Skip to content

📱 Mobile App Blueprint

📱 What Is the Mobile App Blueprint?

🎯 Objective

Define the purpose, scope, and principles of the mobile app blueprint in the context of the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory. Establish its role in enabling agents to generate complete, scalable, and traceable mobile applications for iOS and Android from structured product and architectural inputs.

🧩 Purpose of the Mobile App Blueprint

The Mobile App Blueprint:

  • 📦 Defines the structure and components of a full mobile solution (navigation, screens, services, themes, observability)
  • 🧠 Enables agent generation of mobile apps via modular, edition-aware, and tenant-specific blueprints
  • 🔁 Ensures end-to-end traceability from features and microservices to mobile UI and tests
  • 🧪 Provides a testable, observable, and themable app shell
  • 📲 Supports both iOS and Android, powered by a unified stack

🧠 How It Fits into the Factory

Factory Layer Mobile Blueprint Role
📐 Architect Agent Defines structure, editions, layout types, integrations
🎨 UI/UX Designer Agents Create wireframes, component models, visual tokens
👨‍💻 Mobile Developer Agent Generates screens, services, state, and navigation logic
🔐 Auth & Security Agents Manage login, token flows, session lifecycles
🧪 QA/Test Automation Agents Generate tests, scenarios, and CI-integrated validation
🧭 Studio & Trace System Renders UI trace graphs, test coverage, and observability

📦 Supported App Capabilities

The blueprint is designed to support:

  • ✅ Edition-aware UIs (features gated by plan)
  • ✅ Role-aware navigation and permission guards
  • ✅ Theming and branding per tenant
  • ✅ Localization and language switching
  • ✅ Offline support and sync
  • ✅ Feature flags and toggles
  • ✅ Secure auth and biometric login
  • ✅ Device-native features (camera, GPS, push)
  • ✅ Testability and CI/CD readiness

📘 Primary Outputs

Output Type Description
app-shell/ Root app scaffold, DI container, navigation router
modules/<feature>/ Screens, logic, and services for a specific feature
components/ Atomic and composite UI elements
assets/themes/ Color tokens, logo sets, icons
i18n/ Translation bundles
traces/ Metadata linking screens to features and editions
tests/ Unit, integration, and E2E validation layers

🧬 Traceability & Regeneration Strategy

Every mobile artifact includes metadata:

// traceId: trace-mobile-user-profile-0238
// generatedBy: mobile-developer-agent
// edition: enterprise
// role: admin

→ Enables Studio mapping, CI validation, and incremental regeneration without loss of context.

🧠 Blueprint Goals

  • 🤖 Agent-first, zero-manual-setup mobile generation
  • 🎛️ Modular, testable, traceable mobile UX
  • 🎨 Fully customizable per tenant/edition/role
  • 📈 DevOps + Observability-native app structure
  • 🔁 Evolvable and regenerable from changing specs

🧱 Target Platforms and Tech Stack

🎯 Objective

Define the technological foundation used to generate cross-platform mobile apps within the Factory — including frameworks, native access, architectural styles, and reasons for choosing this stack to support agentic generation at scale.

📱 Target Platforms

Platform Support Level Notes
iOS ✅ Full iOS 14+ supported, Xcode toolchain in CI
Android ✅ Full Android 8+ supported, Play Store-ready
Web (PWA) ✅ Optional Experimental PWA export (for internal apps/kiosks)

🔧 Core Tech Stack

Layer Technology Purpose
UI Framework React Native (default) Cross-platform rendering
Alternative UI Flutter (optional extension) Experimental or use-case-specific path
State Management Redux Toolkit or Zustand Declarative state + async support
Routing React Navigation or App Router Edition-aware, role-guarded route structure
Forms & UI NativeBase / Tailwind-RN / Custom Shared atomic design system
Auth & Tokens SecureStore + AuthContext Session/token handling, refresh, sign-in/out
Testing Jest + Detox + Playwright Mobile Agent-generated tests across all levels
Localization i18next or react-intl Locale switching and fallback support
CI/CD Fastlane + GitHub Actions App signing, versioning, and Store deployment
Tracing & Logs OpenTelemetry + Sentry SDK Mobile observability integrated with Studio
Feature Flags LaunchDarkly / Remote Config Remote toggle-driven UI injection

🧠 Rationale for React Native (Default)

  • 🔁 Hot reload and agent compatibility for fast development
  • 🔄 JavaScript/TypeScript synergy with frontend and backend agents
  • ⚙️ Supported by a rich plugin ecosystem and native module wrappers
  • 🧠 Easily instrumented and traceable for Studio
  • 🧪 Easily testable via Jest and Detox from blueprint outputs
  • 🔀 Shared component tokens with web via Tailwind-based design system

📲 Native Capabilities Accessed

All abstracted via agent-generated services:

  • 🔒 Biometric auth (Face ID, Touch ID)
  • 🧭 GPS + geofencing
  • 📷 Camera & media
  • 🔔 Push notifications (Firebase/APNS)
  • 🗂️ Local DB (SQLite or MMKV)
  • 🔌 Network + connectivity + offline queue

These are documented as part of the Mobile Capability Library and generated on demand by agents.

📁 Directory Structure Template (React Native Example)

/apps/mobile/
├── app.tsx
├── navigation/
├── modules/
├── components/
├── assets/
├── theme/
├── state/
├── services/
├── traces/
├── i18n/
├── tests/
└── sandbox/

🔁 Regeneration & Stack Versioning

Agents inject:

// stackVersion: mobile-stack-rn-v3.2
// supportedBy: mobile-developer-agent
// upgradeable: true

This enables blueprint-compatible upgrades and future extension to alternative stacks (e.g., Flutter v2).

✅ Summary

The mobile blueprint uses React Native as its foundation, supporting full-stack traceable apps across platforms. It is:

  • Agent-compatible
  • Fully testable and observable
  • Feature flag- and edition-aware
  • Ready for CI/CD automation and scaling

→ It allows ConnectSoft to generate high-quality native apps across platforms, entirely from blueprint specs.

🧭 Mobile App Shell and Navigation Patterns

🎯 Objective

Define the mobile app shell architecture, including navigation systems, app containers, route guards, and edition-role-aware routing. Establish the foundation for all agent-generated screens, modules, and flows.

🧱 App Shell Responsibilities

The app shell provides:

  • 🧭 Navigation container and route definitions
  • 🧑 User session and token state providers
  • 🌐 Locale and theme context
  • 🔐 Access control and route guards
  • 🧠 TraceId injection at runtime
  • 🧪 Observability and telemetry hooks

It is the base runtime for all mobile feature modules.

Feature Description
Stack Navigator Used for deep flows like onboarding, auth
Tab Navigator Used for main dashboard sections
Drawer Navigator Used in multi-edition or admin interfaces
Modal Navigator Agent-injected overlays, form wizards, confirmations
Nested Navigation Pages within pages (e.g., profile → settings → password)
Route Guards Based on role, edition, tenant

All navigators are generated declaratively by the Mobile Developer Agent and include traceId metadata.

