Skip to content

🖥️ Frontend Blueprint

🧭 Purpose and Scope of the Frontend Standard Blueprint

🎯 Objective

Define the purpose, scope, and position of the Frontend Standard Blueprint within the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory. It sets the foundation for agent-generated frontend applications aligned with multi-tenant SaaS principles, Clean Architecture, and traceable modular output.

🧠 Why This Blueprint Exists

The Frontend Standard Blueprint enables agents to:

  • Generate full-stack frontend applications, not just UI libraries
  • Support multi-tenant, multi-edition, and multi-role user interfaces
  • Ensure consistent structure, observability, testability, and maintainability
  • Align with backend service contracts, domain models, and features
  • Integrate with Clean DDD-aligned microservices and event-driven systems

It defines a golden path for how frontend portals, consoles, dashboards, and embedded apps are structured, generated, and evolved across industries and tenants.

🧱 What It Covers

This blueprint governs:

  • 🔹 The structure of generated frontend applications (layout, routing, modules)
  • 🔹 The roles of agents involved in frontend generation
  • 🔹 The contracts between backend APIs and UI modules
  • 🔹 The injection of trace metadata, observability, telemetry, and quality signals
  • 🔹 The customization layers per tenant, edition, and deployment

It provides standardization across all AI-generated frontends, including:

Target Type Example Outputs
Admin Portals Internal tenant-facing UIs
Client Dashboards End-user web apps
Embedded Consoles Integratable widgets and SDK-based UIs
Public Sites Auth-free portals with feature flags
Cross-Edition Platforms UI switching per subscription/edition

🧩 Position in the Factory

This blueprint is consumed by the following agents:

Agent Role
Frontend Developer Agent Leads structure and component orchestration
UI Designer Agent Supplies UI mockups, layout contracts, and themes
UX Designer Agent Defines user flows and wireframes
UI Component Library Generator Injects reusable atomic components
DevOps Agent Handles preview builds, linting, CI hooks
Studio Agent Visualizes the final layout and trace graph

📦 Outputs Produced Using This Blueprint

  • A fully structured frontend application, based on a Clean Architecture layout
  • Pages, modules, routes, guards, and layouts tied to traceId, featureId, and edition context
  • Auto-generated test scaffolds, observability hooks, and theming rules
  • Linked documentation artifacts (README, trace metadata, changelog, feature specs)
  • Studio-ready visual tree and module map

📘 Comparison to Other Blueprints

Blueprint Focus
agent-microservice-standard Backend service with Clean Architecture
frontend-library-blueprint Shared component UI library
frontend-standard-blueprint Full frontend application (pages, layout, shell)

✅ Summary

The Frontend Standard Blueprint defines the authoritative, agent-friendly structure for generating modern frontend applications across the ConnectSoft ecosystem.

→ It enables a multi-agent, multi-tenant, and fully traceable frontend experience — scalable to 1000s of editions and UI modules.

🏗️ Target Output – What the Agent Generates

🎯 Objective

Define the expected output structure and deliverables produced when agents generate a frontend solution using this blueprint. This includes the folders, files, routing model, metadata, test artifacts, and rendering outputs.

📦 Output Overview

The agent-generated frontend output is a fully functional, modular frontend application that can be:

  • Executed locally or deployed to preview environments
  • Extended by humans or agents
  • Integrated with APIs, auth providers, and observability layers

🧱 Files and Folders Generated

/frontend/
│
├── apps/
│   └── portal-host/                     # Main application shell
│       ├── app.module.ts               # App entry point
│       ├── app.routes.ts               # Global route registry
│       └── app.component.ts            # Root layout + render zones
│
├── modules/
│   ├── dashboard/                      # Feature module: Dashboard
│   ├── billing/                        # Feature module: Billing
│   └── shared/                         # Shared shell utilities
│
├── components/
│   └── ui/                             # Atomic UI components (imported or generated)
│
├── assets/
│   └── i18n/                           # Localization resources
│
├── styles/
│   └── theme.scss                     # Tenant-based theming layer
│
├── environments/
│   └── environment.prod.ts            # Config per build target
│
├── test/
│   └── e2e/                            # E2E tests per module/page
│
├── docs/
│   ├── blueprint-trace.md              # Traceability injection summary
│   ├── README.md                       # Portal overview
│   └── changelog.md                    # Generated change log

🗺️ Route and Page Structure

Each feature module outputs:

  • A module route entry injected into the global route tree
  • One or more pages bound to paths and guards
  • Optional stepper/wizard flows based on UX wireframes

Example (Angular):

{
  path: 'billing',
  loadChildren: () => import('../modules/billing/billing.module').then(m => m.BillingModule),
  canActivate: [EditionGuard, RoleGuard],
  data: { traceId: 'trace-bill-8012', feature: 'invoicing' }
}

📋 Metadata Injected

Each generated artifact contains trace metadata:

Key Description
traceId Unique trace per agent generation
featureId ID of linked backend feature/module
moduleId Logical module within the app
edition Optional edition/plan this page belongs to
generatedBy Agent ID that produced the page/component

This metadata is embedded in files as comments or frontmatter, and consumed by Studio, copilot, and CI.

🧪 Test Outputs

Each page/module includes:

  • 🧪 Unit test for component/module instantiation
  • 🧪 Snapshot or story if component has visual render
  • 🧪 E2E test for access, load, and navigation flow

These are generated using Cypress, Playwright, BUnit, or Storybook depending on framework.

🎨 Runtime Output

Once built, the output renders a fully functional tenant-aware application, including:

  • Layout shell with routes and pages
  • Auth, theme, locale switchers
  • Dynamically visible content per role or edition
  • Embedded telemetry, logging, and trace markers

✅ Summary

The agent-generated output is a clean, modular, traceable, testable frontend application, delivered with:

  • App shell, routing, layout
  • Feature pages with trace and edition logic
  • Reusable UI components and styles
  • Tests, documentation, metadata, and CI-ready files

→ It is ready to run, inspect, test, and extend — autonomously generated, but human-refactorable.

👥 Agent Roles and Responsibilities

🎯 Objective

Define the multi-agent collaboration model responsible for generating, designing, structuring, testing, and documenting the frontend application. Each agent contributes based on its specialized domain within the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory.

🧠 Core Agents Involved

Agent Responsibility
🧑‍💻 Frontend Developer Agent Leads generation of routing, modules, pages, state, and API bindings
🎨 UI Designer Agent Produces layout contracts, design tokens, and component shape specs
🧪 Test Automation Engineer Agent Generates unit, snapshot, and E2E tests per route/module/component
🧱 UI Component Library Generator Agent Injects reusable atomic components and themes used across pages
🧭 UX Designer Agent Defines navigation flow, input/output UX models, wizards, and error flows
📄 Documentation Writer Agent Generates README.md, blueprint trace docs, metadata, and usage notes
🚀 DevOps Agent Adds build hooks, preview deploy configs, CI/CD validation for trace/test/code
🧑‍🔧 Studio Agent Visualizes the component/module tree and links to generated trace graphs

🔄 Agent Collaboration Flow

flowchart TD
    UX[UX Designer Agent] --> UI[UI Designer Agent]
    UI --> Dev[Frontend Developer Agent]
    Dev --> Lib[UI Component Generator]
    Dev --> Docs[Documentation Writer Agent]
    Dev --> Tests[Test Automation Agent]
    Dev --> CI[DevOps Agent]
    Dev --> Studio[Studio Agent]
Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

Agents operate sequentially and cooperatively, passing signals and embedding trace data between stages.

🧬 Traceability per Agent Output

Artifact Generated By Includes
routes.ts, pages/ Frontend Developer Agent traceId, featureId, role, edition
layout.config.json UI Designer Agent Named zones, slot bindings
component.html, component.ts UI Component Generator Agent Props, style slots, atomic model
README.md, module-trace.md Documentation Writer Agent Blueprint + module metadata
billing.e2e.ts, dashboard.spec.ts Test Automation Agent Guarded access tests, coverage hooks
.github/workflows/deploy.yml DevOps Agent CI validation for lint/build/test/trace

📌 Agent Prompting Model

Each agent uses structured prompts and memory retrieval to generate its output:

  • Frontend Developer Agent uses:

  • Feature structure

  • Auth rules
  • UI layout contracts

  • API surface docs

  • UI Designer Agent uses:

  • Atomic design principles

  • Brand styles and layout grids

  • UX signals from preceding flows

  • Test Agent uses:

  • Feature usage

  • Trace markers
  • Guard conditions

All generated artifacts embed generatedBy metadata for future audit and copilot retrieval.

🧠 Long-Term Memory Injection

All agents embed generated output into memory graphs for future reference by:

  • Other agents (e.g., reuse layout spec)
  • Semantic kernel copilots
  • Studio’s blueprint map

✅ Summary

The frontend standard blueprint is not produced by a single agent, but by an orchestrated team of specialized agents, each contributing:

  • Views, layout, logic
  • Styles, UX flows
  • Tests, trace, and validation

→ Their collaboration creates a complete, testable, modular, and traceable frontend solution — ready for deployment or human refinement.

📥 Input Requirements and Prerequisites

🎯 Objective

Define the minimum inputs required for agent-driven generation of a frontend application using this blueprint. These inputs include business signals, structural metadata, API contracts, and design references necessary to produce a usable and aligned frontend solution.

