π Vision Overview¶
π§ What Is ConnectSoft?¶
ConnectSoft is an AI-powered Software Factory platform β designed to autonomously generate, assemble, test, deploy, and evolve entire SaaS ecosystems through intelligent agents.
It is not just a developer productivity tool β it's a new category:
π Autonomous AI Software Factory
At its core, ConnectSoft:
- Accepts a business idea, domain model, or feature blueprint
- Orchestrates multi-agent collaboration
- Generates modular microservices, APIs, infrastructure, frontend apps, observability layers, and tests
- Deploys and operates them securely, observably, and at scale
- Evolves them through versioned traces and AI feedback loops
Unlike traditional code generation tools or static scaffolding CLIs, ConnectSoft operates as a coordinated system of AI personas β each with scoped skills, memory, responsibilities, and traceable outputs.
π§ What the Factory Builds¶
| Output Type | Description |
|---|---|
| β Microservices | Domain-driven .NET services, generated from blueprints |
| β API Gateways | Secure, multi-tenant edge entry points |
| β Frontend UIs | Blazor, Angular, or CMS-driven apps |
| β Infrastructure | Cloud-native deployments using Bicep, YAML, IaC |
| β Observability | Tracing, metrics, logs, health checks |
| β Tests & Coverage | Unit tests, SpecFlow BDD, security checks |
| β Documentation | Markdown, OpenAPI, diagrams, runbooks |
| β Coordinators | Agent-orchestrated process flows and lifecycles |
π€ What Makes It AI-Driven?¶
- Each agent is task-scoped and LLM-enabled, with a clear contract (inputs, skills, outputs)
- AI agents reason over blueprints, not just prompts
- The platform remembers, compares, re-generates, and adapts across versions
- ConnectSoft uses execution traces, not just static codegen
- All activity is observable, testable, auditable
π ConnectSoft in One Line¶
An AI Software Factory that turns blueprints into full SaaS systems β autonomously, observably, and securely.
π The Factory Metaphor¶
ConnectSoft is modeled after a real-world manufacturing plant β where standardized inputs (blueprints, materials) pass through coordinated stations (agents) to yield repeatable, traceable, high-quality outputs (SaaS systems).
βWe donβt just write code β we assemble, test, package, and deliver software with the rigor of a factory floor.β
π§± Metaphor Components¶
| Factory Element | ConnectSoft Equivalent |
|---|---|
| π Blueprint | Structured business/domain input (YAML, DSL, prompt) |
| π§ Planner / Foreman | Orchestrator Agent that sequences work |
| π§° Station | AI Agent with scoped responsibilities (e.g., UI Designer Agent, API Generator Agent) |
| π© Parts | Templates, models, libraries, plugins |
| π Assembly Line | Agent collaboration flow + execution trace |
| π Quality Control | Test Generator, QA Agent, Observability hooks |
| π¦ Packaging | CI/CD, Bicep, Docker, Helm, release artifacts |
| π Shipping | Secure deployment to cloud environments |
| π Refinement | AI feedback loop, trace replay, prompt tuning |
π Why This Metaphor Works¶
- Repeatable: The same blueprint + agents always produce the same system
- Composable: You can swap a part (template, module, agent) without rewriting the factory
- Scalable: Add more agents, parallelize modules, generate 1000+ services
- Observable: Every operation emits telemetry β traceId, agentId, skillId
- Safe: Faults are isolated, retriable, and visible
- Self-improving: Output quality can be measured, compared, and evolved
π Factory Execution Example¶
graph TD
A[Blueprint Input] --> B[Planner Agent]
B --> C[Domain Modeler Agent]
B --> D[API Designer Agent]
C --> E[Microservice Generator Agent]
D --> F[OpenAPI Generator Agent]
E --> G[CI/CD & Deployment]
F --> G
G --> H[Observability + Trace Completed]
π Output = Traceable Assets¶
- Every build has a traceId
- Every agent emits an execution span
- Every output is linked to blueprint version
- Studio and orchestrators visualize the full flow like a factory dashboard
β Summary¶
ConnectSoft thinks like a factory:
- Blueprint in β agents assemble β test + validate β ship β observe
- Modularity, traceability, and feedback are built-in, not optional
- You get reliable, observable software β not unstructured code blobs
π From Idea to Service: High-Level Lifecycle¶
The ConnectSoft AI Software Factory turns a high-level product idea or feature definition into a running, observable SaaS system β using coordinated AI agents, structured blueprints, modular templates, and traceable execution.
