }
}

πŸ“˜ README.md Generated Section

## πŸ” Feature Flags

- Controlled by: `@connectsoft/feature-flags`
- Flags defined:
  - `userCardRedesign` β†’ toggles new layout
- All flags injected with `useFeatureFlag()` hook

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Action
Component Agent Wraps UI blocks in if (flag) logic
Test Agent Validates both toggled and default render paths
Pipeline Agent Optionally deploys to separate environments (canary vs stable)
Docs Agent Describes flag behavior in usage docs
FlagAgent Optionally creates flag definitions in external systems

  • Phased rollout of redesigned UI components
  • Dynamic experimentation (A/B/C) per cohort or locale
  • Feature testing during development without risk to all users

βœ… Summary

  • Blueprints support flag-driven rendering logic with SDKs
  • Allows conditional layout, props, or even entire render branches
  • Fully testable and documented in generated output
  • Enables seamless support for ConnectSoft or third-party flag providers

πŸ“š Auto-Generated Documentation (README, Storybook, MDX)

This section defines how frontend blueprints automatically produce developer-facing documentation β€” including usage examples, prop tables, Storybook stories, and markdown READMEs β€” ensuring every generated artifact is self-documenting and discoverable.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Documentation Field

documentation:
  enabled: true
  formats:
    - readme
    - storybook
    - mdx
  includePropsTable: true
  includeUsageExamples: true
  includeAccessibilityNotes: true

πŸ“„ README.md Output Structure

# 🧩 UserCard Component

## πŸ’‘ Description
A reusable profile card component showing avatar and username.

## ✨ Props

| Prop       | Type     | Required | Description |
|------------|----------|----------|-------------|
| `username` | string   | βœ…       | The user’s display name |
| `avatarUrl`| string   | ❌       | Optional image URL |

## πŸ“¦ Usage

```tsx
import { UserCard } from 'ConnectSoft.UI';

<UserCard username="Alice" avatarUrl="/a.jpg" />

β™Ώ Accessibility

  • Uses <button> with ARIA labels
  • Fully keyboard navigable
---

### πŸ“˜ Storybook Generation (Auto)

**Output File:**

```plaintext
/src/components/UserCard/UserCard.stories.tsx

Content Example:

export default {
  title: 'Components/UserCard',
  component: UserCard,
  args: {
    username: 'Demo User',
    avatarUrl: '/user.jpg'
  }
};

export const Default = (args) => <UserCard {...args} />;

πŸ“˜ MDX Documentation (Optional)

/docs/components/UserCard.mdx

Used for rendering in docs sites, with:

  • Props table (auto from DSL)
  • Design rationale
  • Links to design system Figma
  • Feature flag status
  • Accessibility score
  • I18n keys

🧠 Docs Agent Responsibilities

Task Output
Generate README with usage, props, a11y βœ…
Scaffold *.stories.tsx for Storybook βœ…
Create *.mdx docs with metadata blocks βœ…
Inject theme and locale controls in Storybook βœ…
Sync doc URLs with platform docsite structure βœ…

🧠 Prompt Context Injection

{
  "documentation": {
    "formats": ["readme", "storybook", "mdx"],
    "includePropsTable": true,
    "includeUsageExamples": true
  }
}

πŸ” Agent Collaboration Hooks

  • DocsAgent receives enriched DSL + styling info + test coverage
  • Hooks into ComponentGenerated β†’ DocsReady event stream
  • Storybook and MDX files are auto-linked to CI pipeline

βœ… Summary

  • Blueprints define rich doc output preferences for each artifact
  • Docs cover usage, props, accessibility, localization, flags
  • Output includes README.md, *.stories.tsx, and optionally MDX
  • Generated by DocsAgent and injected into platform knowledge base
  • Enables plug-and-play Storybook with controls, themes, and locales

🧩 Slot and Composition Strategies

This section defines how frontend blueprints declare and manage slots, enabling flexible content injection, layout customization, and component composition. Slots allow blueprint-defined components to expose structured regions for consumer-defined content β€” similar to children, ng-content, or RenderFragment.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Slot Field

slots:
  - name: avatar
    required: true
    description: "Slot for user avatar image or initials"
  - name: footer
    required: false
    description: "Optional footer with actions or badges"