🧩 Required Inputs for Execution

Input Type Description
featureMap Map of features to implement, with associated featureId, purpose, and scope
routeMap Navigation hierarchy with page-to-path mapping and role/edition visibility
apiSurfaceContracts Typed API specs per feature (OpenAPI, client schema, DTOs, etc.)
authRules Edition-based and role-based access rules
uiLayoutContracts Zones, slots, page layouts, provided by UI Designer Agent
componentLibraryContext What atomic components are already available (shared)
styleTokens Design tokens (typography, colors, spacing, etc.)
localizationSchema Languages supported, structure of translation dictionaries
tenantEditionMatrix Available editions and tenants for conditional logic
targetFramework Angular, Blazor, React, etc.
generationTraceId Unique ID linking to the initiating blueprint context

📋 Example: Feature Map Input

[
  {
    "featureId": "billing-dashboard",
    "title": "Billing Overview",
    "type": "dashboard",
    "requiresAuth": true,
    "visibleForRoles": ["admin", "accounting"],
    "visibleInEditions": ["pro", "enterprise"],
    "route": "/billing"
  }
]

🧠 Source of Input Data

Inputs are sourced from:

Source Supplied By
featureMap, routeMap Business Analyst Agent
uiLayoutContracts UI Designer Agent
authRules, editionMatrix Product Owner Agent
apiContracts System Architect / Backend Agent
styleTokens, branding Branding Agent or predefined
generationTraceId Factory Coordinator Agent

📑 Input Formats Supported

Input Type Format
Features, Routes JSON, YAML, Studio DSL
API Surface OpenAPI, GraphQL, DTO definitions
UI Layouts JSON layout schemas, Mermaid
Style/Token System CSS variables, Tailwind config, JSON
Auth & Roles YAML or embedded in feature map

🧪 Pre-Validation Before Generation

Before frontend generation starts, the Factory validates:

  • Feature → route → edition mappings are consistent
  • Auth rules are assignable and traceable
  • Each feature is linked to a known apiSurfaceContract
  • No orphaned routes or modules
  • UI layout zones match referenced pages

Failure results in agent re-prompt or dependency backfill (via Planner Agent).

🔁 Example Agent Input Flow

1. Product Owner defines features and editions
2. UI Designer defines zones for each feature page
3. Frontend Developer Agent receives combined schema
4. Generator Agent executes output creation with traceId

✅ Summary

Agent-driven frontend generation requires structured input signals, combining:

  • Business rules (features, roles, editions)
  • Design definitions (layout, tokens, localization)
  • Technical specs (API contracts, routes)

→ These inputs enable the frontend blueprint to execute deterministically, traceably, and modularly across tenants, editions, and product scopes.

🧼 Clean Frontend Architecture Principles

🎯 Objective

Define the architectural principles that shape agent-generated frontend applications. These principles ensure separation of concerns, testability, traceability, and alignment with Clean Architecture and modular, event-driven UI design.

🧭 Foundational Principles

Principle Description
Separation of Concerns UI (views) is separated from state, services, and API interactions
Modular Design Features are grouped into self-contained, lazily loaded modules
Atomic UI Composition Components follow Atomic Design: Atom → Molecule → Organism → Template
One-Way Data Flow Inputs flow down, events flow up (observable or event-based)
Dependency Inversion Views depend on interfaces, not implementation of services or clients
Event-Driven UI Internal UI communication uses signals or events, not direct references
Traceability Everywhere Each component, page, and route carries trace metadata

🏛️ Clean Frontend Layer Mapping

Layer Responsibilities Blueprint Output
Presentation Layer Pages, components, UI layout app.component.ts, *.page.tsx
Container Layer Handles state, calls services, passes props dashboard-container.ts
State Layer Local/global state stores (e.g., NgRx, Redux, Signals) billing.store.ts
Service Layer Adapters for backend APIs, injected via DI invoice.service.ts
Contract Layer DTOs, enums, types, client schema definitions types/invoice.dto.ts

🧱 Folder Structure (Angular Example)

/modules/
  billing/
    ├── pages/
    │   └── billing.page.ts
    ├── components/
    │   └── invoice-table.component.ts
    ├── containers/
    │   └── billing-container.ts
    ├── store/
    │   └── billing.state.ts
    ├── services/
    │   └── invoice.service.ts
    └── types/
        └── invoice.dto.ts

🧠 Each artifact carries traceId, featureId, moduleId, and generatedBy annotations.

📐 Design-Time Constraints

The blueprint enforces:

  • Each module has one or more PageComponents
  • Pages delegate logic to ContainerComponents or state
  • API services must use strongly typed DTOs
  • No business logic in presentational components
  • UI events are handled via emitted events or effects

🧩 Event-Driven Interactions

Agents inject a UI messaging layer (signals or events):

// Angular (NgRx/Signals)
billingStore.effect(invoicePaid, () => showSuccessToast('Invoice paid!'))

// Blazor
EventBus.Publish(new InvoicePaidEvent(invoiceId));

🔁 Encouraging indirect coupling, testability, and logging.

🧪 Testability by Layer

Layer Test Type
Component Unit test, snapshot test
Container Integration test with store
State Reducer/effect test
Service Contract/mocking test

Each test file is auto-generated with appropriate trace linkage.

✅ Summary

The Clean Frontend Architecture ensures that agent-generated frontend apps are:

  • Layered, modular, and composable
  • Observable, testable, and edition-aware
  • Fully traceable and maintainable across teams and tenants

→ It provides a scalable and extensible foundation for frontend automation at SaaS scale.

📂 Directory and Module Structure

🎯 Objective

Define the standard folder and module structure produced by the frontend generation agents, ensuring consistency across all applications. This structure supports clean modularization, edition-aware routing, atomic component reuse, and agent traceability.

🗂️ High-Level Folder Layout

/frontend/
├── apps/                     # Application host (shell entry)
│   └── portal-host/
│       ├── app.module.ts
│       ├── app.routes.ts
│       ├── app.component.ts
│       └── layout/
│           └── default-layout.component.ts
│
├── modules/                  # Feature-aligned domain modules
│   ├── dashboard/
│   ├── billing/
│   └── ...
│
├── components/               # Reusable atomic components
│   ├── atoms/
│   ├── molecules/
│   └── organisms/
│
├── services/                 # Shared services across modules
│   └── api/
│       └── billing-api-client.ts
│
├── store/                    # Global state management stores
│   └── user.store.ts
│
├── assets/
│   └── i18n/                 # Localization dictionaries
│
├── styles/
│   └── theme.scss
│
├── environments/            # Build-time configs
│   ├── environment.dev.ts
│   └── environment.prod.ts
│
├── test/                    # E2E and integration tests
│   ├── e2e/
│   └── unit/
│
└── docs/                    # Generated documentation and trace files
    ├── blueprint-trace.md
    ├── module-map.md
    └── README.md

📦 Feature Module Template Structure

Each feature (e.g., billing, dashboard) is structured as:

/modules/billing/
├── pages/                  # Page entrypoints (route-bound)
│   └── billing-page.ts
├── containers/             # Logic-bound smart components
│   └── billing-container.ts
├── components/             # Local, reusable dumb components
│   └── invoice-table.ts
├── store/                  # Feature-specific state store
│   └── billing.store.ts
├── services/               # Adapters to backend APIs or services
│   └── invoice.service.ts
├── types/                  # DTOs and types linked to API
│   └── invoice.dto.ts
└── tests/
    └── billing-page.e2e.ts

🧠 Blueprint Embedding in Structure

Each directory:

  • Has an associated README.md or module-doc.md file

  • Is tagged with:

  • traceId

  • featureId
  • generatedBy
  • role, edition if conditional
  • Links back to the blueprint via file-level metadata

Example in billing-page.ts:

// traceId: trace-ui-bill-2184
// featureId: billing-overview
// generatedBy: frontend-developer-agent

🧩 Page vs Module vs Component

Type Folder Description
Page pages/ Routable component, tied to route + guard
Container containers/ Smart component handling state + behavior
Component components/ Dumb UI unit used inside pages/containers
Module modules/<feature>/ Feature encapsulation unit (lazy-loaded)

🛠️ Automation and Agent Enforcement

The blueprint generation engine enforces:

  • 📁 One module/ per feature
  • 🧭 One page/ per route
  • 🧪 One tests/ folder with E2E/unit templates per module
  • 📄 Auto-injection of doc stubs per folder

✅ Summary

The directory and module structure is strict, traceable, and aligns to Clean Frontend Architecture:

  • Promotes isolation of features and responsibilities
  • Enables lazy loading and tree-shaking
  • Supports edition/role targeting and documentation automation

→ A consistent folder layout makes the system machine-extensible and human-friendly.

🧱 Application Shell and Layout Injection

🎯 Objective

Define the structure and generation of the application shell, including layout injection points, tenant branding, header/footer zones, and how agents compose the final render tree. The shell acts as the backbone of all frontend apps generated by the Factory.

🏗️ What Is the App Shell?