βYou describe the what β ConnectSoft delivers the how, the who, and the running software.β
This section outlines the end-to-end lifecycle from concept to cloud deployment.
π§© Lifecycle Phases¶
| Phase | Description |
|---|---|
| π§ Vision & Intent | Input comes in the form of prompts, business blueprints, or API sketches |
| π Planning & Decomposition | Agents like the Planner, Product Manager, and Domain Modeler break input into features, modules, and service boundaries |
| βοΈ Assembly & Generation | Specialized agents generate backend services, APIs, UIs, tests, docs, infrastructure, and coordination scripts |
| β Validation | QA, test, policy, and security agents validate correctness, coverage, compliance |
| π Deployment | CI/CD pipelines and infrastructure agents provision, package, and deploy services to the cloud |
| π‘ Observability & Feedback | Telemetry flows into Studio β triggering test assertions, health checks, cost monitors, and AI feedback scores |
| π Evolution | Changes are diffed, replayed, versioned, and applied as updated blueprints |
π Blueprint-to-Artifact Loop¶
graph LR
A[User Input: Vision / Feature / API Spec] --> B[Blueprint Created]
B --> C[Planner Agent]
C --> D[Skill Execution Tree]
D --> E[Agents Generate Code + Infra + Docs]
E --> F[Validation & Tests]
F --> G[Deployment]
G --> H[Telemetry + Feedback]
H --> I[Studio + Trace Review]
I --> B
β Every loop produces traceable output with versioned artifacts.
𧬠Immutable Trace Per Run¶
Every lifecycle pass emits a full execution trace:
traceIdblueprintId+ version- All agent skills executed
- All outputs produced
- Success/failure/retry history
- Full observability map (logs, spans, metrics, events)
This enables blueprint replay, trace diffing, and compliance audits.
π¦ Lifecycle Control¶
The process supports:
- Human-in-the-loop checkpoints
- Automated validation gates (test, policy, security, cost)
- Preview environments
- Parallel generation of independent services
- Coordinated promotion to production
β Summary¶
The ConnectSoft lifecycle:
- Starts with intent
- Passes through agent collaboration
- Produces traceable, observable systems
- Enables continuous feedback and evolution
π€ The Role of AI Agents¶
At the heart of ConnectSoft is a coordinated network of AI agents β each with a defined scope, set of skills, and traceable responsibilities. These agents replace static scripts, manual coding, and siloed tooling with dynamic, autonomous, and testable generation workflows.
βAgents arenβt plugins β theyβre purpose-built, prompt-driven team members.β
This section defines the core responsibilities and design philosophy behind ConnectSoftβs agent model.
π§ What Is an Agent in ConnectSoft?¶
| Attribute | Description |
|---|---|
| Persona-aligned | Mimics a real software engineering role (e.g., Product Manager, Backend Developer, DevOps Engineer) |
| Skill-scoped | Only performs defined actions (e.g., GenerateDTO, EmitReleaseYaml, ValidateAccessPolicy) |
| Prompt-aware | Uses structured instructions, templates, and context-specific blueprints |
| Trace-linked | Every action emits spans, logs, events, and trace metadata |
| Composable | Works with other agents in execution chains coordinated by Orchestrators |
| Replayable | Outputs can be re-generated or diffed across versions or environments |
π§ Agent Responsibility Examples¶
| Agent | Skills |
|---|---|
API Designer Agent |
GenerateOpenAPI, EmitEndpointScaffold, DefineScopes |
Frontend Developer Agent |
GenerateComponent, ApplyTailwindStyle, Injecti18nSupport |
DevOps Engineer Agent |
EmitK8sManifests, ConfigureIngress, AttachSecrets |
QA Engineer Agent |
EmitSpecFlowTest, AssertAuthorization, GeneratePerformanceChecks |
Each agent operates as a specialized, reusable node in the software factory.