🧠 Output for React

type UserCardProps = {
  avatar: React.ReactNode;
  footer?: React.ReactNode;
  username: string;
};

export function UserCard({ avatar, footer, username }: UserCardProps) {
  return (
    <div className="user-card">
      <div className="avatar-slot">{avatar}</div>
      <div className="info">{username}</div>
      {footer && <div className="footer-slot">{footer}</div>}
    </div>
  );
}

🧠 Output for Angular

<ng-content select="[slot=avatar]"></ng-content>
<span>{{ username }}</span>
<ng-content select="[slot=footer]"></ng-content>

Used in consumer like:

<user-card username="Alice">
  <img slot="avatar" src="a.jpg" />
  <span slot="footer">Premium User</span>
</user-card>

πŸ“˜ DSL-Powered Slot Definition

Blueprints can also define slots inside DSL:

dsl:
  slots:
    avatar: required
    footer: optional

🧠 Agents That Use Slot Definitions

Agent Behavior
Component Agent Injects ReactNode or <ng-content> placeholders
Test Agent Verifies rendering behavior when slots are present/missing
Docs Agent Renders slot usage examples and constraints
Storybook Agent Creates multiple stories using different slot fills

πŸ“˜ Generated Story Variants

export const WithFooter = () => (
  <UserCard username="Alice" footer={<span>VIP</span>}>
    <Avatar slot="avatar" />
  </UserCard>
);

πŸ“˜ README.md Slot Section

## 🧩 Slots

| Name   | Required | Description |
|--------|----------|-------------|
| avatar | βœ…        | Main user avatar |
| footer | ❌        | Actions or badges under the card |

🧠 Prompt Context Sample

{
  "slots": [
    { "name": "avatar", "required": true },
    { "name": "footer", "required": false }
  ]
}

  • Works with children in React
  • Converts to RenderFragment in Blazor
  • Supports ng-content select in Angular
  • Enables reusable shell-like layout blocks

βœ… Summary

  • Slots are first-class in blueprint composition logic
  • Declared via blueprint metadata or DSL
  • Enable flexible injection of sub-elements or extensions
  • Used across code, stories, docs, and test generation
  • Promote reusable, composable UI patterns across frameworks

πŸš€ CI/CD: Linting, Previews, and Build Pipelines

This section defines how frontend blueprints automate continuous integration and deployment workflows β€” including linting, test execution, Storybook previews, static builds, and publishing β€” ensuring every UI artifact is pipeline-ready from creation.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint CI/CD Field

cicd:
  enabled: true
  lint: true
  test: true
  storybookPreview: true
  buildArtifacts: true
  publishTo:
    - type: npm
      scope: "@connectsoft/ui"
    - type: storybook
      target: "https://ui.connectsoft.dev"

βš™οΈ Output Pipelines (Azure DevOps Example)

trigger:
  branches:
    include:
      - main

jobs:
  - job: lint
    steps:
      - script: yarn lint

  - job: test
    steps:
      - script: yarn test

  - job: build
    steps:
      - script: yarn build

  - job: storybook
    steps:
      - script: yarn build-storybook
        displayName: "Build Storybook"
      - task: PublishPipelineArtifact@1
        inputs:
          targetPath: storybook-static

πŸ“‚ Artifacts Produced

Artifact Description
dist/UserCard/ Transpiled component
coverage/ Jest or Cypress code coverage
storybook-static/ Static Storybook instance
README.md Linked from docs site
*.test.tsx, *.spec.ts Test logs and snapshot diffs

🧠 Agents That Drive CI/CD Output

Agent Role
PipelineAgent Assembles full azure-pipelines.yml
TestAgent Adds coverage gates
DocsAgent Adds publish-to-Storybook steps
DependencyAgent Adds npm publish step if blueprint type is library
QualityAgent Enforces thresholds (lint/test/coverage)