The application shell is the persistent UI wrapper that surrounds all route-bound pages. It is responsible for:

  • Rendering the layout frame (header, sidebar, footer, notifications)
  • Applying tenant-specific branding and themes
  • Hosting navigational controls
  • Executing guards and auth resolution
  • Serving as a layout context injector

🧱 Shell Zones and Layout Contracts

The shell includes named layout zones:

+-----------------------------------------------------+
|        🔹 Header (Zone: header)                      |
+-----------+------------------------------+----------+
|           |                              |          |
| Sidebar   |     🔸 Page Content           | Optional |
| (Zone:    |     (Zone: main)             | Right    |
| sidebar)  |                              | Panel    |
+-----------+------------------------------+----------+
|              🔻 Footer (Zone: footer)               |
+-----------------------------------------------------+

These zones are defined by the UI Designer Agent in layout contracts:

{
  "layoutId": "default-shell",
  "zones": ["header", "sidebar", "main", "footer"],
  "themeBinding": "tenant",
  "responsive": true
}

🧬 Shell Output Generated

/apps/portal-host/
├── app.component.ts       # Root component
├── app.routes.ts          # Route mapping
├── layout/
│   ├── default-layout.component.ts
│   ├── header.component.ts
│   ├── sidebar.component.ts
│   └── footer.component.ts

These files are generated with metadata:

// layoutId: default-shell
// traceId: trace-shell-09213
// generatedBy: ui-designer-agent

🎨 Theme and Branding Injection

The shell binds to the design token system and applies branding via:

  • theme.scss or Tailwind config
  • Dynamic logo, colors, fonts, tenant text
  • Dark mode toggle logic
  • Layout-specific CSS classes

Agents use tenantConfig and editionConfig to resolve theme bindings.

🔐 Auth and Shell Guarding

The shell executes:

  • Global AuthGuard (on first load)
  • Token validation and session restoration
  • Redirection to login or onboarding flows
  • Role/Edition gate logic per section

It provides a guarded layout to child modules and acts as the root provider of auth state.

📌 Studio View: Shell as Tree Root

In ConnectSoft Studio:

  • The app shell is shown as the root node in the module graph
  • Each page is a branch under the layout
  • Metadata is injected into memory for traversal

🧪 Shell Testing

  • Unit tests for render and layout slots
  • E2E test for login, dashboard access, tenant switch
  • Visual regression test (if supported)

✅ Summary

The App Shell is the foundation of all frontend applications. Generated by the agents, it:

  • Hosts layout zones for page rendering
  • Applies tenant-aware themes and guards
  • Provides auth, navigation, and context to pages
  • Links directly to Studio's traceable blueprint view

→ It turns a set of modules into a cohesive, navigable, secure SaaS application.

🧭 Route Definitions and Navigation Models

🎯 Objective

Define how routes are generated, guarded, linked to features, and dynamically resolved by edition, role, and tenant. Routing is a core part of blueprint traceability, dictating what UI is reachable, when, and by whom.

🗺️ Route Configuration Model

Each page is registered in the global route map with:

  • path: URL segment
  • loadChildren or component binding
  • canActivate: role/edition/tenant guard(s)
  • data: traceability and layout hints

Angular Example

{
  path: 'billing',
  loadChildren: () =>
    import('../modules/billing/billing.module').then(m => m.BillingModule),
  canActivate: [AuthGuard, EditionGuard],
  data: {
    traceId: 'trace-ui-billing-2321',
    featureId: 'billing-dashboard',
    layout: 'default-shell',
    visibleForRoles: ['admin', 'accounting'],
    visibleInEditions: ['pro', 'enterprise']
  }
}

🧠 Source of Routes

Routes are generated based on:

Source Provided By
featureMap Product Owner / Business Analyst Agent
navigationTree UX Designer Agent
authRules Product Manager Agent
layoutContracts UI Designer Agent

📌 Route Metadata

Each route embeds:

  • traceId: for Studio/observability
  • featureId: links to backend functionality
  • layout: layout zone or shell
  • visibleForRoles: role-level UI filtering
  • visibleInEditions: edition-specific access gating

🔐 Route Guards and Access

Guards enforce runtime logic before page load:

  • AuthGuard: Is user logged in and token valid?
  • RoleGuard: Does user have one of required roles?
  • EditionGuard: Is the current edition allowed?
  • TenantGuard: Is tenant authorized to use feature?

Each guard is generated from editionMatrix and roleMap.

🧭 Dynamic Navigation Tree

Agents also generate sidebars and menus based on the route config:

[
  {
    title: "Billing",
    icon: "credit-card",
    path: "/billing",
    roles: ["admin"],
    editions: ["pro", "enterprise"]
  }
]

These trees are injected into:

  • Sidebar components
  • Top navigation menus
  • Breadcrumb generators
  • Studio visual UI graphs

🧩 Routing and Lazy Loading

Each route is mapped to a lazy-loaded feature module:

Route Loads
/billing modules/billing/billing.module.ts
/dashboard modules/dashboard/dashboard.module.ts

This enables per-module bundling, edition-based page stripping, and modular UI delivery.

🧪 Route Test Outputs

Each generated route includes:

  • Unit test (guard resolution)
  • E2E test for access, redirect, and UI rendering
  • Metadata assertion test (is traceId present, etc.)

🧱 Route Registration File

Centralized route file (e.g., app.routes.ts) is:

  • Auto-assembled by the generator agent
  • Sorted by order of appearance
  • Fully commented with trace metadata

✅ Summary

The route system connects:

  • Features → Pages → Roles → Editions
  • Guards → Layouts → Metadata

→ It defines what gets rendered to whom, and why — with complete traceability and agent-validated logic.

📄 Page and Module Composition

🎯 Objective

Define how pages and feature modules are structured, generated, and linked to routes, API contracts, and layout zones. This cycle ensures that all UI output is cleanly modularized, traceable, and edition-aware.

📦 What Is a Page?

A page is a routable unit of UI, tied to a specific feature. It includes:

  • A PageComponent for presentation
  • Optional ContainerComponent for state or logic
  • Layout bindings and trace metadata
  • Child components from shared libraries or module-local

Each page is scoped to one or more:

  • Roles (visibleForRoles)
  • Editions (visibleInEditions)
  • Tenants (tenantGuard optional)

🧱 Feature Module Structure

Each feature is generated as a self-contained module:

/modules/billing/
├── billing.module.ts
├── pages/
│   └── billing-page.component.ts
├── containers/
│   └── billing-container.ts
├── components/
│   └── invoice-table.component.ts
├── services/
│   └── invoice.service.ts
├── store/
│   └── billing.state.ts
├── types/
│   └── invoice.dto.ts
└── tests/
    └── billing-page.e2e.ts

This allows lazy loading, tree-shaking, trace-based evaluation, and CI validation.

🔁 Page Composition Model

Each page is composed of:

  1. ContainerComponent
    • Loads data from API/service
    • Manages state/store
    • Passes props to presentational child components
  2. Presentational Component
    • Stateless rendering logic
    • Handles visual representation only
  3. Layout Bindings
    • Injected into shell’s main zone
    • Bound to a named layout (default-shell, blank, wizard)

🧠 Trace Injection per Page

@Component({
  selector: 'app-billing-page',
  templateUrl: './billing-page.component.html'
})
// traceId: trace-ui-billing-page-828
// featureId: billing-overview
// generatedBy: frontend-developer-agent
// layout: default-shell
// visibleForRoles: ['admin']
// visibleInEditions: ['pro', 'enterprise']

Trace tags are used for:

  • Studio visualization
  • Copilot reasoning
  • Build validation
  • Observability spans

🧩 Agent Flow for Module Composition

Business Analyst Agent → defines featureMap
↓
Frontend Developer Agent → creates module + page + container
↓
UI Designer Agent → supplies layout slot bindings
↓
UI Component Generator Agent → injects atomic UI into page

🧪 Test Output per Page

Each page generates:

  • ✅ Unit test for component render
  • ✅ E2E test for route entry + UI checks
  • ✅ Store test if state is present
  • ✅ Snapshot test (optional for supported frameworks)

All tests embed traceId and are CI-enabled.

📘 Page Documentation

Each module includes:

  • module-readme.md for functional overview
  • trace-log.md for agent provenance
  • Optional ux-contract.json or layout-map.mmd

These are used in copilot prompts and Studio mapping.

✅ Summary

Each page is a feature-aligned, testable, traceable unit, embedded in a lazy-loaded module, rendered inside layout zones, and governed by role/edition rules.

→ It enables dynamic UI composition from declarative blueprints and agent contracts — not just static views.

🧩 UI Component Integration

🎯 Objective

Define how UI components are integrated into generated pages and modules. This includes the use of atomic components, dynamic UI injection, traceability, and collaboration with the UI Component Library Generator Agent.

🧱 Types of Components Integrated

Type Description Location
Atomic Reusable UI primitives (e.g., button, input, card) components/atoms/
Molecule Composable units (e.g., form section, data table) components/molecules/
Organism Interactive layout blocks (e.g., dashboard tile, wizard) components/organisms/
Page-local Components created just for a single feature modules/<feature>/components/

These are generated by the UI Component Library Generator Agent, or manually composed via page/container templates.

🔗 Integration in Page Templates

Each generated page includes:

  • A layout-rendering area (<app-page-layout>)
  • Component slots injected by the generator agent
  • Component bindings via prop contracts

Example (Angular):

<app-invoice-summary 
  [invoices]="invoices$ | async"
  [highlightOverdue]="true"
  traceId="trace-comp-invoice-summary-014"
  generatedBy="ui-component-generator-agent"
/>

🧠 Component Trace Metadata

Each component used in a page includes:

  • traceId: Unique ID for Studio/observability
  • featureId: If it's part of a feature flow
  • generatedBy: Source agent ID
  • styleScope: Atomic, themed, or tenant-scoped
  • isReusable: Indicates reuse potential

Injected via decorators or HTML comments depending on framework.

🧪 Component Test Scaffolds

Generated components include:

  • Unit tests for inputs/outputs
  • Snapshot test (if renderable)
  • Accessibility test (optional)
  • Usage examples for Storybook or local sandbox

Test files are named and grouped per blueprint structure.