🧾 Example Route Contract

{
  route: 'BillingDashboard',
  path: '/billing',
  component: BillingScreen,
  meta: {
    traceId: 'trace-route-billing-1029',
    requiresAuth: true,
    roles: ['admin', 'manager'],
    editions: ['pro', 'enterprise']
  }
}

🧠 Route Resolution Flow

  1. User opens app → AppShell loads
  2. Auth check and context loading
  3. Edition and role fetched from session
  4. Navigation tree filtered dynamically
  5. Initial screen routed (e.g., Home, Wizard, Login)

🔐 Role- and Edition-Aware Routing

Agents inject logic:

if (!auth.hasRole('admin') || !edition.isAllowed('enterprise')) {
  return <ForbiddenScreen />;
}

Route guards are implemented using wrappers like:

<ProtectedRoute
  roles={['admin']}
  editions={['pro', 'enterprise']}
  traceId="trace-guard-settings"
/>

📁 Shell Directory Structure

/app/
├── App.tsx
├── navigation/
│   ├── index.tsx
│   ├── tabs.tsx
│   ├── drawer.tsx
│   └── routes.ts
├── shell/
│   ├── AppShell.tsx
│   ├── AuthProvider.tsx
│   ├── EditionGuard.tsx
│   └── ThemeProvider.tsx

📦 Artifacts Generated

File Purpose
AppShell.tsx Contexts and navigation root
routes.ts All routes, guards, metadata
navigation-map.mmd Mermaid diagram of app navigation graph
route-trace-index.json TraceId → route linkage
auth-context.ts Provides session and edition information

🧪 App Shell Tests

  • ✅ Navigation tree renders based on edition/role
  • ✅ Guarded screens are blocked correctly
  • ✅ Telemetry spans are emitted for route transitions
  • ✅ TraceId is present on every screen load

✅ Summary

The mobile app shell:

  • Hosts navigation, session, locale, and edition state
  • Supports role-based, edition-aware dynamic routes
  • Is the anchor for all generated mobile feature modules
  • Integrates tracing, testing, and agent lifecycle

→ It turns every mobile app into a traceable, extensible, and modular agent-friendly runtime.

🧩 App Layouts and Slot Injection

🎯 Objective

Define how mobile UIs use layout scaffolding and slot-based injection, enabling agents to generate screen content that is dynamically wrapped with headers, footers, toolbars, banners, and contextual overlays — all governed by tenant, edition, or role logic.

🧱 What Is a Layout in Mobile?

In the mobile blueprint, a layout is a reusable structural container that wraps screen content and includes named regions (slots) such as:

  • HeaderSlot
  • ToolbarSlot
  • ContentSlot
  • FloatingActionSlot
  • FooterSlot
  • BannerSlot

Layouts provide consistency, composability, and responsive adaptability — even in native mobile views.

📁 Layout Directory Structure

/layouts/
├── AppLayout.tsx
├── AuthLayout.tsx
├── OnboardingLayout.tsx
├── slots/
│   ├── HeaderSlot.tsx
│   ├── FooterSlot.tsx
│   ├── FABSlot.tsx

Each layout is a traceable, themed, and edition-aware functional component.

🔩 Slot Injection API

Agents declare UI blocks with layout context:

<AppLayout
  header={<HeaderSlot title="Dashboard" />}
  content={<DashboardScreen />}
  footer={<TabNavigation />}
  traceId="trace-layout-dashboard"
/>

Layouts can conditionally show/hide slots based on:

  • Edition
  • Role
  • Device type
  • Navigation state
  • Feature flags

🧠 Role of Agents in Layout Generation

Agent Responsibilities
UI Designer Agent Defines standard layout variants and slot contracts
Mobile Developer Agent Binds screen content into those layouts
Edition Matrix Agent Applies conditional logic for slot visibility

🎯 Example: Onboarding Layout

<OnboardingLayout
  content={<Step3Form />}
  banner={<ProgressIndicator />}
  traceId="trace-onboard-step3"
/>

Slots are designed with agent-recognizable names and generate traceable hooks for layout telemetry and testing.

🧩 Layout Rendering Strategy

Layouts also support:

  • Theme tokens (e.g., background, padding, spacing)
  • Safe area insets (for notches, status bars)
  • Transitions (slide-in headers, modal footers)
  • Sticky/fixed behavior (FABs, banners)

📘 Trace Metadata per Slot

Each slot includes:

// slotId: slot-header
// traceId: trace-slot-header-dashboard
// visibleInEditions: ['pro', 'enterprise']

This feeds into Studio layout graph visualization and test coverage mapping.

🧪 Layout Testing

  • ✅ Slot presence/absence based on edition/role
  • ✅ Layout structure integrity
  • ✅ TraceId presence and rendering consistency
  • ✅ Layout interactions (e.g., sticky header, FAB tap)

📦 Output Artifacts

Artifact Description
*.Layout.tsx Main layout component definitions
slot-contract.schema.json Declarative spec for layout and expected slot types
layout-trace-index.json Mapping of layouts to screen modules and slots
layout-map.mmd Mermaid diagram showing layout-to-slot relationships

✅ Summary

Layout and slot injection enables:

  • Modular, reusable screen scaffolding
  • Dynamic slot-based rendering
  • Edition-aware and role-filtered UI wrapping
  • Full traceability and test automation per region

→ This empowers agents to generate composable, branded, and context-sensitive mobile screens with zero manual layout wiring.

📦 Mobile Feature Modules and Page Contracts

🎯 Objective

Define how agents generate mobile feature modules — self-contained page bundles — including screens, services, state, routing, forms, tests, and metadata. Each module adheres to a page contract for traceability, regeneration, and cross-agent collaboration.

🧩 What Is a Feature Module?

A mobile feature module includes:

  • One or more screens
  • Associated API services
  • Optional state slice
  • UI components (atoms/molecules)
  • Layout binding
  • Navigation entry (route)
  • Form schema (if applicable)
  • Tests and trace metadata

These are the unit of delivery for mobile functionality.

📁 Feature Module Structure

/modules/user-profile/
├── screens/
│   └── ProfileScreen.tsx
├── services/
│   └── profile.service.ts
├── state/
│   └── profile.slice.ts
├── components/
│   └── Avatar.tsx
├── form/
│   └── profile.schema.json
├── tests/
│   └── profile.test.ts
├── route.ts
├── layout-binding.tsx
└── trace.meta.json

All folders are optional — generated based on agent input.

📑 Page Contract Schema

Each module is created from a page contract:

{
  "pageId": "user-profile",
  "title": "User Profile",
  "layout": "AppLayout",
  "slots": {
    "header": "User Info Header",
    "content": "Profile Form"
  },
  "roles": ["admin", "user"],
  "editions": ["pro", "enterprise"],
  "traceId": "trace-page-user-profile-0843"
}

This contract is used by multiple agents (UI, UX, Dev, QA, TestGen, Docs).

🧠 Agent Collaboration

Agent Module Contribution
Mobile Developer Agent Screens, route config, layout bindings
UI Designer Agent Components, theming, atomic blocks
QA Agent Tests, trace assertions
UX Agent Form logic, field groups, microcopy
Studio Agent Injects traceId, visual blueprint anchors

🔁 Regeneration Support

Because each feature module is traceable and isolated, the Factory can:

  • Regenerate a single module without affecting others
  • Version features and snapshots independently
  • Track diff history of forms and screens
  • Link test failures to modules directly in Studio

📊 Studio Mapping

Each feature module appears in:

  • feature-map.mmd (Mermaid dependency graph)
  • ui-trace-index.json (flat index for copilots and QA)
  • test-coverage.graph.json (QA overlay)

Agents can trace any form field, button, or state slice to its feature module.

🧪 Test Generation

Each module outputs:

  • ✅ Component rendering test
  • ✅ Route guard test (roles/editions)
  • ✅ API integration stub
  • ✅ Snapshot or golden test
  • ✅ Sandbox config

📘 Blueprint Artifacts

File Purpose
page-contract.json Formal input contract for page generation
trace.meta.json Full metadata: traceId, roles, editions, etc.
layout-binding.tsx Screen-to-layout-slot mapper
route.ts Route config + guards
form.schema.json (optional) Form logic in JSON Schema format

✅ Summary

Mobile feature modules are:

  • The core unit of blueprint output
  • Agent-collaborated and fully traceable
  • Modular, layout-wrapped, and testable
  • Regenerable and Studio-visualized

→ They allow the Factory to scale mobile development like assembling Lego blocks, with full role/edition control, test hooks, and design consistency.