πŸ” Blueprint to Pipeline Flow

flowchart TD
  blueprint["πŸ“˜ frontend-library-blueprint.yaml"]
  blueprint --> cicd
  cicd --> PipelineAgent
  PipelineAgent --> YAML["azure-pipelines.yml"]
  YAML --> Artifact["dist + docs + storybook + test"]
Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

πŸ“˜ README.md CI Section (Auto-Generated)

## πŸš€ CI/CD

- Lint, Test, and Build enabled
- Storybook deployed to: https://ui.connectsoft.dev
- Artifacts:
  - /dist/UserCard
  - /coverage
  - /storybook-static

πŸ“˜ Prompt Context Sample

{
  "cicd": {
    "lint": true,
    "test": true,
    "storybookPreview": true,
    "publishTo": [
      { "type": "npm", "scope": "@connectsoft/ui" }
    ]
  }
}

πŸ“¦ Example Publishing Targets

Target Type Destination
npm @connectsoft/ui
storybook https://ui.connectsoft.dev
azure-storage Static preview site for marketing / QA
docs-site Push MDX and metadata to ConnectSoft documentation

βœ… Summary

  • CI/CD blueprint section ensures components are pipeline-ready
  • Agents generate azure-pipelines.yml, lint/test/build commands
  • Storybook previews and publishing logic are scaffolded
  • Coverage, build size, and test health are enforced by default
  • Artifacts are versioned, published, and traceable

🧩 Component Composition and Slot Injection

This section describes how frontend blueprints support compositional patterns, enabling one component to wrap, nest, or extend others using slot injection, children hierarchies, or template overrides. This promotes modular reuse, design system enforcement, and agentic UI layering.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Composition Field

composition:
  extends: ConnectSoft.UI.BaseCard
  slots:
    content: Injects detailed content (username, avatar)
    actions: Button group slot for user operations
  template:
    layout: vertical
    border: true

🧠 Composition Strategies

Strategy Description
extends Inherits layout or styling from another component
wraps Embeds the target component as child content
slots Declares where downstream components inject content
template Declares visual structure and styling intent

πŸ“¦ Output (React Example – Composition + Slots)

export function UserCard({ children, actions }: Props) {
  return (
    <BaseCard layout="vertical" border>
      <div className="user-content">{children}</div>
      <div className="user-actions">{actions}</div>
    </BaseCard>
  );
}

Consumer usage:

<UserCard
  actions={<ButtonGroup />}>
  <UserDetails />
</UserCard>

πŸ”— Blueprint Inheritance Chain

extends: ConnectSoft.UI.BaseCard
wraps:
  - ConnectSoft.UI.Avatar
  - ConnectSoft.UI.UserInfo

Agents resolve these dependencies and inline references via:

  • Import statements
  • Slot bindings
  • Component tree structure

🧠 DSL Integration for Composition

dsl:
  slots:
    content: required
    actions: optional
  wraps:
    - Avatar
    - UsernameLabel

πŸ“˜ Storybook Variant for Composition

export const Composed = () => (
  <UserCard
    actions={<div><Button>Edit</Button></div>}
  >
    <Avatar size="lg" />
    <span>Alice</span>
  </UserCard>
);

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Role
Component Agent Reads extends, wraps, and slots to build component tree
Docs Agent Adds composition graph and usage
Test Agent Verifies that injected content renders correctly
PromptShaperAgent Uses composition graph to expand prompts for rendering logic
SlotAgent Maps blueprint-defined slots into proper prop/slot constructs

πŸ“˜ README.md Composition Section

## 🧩 Composition

- Extends: `BaseCard`
- Injects:
  - `children` (user content)
  - `actions` (button area)
- Uses: `Avatar`, `UsernameLabel`

πŸ“˜ Prompt Context Example

{
  "composition": {
    "extends": "ConnectSoft.UI.BaseCard",
    "slots": {
      "content": "required",
      "actions": "optional"
    },
    "wraps": ["Avatar", "UsernameLabel"]
  }
}