🧰 Prop and Slot Contracts

Component integration is contract-driven. Prop types and event outputs are generated based on:

  • DTOs from backend
  • UX contract definitions
  • Layout zone bindings

This contract is used to validate component placement during generation.

🎨 Theming and Edition-Aware Variants

Component variants may be injected based on:

  • Edition (e.g., plan === 'enterprise')
  • Role (e.g., admin vs viewer)
  • Tenant theming (colors, icons, labels)

Agents reference tenantEditionMatrix and designTokens.

🔁 Reusability Signals

Components are tagged with:

  • reusable: true|false
  • editionScoped: true|false
  • featureScoped: true|false

These affect where they are stored, tested, and how they evolve.

👁️ Studio Visualization

In ConnectSoft Studio:

  • Each component becomes a node on the UI tree
  • Clicking it shows props, traceId, feature links, and tests
  • Reuse graphs and snapshot diffs are visualized per tenant/edition

✅ Summary

UI components are traceable, reusable, composable units that align with:

  • Atomic design
  • Test-driven generation
  • Tenant/edition-aware rendering
  • Full blueprint observability

→ They enable agents to render entire UIs from structured contracts and visual intent, with no hard-coded views.

🌐 API Client Adapters and HTTP Layer

🎯 Objective

Define how frontend modules interact with backend services using typed, traceable, edition-aware API clients. This ensures alignment with Clean Architecture, contract integrity, testability, and agent-driven extensibility.

🔗 API Layer Responsibilities

The API adapter layer enables frontend pages and containers to:

  • Fetch or mutate backend data
  • Handle tenant/session tokens
  • Manage retry, caching, error fallback
  • Emit trace and observability metadata
  • Adapt OpenAPI/GraphQL contracts to UI models

🛠️ Structure of API Adapters

Each feature module includes an injectable API adapter:

/modules/billing/services/
└── invoice.service.ts

@Injectable()
export class InvoiceService {
  constructor(private http: HttpClient) {}

  getInvoices(): Observable<InvoiceDto[]> {
    return this.http.get<InvoiceDto[]>('/api/billing/invoices', {
      headers: {
        'X-Tenant': currentTenantId(),
        'X-TraceId': 'trace-api-invoice-8129'
      }
    });
  }
}

🧩 Client Generation Options

Agents use one of the following strategies:

Source Type Strategy
OpenAPI Use @openapitools/openapi-generator or NSwag for typed client code
GraphQL Use GraphQL Code Generator with hooks/adapters
REST DTOs Use custom template with HttpClient, typed DTOs, interceptors

All outputs are wrapped in blueprint-aligned service classes, scoped per feature/module.

📌 Trace Injection Per Call

Every API method includes injected trace metadata:

headers: {
  'X-TraceId': 'trace-ui-call-4491',
  'X-Feature': 'invoice-dashboard',
  'X-Edition': 'enterprise'
}

These are used in:

  • Observability (OpenTelemetry, Application Insights)
  • Request inspection via DevTools or Studio
  • Debug and performance traceability

🧠 Agent-Centric API Client Contracts

The Frontend Developer Agent queries:

  • API contract registry (OpenAPI/GraphQL)
  • DTO definitions (invoice.dto.ts)
  • Auth scopes and route guards (authRules)
  • Edition access matrix for endpoints

This produces:

  • Service classes
  • Injection contracts
  • Store effects (if used)

🧪 API Client Test Output

Each adapter includes:

  • ✅ Interface-level unit tests (mocks or spies)
  • ✅ Integration test with mock server (WireMock/MockServiceWorker)
  • ✅ Error fallback test for 4xx/5xx codes
  • ✅ Trace presence validation

🔐 Auth & Session Handling

All clients include session token resolution via:

  • Auth token injected via interceptor
  • Tenant ID via current session
  • Optional API versioning headers

Security headers are generated dynamically via the Auth State Agent or session service.

📘 Client Adapter Metadata

// generatedBy: frontend-developer-agent
// apiSource: openapi:/billing.yaml
// traceId: trace-api-adapter-2219
// featureId: billing

✅ Summary

The API layer ensures agent-generated frontend modules:

  • Communicate via typed, secure, edition-aware clients
  • Include full traceability and observability metadata
  • Align with backend specs and UI module boundaries

→ This enables testable, observable, maintainable frontend-service communication — fully automated by agents.

🔐 Auth, Guard, and Role-Based View Logic

🎯 Objective

Define how agent-generated frontend apps implement authentication, authorization, and dynamic view logic based on user role, tenant, and edition. This ensures secure access control across UI routes, modules, and components.

🛡️ Authentication Support

Frontend apps integrate with OpenID Connect or OAuth2-based identity providers. Each agent-generated shell includes:

  • 🔑 Login redirect & token exchange
  • 🪪 Session restoration on refresh
  • 🚫 Access denial UI (401, 403, expired session)
  • 🔄 Token renewal handling

Generated files:

/apps/portal-host/
├── auth/
│   ├── auth.guard.ts
│   ├── auth.service.ts
│   ├── token.interceptor.ts
│   └── login-callback.component.ts

✅ Guard Types Injected

Guard Purpose Used In
AuthGuard Validates access token & session Global & route-level
RoleGuard Checks user role against visibleForRoles route field Feature routes
EditionGuard Verifies edition access from visibleInEditions route data Pages, modules
TenantGuard (Optional) Ensures tenant-level feature availability High-tier features

Each guard is generated and injected by the Frontend Developer Agent, informed by featureMap, authRules, and tenantEditionMatrix.

🧠 Route Metadata Usage

Example:

{
  path: 'admin/users',
  canActivate: [AuthGuard, RoleGuard],
  data: {
    traceId: 'trace-admin-user-guard-3021',
    visibleForRoles: ['admin', 'superuser'],
    visibleInEditions: ['enterprise']
  }
}

Guards read data.visibleForRoles and data.visibleInEditions at runtime to dynamically enforce access.

🎭 Role-Based UI Logic

Views adapt to roles using structural bindings:

<app-user-management *ngIf="auth.hasRole('admin')"></app-user-management>
<app-readonly-view *ngIf="auth.hasRole('viewer')"></app-readonly-view>

Agents generate these blocks in page templates, guided by UX signals and feature requirements.

🧩 Edition-Aware Conditional Rendering

Agents inject edition-specific UI blocks:

<app-advanced-analytics *ngIf="editionService.isEdition('pro')"></app-advanced-analytics>

These are automatically embedded by the Page Generator Agent based on visibleInEditions tags.

🔄 Edition and Role Switchers (Optional)

For Studio, QA, or demo environments, agents optionally include:

  • 🌐 Edition dropdown to preview UI variants
  • 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Role switcher for dynamic permission testing

These are excluded in production builds.

📁 Generated Tests for Guards

Test Type Scenario
Guard Unit Test Simulates role/edition mismatch and expected redirect
Route E2E Test Login + route + assertion on guarded content
Trace Test Ensures guard contains traceId, logs appropriately

📘 Metadata for Auth Artifacts

All guards, conditionals, and role-based elements are tagged:

// generatedBy: frontend-developer-agent
// traceId: trace-guard-users-admin-0023
// scope: edition='enterprise', role='admin'

✅ Summary

Auth, guards, and role logic in the blueprint:

  • Ensure secure, edition-aware, and role-appropriate UI access
  • Support automated generation of guards, templates, and tests
  • Feed trace data into Studio and observability layers

→ They guarantee that each UI module is only visible to the correct actor — verified both at runtime and via tests.

🗃️ State Management Patterns

🎯 Objective

Establish how frontend agents manage UI state, both locally and globally, using structured, testable, and traceable patterns. State is separated from views and services, aligning with Clean Architecture and supporting edition-aware UI behavior.

🧠 Types of State

Type Description Scope
Local State Temporary values within a page/component Page or feature module
Global State Shared auth, tenant, user profile, layout preferences App-wide
Remote State Data loaded from APIs and stored in observable form Per module or global
Derived State Computed values (e.g., totals, filters, edition flags) Reactive projections

🧱 State Architecture Layers

Layer Purpose Example File
Store Manages data, emits observables billing.store.ts
Selectors Read-only derived values for views billing.selectors.ts
Effects Connect state to APIs and user events billing.effects.ts
Actions Describe state transitions billing.actions.ts
Services Wrap API calls and trigger store updates invoice.service.ts

💡 All stores are generated with observability and trace metadata.

🔄 Framework Support Options

Framework Tool/Pattern
Angular Signals API, NgRx (optional)
React Zustand, Redux Toolkit, Context
Blazor Fluxor or ObservableObjects

Agents select based on targetFramework input.

🧩 Signal-Based Store Example (Angular Signals)

export const billingState = signal({
  invoices: [] as Invoice[],
  selectedInvoiceId: null
});

export const totalDue = computed(() =>
  billingState().invoices.reduce((acc, x) => acc + x.amountDue, 0)
);

This is used in:

<app-total-banner [total]="totalDue()"></app-total-banner>

🧠 Agent Memory in State Management

State slices are auto-bound to:

  • DTOs from API clients
  • UX contracts from wireframes
  • UI slots from layout maps

The Frontend Developer Agent and UX Designer Agent collaborate to define what is stored, derived, or reactive.

🧪 Tests for State Artifacts

Artifact Test Type
store.ts State transitions, defaults
effects.ts API-to-store reaction tests
selectors.ts Derived value integrity
actions.ts Dispatch/output consistency

Test output is traceable via:

// traceId: trace-store-billing-8231
// generatedBy: frontend-developer-agent

📘 State Docs

Each store includes:

  • store-overview.md
  • state-diagram.mmd
  • selector-map.json

These docs are embedded into the Studio visual state graph, allowing navigation from modules → state → UI.