🔄 State Management Strategy

🎯 Objective

Define the state architecture used in agent-generated mobile apps — supporting isolation, testability, feature modularity, and traceability. Enable agents to manage UI state, API data, session context, and form data in a consistent and scalable way.

🧠 Why It Matters

Mobile apps involve multiple sources of truth:

  • User session
  • Form state
  • API-fetchable data
  • UI component state
  • Offline queues

Agents must generate predictable, observable, and testable state patterns that can be updated, reset, and traced.

📦 Preferred State Patterns

State Type Stack Used (React Native) Agent Use
Global App State Redux Toolkit (default) Session, config, theme, navigation
Feature Local State Redux Slice or Zustand Module-specific data: profiles, tasks, etc.
Component UI State useState, useReducer Modal visibility, toggles, counters
Form State React Hook Form / Formik Controlled inputs, errors, schema validation

Agents output state logic with traceIds, mock seeds, and test cases.

🧩 Example Slice (Redux Toolkit)

export const userProfileSlice = createSlice({
  name: 'userProfile',
  initialState,
  reducers: {
    setProfile(state, action) {
      state.data = action.payload;
    },
    clearProfile() {
      return initialState;
    }
  }
});
// traceId: trace-slice-user-profile-0281

Each reducer is trace-linked and tested independently.

🧠 Agent-Generated State Responsibilities

Agent State Responsibilities
Mobile Developer Agent Creates feature slices, action creators
UX Agent Maps form fields to state contracts
QA Agent Verifies reducer logic and coverage
Studio Agent Visualizes state graphs and trace trees

🧪 Testing Agent State

Generated state tests include:

  • ✅ Initial value assertions
  • ✅ Action → state transition tests
  • ✅ Selector correctness tests
  • ✅ Error fallback coverage
  • ✅ TraceId linkage to UI elements

🎛️ State-to-UI Binding Example

const { profile } = useSelector((state: AppState) => state.userProfile);

return <Text>{profile.name}</Text>;

This connects feature state to layout-rendered components, with traceable spans.

📁 State Directory Layout

/state/
├── store.ts
├── app.slice.ts
└── modules/
    └── user-profile/
        ├── profile.slice.ts
        └── profile.selectors.ts

📊 Blueprint Outputs

File Purpose
*.slice.ts Modular state logic for a feature
*.selectors.ts Reselect-based derived values
state-trace-index.json Links state slices to UI/test features
state-graph.mmd Mermaid visual of global + module states

🧠 Studio Integration

State slices appear in:

  • Feature graphs
  • Store overviews
  • Test coverage maps
  • Prompt context injections for copilots

Studio copilots can explain:

“How does the app manage the profile picture state?” And trace the flow from store → component → test.

✅ Summary

The Factory’s mobile state blueprint:

  • Is modular, traceable, and test-first
  • Supports Redux, Zustand, or UI-local state
  • Connects tightly to forms, layouts, and observability
  • Enables feature-level regeneration and QA tracking

→ It empowers agents to build predictable, testable, and audit-friendly UI state logic with full Studio support.

🧠 Agent Roles and Responsibilities

🎯 Objective

Define the key AI agents involved in mobile app generation, along with their specific deliverables, traceable outputs, and coordination points. Establish a clear responsibility matrix for multi-agent collaboration in mobile projects.

🤖 Primary Mobile Agents

Agent Name Category Role in Mobile App Generation
Mobile Developer Agent Engineering Core code generation: screens, modules, state, services
Mobile Designer Agent Design / UI Ensures adherence to theme, spacing, component structure
UX Designer Agent Experience & Forms Wireframes, page flow, form layout and field logic
UI Component Generator Agent Component Engineering Generates reusable atomic/molecular components
Mobile QA Agent Quality & Testing Tests (unit, E2E, a11y, snapshot), trace coverage, failure diffs
Accessibility Agent Compliance & A11y Ensures mobile accessibility standards and semantic correctness
Observability Agent Telemetry Injects spans, error hooks, navigation tracking
Edition Matrix Agent Product Configuration Controls feature exposure per edition and role
Studio Visualization Agent Visualization & Docs Builds trace maps, layouts, and Studio UI overlay

🧩 Division of Responsibilities

Task/Output Primary Agent(s)
Screen Component Mobile Developer Agent
App Navigation & Routes Mobile Developer Agent
Page Layouts & Slots UI Component Generator, Mobile Dev
Page Flow & Form Logic UX Designer Agent
State Slice & Actions Mobile Developer Agent
API Integration Stub Mobile Developer Agent
Style & Theme Tokens Mobile Designer Agent
Translation Keys UX + Mobile Designer Agents
A11y Roles and Tags Accessibility Agent
Tests (unit, E2E, snapshot) QA Agent
Feature Flag & Role Guards Edition Matrix Agent
Trace Metadata + Studio Graph Studio Visualization Agent
Telemetry Hooks Observability Agent

🧠 Orchestration Notes

  • Mobile Developer Agent is the core implementer for all code artifacts.
  • Design Agents (UI, UX) output design tokens, layout zones, and field group specs.
  • Studio Agent pulls in traceId metadata to build graphs and diff snapshots.
  • QA Agent validates module compliance and test coverage based on traceId.

🔁 Hand-off Flow Example

sequenceDiagram
  UX Agent ->> Mobile Dev Agent: Provide page-contract.json
  Mobile Dev Agent ->> QA Agent: Submit generated screens + tests
  Mobile Dev Agent ->> Studio Agent: Emit trace.meta.json
  QA Agent ->> Studio Agent: Push test trace coverage
  Accessibility Agent ->> QA Agent: Validate a11y map
Hold "Alt" / "Option" to enable pan & zoom

📘 Trace Responsibilities

Each agent injects:

// generatedBy: mobile-developer-agent
// traceId: trace-screen-settings-0401
// ownerAgent: mobile-qa-agent

→ TraceId and agent fingerprinting ensure accountability, version control, and rollback at any time.

📦 Artifacts Tagged by Agent

Agent Outputs
Mobile Developer Screens, services, route bindings, trace meta
UX Designer Page contracts, form sections, locale keys
QA Agent Tests with trace links, coverage report, failed snapshots
Studio Agent studio-map.graph.json, trace-index.json, layout.mmd

✅ Summary

Mobile app generation is a collaborative, agentic process where:

  • Roles are clearly segmented by responsibility and output
  • TraceIds link every asset to its creator and validator
  • All flows are orchestrated to enable regeneration, rollback, and audit

→ This structure ensures that mobile apps can be safely evolved, regenerated, tested, and explained at scale by both agents and human copilots.

🌐 API Integration and Service Abstractions

🎯 Objective

Define how mobile apps generated by the Factory consume backend APIs, including:

  • 🧩 Modular service abstraction
  • 🔐 Secure token-aware requests
  • 🧪 Testable and mockable integration
  • 🧠 Traceable client-server linkage

🔧 API Access Strategy

The Factory generates modular, type-safe API service classes per microservice or domain. These services handle:

  • ✅ Token injection (access/refresh)
  • ✅ HTTP method abstraction (GET, POST, etc.)
  • ✅ Serialization and transformation
  • ✅ Error handling and retry logic
  • ✅ Agent traceId embedding

📁 Structure Example

/services/
└── profile/
    ├── profile.service.ts
    └── types.ts

Each service corresponds to a backend agent-generated API library.