βœ… Summary

  • Composition allows components to inherit, extend, or wrap others
  • Enables UI layering, atomic reuse, and slot-based flexibility
  • Agents generate proper imports, slot maps, and rendering hierarchy
  • Storybook and docs reflect composed structure for developer clarity
  • Blueprint-driven composition supports both atomic and complex layouts

⚑ Performance Hints and Lighthouse Rules

This section defines how frontend blueprints encode performance budgets, rendering heuristics, and Lighthouse rules to guide agents in generating fast, optimized, and responsive UI components. These hints shape everything from asset loading to animation behavior.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Performance Field

performance:
  enabled: true
  lighthouseTargetScore: 95
  lazyLoadAssets: true
  debounceInputs: true
  avoidHeavyRerenders: true
  hydrationStrategy: optimized

🎯 Common Performance Targets

Hint Description
lighthouseTargetScore Target score (0–100) in CI Lighthouse runs
lazyLoadAssets Lazy-load images, icons, subcomponents
debounceInputs Add debounce to text fields and filters
avoidHeavyRerenders Use memo, PureComponent, or OnPush
hydrationStrategy Static HTML or optimized SSR compatibility

🧠 Output Examples

Lazy Image Load:

<img loading="lazy" src={avatarUrl} />

Debounced Input:

const [value, setValue] = useState('');
const debouncedValue = useDebounce(value, 300);

React Memoization:

export const UserCard = React.memo(function UserCard(props) { ... });

πŸ“˜ Agent-Generated Lighthouse Audit Step (CI)

- job: lighthouse
  steps:
    - script: |
        npm run build
        npx lighthouse http://localhost:3000 \
          --output=json --output-path=report.json \
          --only-categories=performance \
          --budget-path=./budget.json

budget.json (example):

{
  "resourceSizes": [
    {
      "resourceType": "script",
      "budget": 125
    }
  ]
}

πŸ“˜ README.md Performance Section

## ⚑ Performance

- Target Lighthouse score: β‰₯95
- Lazy load: enabled
- Debounced inputs: enabled
- Memoization: applied

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Task
Component Agent Inserts loading="lazy", React.memo, OnPush
Test Agent Validates render performance heuristics (e.g. debounce timing)
Pipeline Agent Adds Lighthouse performance tests in CI
Docs Agent Outputs expected behavior in docs
PromptShaperAgent Injects performance targets into prompt context

πŸ“˜ Prompt Context Example

{
  "performance": {
    "lighthouseTargetScore": 95,
    "lazyLoadAssets": true,
    "debounceInputs": true,
    "avoidHeavyRerenders": true
  }
}

βœ… Summary

  • Performance hints guide low-latency UI generation from the start
  • Lazy loading, debouncing, and memoization are blueprint-driven
  • Lighthouse audits can be auto-configured in CI pipelines
  • Helps meet ConnectSoft’s observability-first and user-experience-first goals

πŸ“¦ Packaging, Distribution, and Versioning

This section defines how frontend blueprints declare packaging, publishing, and versioning policies β€” enabling generated components and libraries to be shared, published, and consumed across multiple solutions within the ConnectSoft ecosystem or external registries.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Packaging Field

packaging:
  enabled: true
  type: library
  format: esm
  bundler: vite
  outputDir: dist/ui/user-card
  exportType: named
  registry:
    type: npm
    scope: "@connectsoft/ui"
  versioning:
    strategy: semantic
    initialVersion: 0.1.0

πŸ“¦ Supported Options

Field Description
type library (component lib) or bundle (design system export)
format esm, cjs, umd
bundler vite, rollup, tsup, webpack
registry Target NPM registry, GitHub packages, Azure artifacts
versioning semantic, manual, calver

🧠 Output Example (ESM Package)

// dist/ui/user-card/index.js
export { UserCard } from './UserCard';

Package.json:

{
  "name": "@connectsoft/ui-user-card",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "main": "dist/index.js",
  "module": "dist/index.js",
  "exports": {
    ".": "./dist/index.js"
  },
  "types": "dist/index.d.ts"
}