✅ Summary

State management in the frontend blueprint is:

  • Modular, observable, and testable
  • Aligned with Clean Architecture principles
  • Automatically linked to API contracts and UX flows
  • Traceable from store to view to service to test

→ It gives agents a controlled memory model for rendering dynamic, real-time, and edition-aware experiences.

📊 Observability and Telemetry Injection

🎯 Objective

Define how frontend agents embed observability hooks into the generated UI, enabling real-time tracing, diagnostics, performance metrics, and feature-level insight across tenants and editions.

🧩 Observability Components Generated

Component Purpose
TraceService Captures traceId spans and propagates them to backend
UserTelemetryService Tracks user behavior, feature usage, edition access
ErrorHandlerService Logs frontend exceptions with context
PerformanceTracker Measures load time, UI paint, and API timing

Generated in:

/apps/portal-host/observability/
├── trace.service.ts
├── telemetry.service.ts
├── error-handler.service.ts
└── perf-tracker.service.ts

🧠 Agent Metadata Injection

Each page, route, and component embeds:

// traceId: trace-ui-dashboard-2398
// featureId: dashboard-view
// edition: enterprise
// generatedBy: frontend-developer-agent

This is surfaced to:

  • 🧭 Studio observability graph
  • 📈 Performance dashboards (Grafana, Azure Insights)
  • 🧪 E2E test validation
  • 🤖 LLM prompt context (via context-aware copilots)

🔍 Event Types Tracked

Event Category Examples
Navigation Page entered, route rejected, breadcrumb path
Action Button clicks, form submissions, dropdown changes
State Change Store updates, toggle switches, modals shown/hidden
API Metrics Start/stop, latency, error per endpoint
Edition Behavior Hidden component count, gated access attempts

These events are injected as part of TraceService.logEvent(...).

🔄 Span and Trace Linkage

All observable events are linked to:

  • traceId (blueprint or request level)
  • featureId (per functional module)
  • userId, tenantId, sessionId
  • role, edition, locale

This creates cross-stack distributed traces from frontend → backend → message queue → DB.

🧪 Observability Tests

Agents generate:

  • Unit test: assert that TraceService fires expected event
  • E2E test: simulate user click and verify trace is captured
  • Mock test: ensure telemetry can be stubbed in test environments

🎯 Real-Time Telemetry View in Studio

Frontend agents output metadata used to generate:

  • Heatmaps (UI usage)
  • Edition impact graphs
  • Unused feature flags per tenant
  • Observability dashboards

These are rendered in ConnectSoft Studio via blueprint trace overlays.

📦 Output Artifacts

File Description
trace.service.ts Manages trace lifecycle and metadata
telemetry.config.json Feature-level toggle rules
studio-frontend-span-map.json Frontend observability trace layout for Studio

✅ Summary

Observability in frontend blueprints is deeply agent-integrated:

  • Every interaction is traceable and mapped to edition/role
  • Event telemetry, errors, and spans are standardized
  • Data flows into CI, Studio, dashboards, and LLM copilots

→ It turns every agent-generated page into a diagnostic-aware, testable, intelligent UI node.

🌍 Localization and Multi-Language Strategy

🎯 Objective

Define how agent-generated frontends support multi-language localization, translation workflows, edition-specific language restrictions, and runtime locale switching. This ensures every UI artifact can serve a global, multi-tenant SaaS audience.

🗺️ Localization Scope

Scope Examples
Static UI Texts Labels, headings, menu items, tooltips
Dynamic Data Labels Field names, enums, dropdowns
Error Messages Form errors, server errors, toast text
Content Blocks Rich text sections, markdown help
Metadata Injection Document titles, aria-label, etc.

All localized content is tied to locale-aware trace metadata and edition rules when needed.

📁 File & Folder Structure

/assets/i18n/
├── en.json
├── es.json
├── fr.json
└── ru.json

Each file includes flat or nested key-value pairs:

{
  "dashboard.title": "Billing Dashboard",
  "invoice.status.paid": "Paid",
  "error.required": "This field is required"
}

🌐 Locale Switching Support

Each app includes:

  • Language selector dropdown (flag + label)
  • LocaleService (provided by agent)
  • URL or cookie-based locale preference
  • Optional browser auto-detection fallback

The shell template includes:

<app-language-switcher [supported]="['en', 'es', 'fr']"></app-language-switcher>

🧠 Agent Generation Workflow

Agent Responsibility
UX Designer Agent Identifies localized vs non-localized zones
Frontend Developer Agent Injects i18n keys and pipe usage
Documentation Writer Agent Writes translation notes and fallback specs
Localization Agent Generates translation file skeletons, diffs

🔁 i18n Binding Examples

Angular:

<h1>{{ 'dashboard.title' | translate }}</h1>

React:

<h1>{t('dashboard.title')}</h1>

Blazor:

@localizer["dashboard.title"]

All agents inject consistent i18n key paths during component and page generation.

🌍 Edition and Tenant-Aware Localization

Tenants and editions may restrict available locales:

"editionLocales": {
  "basic": ["en"],
  "enterprise": ["en", "es", "fr", "ru"]
}

The generated LocaleService reads this matrix and disables unsupported options in the UI.

🧪 Localization Test Generation

Agents create:

  • ✅ Missing key detection tests
  • ✅ Locale fallback verification
  • ✅ Language toggle E2E test
  • ✅ Language-specific snapshot test (optional)

These validate that translation keys exist and display correctly across the supported matrix.

📘 Translation Docs and Indexes

Generated:

  • translation-missing.md: Agent-detected gaps
  • localization-coverage.json: Percentage per locale
  • studio-locale-map.mmd: Visual overlay of i18n zones

Used by Studio to guide translation QA and tenant onboarding.

✅ Summary

Localization in the blueprint is:

  • Fully traceable and key-driven
  • Integrated into agent workflows
  • Compatible with editions, tenants, and Studio views
  • Automatically tested, indexed, and documented

→ It enables the Factory to generate globally ready, edition-aware UIs — multilingual from the first render.

📝 Form Handling and Validation Contracts

🎯 Objective

Define how agent-generated frontend applications manage forms, including field generation, validation rules, error messaging, traceability, and edition-aware dynamic behavior.

🔧 Form Generation Model

Each form is built using:

  • form-schema.json (contract from UX or backend)
  • dto.ts types (OpenAPI, backend-generated)
  • validationRules (inline or linked)
  • role and edition bindings for conditional fields

Agents synthesize all of the above to generate fully typed, localized, traceable forms.

🧱 Generated Folder Structure

/modules/user-profile/
├── forms/
│   └── user-form.component.ts
│   └── user-form.schema.json
│   └── user-form.validation.ts
│   └── user-form.messages.json

🧩 Field Definition Schema (Example)

{
  "fields": [
    {
      "name": "firstName",
      "type": "text",
      "label": "user.firstName",
      "required": true,
      "visibleForRoles": ["admin", "user"],
      "visibleInEditions": ["pro", "enterprise"]
    },
    {
      "name": "email",
      "type": "email",
      "validators": ["required", "email"]
    }
  ]
}

🧪 Validation Contracts

Validator Type Source
required, email, minLength Built-in
matches, customAsync Provided by agents or backend
Role/edition conditions From featureMap, authRules

Validation is defined in .validation.ts and linked to messages:

validators: [
  required(),
  matchesRegex(/^[A-Za-z]+$/, 'error.onlyLetters')
]

📢 Error Messaging Strategy

  • Keys linked to i18n (e.g., "error.emailInvalid")
  • Messages localizable via messages.json
  • Shown as inline errors or toast notifications
  • Agent-curated messageMap per form

🧠 Dynamic Behavior via Metadata

Agents embed dynamic conditions:

<app-phone-field *ngIf="editionService.isEdition('enterprise')"></app-phone-field>

Or:

this.form.get('taxId')?.disableIf(!auth.hasRole('admin'));

✅ Form State & Submission Hooks

Forms support:

  • Dirty/pristine tracking
  • Step-by-step wizard layout (if applicable)
  • Pre-submit validation
  • Async backend validation (e.g., email exists)

Submission result triggers TraceService.logEvent(...).

🔁 Reusability and Modularity

Reusable fields/components:

/components/atoms/
├── input-text.component.ts
├── input-select.component.ts
├── input-date.component.ts

Agents pull from these automatically unless custom component is required.

🧪 Form Test Generation

Each form includes:

  • ✅ Required field validation test
  • ✅ Role/edition conditional logic test
  • ✅ Error message coverage test
  • ✅ Submit success/failure simulation

All tests tagged with traceId and mapped in Studio.

📘 Output Artifacts

Artifact Purpose
form.schema.json Declarative form structure
form.validation.ts Central rule definition
form.messages.json Localized validation messages
form.test.ts Field behavior tests
form.metadata.json Trace and edition guard logic

✅ Summary

Agent-generated forms are:

  • Declarative, traceable, and edition-aware
  • Fully validated with localized messages
  • Testable and integrated into observability
  • Dynamically adjusted per user role and tenant

→ They allow the Factory to generate consistent, intelligent, and secure input workflows across all applications.

🧪 UI Test Generation and Validation Strategy

🎯 Objective

Define how frontend agents automatically generate unit, integration, and end-to-end tests for each UI artifact, ensuring full test coverage, CI compatibility, and traceable validation for all generated features.