π AI Agents vs Templates¶
| Templates | ConnectSoft Agents |
|---|---|
| Static scaffolding | Dynamic, context-aware generation |
| One-shot | Incremental, trace-linked execution |
| Limited to code | Full lifecycle (code, infra, docs, validation, deployment) |
| Not observable | Telemetry-native: spans, events, metrics |
| No memory | Long-term blueprint-aware context |
| No autonomy | Agents collaborate + reroute on failure |
π What Makes Agents Autonomous¶
- Skill contracts and capability boundaries
- Blueprint + prompt as input
- Output verification and retry logic
- Observability:
AgentExecuted,SkillValidated,TraceCompleted - Cross-agent coordination via execution trees
- Feedback from validation, cost, performance β replanning
π‘ Agents Emit Traceable Outputs¶
Every agent execution results in:
- Structured output files or artifacts
- Execution metadata
- Logs, spans, and metrics
- Policy compliance signals
- Feedback loops (
feedbackScore, retry count, quality flags)
β This allows full inspection and audit of who did what, and why.
β Summary¶
- ConnectSoft agents replace traditional engineering steps with autonomous, scoped, and traceable capabilities
- Each agent has a defined role, skills, execution rules, and observability hooks
- This enables massive parallelism, reliability, and evolution across SaaS blueprints
π The Future of Software Creation¶
Software today is built through tools, frameworks, and manual coordination. But that model doesnβt scale to the complexity, velocity, and multidimensional scope of modern SaaS. ConnectSoft represents a paradigm shift: from developer-centered delivery to AI-coordinated software creation.
βTomorrowβs SaaS will be designed by people β and built by agents.β
This cycle frames how ConnectSoft points toward the next era of software engineering.
π οΈ The Status Quo: Toolkits & Manual Workflows¶
Todayβs typical delivery model:
- Human designs the system
- Developers build piece-by-piece using CLIs, frameworks, libraries
- DevOps teams configure infra and release pipelines
- QA and security bolt on validation afterward
- Logs and metrics come later
- Toolchain is fragile, tribal, unobservable
Result: Slow, expensive, and error-prone delivery.
π§ The ConnectSoft Future¶
With ConnectSoft:
- Blueprints drive all generation β from domain model to deployment
- AI agents collaborate to generate, test, validate, deploy, and observe
- Every step is traceable, observable, replayable
- Changes are scoped, simulated, and safely applied
- Everything is modular, auditable, and cost-aware
- Human oversight is focused on intent and verification, not wiring things together
π Manual Model vs. Factory Model¶
| Aspect | Manual Model | ConnectSoft Model |
|---|---|---|
| Codegen | Templates / scaffolding scripts | Autonomous agents with skills |
| Lifecycle coordination | Manual pipelines & human handoff | Orchestrator-driven execution |
| Observability | Added late | Emitted at every step |
| Compliance & testing | Reactive | Generated + enforced |
| Repeatability | Inconsistent, tribal | Traceable and version-controlled |
| Scaling to 1000+ modules | Not practical | Core to platform design |
π Why This Shift Is Inevitable¶
- LLMs + orchestration enable coordinated AI workstreams
- Multi-cloud, multi-tenant systems need traceable automation
- Regulation and compliance require transparent and auditable pipelines
- Developers want to move up the stack to strategy, not mechanics
- AI will drive software evolution β not just creation
π§ ConnectSoft Enables¶
- Product managers to describe features in natural language
- Architects to define constraints and get real microservices
- DevOps teams to manage blueprints instead of scripts
- Testers to validate logic without manual setup
- Platform teams to govern delivery at scale
β Summary¶
- The future of software is agentic, traceable, and orchestrated
- ConnectSoft replaces brittle toolchains with AI-powered delivery pipelines
- It redefines software creation as a lifecycle, not a task
π§© ConnectSoft as an Internal Developer Platform (IDP) with Superpowers¶
At its core, ConnectSoft functions as a powerful Internal Developer Platform (IDP) β but not like the ones youβve seen before. It doesnβt just standardize pipelines or provision environments. It introduces AI agents, observability-first design, and trace-based execution coordination, giving teams a self-improving, secure, and autonomous platform for delivering software.