πŸ§ͺ Versioning & Tags

  • semantic: auto-bumped via CI based on changesets or Git history
  • manual: user-defined bump via blueprint revision
  • calver: calendar-based (e.g., 2025.06.01)

πŸ“˜ README.md Packaging Section

## πŸ“¦ Packaging

- Format: `esm` via Vite
- Output: `dist/ui/user-card`
- Registry: `@connectsoft/ui-user-card`
- Version: `0.1.0` (semantic versioning)

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Action
Pipeline Agent Builds bundle via vite, copies dist/
Docs Agent Generates install/use instructions
Versioning Agent Applies 0.1.0 and calculates bumps
PackageAgent Publishes to NPM, GitHub, Azure registry
RegistryAgent Validates name, scope, access permissions

πŸ“˜ Prompt Context Example

{
  "packaging": {
    "type": "library",
    "format": "esm",
    "registry": {
      "type": "npm",
      "scope": "@connectsoft/ui"
    },
    "versioning": {
      "strategy": "semantic",
      "initialVersion": "0.1.0"
    }
  }
}

  • Packaging connects blueprint β†’ artifact delivery
  • Enables inclusion via npm i @connectsoft/ui-user-card
  • Aligns with modular platform design for cross-project reuse

βœ… Summary

  • Blueprints define how generated UI libraries are built, versioned, and published
  • Bundler (e.g., vite) and registry (npm, GitHub, Azure) are configurable
  • Versioning is managed by agents (semantic, manual, calver)
  • Supports ConnectSoft’s plug-and-play, reusable microfrontend strategy

🧾 Docs & UX Documentation Generation

This section focuses on how blueprints automate the generation of user experience documentation, including design intent, behavioral notes, Figma links, and UX decisions. These are in addition to technical READMEs and help developers, designers, and testers understand the β€œwhy” behind the UI.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint UX Documentation Field

uxDocumentation:
  enabled: true
  sections:
    - usageGuidelines
    - doAndDont
    - figmaReference
    - behaviorNotes
    - accessibilityConsiderations
  figmaUrl: "https://www.figma.com/file/abc123/UserCardDesign"

πŸ“„ Output: UX .mdx or Markdown Block

## 🧠 UX Guidelines

This component is intended to display a user’s avatar and name in a compact card layout. Avoid overloading it with detailed profile info.

### βœ… Do
- Use it in profile lists
- Combine with action menus

### ❌ Don’t
- Nest within table cells
- Display inside modals without spacing

### 🎨 Figma Reference
[Figma: User Card Design Spec](https://www.figma.com/file/abc123/UserCardDesign)

### ⚠️ Behavior Notes
- Avatar loads lazily on scroll
- Card has hover and focus states

### β™Ώ Accessibility Considerations
- Keyboard tab order enforced
- ARIA roles and landmarks used

πŸ“˜ README.md Embedded Section (if includeInReadme: true)

## 🧠 UX Guidelines

- Optimized for lists, toolbars, and sidebars
- Avoid nesting in narrow containers
- Reference Figma spec: [link]

πŸ“˜ Figma Agent Collaboration

If figmaUrl is provided:

  • Agent will fetch metadata (component name, tokens, layout notes)
  • Embed links or previews
  • Optionally validate that blueprint matches spec

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Task
DocsAgent Scaffolds UX guidelines section (MDX or .md)
UXNarrativeAgent Translates blueprint logic into plain-English UX rationale
FigmaAgent Pulls or verifies design specs from Figma
DocsFormatterAgent Merges UX content with API docs
StorybookAgent Optionally renders usage tips or UX notes in preview panel

πŸ“˜ Prompt Context Example

{
  "uxDocumentation": {
    "enabled": true,
    "sections": ["usageGuidelines", "behaviorNotes", "figmaReference"],
    "figmaUrl": "https://www.figma.com/file/abc123/UserCardDesign"
  }
}

πŸ“š Benefits

  • Brings UX best practices into generated artifacts
  • Provides context for devs who consume components
  • Enables automated documentation without relying on manual writing
  • Enhances handoff from design to engineering