📑 Example Service (React Native + Axios)

import { http } from '../core/http'; // trace-aware instance

export const ProfileService = {
  async getUserProfile() {
    return http.get<UserProfile>('/api/profile/me', {
      traceId: 'trace-api-profile-get-0012',
    });
  },

  async updateProfile(input: UpdateProfileInput) {
    return http.put('/api/profile', input, {
      traceId: 'trace-api-profile-update-0013',
    });
  },
};

🔐 Auth-Integrated Requests

Requests include:

  • Authorization: Bearer <token>
  • Retry with refresh token if expired
  • Inject edition/tenant headers:
headers: {
  'X-Tenant-Id': context.tenantId,
  'X-Edition': context.edition,
}

These are resolved by the Session Agent or via DI tokens.

🧠 Agent-Generated Features

Feature Description
traceId injection For each API request
api.schema.json Generated OpenAPI spec for service contracts
api-mock.ts Mock responses for sandbox/testing
Retry and error wrapper Includes fallback logic and observability
Auto-generated types (types.ts) Based on backend API DTOs

🧪 Testing API Integration

QA agents verify:

  • ✅ Correct base URL and endpoints
  • ✅ All expected headers set
  • ✅ TraceId is passed
  • ✅ API mocks are available in sandbox/
  • ✅ Failure handling path tested

📘 Blueprint Outputs

Artifact Description
*.service.ts Mobile API access layer
api.schema.json Service-level OpenAPI schema
trace-meta.json Links requests to features and components
sandbox/api-mock.ts Test-ready mock services
api-usage-map.mmd Visual diagram of screen-to-API dependency graph

🔄 Studio Integration

Studio overlays show:

  • Which screens use which APIs
  • Test coverage of endpoints
  • API performance (via observability spans)
  • Broken contract alerts (mismatched DTOs)

✅ Summary

The API service layer in the mobile blueprint:

  • Provides type-safe, traceable, and secure abstraction over backend APIs
  • Enables testable, sandboxed API usage with mocking and fallback logic
  • Allows agents to evolve client-server contracts with full trace coverage

→ The result is a mobile app that talks to your backend predictably, safely, and observably — with zero boilerplate or duplication.

📝 Form Handling and Validation in Mobile Context

🎯 Objective

Define the form handling strategy for mobile screens — enabling agents to generate dynamic, edition-aware, and locale-ready forms that are:

  • 🧠 Declaratively defined
  • ✅ Validated with schema logic
  • 🔄 Bound to state
  • 📱 Mobile-native in behavior

📦 Core Principles

  1. Declarative Schema Contracts Forms are defined via JSON-like schemas for maximum regeneration and testability.

  2. Mobile UX Optimized Supports keyboard avoidance, touch focus, auto-advance, and accessibility.

  3. Integrated with State & API Form state is connected to Redux (or other agent-chosen state engine) and API service methods.

  4. Traceable & Testable Each field, validator, and submission is trace-linked.

📁 Example Form Module

/modules/user-profile/
├── form/
│   ├── profile.schema.json
│   └── profileForm.tsx

🧾 Example Form Schema

{
  "title": "User Profile",
  "fields": [
    {
      "name": "firstName",
      "type": "text",
      "label": "First Name",
      "required": true,
      "traceId": "trace-form-firstName-0091"
    },
    {
      "name": "email",
      "type": "email",
      "label": "Email",
      "validators": ["required", "email"],
      "editionVisibility": ["pro", "enterprise"]
    }
  ]
}

🧠 Agent Workflow

Agent Role in Form Handling
UX Designer Agent Defines schema, labels, grouping, steps
Mobile Developer Agent Generates JSX forms, binds state
Edition Matrix Agent Applies edition/role-based visibility
QA Agent Produces trace-bound form tests

🧑‍💻 Form Rendering Example (React Native)

<FormField
  name="email"
  control={control}
  label={t('form.email')}
  rules={{ required: true, pattern: emailRegex }}
  traceId="trace-form-email"
/>

Validation rules are auto-injected from schema.

✅ Validation Support

  • Required
  • Min/Max length
  • Regex
  • Custom validators
  • Cross-field dependencies
  • Edition/role-aware conditional validators

🧪 Form Tests

Generated by QA agent:

  • ✅ Field renders with correct label and traceId
  • ✅ Required/invalid input triggers correct message
  • ✅ Submit action emits telemetry span
  • ✅ Field visibility toggles per edition/role

🌍 Localization Support

Labels and errors are injected with i18n keys:

label={t('profile.form.firstName')}
errorMessage={t('profile.form.errors.required')}

Schemas include translationKey per field.

📘 Artifacts

File Description
*.schema.json Declarative form structure and logic
*.form.tsx JSX render + controller binding
form-test.spec.ts Test automation (trace-linked)
form-trace-index.json List of all form traceIds
form-layout-map.mmd Visual overview of page + form field layout

🧠 Studio Mapping

Studio renders form fields visually:

  • Layout grid
  • Edition/role visibility toggles
  • TraceId inspection
  • Test coverage overlay

Copilot prompts can inspect:

“What fields are visible in the Enterprise edition but not Pro?”

✅ Summary

Mobile form generation in the Factory is:

  • Declarative and schema-driven
  • Role- and edition-aware
  • Fully localizable and accessible
  • Testable and visually traceable in Studio

→ Forms are not just UI — they’re blueprinted interactions with built-in validation, state sync, and observability.

🎨 Mobile Design System and Component Library

🎯 Objective

Define how the blueprint governs the creation and integration of a mobile design system and component library, enabling consistent, reusable, themed, and accessible UI elements across all generated mobile apps.

🧩 Design System Core Principles

Principle Description
Atomic Design Components organized as atoms, molecules, organisms
Themed and Tokenized Colors, typography, spacing, icons, animations driven by tokens
Accessibility First Built-in ARIA roles, focus management, and screen reader support
Platform-Native Styling Adapt components for iOS and Android idioms
Responsive and Adaptive Support multiple screen sizes, orientations, and devices

📁 Component Library Structure

/components/
├── atoms/
│   ├── Button.tsx
│   ├── TextInput.tsx
│   ├── Icon.tsx
├── molecules/
│   ├── FormField.tsx
│   ├── Card.tsx
├── organisms/
│   ├── UserProfileSummary.tsx
│   ├── SettingsPanel.tsx

🧠 Agent Roles in Design System

Agent Responsibility
UI Designer Agent Defines component visuals, interaction patterns
Mobile Developer Agent Implements and wraps components with logic
Accessibility Agent Ensures components meet accessibility standards
Theme Agent Applies tokens and branding overrides
QA Agent Generates component-level tests

🎨 Theming & Token Example

Tokens defined as JSON or SCSS variables:

{
  "primaryColor": "#007AFF",
  "fontFamily": "System",
  "borderRadius": "8px",
  "spacing": {
    "small": 8,
    "medium": 16,
    "large": 24
  }
}

Components consume tokens via props or context providers.

📱 Platform Adaptation

  • iOS uses Cupertino style components
  • Android uses Material Design guidelines
  • Agents generate platform-specific style overrides and gestures

🧪 Component Testing

  • Unit tests per atomic/molecular component
  • Snapshot tests for visual consistency
  • Accessibility tests (focus order, contrast)
  • Interaction tests for touch, swipe, gestures

🧩 Reusability and Extensibility

  • Components are parameterized for use in multiple editions/tenants
  • Extendable via slots, props, or composition
  • Agent-generated stories or examples included for sandboxing

📘 Documentation Artifacts

Artifact Purpose
component-library.md Describes design tokens and patterns
tokens.json Central theme and spacing definitions
storybook/ Auto-generated component stories
accessibility-report.md Compliance and test results

✅ Summary

The mobile design system blueprint:

  • Ensures consistent, accessible, and platform-native components
  • Supports theme-driven customization per tenant/edition
  • Integrates deeply with agent workflows for generation and testing
  • Provides reusable building blocks for all mobile screens

→ It’s the foundation of beautiful, usable, and maintainable mobile UI in the ConnectSoft ecosystem.