🧬 Test Types and Layers

Layer Test Type Scope
Component Unit, Snapshot Inputs/outputs, rendering, events
Container Integration Store, API bindings, logic
Page E2E Full user flows, layout, behavior
Store Reducer, Effect State transitions, API triggers
API Client Integration, Retry HTTP success/failure, fallback
Form Validation, Interaction Field logic, error feedback
Guard Access, Redirection Role/edition enforcement

🧠 Agent-Driven Test Generation Model

Agent Test Responsibility
Frontend Developer Agent Generates component, store, and API adapter tests
UI Component Generator Generates atom/molecule snapshots and usage tests
QA Engineer Agent Writes E2E test flows and user story validations
Test Automation Agent Maps test to features, editions, and routes

📁 Folder Structure for Tests

/tests/
├── unit/
│   └── billing/
│       └── billing-page.component.spec.ts
├── e2e/
│   └── billing/
│       └── billing.feature.ts
├── snapshots/
│   └── atoms/
│       └── input-text.snap.ts

Each test is grouped by module and linked via traceId.

🧩 Test Trace Metadata Injection

// traceId: trace-test-billing-0019
// featureId: billing-dashboard
// generatedBy: qa-engineer-agent
// coversRoute: /billing

Used in:

  • ✅ Studio feature coverage maps
  • ✅ CI coverage metrics
  • ✅ LLM reasoning (copilot can suggest missing tests)

🧪 Test Examples

  • Component Unit Test:
it('should render invoice table with data', () => {
  component.invoices = mockInvoices;
  fixture.detectChanges();
  expect(component.el.querySelectorAll('tr').length).toBe(5);
});
  • E2E Test (SpecFlow / Cypress / Playwright):
Feature: Billing Page Access
  Scenario: Admin accesses billing
    Given I login as "admin"
    When I navigate to "/billing"
    Then I should see "Invoices"

🔁 Edition-Aware Test Logic

Tests dynamically check for edition-gated features:

if (editionService.isEdition('enterprise')) {
  expect(component.hasAdvancedFeatures()).toBeTrue();
}

E2E tests verify gated buttons, hidden components, and redirect behavior per edition matrix.

🧪 CI Integration

All tests are:

  • Auto-registered in test manifest
  • Executable via CLI pipelines
  • Mapped to trace coverage reports

Agents update test-matrix.json for each feature with pass/fail expectations.

📘 Test Artifacts Output

File Purpose
*.spec.ts Unit/integration test
*.feature.ts or .e2e.ts Full route test
test-metadata.json Feature/test coverage trace
snapshot/*.snap.ts Visual test baseline

✅ Summary

Agent-generated frontend tests provide:

  • High test coverage at every layer
  • Traceable, feature-aligned validation
  • CI-friendly execution and result tracking
  • Edition, role, and tenant-aware assertions

→ They transform every UI module into a self-validating, trace-complete, production-grade artifact.

🧱 Layouts, Slots, and Responsive Design Contracts

🎯 Objective

Define how agent-generated frontends implement structured layout systems, responsive behavior, and layout slot contracts that support edition-based, role-based, and device-based rendering patterns.

🧩 What Is a Layout?

A layout is a visual and structural container that wraps around page content, providing consistent UI zones like:

  • header
  • sidebar
  • main content
  • footer
  • notifications / quick actions
  • right drawer (optional)

Layouts act as containers for dynamically injected pages, and are selected based on edition, route, or UX intent.

🗂️ Layout Folder Structure

/apps/portal-host/layout/
├── default-layout.component.ts
├── wizard-layout.component.ts
├── blank-layout.component.ts
├── header.component.ts
├── sidebar.component.ts
├── footer.component.ts

Each layout is generated with metadata:

// layoutId: default-shell
// generatedBy: ui-designer-agent
// traceId: trace-layout-default-3821

🎛️ Layout Slot Contract

Each layout defines named slots:

{
  "layoutId": "default-layout",
  "slots": ["header", "sidebar", "main", "footer"],
  "responsive": true,
  "themeBinding": "tenant"
}

The UI Designer Agent declares these slots. The Frontend Developer Agent binds components into them via composition.

📐 Responsive Design Patterns

Layouts adapt to:

Viewport Behavior
Desktop Full sidebar, header, footer visible
Tablet Collapsible sidebar, stacked layout
Mobile Drawer-based nav, minimal top bar

Implemented via:

  • CSS grid / flex layout
  • Tailwind / SCSS breakpoints
  • @media queries or framework-specific APIs

Agents embed responsive classes directly from UX specs.

🧠 Edition and Role-Aware Layouts

Some layouts are edition-specific:

  • wizard-layout: Only for onboarding flows in enterprise plans
  • blank-layout: For authentication or public views

Slots may be dynamically shown/hidden:

<app-sidebar *ngIf="auth.hasRole('admin')"></app-sidebar>

🧪 Layout Testing

Each layout includes:

  • ✅ Unit test for layout rendering
  • ✅ Slot injection test for each zone
  • ✅ Responsive viewport simulation test
  • ✅ Edition role toggle test

All outputs include trace and layoutId metadata.

🧩 Studio Visualization of Layout Graphs

Layouts are nodes in the UI Blueprint Graph:

  • Clicking on a layout shows its slot structure
  • Pages linked to a layout are visually nested
  • Tests and observability hooks are displayed per zone

This allows drag-and-drop UI insight into layout composition and customization.

📘 Output Artifacts

Artifact Description
layout.component.ts Render contract + slot injector
layout.schema.json Slot metadata and layout rules
layout.test.ts Test coverage for responsive behavior
layout-map.mmd Mermaid diagram of layout slot topology

✅ Summary

The layout system in the frontend blueprint:

  • Provides a structural contract for all UI rendering
  • Supports responsive, tenant-aware, edition-aware variations
  • Allows agents to inject, test, and observe slot content
  • Integrates with Studio for real-time visual mapping

→ It enables UIs to be dynamically composed, rearranged, and customized without breaking consistency or traceability.

🚩 Feature Flag Integration and Conditional UI Delivery

🎯 Objective

Describe how agent-generated frontend applications use feature flags to control visibility, behavior, and progressive rollout of UI elements based on roles, tenants, editions, or experiments.

🔧 Feature Flag System Overview

The blueprint supports dynamic feature gating using:

  • 🧪 Experiment toggles (A/B tests)
  • 🚦 Edition gates (e.g., Pro vs Enterprise)
  • 🔐 Role-based switches (e.g., Admin vs Viewer)
  • 🧩 Tenant-scoped features (early access, regional restrictions)

🧱 Architecture and Services

All apps include:

/apps/portal-host/features/
├── feature-flag.service.ts
├── feature-flag.guard.ts
├── feature-flags.json

Injected into shell and modules via FeatureFlagService.

🧠 Agent-Supported Flag Scenarios

Use Case Implemented By
Toggle button visibility Frontend Developer Agent
Load/unload routes or modules Route Guard + Lazy Loading
Enable page widgets UI Designer Agent
Dynamic theme or behavior Edition/UX Rule Agents
Track flag usage TraceService + QA Agents

🔁 Conditional UI Example

Template binding:

<app-enterprise-dashboard *ngIf="flags.isEnabled('enterpriseDashboard')"></app-enterprise-dashboard>

Route-level binding:

{
  path: 'dashboard',
  canActivate: [FeatureFlagGuard],
  data: {
    featureFlag: 'enterpriseDashboard',
    traceId: 'trace-flag-dashboard-723'
  }
}

🧩 Flag Resolution Strategy

Feature flags are resolved using:

  1. feature-flags.json: Static baseline
  2. TenantFeatureMapService: Remote per-tenant overrides
  3. EditionFeatureMatrix: Enables edition-linked logic
  4. Runtime signals (experiments, user traits)

Agents inject traceable fallback logic and default values.

📈 Feature Flag Telemetry

Each toggle usage emits observability events:

this.trace.logEvent('featureFlagUsed', {
  flag: 'enterpriseDashboard',
  result: true,
  userId: session.user.id,
  traceId: 'trace-ui-dashboard-toggle'
});

Used to measure:

  • UI branch adoption
  • Feature abandonment or churn
  • A/B test conversion

🧪 Flag Test Generation

Each flag includes:

  • ✅ Toggle enable/disable test
  • ✅ Fallback scenario test (flag missing or undefined)
  • ✅ Coverage mapping to modules/pages
  • ✅ E2E visibility toggle test

📘 Metadata Outputs

File / Artifact Description
feature-flags.json Declares flags, default states
feature-flag.service.ts Resolver logic
feature-flag.guard.ts Route enforcement
flag-coverage.report.json Feature-to-flag mapping

Studio visualizes flag usage across tenants and routes.

✅ Summary

Feature flags in the blueprint are:

  • Declaratively generated by agents
  • Fully traceable, testable, and observable
  • Integrated into guards, templates, telemetry, and docs
  • Key to progressive delivery, edition tiering, and UI experiments

→ They allow the Factory to gradually ship, experiment, and segment UIs per customer context — without breaking structure or agent logic.

🎨 Theming, Branding, and Tenant Customization Strategy

🎯 Objective

Describe how the frontend blueprint supports dynamic theming, tenant-specific branding, and UI customization — while maintaining structural consistency, traceability, and modular reuse.

🧩 Core Concepts

Concept Description
Themes Global UI styles: color palettes, typography, spacing, animations
Branding Logos, slogans, favicons, legal footers, images
Customization Component-level overrides or visibility toggles per tenant/edition

All of these are defined declaratively, applied dynamically, and scoped by tenant/role/edition.