βœ… Summary

  • UX documentation is first-class in blueprint generation
  • Supports markdown and MDX output, optionally embedded in README or Storybook
  • Pulls metadata from Figma and enriches it with usage rationale
  • Ensures components are not just functional β€” but understandable and usable

πŸ” Drift Detection and Visual Regression Testing

This section defines how frontend blueprints enable visual regression tracking and blueprint drift detection, ensuring that changes to components β€” intentional or accidental β€” are observable, traceable, and testable across commits, environments, or blueprint revisions.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Drift & Visual Regression Field

visualRegression:
  enabled: true
  strategy: storybook-snapshots
  baselineStorage: azure-blob
  diffThreshold: 0.01
  monitoredStates:
    - default
    - hover
    - focused

πŸ–ΌοΈ Output: Snapshot & Diff Storage

File Description
__snapshots__/UserCard.snap.png Baseline image
__snapshots__/UserCard.diff.png Pixel diff overlay
__snapshots__/UserCard.new.png New render for PR comparison

🧠 Output Tooling (Playwright Example)

test('UserCard visual snapshot', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto('/storybook');
  const userCard = page.locator('#user-card-default');
  expect(await userCard.screenshot()).toMatchSnapshot('usercard.png', {
    threshold: 0.01
  });
});

☁️ Cloud-Based Diff Storage

If baselineStorage = azure-blob, agents:

  • Push baseline and diff images to a storage account container
  • Expose public links or markdown embeds for diff PR comments
  • Auto-expire after TTL if configured

πŸ” Drift Detection Blueprint Comparison

If blueprint definition changes (e.g. props, styles, layout):

  • BlueprintDriftAgent computes structural diff
  • Emits BlueprintDriftDetected event with summary
{
  "event": "BlueprintDriftDetected",
  "component": "UserCard",
  "changedFields": ["styles.border", "props.avatarSize"],
  "origin": "commit abc123"
}

πŸ“˜ README.md Snapshot Section (Optional)

## πŸ“Έ Visual Testing

- Snapshots generated for:
  - Default
  - Hover
  - Focused
- Visual diff threshold: 1%

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Task
VisualRegressionAgent Generates snapshots and diffs using Playwright/Cypress
SnapshotPublisherAgent Uploads diffs to blob storage or GitHub PRs
BlueprintDriftAgent Tracks YAML/DSL mutations across commits
TestAgent Validates diff acceptance threshold in CI
DocsAgent Embeds drift info into generated docs if needed

πŸ“˜ Prompt Context Example

{
  "visualRegression": {
    "enabled": true,
    "diffThreshold": 0.01,
    "monitoredStates": ["default", "hover"]
  }
}

πŸ“ˆ Use Cases

  • Prevent regressions after LLM prompt updates
  • Detect unexpected UI shifts during refactoring
  • Enable trust and review for auto-generated components
  • Make visual changes traceable and auditable

βœ… Summary

  • Blueprints enable visual testing and change tracking out of the box
  • Snapshots, diffs, and structural drifts are managed by agents
  • Integration with blob storage or GitHub PRs ensures visibility
  • Reinforces design fidelity and CI confidence

🧠 Blueprint Memory and Traceability Metadata

This section describes how frontend blueprints embed metadata for traceability, long-term memory indexing, and reproducibility. These metadata fields ensure every generated component is traceable to its agent lineage, source DSL, design origin, and factory run context β€” vital for audits, drift handling, reuse, and agentic learning.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Metadata Fields

metadata:
  id: ConnectSoft.UI.UserCard
  version: 0.1.0
  createdBy: ComponentScaffolderAgent
  createdAt: 2025-06-07T13:00:00Z
  originatingRunId: RUN-3421
  designSource:
    figmaUrl: "https://figma.com/file/abc/UserCard"
    designSystemToken: "card.avatar.compact"
  memoryScope: global
  traceTags:
    - frontend
    - profile
    - card
    - interactive