🎨 Theming and Tenant Branding

🎯 Objective

Define how mobile apps dynamically apply tenant-specific branding and theming, supporting multi-tenant SaaS requirements for custom colors, logos, fonts, and layout adjustments — all generated and managed by agents.

🧩 Core Theming Concepts

Concept Description
Theme Tokens Colors, typography, spacing, shadows, and animations defined as tokens
Brand Assets Tenant logos, splash screens, icons, and fonts
Dynamic Styles Runtime CSS or style overrides based on tenant/edition context
Dark Mode Support for light/dark themes with automatic switching

📁 Theming Directory Structure

/theme/
├── tokens.json              # Design tokens for default and tenant themes
├── tenants/
│   ├── acme-corp.json       # Tenant-specific overrides
│   └── globex.json
├── assets/
│   ├── logos/
│   ├── splash/
│   └── fonts/

🧠 Agent Collaboration

Agent Responsibility
UI Designer Agent Defines design tokens and branding guidelines
Mobile Developer Agent Implements runtime theme loading and overrides
Branding Agent Uploads and validates tenant brand assets
Studio Agent Visualizes applied themes per tenant

🔧 Runtime Theme Application

The app shell loads tenant theme on startup:

const tenantTheme = loadTheme(tenantId);
applyTheme(tenantTheme);

Tokens drive:

  • Component colors and typography
  • Layout spacing and borders
  • Brand-specific UI elements (buttons, banners)

📘 Branding Overrides

Agents generate:

  • Tenant logo bindings in header/footer
  • Splash screens per tenant and edition
  • Font face declarations and dynamic font loading

🧪 Theming Test Strategy

Tests include:

  • Verification of token application per tenant
  • Visual snapshot comparisons for branding variants
  • Dark mode toggle correctness
  • Asset loading validation (logos, fonts)

🔄 Studio and Observability

Studio tracks:

  • Tenant-theme mappings and active overrides
  • Branding asset usage and version
  • Theme-related telemetry on UI load and render times

✅ Summary

Tenant theming in the mobile blueprint:

  • Provides full dynamic customization per client
  • Is tightly integrated with design tokens and runtime overrides
  • Supports multi-edition and role-based variations
  • Includes agent-generated tests and Studio visualization

→ It empowers the Factory to deliver distinct, brand-aligned mobile experiences at scale.

🌍 Localization and Language Switching

🎯 Objective

Define how mobile apps support multi-language localization, dynamic language switching, and translation management — ensuring globally accessible, edition-aware, and tenant-specific user experiences.

🗂️ Localization Architecture

Component Responsibility
Translation Files JSON or YAML resource files per supported locale
Localization Service Runtime language detection and switching
Translation Hooks UI component bindings to translation keys
Fallback Handling Default language fallback for missing translations

📁 File Structure

/i18n/
├── en.json
├── es.json
├── fr.json
└── ru.json

Each file contains key-value pairs:

{
  "login.title": "Welcome back",
  "error.network": "Network error. Please try again."
}

🔄 Runtime Language Switching

Mobile apps include:

  • Language selector UI (dropdown or modal)
  • Persistence of user language choice (AsyncStorage, SecureStore)
  • Auto-detection based on device locale (optional)
  • Edition and tenant restrictions on available languages

Example:

<LanguageSwitcher
  supportedLanguages={['en', 'es', 'fr']}
  currentLanguage={language}
  onChange={setLanguage}
/>

🧠 Agent Workflows

Agent Role
UX Designer Agent Defines which UI strings and pages need localization
Mobile Developer Agent Implements i18n service and injects keys
Localization Agent Generates translation scaffolds, tracks missing keys
QA Agent Validates translation completeness and correctness

🧪 Testing Localization

  • Automated tests verify all keys render properly
  • Fallback language tests ensure UI completeness
  • Snapshot tests compare localized UI renders
  • Studio flags missing keys and untranslated text

📘 Blueprint Artifacts

File Description
i18n/en.json Default language strings
i18n/{locale}.json Translated resource files
localization-metadata.json Tracks coverage, missing keys
translation-report.md Agent-generated translation quality summary

✅ Summary

Localization in mobile apps is:

  • Fully integrated into the agent generation pipeline
  • Editable and extendable per tenant and edition
  • Supported by runtime language toggling and persistence
  • Covered by tests and Studio translation reports

→ This ensures the Factory delivers seamless multilingual experiences at scale.

🚩 Feature Flag Support in Mobile UI

🎯 Objective

Define how agent-generated mobile apps incorporate feature flags to enable dynamic, runtime control over UI components, flows, and capabilities — supporting gradual rollout, edition gating, and A/B testing.

🧩 Feature Flag Architecture

Component Description
FeatureFlagService Runtime flag resolution and caching
FlaggedComponent Wrapper to conditionally render components
RemoteConfig Integration with remote flag providers (e.g., LaunchDarkly)
TraceEventEmitter Emits telemetry on flag usage

📁 Feature Flag Directory Structure

/features/
├── feature-flag.service.ts
├── feature-flags.json
├── flag-guards.ts

The feature-flags.json includes flag metadata:

{
  "flags": [
    {
      "id": "new-dashboard",
      "enabledForEditions": ["pro", "enterprise"],
      "enabledForRoles": ["admin", "powerUser"]
    }
  ]
}

🔄 UI Conditional Rendering Example

{flags.isEnabled('new-dashboard') && <NewDashboard />}

🛡️ Route Guarding by Feature Flag

Routes can be conditionally enabled:

<Route path="/dashboard" element={
  <FeatureGuard flag="new-dashboard">
    <DashboardScreen />
  </FeatureGuard>
} />

🧠 Agent-Driven Flag Integration

Agent Responsibility
Mobile Developer Agent Injects flag checks in UI and routing
Edition Matrix Agent Supplies edition and role mappings for flags
Observability Agent Tracks flag usage and telemetry
QA Agent Generates tests to cover feature flag toggles

📊 Telemetry and Analytics

Flag usage triggers:

  • featureFlagEvaluated events with flag ID, user, edition, role
  • Analytics on adoption rates and rollback signals
  • Studio dashboards showing flag impact

🧪 Testing Feature Flags

Tests cover:

  • Flag enabled/disabled scenarios
  • Fallback UI rendering
  • Role and edition conditional visibility
  • Telemetry emission on flag state change

✅ Summary

Feature flag support in mobile apps allows:

  • Dynamic UI/feature toggling without redeploy
  • Granular control per tenant, role, and edition
  • Integration with telemetry and rollout monitoring
  • Automated testing and Studio traceability

→ Enabling the Factory to ship features safely and customize experiences dynamically.

📊 Observability and Telemetry in Mobile Apps

🎯 Objective

Define how mobile apps embed observability hooks and telemetry events to provide real-time insights into app performance, user behavior, error tracking, and feature usage — integrated end-to-end with ConnectSoft Studio.

🧩 Core Observability Components

Component Purpose
TraceService Manages distributed trace IDs and spans
TelemetryService Logs user events, feature usage, and errors
ErrorReporter Captures runtime exceptions and crashes
PerformanceMonitor Measures app load time, screen render durations

📁 Observability Directory Structure

/observability/
├── trace.service.ts
├── telemetry.service.ts
├── error-reporter.ts
├── perf-monitor.ts

🧠 Instrumentation Points

  • Navigation transitions
  • API request/response cycles
  • User interactions (button taps, form submissions)
  • Feature flag evaluations
  • Error occurrences and crash reports

All instrumentation includes traceId, tenantId, userId, edition, and role metadata.