🛠️ Theme and Branding Architecture

/apps/portal-host/theme/
├── tenant-theme.service.ts
├── theme.tokens.ts
├── themes/
│   ├── default.theme.json
│   └── acme-corp.theme.json
├── assets/branding/
│   ├── logos/
│   └── illustrations/

Generated by the UI Designer Agent and extended by the Frontend Developer Agent.

🎨 Theme Tokens

Defined via JSON or SCSS variables (depending on framework):

{
  "primaryColor": "#0057D9",
  "accentColor": "#FFB900",
  "fontFamily": "Inter",
  "borderRadius": "8px",
  "elevation": {
    "card": "0px 2px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.1)"
  }
}

These are consumed by:

  • Component libraries
  • Layout containers
  • Tailwind or SCSS frameworks

🏷️ Branding Zones

Agents identify the following zones as brandable:

Zone Asset Type Example
Header Logo, company name /assets/logos/acme-logo.svg
Login screen Background, slogan /assets/branding/login-bg.svg
Footer Legal text, policy URL Tenant config binding
Email Templates Brand color, footer Shared with frontend theming

🧠 Edition-Scoped Theme Rules

Themes may adapt by edition:

"themeMatrix": {
  "basic": "default",
  "pro": "pro-theme",
  "enterprise": "enterprise-dark"
}

Resolved at runtime using ThemeResolverService and TenantContextService.

🧪 Customization Test Outputs

Agents validate:

  • ✅ Theme tokens are valid and applied
  • ✅ Logo/image assets resolve correctly
  • ✅ Branding files load per tenant
  • ✅ UI renders with tenant-specific look in snapshot tests

🧱 Dynamic Theme Application (Example)

Angular:

this.theme.applyCurrentTenantTheme();

React:

<ThemeProvider theme={tenantTheme}>
  <App />
</ThemeProvider>

Blazor:

<style href="@themeProvider.CurrentTenantCss" />

🧩 Agent Collaboration

Agent Role
UI Designer Agent Defines theming tokens, layout overlays
Frontend Developer Agent Applies theme bindings and tenant switcher logic
Branding Agent (Optional) Uploads brand packs, validates media assets

🧬 Observability Metadata

Theme changes emit events:

trace.logEvent('themeApplied', {
  tenantId: session.tenantId,
  themeId: 'acme-corp',
  traceId: 'trace-ui-theme-switch-1942'
});

Used in:

  • Studio tenant branding views
  • QA snapshots
  • A/B test analysis (for design variants)

📘 Artifact Outputs

File Purpose
*.theme.json Token-based themes per tenant/edition
tenant-theme.service.ts Dynamic resolver service
theme-coverage.json Which components use which tokens
theme-overview.mmd Diagram: themes → tenants → editions

✅ Summary

The blueprint supports:

  • Multi-tenant UI branding from day one
  • Cleanly applied theme tokens and asset bindings
  • Role/edition-based component theming
  • Observability of theme application and asset delivery

→ It empowers the Factory to produce custom-branded, visually distinct SaaS UIs per client or partner — without hardcoding anything.

🧩 Dynamic Module Loading and Plugin Architecture

🎯 Objective

Define how the blueprint supports runtime-loadable feature modules, external plugins, and configurable frontends, enabling composability, B2B extensibility, and developer sandboxing.

🧱 What Is a Dynamic Module?

A dynamic module is a feature package that can be:

  • Lazy-loaded on demand
  • Configured via feature registry
  • Injected by edition, tenant, or plugin configuration
  • Maintained independently as a micro-frontend or standalone package

🛠️ Implementation Variants

Technique Stack Compatibility Use Case
Lazy Routes Angular, React Edition-specific dashboard widgets
Remote Modules Webpack Module Federation Third-party plugin bundles
Runtime Registry Any Dynamic feature switcher
Browser Sandbox iframe/VM-based isolation Customer-built integrations

📁 Structure for Dynamic Modules

/modules/integrations/
├── calendar-sync/
│   └── calendar.module.ts
│   └── remoteEntry.js
│   └── manifest.json

🔗 Dynamic Module Registration (Registry-Driven)

{
  "modules": [
    {
      "id": "calendarSync",
      "entry": "/remote/calendar-sync/remoteEntry.js",
      "visibleInEditions": ["enterprise"],
      "roles": ["admin"],
      "traceId": "trace-module-calendar-1093"
    }
  ]
}

The registry is loaded at runtime or injected during bootstrap.

🔧 Plugin Architecture Design

Plugins follow a UI contract spec, such as:

export interface FrontendPlugin {
  pluginId: string;
  render(container: HTMLElement, context: PluginContext): void;
  destroy(): void;
}

This allows injection of:

  • Marketplace extensions
  • Internal sandbox apps
  • White-labeled or OEM components

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Function
Frontend Developer Agent Declares module metadata and routes
Plugin Loader Agent Manages plugin manifests and injection lifecycle
Edition Matrix Agent Binds module/plugin to allowed editions/roles
Security Agent (Optional) Validates isolation, CSP, boundary protection

📦 Output Artifacts

File / Asset Description
module-registry.json List of available dynamic modules/plugins
remoteEntry.js Entry point for remote plugin bundles
plugin-host.component.ts Dynamic container for mounting plugins
plugin-contract.schema.json Interface contract definition

🔍 Studio Visualization

Dynamic modules appear in:

  • Feature maps as detachable blocks
  • Edition views as loadable overlays
  • Tenant registries showing active modules/plugins

TraceId tags enable click-through for dev/test feedback.

🧪 Test Strategy

Agents auto-generate:

  • ✅ Load/unload test for dynamic module
  • ✅ Plugin contract conformance test
  • ✅ Role/edition access tests
  • ✅ Observability event emission test

🔄 Example Use Cases

Scenario Enabled By
Add Google Calendar Sync Enterprise edition plugin module
Inject Third-Party CRM Remote plugin rendered in iframe container
Enable Beta Feature Toggle Dynamic registry + guard
Tenant-Specific Widgets Remote module with tenant filter

✅ Summary

The dynamic module/plugin architecture enables:

  • Runtime feature extensibility
  • Edition-specific and tenant-specific module activation
  • Plugin-based third-party and marketplace integration
  • Blueprint-governed testability, traceability, and Studio mapping

→ It allows the Factory to build adaptive, pluggable, composable UIs at massive scale — with safe isolation and full agent visibility.

🧪 Dev and QA Sandbox Modes

🎯 Objective

Define how the frontend blueprint supports developer and QA sandbox modes, allowing agents and human contributors to test UI modules, simulate roles/tenants/editions, and inspect generated components in isolation.

🧩 Purpose of Sandbox Modes

Persona Use Case
Developer Test a page/module without full app routing
QA Engineer Validate a single feature flow with mocked state and API
Designer Preview theme/edition variants of a component or layout
Agent Inject and render generated UI blocks in a controlled scope

🛠️ Sandbox Architecture

/apps/sandbox-host/
├── main.ts
├── sandbox.module.ts
├── sandbox.component.ts
├── sandbox.config.ts
└── mocks/
    ├── mock-store.ts
    ├── mock-api.service.ts

The sandbox app is launched in parallel to the main portal-host app but includes:

  • Dynamic module loader
  • Role and edition simulator
  • Component previewer
  • Live-edit JSON mock inputs

🧪 Key Sandbox Features

Feature Description
Role/Edition Switcher Simulate different user types and plans
Mocked Services Disable real APIs, inject fake responses
Component Preview Mode Isolate and preview any atom/molecule/organism
Layout + Slot Test Harness Render page in different layout shells
Form Playground Render forms with schema-driven mock data

🧠 Agent Workflow Integration

Agent Sandbox Role
Frontend Developer Agent Creates component preview setups, provides mock inputs
QA Engineer Agent Defines test cases, screenshot scenarios
UI Component Generator Outputs sandbox-ready stories (like Storybook entries)
Test Automation Agent Validates sandbox interactions via scripted tests

🧩 Configurable Sandbox Sessions

Sandbox sessions are declaratively defined:

sandbox.load({
  component: UserFormComponent,
  props: {
    user: mockUser
  },
  role: 'admin',
  edition: 'pro',
  layout: 'wizard-layout'
});

Agents may inject sandbox configs per feature during code generation.

🔍 Studio + Sandbox Integration

Each blueprint component links to:

  • 🔬 "Open in Sandbox" button in Studio
  • 🎛️ Control panel to adjust props, layout, edition
  • 📸 Snapshot recording for QA sessions
  • 🔄 Regenerate sandbox from new agent output

🧪 Generated Sandbox Tests

Test Type Description
Component Behavior Props input/output and visibility checks
Role Switch Test Re-render with different roles
Edition Toggle Test Check for presence/absence of gated content
Form Interaction Mock Test Simulate typing, errors, submit flow

📦 Output Artifacts

File / Asset Purpose
sandbox.config.ts Declares available scenarios
sandbox-playbook.json Agent-defined feature test recipes
mock-api.service.ts Fake backend injector
sandbox-session.snapshot Replayable UI state capture

✅ Summary

Sandbox mode is a zero-dependency, role/edition-aware, test harness for:

  • Visual UI QA and preview
  • Form contract testing
  • Agent output verification
  • Automated scenario validation

→ It gives both humans and agents a safe place to test and iterate UI features, enabling continuous feedback and evolution without breaking production code.

♿ Accessibility and Compliance by Design

🎯 Objective

Define how agent-generated UIs enforce accessibility (a11y) and compliance standards (e.g., WCAG 2.1, ARIA) automatically during component generation, layout rendering, and UI behavior — ensuring inclusivity and legal compliance from the blueprint level.