πŸ“¦ Purpose of Each Field

Field Description
id Unique identifier in blueprint registry
version Semantic version or Git SHA of blueprint snapshot
createdBy Which agent generated the blueprint
originatingRunId Factory execution session for trace replay
designSource Link back to design tool or token system
memoryScope global, project, module β€” memory storage context
traceTags Used for search, similarity indexing, prompt enrichment

🧠 Output: Embedded in Artifact Headers

/**
 * Blueprint: ConnectSoft.UI.UserCard
 * Version: 0.1.0
 * Generated By: ComponentScaffolderAgent
 * Source: RUN-3421
 * Tags: [frontend, profile, card]
 */

Also attached as blueprint.meta.json:

{
  "id": "ConnectSoft.UI.UserCard",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "createdBy": "ComponentScaffolderAgent",
  "originatingRunId": "RUN-3421"
}

🧠 Memory and Search Indexing

  • Metadata is embedded in:

  • vector DB (blueprint-memory-graph)

  • file system (.factory-cache)
  • Azure Table/Blob (long-term trace archive)

Agents use these to:

  • Search similar blueprints
  • Detect reuse opportunities
  • Regenerate from blueprint-only snapshots

πŸ” Blueprint Run Trace Events

{
  "event": "BlueprintPublished",
  "blueprintId": "ConnectSoft.UI.UserCard",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "agentId": "DocsAgent",
  "traceId": "abc-trace-20250607"
}

πŸ“˜ README.md Metadata Block (Optional)

## 🧠 Metadata

- Blueprint ID: `ConnectSoft.UI.UserCard`
- Version: `0.1.0`
- Generated by: `ComponentScaffolderAgent`
- Figma: [link]

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Task
MemoryIndexerAgent Stores metadata in factory memory graphs
TraceLoggerAgent Emits BlueprintPublished and ArtifactLinked
DocsAgent Embeds metadata in docs and headers
RegenerationAgent Uses metadata to restore or fork blueprints
AuditAgent Verifies provenance and generation trace logs

βœ… Summary

  • Blueprint metadata provides a structured identity for every UI artifact
  • Enables traceability, versioning, regeneration, and agent coordination
  • Stored across memory systems (vector, blob, table) for long-term use
  • Ensures reproducibility and insight into how each component was created

πŸ“Š Analytics and Feedback Hooks

This section defines how frontend blueprints include support for usage analytics, user feedback hooks, and runtime behavior tracking. These enable ConnectSoft agents to observe real-world component adoption, interaction frequency, and usability outcomes β€” feeding back into future agent decisions and blueprint refinements.


πŸ“˜ Blueprint Analytics Field

analytics:
  enabled: true
  provider: "@connectsoft/analytics"
  events:
    - name: userCardViewed
      trigger: onRender
    - name: userCardClicked
      trigger: onClick
  feedback:
    enabled: true
    type: thumbs
    storage: azure-table

πŸ“Š Event Emission Example (React)

import { useAnalytics } from '@connectsoft/analytics';

const analytics = useAnalytics();

useEffect(() => {
  analytics.track('userCardViewed');
}, []);

return (
  <div onClick={() => analytics.track('userCardClicked')}>
    <Avatar />
    <span>{username}</span>
  </div>
);

🧠 Feedback Button Injection (Optional)

<FeedbackWidget component="UserCard" variant="thumbs" />

Stores:

{
  component: "UserCard",
  feedback: "πŸ‘",
  userId: "anon-9812",
  timestamp: "2025-06-07T14:10:00Z"
}

πŸ“‚ Output: Storage Targets

Type Output
Analytics Azure App Insights, Segment, PostHog
Feedback Azure Table, CosmosDB, file blob
Agent Memory Feedback aggregated into blueprint scoring models

πŸ“˜ README.md Analytics Section

## πŸ“Š Analytics

- Tracks: `userCardViewed`, `userCardClicked`
- Feedback: Thumbs rating (enabled)
- Events published via `@connectsoft/analytics`

πŸ“˜ Prompt Context Example

{
  "analytics": {
    "enabled": true,
    "events": [
      { "name": "userCardViewed", "trigger": "onRender" },
      { "name": "userCardClicked", "trigger": "onClick" }
    ],
    "feedback": {
      "enabled": true,
      "type": "thumbs",
      "storage": "azure-table"
    }
  }
}