📡 Event Example

this.telemetry.logEvent('button_click', {
  buttonId: 'save-profile',
  traceId: 'trace-ui-profile-save-001',
  tenantId: 'tenant-123',
  userRole: 'admin',
});

🔍 Error Tracking Integration

Integration with Sentry, Firebase Crashlytics, or Azure App Insights via generated wrappers to collect:

  • Stack traces
  • Device info
  • Session context
  • User identifiers (anonymized)

🧪 Observability Testing

Agents generate tests that:

  • Validate traceId propagation
  • Confirm telemetry event firing on user actions
  • Simulate error conditions and verify reporting
  • Check performance timing accuracy

📘 Blueprint Outputs

Artifact Description
trace.service.ts Distributed tracing implementation
telemetry.service.ts Event logging and analytics
observability-metadata.json Mapping of trace points and spans
error-reporter.ts Exception and crash reporting wrapper

✅ Summary

Mobile app observability in the blueprint provides:

  • End-to-end tracing across user flows and backend
  • Telemetry for behavior and feature usage analytics
  • Robust error reporting and diagnostics
  • CI and Studio integration for quality monitoring

→ It transforms every mobile app into a self-instrumenting, diagnosable, and evolvable system.

🔐 Authentication and Session Flow

🎯 Objective

Define how agent-generated mobile apps implement secure authentication flows, session management, token handling, and biometric integration — supporting seamless login, session renewal, and secure data access.

🔒 Authentication Features

  • OAuth2/OpenID Connect integration
  • Secure token storage (SecureStore, Keychain, Keystore)
  • Refresh token management with auto-renewal
  • Biometric authentication (Face ID, Touch ID, fingerprint)
  • Multi-factor authentication (optional)
  • Logout and session expiration handling

🏗️ Authentication Folder Structure

/auth/
├── auth.service.ts
├── auth.guard.ts
├── token.interceptor.ts
├── biometric.service.ts
├── login-screen.tsx
└── logout-handler.tsx

🔁 Session Lifecycle

  1. User initiates login via OAuth2 flow
  2. Tokens are securely stored and loaded on app start
  3. Token refresh handled transparently by interceptor
  4. Session expiration triggers logout or refresh prompt
  5. Biometric unlock optionally replaces password login
  6. Logout clears tokens and redirects to login screen

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Task
Mobile Developer Agent Implements auth flows, token storage, and guards
Security Agent Ensures compliance with secure storage standards
UX Designer Agent Designs login screens and error flows
QA Agent Generates tests for auth success, failure, timeout

📘 Trace Metadata

All auth components include:

// traceId: trace-auth-login-flow-0123
// generatedBy: mobile-developer-agent

🧪 Authentication Testing

  • Token acquisition and storage tests
  • Refresh token lifecycle tests
  • Biometric enable/disable and fallback tests
  • Logout and session timeout tests

✅ Summary

Authentication and session management in mobile apps:

  • Provide secure, seamless user login and session handling
  • Support biometric and MFA flows for enhanced security
  • Are fully traceable, testable, and compliant by design

→ Enabling safe and reliable mobile access aligned with enterprise-grade security.

📴 Offline Mode and Sync Strategy

🎯 Objective

Define how mobile apps handle offline scenarios, including local caching, data synchronization, conflict resolution, and user notifications — ensuring seamless user experience despite network disruptions.

🧩 Offline Support Components

Component Purpose
Local Data Store Persist user data and API responses locally
Sync Engine Synchronize local changes with backend
Conflict Resolver Handles merge conflicts and data integrity
Network Status Monitor Detects connectivity changes
User Notification Alerts user to offline status and sync results

📁 Offline Directory Structure

/offline/
├── local-store.ts
├── sync-engine.ts
├── conflict-resolver.ts
├── network-monitor.ts
└── offline-ui.tsx

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Role
Mobile Developer Agent Implements offline store and sync logic
UX Designer Agent Designs offline UI states and user feedback
QA Agent Tests sync accuracy and conflict resolution

🔄 Sync Flow Overview

  1. Detect network loss → switch to offline mode
  2. Cache user inputs and state changes locally
  3. On reconnect, push local changes to server
  4. Pull updated data from backend
  5. Resolve conflicts automatically or prompt user
  6. Emit telemetry and update UI status

📘 Trace and Observability

Offline operations emit trace events:

trace.logEvent('syncStarted', { traceId, tenantId, userId });
trace.logEvent('conflictDetected', { traceId, conflictDetails });
trace.logEvent('syncCompleted', { traceId, success: true });

🧪 Testing Offline Features

  • Simulate network loss and recovery
  • Validate local store consistency
  • Conflict scenarios and resolution correctness
  • UI feedback during offline periods

✅ Summary

Offline and sync support enables:

  • Reliable data access despite connectivity issues
  • Transparent conflict management
  • User-informed sync status and error handling
  • Traceable, testable, and observable offline flows

→ A critical component for mobile resilience and user trust.

📱 Device APIs and Native Feature Access

🎯 Objective

Define how the mobile blueprint enables agent-generated apps to access and integrate with native device capabilities, delivering rich, platform-native experiences while maintaining cross-platform consistency and traceability.

🧩 Core Device APIs Supported

API Feature Purpose Notes
Camera and Media Capture photos, videos, and media selection Agent-generated wrappers for permissions and usage
Geolocation Access GPS and location services Includes background tracking support
Push Notifications Receive and handle remote notifications Integrates with Firebase, APNS
Contacts Access Read/write device contacts Permission-guarded
Accelerometer & Sensors Motion and environmental sensors Optional per use case
Clipboard Copy-paste interactions
Network Info Monitor connectivity status For offline mode triggers

📁 Native Features Directory Structure

/native/
├── camera.service.ts
├── geolocation.service.ts
├── push-notification.service.ts
├── contacts.service.ts
└── sensors.service.ts

🧠 Agent Roles

Agent Responsibilities
Mobile Developer Agent Implements cross-platform native wrappers
UX Designer Agent Specifies native feature usage in flows
QA Agent Tests device API integration and permission flows
Security Agent Ensures proper permissions and privacy compliance

🔐 Permissions Management

  • Agents generate permission request flows compliant with iOS/Android guidelines
  • Handles fallback and denial gracefully with user messaging
  • Injects trace metadata in permission dialogs for audit

📘 Trace Metadata Example

// traceId: trace-native-camera-0219
// generatedBy: mobile-developer-agent

🧪 Testing Native Features

  • Permission request and denial handling tests
  • API response mocks and edge cases
  • Integration tests on physical devices/emulators
  • Performance and battery usage monitoring (optional)

✅ Summary

Agent-generated access to native device APIs provides:

  • Rich, platform-consistent UX
  • Permission-aware, secure access
  • Traceable usage for debugging and auditing
  • Integration with agent lifecycle and Studio mapping

→ Essential for building fully featured, responsive, and compliant mobile applications.

⚙️ App Settings, Config Store, and Versioning

🎯 Objective

Define how mobile apps manage runtime configuration, feature toggles, tenant-specific settings, and versioning metadata, enabling dynamic behavior, safe upgrades, and tenant customizations driven by agents.

🗃️ Configuration Management

Config Type Description
Static Build Config Embedded compile-time settings (API URLs, keys)
Remote Config Runtime overrides fetched from backend or CDN
Tenant Settings Per-tenant feature flags, UI themes, branding
Edition Settings Controls available features and UI modules
User Preferences Language, theme, notification preferences

📁 Config Storage Structure

/config/
├── default.json
├── tenants/
│   ├── tenantA.json
│   └── tenantB.json
├── versions/
│   ├── v1.0.0.json
│   └── v1.1.0.json

🧠 Agent Roles

Agent Responsibility
Mobile Developer Agent Implements config store and reactive config providers
Product Owner Agent Defines tenant and edition config values
DevOps Agent Manages config deployment pipelines
QA Agent Validates config-driven UI changes

🔧 Runtime Config Access

Apps expose reactive config API:

const apiUrl = config.get('apiBaseUrl');
const featureFlags = config.get('featureFlags');

Config updates trigger UI refresh or feature toggling dynamically.