📏 Standards and Targets

The blueprint aligns with:

  • ✅ WCAG 2.1 AA guidelines
  • ✅ ARIA roles and landmarks
  • ✅ Keyboard navigation support
  • ✅ Color contrast and focus visibility
  • ✅ Screen reader-friendly semantics

🧠 Agent Roles in Accessibility

Agent Accessibility Role
UI Designer Agent Identifies visual patterns and ARIA role targets
Frontend Developer Agent Injects a11y attributes and keyboard handling
Accessibility Agent (Optional) Validates output against compliance tools
QA Engineer Agent Generates accessibility test coverage

🧩 Accessibility Blueprint Contracts

Each component and layout includes:

@Component({
  selector: 'app-primary-button',
  template: `<button role="button" aria-label="Submit invoice">...</button>`,
})

Also supported:

  • aria-live, aria-expanded, aria-controls
  • tabindex, role="dialog", role="region"
  • Skip-links and landmark regions (nav, main, aside)

🧪 Accessibility Test Coverage

Agents generate:

  • ✅ Keyboard navigation test (Tab, Shift+Tab, Enter, Esc)
  • ✅ Screen reader snapshot test (axe-core, pa11y)
  • ✅ Color contrast validator output
  • ✅ Focus state and trap validation (modals, drawers)

Each test includes trace metadata:

// traceId: trace-a11y-userform-0301
// compliance: WCAG-2.1-AA

🧱 Accessible UI Component Patterns

Component Type A11y Patterns Applied
Buttons aria-label, role, keyboard activation
Forms label[for], aria-describedby, focus traps
Modals/Dialogs role="dialog", keyboard escape, focus loop
Menus/Dropdowns Arrow navigation, aria-haspopup, roles
Tables aria-label, scope, keyboard paging
Charts (optional) Fallback alt-text or data summary

These are standardized across all agent-generated atoms and molecules.

🧩 Layout and Navigation Compliance

Each layout is embedded with:

<main role="main" tabindex="-1" aria-labelledby="pageTitle">
  <router-outlet></router-outlet>
</main>

<nav role="navigation" aria-label="Main Navigation">...</nav>

And includes skip to content anchors.

🌐 Localization + Accessibility

Accessible labels use localization keys:

<button [attr.aria-label]="'submit.invoice.button' | translate">...</button>

Ensures screen reader support in all supported languages.

📘 Artifact Outputs

File Description
a11y-report.json Results of automated accessibility audits
a11y-trace-map.mmd Component-to-standard traceability map
a11y-tests.spec.ts Validates navigation, roles, and announcements
aria-snapshot.log Snapshot DOM with ARIA role and label overlays

💡 Studio Integration

Studio visually overlays accessibility regions on each page and:

  • Shows ARIA regions
  • Highlights missing roles or labels
  • Flags color contrast violations
  • Links to accessibility trace coverage

✅ Summary

Accessibility is not an afterthought — it is:

  • Baked into every component and layout
  • Automatically validated by agents and tools
  • Traceable, testable, and visible in Studio
  • Compliant with standards and localization-aware

→ The Factory ensures every UI is usable by all, compliant by design, and legally future-proof.

🗺️ Studio Mapping and Trace Visualization

🎯 Objective

Describe how all agent-generated frontend artifacts are automatically mapped and visualized in ConnectSoft Studio, enabling developers, QA, architects, and copilots to navigate, inspect, and trace UI blueprints interactively.

🧠 What Is Studio Mapping?

Studio provides a visual graph and metadata explorer for:

  • 📄 Pages, components, and modules
  • 🧪 Tests and coverage
  • 📦 State, forms, routes, layouts
  • 🔐 Guards, feature flags, editions
  • 🔍 Observability events, a11y zones

Every node in the UI blueprint graph is trace-linked and update-aware.

🧩 Source of Truth: Trace Metadata

Agents embed traceId in:

Artifact Type Metadata Example
Components traceId: trace-component-user-form-0391
Pages & Layouts traceId: trace-page-dashboard-1012
Tests traceId: trace-test-profile-0247
Feature Flags traceId: trace-flag-settings-0023
Themes, Locale Zones traceId: trace-theme-customer-acme

🧰 Trace Maps and Visual Indexes

Studio generates visualizations from:

File Role
ui-trace-index.json List of traceIds and locations
feature-map.mmd Mermaid diagram of features and pages
test-coverage.graph.json Node-link map of test coverage
layout-slot-map.json Layout structure with slot and region info
a11y-trace-map.mmd Accessibility overlays and zone traces

These are rendered using Studio's interactive visual explorer.

🧬 Drill-Down Navigation in Studio

From any node (e.g., user-form.component.ts), Studio allows:

  • 🔍 View source
  • 🧪 View tests
  • 🎛️ Open in sandbox
  • 🧭 See routes using this component
  • 🌐 Explore edition/role restrictions
  • 📸 Access snapshots and telemetry

🔁 Real-Time Trace Sync and Regeneration

When a page/module is regenerated:

  • Its traceId is preserved
  • The traceId → file mapping updates
  • Studio highlights diffs or unlinked traces
  • Invalid/missing traces are flagged for repair

Ensures trace continuity across regenerations.

🧪 QA and Coverage Views

QA agents use Studio trace graphs to:

  • View which tests validate which components
  • Identify missing coverage or edition-specific holes
  • Trigger snapshot comparison or re-run

💡 Copilot Integration

Trace graphs feed into copilots and prompt injectors:

  • LLMs can explain component X or feature Y with trace context
  • Prompts use traceId to fetch docs, tests, diagrams
  • Studio copilots navigate the visual graph as API

📘 Artifact Outputs

Artifact Description
trace-index.json All traceIds across the app
studio-ui-map.graph.json Complete trace-linked node graph
traceId-linker.ts Links source files to trace metadata
ui-blueprint.mmd Mermaid visualization of UI layers

✅ Summary

Studio mapping enables:

  • A live blueprint view of the entire frontend structure
  • Interactive tracing from page to store to test to layout
  • LLM + human visibility into every UI asset
  • Auto-healing and regenerating trace links

→ It makes the frontend not just generated — but fully mapped, test-visible, and explorable in real-time.

🧾 Final Blueprint Summary and Output Snapshot

🎯 Objective

Summarize the full scope of the frontend blueprint, its traceable outputs, agent responsibilities, test artifacts, and how it integrates with the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory and Studio for scalable, composable UI generation.

🧱 Core Principles Recap

The frontend blueprint adheres to:

  • ✅ Clean Architecture — separation of UI, state, service, and logic layers
  • ✅ Edition- and Role-Aware UIs — fully customizable per tenant/context
  • ✅ Blueprint-Driven Generation — every element has traceId, featureId, and metadata
  • ✅ Testability by Default — unit, integration, E2E, a11y, localization, sandbox
  • ✅ Agent Responsibility Segregation — multiple frontend-related agents generate, validate, and trace different UI parts

🧠 Agent Roles Recap

Agent Key Output Responsibilities
Frontend Developer Agent Components, modules, stores, routes, feature toggles
UI Designer Agent Layouts, slots, theming tokens, branding zones
UX Designer Agent Forms, field logic, navigation structure, wireframes
QA Engineer Agent UI test flows, trace-linked test coverage
Accessibility Agent ARIA compliance, navigation, validation
Plugin Loader Agent Dynamic modules, plugin interfaces, registry injection

📦 Output Snapshot Overview

Area Key Output Files / Artifacts
💻 UI Components *.component.ts, *.html, *.scss, traceId injected
🧾 Forms form.schema.json, form.validation.ts, form.test.ts
🎛️ State store.ts, selectors.ts, effects.ts, traceId injected
🧪 Tests Unit, integration, E2E, sandbox tests, test-metadata.json
🧭 Layouts/Pages layout.component.ts, routes.ts, slot-map.mmd
📊 Observability trace.service.ts, telemetry hooks, span emitters
🌍 Localization *.json per locale, toggle support, i18n keys everywhere
🎨 Theming *.theme.json, branding assets, layout style overlays
⚙️ Feature Flags feature-flags.json, guards, toggle points
🧩 Plugins plugin.contract.ts, remoteEntry.js, sandbox loaders
📘 Documentation Markdown docs, Studio metadata, Mermaid diagrams

🧠 Studio and Trace Output Summary

  • All outputs are indexed via traceId

  • Connected in Studio via:

  • Feature maps

  • Layout views
  • Test coverage overlays
  • Sandbox entry points
  • Observability dashboards

Agents emit .trace-index.json, .studio-graph.json, and .snapshot.metadata.json on blueprint finalize.

📘 Exportable Artifacts (For CI and Studio)

Artifact Description
frontend-blueprint.md Markdown summary of all modules, tests, themes
trace-index.json List of all traceable frontend assets
frontend-blueprint.snapshot.json Compact final export for regeneration, audit
frontend-blueprint-summary.pdf (Optional) Printable/shareable export

✅ Summary

The Frontend Standard Blueprint allows the AI Software Factory to:

  • Generate fully structured, modular, and themed UIs
  • Adapt to any tenant, edition, role, and locale
  • Ensure accessibility, traceability, testability, and observability
  • Integrate tightly into DevOps pipelines and Studio visual maps
  • Provide human and copilot-friendly outputs for documentation and QA

→ It's not just frontend code. It's a full-stack visual, testable, composable, and edition-aware UI system — born from agent collaboration and Factory precision.