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Task
AnalyticsAgent Injects event bindings, initializes tracking client
FeedbackAgent Adds feedback widget and storage logic
TraceLoggerAgent Captures usage + feedback in platform memory
QualityAgent Uses event/failure frequency for blueprint scoring
UXImprovementAgent Analyzes feedback for blueprint evolution suggestions

πŸ“ˆ Use Cases

  • Measure which UI elements get most attention
  • Identify drop-off points or missing states
  • Collect user feedback in a low-friction way
  • Guide agentic UX optimization across factory runs

βœ… Summary

  • Analytics and feedback enhance visibility into real usage
  • Hooks are injected automatically if enabled in the blueprint
  • Feedback is stored and traceable per component or user cohort
  • Reinforces observability-first and continuous-improvement goals

🧩 Final Summary and Blueprint Lifecycle Diagram

This final section consolidates the full scope of a frontend library blueprint and presents the end-to-end lifecycle β€” from DSL and agent prompts to artifact generation, deployment, usage feedback, and memory integration β€” within the AI Software Factory.


βœ… Final Summary: What a Frontend Blueprint Encodes

Area Encoded by Blueprint
πŸ“ Structure Component name, props, slots, layouts
🧠 Behavior Events, feature flags, conditional logic
πŸ§ͺ Quality Test expectations, coverage, a11y rules
πŸ“š Documentation README, Storybook, UX guidelines
πŸš€ CI/CD Pipelines, artifacts, publish rules
πŸ“¦ Packaging Registry metadata, bundling config
πŸ“Š Observability Telemetry hooks, performance rules
🎨 UX Context Figma link, usability rationale
πŸ” Traceability Metadata, run ID, memory scope
🧾 Analytics Runtime feedback, usage metrics

πŸ” Blueprint Lifecycle Diagram

flowchart TD
  subgraph Authoring
    A1[DSL / YAML / Prompt]
    A2[Agent Prompts]
  end

  subgraph Generation
    G1[Component Generator]
    G2[Test Generator]
    G3[Docs Generator]
    G4[CI/CD Pipeline]
    G5[Telemetry Hook Inserter]
    G6[Storybook + MDX Writer]
  end

  subgraph Publishing
    P1[NPM / GitHub / Azure]
    P2[Storybook Deployment]
    P3[README + Metadata Index]
  end

  subgraph Runtime
    R1[Usage + Analytics]
    R2[Feedback Collector]
    R3[Visual Drift Detector]
  end

  subgraph Memory
    M1[Blueprint Trace Store]
    M2[Memory Index (vector + table)]
    M3[Agent Scoring & Evolution]
  end

  A1 --> G1
  A2 --> G1
  G1 --> G2 --> G3 --> G4 --> G5 --> G6 --> P1 & P2 & P3
  P1 --> R1 --> R2
  P3 --> M1
  R2 --> M2
  M2 --> M3
Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

πŸ”— Blueprint Longevity and Reusability

  • Blueprints live across:

  • πŸ”„ Agent retries

  • 🧠 Factory memory graphs
  • πŸ§ͺ Regeneration attempts
  • πŸ“¦ Microfrontend registries

  • Each blueprint:

  • Is reproducible and version-controlled

  • Can be forked by new agents
  • Has traceable memory impact and usage footprint

πŸ“˜ Future Extension Topics

Area Description
🧩 Multi-Framework Targets Generate for React, Angular, Blazor, Vue
πŸ§ͺ Behavioral Testing DSLs Auto-generate Cypress, Playwright
πŸ”§ Custom UI SDK Integration Tailwind, Chakra, Material UI configs
🧠 Active Learning Loops Feed analytics into LLM prompt refinement
🧰 Live Playground Scaffolds Auto-deploy component playgrounds for QA/UX review

🧠 Blueprint = Executable Design Contract

β€œEach frontend blueprint is a modular contract between agents β€” describing not just what to build, but how it behaves, how it performs, and how it evolves.”