🧩 Versioning Metadata

  • Embedded app version (semver)
  • API compatibility matrix
  • Migration flags and release notes

Agents generate version metadata files:

{
  "appVersion": "1.2.3",
  "apiVersion": "v1",
  "releaseDate": "2025-06-10T12:00:00Z"
}

🧪 Testing Configurations

  • Default vs tenant config loading
  • Config overrides at runtime
  • Feature toggle effects on UI
  • Version mismatch handling (upgrade prompts)

✅ Summary

The app settings and config store blueprint:

  • Provides dynamic, tenant-aware runtime configs
  • Enables safe feature rollout via flags and versions
  • Supports seamless upgrades and rollback plans
  • Integrates with agent workflows and Studio telemetry

→ Ensures mobile apps remain adaptable, configurable, and maintainable at scale.

🧪 Mobile Test Generation Strategy

🎯 Objective

Define how agents systematically generate and organize comprehensive test suites for mobile apps, covering unit, integration, UI snapshot, and end-to-end tests — ensuring reliability, coverage, and traceability across platforms.

🧩 Test Types

Test Type Description Tools/Frameworks
Unit Tests Isolated logic, reducers, services Jest, Mocha, React Testing Library
Integration Tests Module interaction and API service integration Jest, MSW (Mock Service Worker)
UI Snapshot Tests Visual consistency of components and screens Jest + React Test Renderer, Storybook
E2E Tests User workflows, navigation, and native feature usage Detox, Appium, Playwright Mobile
Accessibility Tests Automated a11y checks on rendered components axe-core, react-native-accessibility
Performance Tests App launch and navigation performance Custom benchmarks, profiling tools

📂 Test Folder Structure

/tests/
├── unit/
│   └── modules/
│       └── profile/
│           └── profile.reducer.test.ts
├── integration/
│   └── services/
│       └── api.service.test.ts
├── snapshots/
│   └── atoms/
│       └── button.snapshot.ts
├── e2e/
│   └── login.e2e.ts
├── accessibility/
│   └── profile.a11y.test.ts

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Test Scope
Mobile Developer Agent Unit and integration tests
QA Agent E2E and accessibility tests
Accessibility Agent a11y audits and validations
Performance Agent Load and performance benchmarks

🔗 Trace Metadata in Tests

Each test file embeds:

// traceId: trace-test-profile-0421
// generatedBy: mobile-qa-agent
// featureId: user-profile

Enabling trace-based reporting in Studio and CI.

📋 Test Coverage & Reporting

  • Agents generate coverage reports per module and feature
  • Coverage maps link tests to traceable frontend artifacts
  • Studio visualizes gaps and suggests new tests
  • CI pipelines enforce quality gates and test pass thresholds

🧪 Sample Test Case

test('renders user profile screen', () => {
  const { getByText } = render(<ProfileScreen />);
  expect(getByText('User Profile')).toBeTruthy();
});

✅ Summary

Mobile test generation strategy ensures:

  • Complete multi-layered test coverage
  • Automated, trace-linked test artifacts
  • Integration with Studio and CI for quality monitoring
  • Support for cross-platform reliability and compliance

→ Delivering robust, maintainable, and trusted mobile apps built by agents.

🧪 Mobile Sandbox and QA Playground

🎯 Objective

Define how the mobile blueprint supports isolated sandbox environments and QA playgrounds where agents and humans can preview, test, and debug individual screens, components, and flows without full app dependencies.

🧩 Sandbox Capabilities

Feature Description
Component & Screen Preview Render individual UI elements or pages with mock data
Role & Edition Simulation Switch roles and editions dynamically for testing
API Mocking Simulate backend responses and error states
Layout & Theme Variations Preview different layouts, themes, and branding per tenant
Form Interaction Playground Test form fields, validation, and submission workflows
Snapshot Recording Capture UI states for regression testing

📁 Sandbox Directory Layout

/sandbox/
├── index.tsx                  # Sandbox entry point
├── mocks/
│   ├── api-mocks.ts
│   ├── user-mock-data.ts
├── stories/                   # Auto-generated Storybook-like files
│   ├── ProfileScreen.story.tsx
│   ├── BillingWidget.story.tsx
├── sandbox-config.json        # Scenario definitions and metadata

🧠 Agent Collaboration

Agent Sandbox Role
Mobile Developer Agent Generates sandbox wrappers and mock data
QA Agent Creates test scenarios and scripts
UX Designer Agent Specifies variant scenarios and edge cases
Studio Agent Integrates sandbox access within visual UI workflows

🔄 Workflow Example

  1. Developer or agent selects a component or screen
  2. Sandbox loads with mocked data and configured roles/editions
  3. UI is interactively tested for responsiveness and validation
  4. Snapshots and telemetry are recorded for QA and regression
  5. Feedback loop feeds new test cases or bug reports into Factory

🧪 Testing & Validation

Sandbox sessions generate:

  • ✅ Interaction tests (typing, clicks, navigation)
  • ✅ Visual snapshot tests
  • ✅ Accessibility tests in isolated mode
  • ✅ Network error simulation and recovery

📘 Blueprint Outputs

Artifact Purpose
sandbox-config.json Defines scenarios, roles, and mock inputs
api-mocks.ts Simulated backend responses
story-*.tsx Component/story previews
sandbox-telemetry.log Recorded interactions and errors

✅ Summary

The mobile sandbox environment enables:

  • Rapid, isolated testing and debugging
  • Multi-role, edition-aware UI previews
  • Controlled API mocking for offline development
  • Integration with Studio and CI for regression tracking

→ Providing a safe playground for iterative UI development and validation within the Factory.

♿ Accessibility and Mobile Compliance

🎯 Objective

Define how the mobile blueprint ensures accessibility (a11y) and compliance with mobile-specific standards, making apps usable for all users and meeting legal and industry requirements.

📏 Accessibility Standards

  • WCAG 2.1 AA compliance adapted for mobile
  • ARIA roles and properties for native mobile
  • VoiceOver (iOS) and TalkBack (Android) support
  • Keyboard navigation for accessibility hardware
  • Color contrast and font size considerations

🧠 Agent Roles

Agent Responsibility
Accessibility Agent Enforces a11y rules, audits generated UI
Mobile Developer Agent Implements accessible components and behaviors
QA Agent Generates accessibility test cases
UX Designer Agent Designs inclusive user flows and UI layouts

🧩 Accessibility Features

  • Proper semantic labels on buttons, inputs, and images
  • Focus management and visible focus indicators
  • Screen reader announcements for dynamic content
  • Adjustable font sizes and scalable UI elements
  • Skip navigation links and landmarks

📋 Testing and Auditing

  • Automated audits using tools like axe-core
  • Manual validation via screen readers
  • Test generation for keyboard and gesture navigation
  • Compliance reports with trace linkage

📦 Output Artifacts

Artifact Description
a11y-report.json Accessibility audit results
a11y-tests.ts Automated and manual test scripts
trace-a11y-map.mmd Studio visualization of accessibility coverage

✅ Summary

Accessibility is integral to the mobile blueprint, providing:

  • Inclusive, compliant UIs from the ground up
  • Traceable and testable accessibility features
  • Studio-integrated compliance visualization

→ Ensuring mobile apps are usable, legal, and accessible to all users.

📱 Mobile App Icon, Splash, and Deep Linking

🎯 Objective

Define how agent-generated mobile apps handle branding assets such as app icons and splash screens, along with deep linking for navigation into app content from external sources.

🖼️ Branding Assets

Asset Type Description
App Icons Multi-resolution icons for iOS and Android
Splash Screens Initial loading screen with branding and animations
Adaptive Icons Android-specific adaptive icons
Launch Images iOS-specific launch screens

📁 Assets Directory Structure

/assets/
├── icons/
│   ├── ios/
│   └── android/
├── splash/
│   ├── ios/
│   └── android/

🧠 Agent Responsibilities

Agent Role
Mobile Designer Agent Designs icons, splash graphics, and animation
Mobile Developer Agent Integrates assets into build pipelines
Branding Agent Manages asset versions and tenant-specific branding

🔗 Deep Linking Support

  • Configured to handle URL schemes and universal links
  • Supports routing into specific app screens or flows
  • Integrates with push notifications and external intents
  • Validated for platform-specific deep link compliance
const linking = {
  prefixes: ['myapp://', 'https://myapp.com'],
  config: {
    screens: {
      Profile: 'profile/:userId',
      Settings: 'settings',
    },
  },
};

🧪 Testing and Validation

  • Verify deep link resolution routes to correct screen
  • Test link handling when app is cold-started or backgrounded
  • Validate icons and splash render correctly on all device sizes
  • Ensure tenant-specific branding applies properly

✅ Summary

Branding assets and deep linking in mobile apps provide:

  • Strong first impression and brand consistency
  • Seamless navigation from external sources into app content
  • Multi-tenant, edition-aware branding integration
  • Traceable and testable deep link handling

→ Essential components for polished, user-friendly mobile experiences.

🚀 CI/CD and Store Deployment Integration

🎯 Objective

Define how agent-generated mobile apps integrate with continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, automate store packaging, signing, and submission workflows to App Store and Google Play.

🧩 CI/CD Pipeline Features

Capability Description
Automated builds Compile, bundle, and package iOS and Android apps
Code signing and provisioning Manage certificates and profiles securely
Automated testing Run unit, integration, and E2E tests
Store artifact generation Create IPA (iOS) and APK/AAB (Android) packages
Deployment triggers Promote to TestFlight, Google Play internal tracks
Versioning and changelogs Automatically bump versions and generate release notes

🛠️ Common Tools

  • Fastlane: For build, signing, and store deployment automation
  • GitHub Actions / Azure Pipelines: CI orchestration
  • App Center / Bitrise: Mobile-focused CI/CD platforms
  • SonarQube / Codecov: Quality and coverage reporting

📁 Pipeline Artifact Structure

/build/
├── ios/
│   ├── app.ipa
│   ├── exportOptions.plist
├── android/
│   ├── app-release.apk
│   ├── app-release.aab

🧠 Agent Roles in CI/CD

Agent Responsibility
DevOps Agent Configures and manages pipelines and signing
Mobile Developer Agent Defines build configurations and triggers
QA Agent Ensures tests run and passes before deployment
Studio Agent Monitors build status and deployment metrics

🔄 Pipeline Workflow

  1. Code commit triggers CI pipeline
  2. Build artifacts generated per platform
  3. Tests executed and results collected
  4. Artifacts signed and packaged
  5. Automated deployment to store beta or production tracks
  6. Studio updated with build and deployment status

🧪 CI/CD Testing

  • Pipeline success/failure notification tests
  • Artifact integrity and version validation
  • Deployment rollbacks and promotion tests
  • Security checks on signing certificates

✅ Summary

CI/CD and deployment integration in the mobile blueprint:

  • Fully automates build and release cycles
  • Ensures quality via automated testing gates
  • Supports multi-platform artifact management
  • Integrates tightly with Studio and agent workflows

→ Enables rapid, reliable, and compliant mobile app delivery at enterprise scale.

🗺️ Studio Visualization and Blueprint Trace Mapping

🎯 Objective

Define how the mobile blueprint’s generated artifacts are mapped and visualized in ConnectSoft Studio, providing an interactive trace graph for developers, testers, architects, and AI copilots to explore the app structure, flows, and telemetry.

🧠 Studio Trace Mapping Features

  • Trace Graphs: Visualize screens, modules, state slices, and services linked by trace IDs
  • Test Coverage: Overlay test status and gaps on UI elements
  • Layout Maps: Show screen-to-layout slot mappings and component hierarchies
  • Telemetry Insights: Surface user flows, errors, and performance metrics
  • Accessibility & Localization: Display coverage of a11y and translation zones

📁 Trace Metadata Sources

Artifact Type Metadata File Studio Usage
Screens/Modules trace.meta.json Node anchors and navigation
Tests test-coverage.graph.json Coverage heatmaps
Layouts layout-map.mmd UI region structure
Feature Flags feature-flag-trace.json Toggle impact analysis
Observability observability-metadata.json Real-time telemetry overlay

🔍 Interactive Studio Features

  • Click on any node to view source, tests, telemetry, and docs
  • Search by feature ID, role, or edition
  • Visual diff for regenerated modules
  • Direct launch into sandbox or debug mode

🧩 Agent Collaboration

Agent Studio Contribution
Studio Agent Builds and updates trace graph and maps
QA Agent Links test results and coverage
Observability Agent Streams telemetry and error reports
Mobile Developer Agent Tags outputs with trace IDs

✅ Summary

Studio visualization:

  • Makes the mobile app blueprint transparent and explorable
  • Connects code, tests, telemetry, and design in one UI
  • Facilitates faster debugging, QA, and architecture reviews
  • Enhances AI copilot capabilities with rich context

→ It transforms the generated app from code into a living, visual, and traceable system.

🧾 Final Blueprint Summary and Output Snapshot

🎯 Objective

Provide a comprehensive summary of the entire mobile app blueprint, consolidating key outputs, traceability, agent roles, and integration points — serving as a definitive reference and snapshot for the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory.

🧱 Blueprint Highlights

  • Modular, edition- and role-aware mobile app architecture
  • Full lifecycle coverage: shell, modules, state, navigation, forms, native APIs
  • Comprehensive test generation and observability instrumentation
  • Multi-tenant theming, branding, localization, and feature flags
  • Deep integration with CI/CD pipelines and Studio trace visualization

🧠 Agent Contribution Summary

Agent Key Deliverables
Mobile Developer Agent Screens, services, state, API integration, routing
Mobile Designer Agent Theming, branding, component design
UX Designer Agent Form schemas, page flows, accessibility flows
QA Agent Unit, E2E, accessibility tests
Accessibility Agent Compliance validation and auditing
Observability Agent Telemetry hooks, error tracking
DevOps Agent Build pipelines and deployment
Studio Agent Trace maps, UI graphs, visual diffing

📦 Core Output Artifacts

Artifact Purpose
app-shell/ Root app scaffolding and navigation
modules/ Feature bundles with screens and logic
components/ Reusable atomic UI components
state/ Redux or equivalent state slices
forms/ Declarative form schemas and validation
assets/theme/ Tenant themes and branding assets
tests/ Comprehensive multi-layer tests
observability/ Telemetry and tracing services
ci-cd/ Pipeline and store deployment configurations
trace-meta.json Trace ID linkage for Studio and agent collaboration

🧩 Traceability & Studio Integration

  • Every artifact is tagged with traceId and generatedBy metadata
  • Studio provides a live, interactive UI graph, test coverage, and telemetry dashboards
  • Agents utilize trace metadata for regeneration, auditing, and prompt optimization

✅ Summary

The Mobile App Blueprint is a full-stack, agent-driven, traceable, and testable blueprint that enables the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory to autonomously generate high-quality, customizable mobile applications at enterprise scale.

It guarantees:

  • Modularity and extensibility
  • Security and compliance
  • Performance and observability
  • Globalization and branding flexibility
  • Continuous integration and delivery