βItβs an IDP β but alive.β
π§ What Is an IDP?¶
An Internal Developer Platform helps:
- Standardize dev environments
- Automate provisioning, CI/CD, and deployments
- Offer reusable services (auth, logging, metrics, etc.)
- Improve developer productivity across teams
Traditional IDPs are built manually β ConnectSoft is built and extended by agents.
π οΈ What Makes ConnectSoft an AI-First IDP?¶
| Capability | ConnectSoft Behavior |
|---|---|
| π Dynamic Blueprints | SaaS described declaratively, interpreted by agents |
| π€ AI Agents | Autonomous personas own parts of the lifecycle |
| π Observability-First | Every artifact, trace, and change is observable and testable |
| π§ͺ Validation by Default | Security, tests, coverage, cost embedded and auto-enforced |
| π Compliance-Ready | Secrets, redaction, audit logs all natively built in |
| π¦ Modular by Design | Microservices, libraries, gateways, and apps generated in isolation or as bundles |
| βοΈ Self-evolving | Prompts, traces, and execution histories guide improvement |
| π Feedback Loops | Every trace evaluated, scored, and tuned via feedback agents |
𧬠Factory + IDP = Autonomous Delivery Platform¶
graph TD
Blueprint["π Blueprint"]
Plan["π§ Plan"]
Agents["π€ AI Agents"]
Validate["π§ͺ Validate"]
Deploy["π Deploy"]
Observe["π Observe"]
Feedback["π Feedback"]
Blueprint --> Plan
Plan --> Agents
Agents --> Validate --> Deploy --> Observe --> Feedback --> Plan
β Every loop emits structured execution telemetry and traceable state.
π§ Roles That Benefit¶
| Persona | What They Gain |
|---|---|
| Product Owner | Feature-to-service without managing delivery |
| Engineer | Reuse patterns, focus on logic, not scaffolding |
| Platform Team | Governance, modularization, security enforcement |
| Security | Policy-as-code enforcement and audit-ready output |
| DevOps | Blueprint-managed CI/CD, with observability and rollback logic |
| QA | Trace-aware test generation and regression validation |
| Executives | Visibility into cost, velocity, coverage, and trace health |
π Extendability¶
- Add custom agents with defined skills
- Swap orchestration logic per blueprint type
- Publish internal templates and skill kits
- Integrate external tools (e.g., Azure DevOps, GitHub, Vault) via skills
β Summary¶
- ConnectSoft is an Internal Developer Platform, elevated by AI, traceability, and orchestration
- It supports secure, compliant, feedback-driven delivery at scale
- Unlike manual IDPs, itβs self-assembling, self-validating, and self-aware
π§± Supporting 3000+ Microservices: Why Scale Matters¶
ConnectSoft isnβt built for teams managing 3 services β itβs built for organizations that may one day manage 3,000. Whether across domains, tenants, regions, or brands, modern SaaS ecosystems require scale in every dimension: code, coordination, compliance, and cost control.
βScale isnβt a performance problem β itβs a design problem.β
This section explores how ConnectSoft was built to scale modularity and traceability, not just raw throughput.
π§ Why 3000+ Modules Is a Real Use Case¶
| Context | Example |
|---|---|
| π₯ Multi-clinic SaaS | Each location = 20+ microservices Γ 150 tenants |
| π¦ White-labeled platforms | 100 clients Γ isolated feature editions |
| π Regional compliance | Same service in 12 countries, each with different rules |
| π Internal reuse | Shared microservice libraries reused across 50 teams |
| π Feature isolation | Each capability split into its own testable, deployable module |
Scaling isnβt theoretical β itβs survival.
π§© What Happens When You Donβt Design for This Scale?¶
- CI/CD pipelines become bottlenecks
- Observability tools collapse under high-cardinality tags
- Manual reviews donβt scale β risk explodes
- Naming, versioning, ownership drift across teams
- No way to validate all generated code and infrastructure
- Feedback loops break β no consistent way to compare outcomes
- Security and compliance gaps become inevitable
π How ConnectSoft Supports Scale by Design¶
| Area | Scalable Design |
|---|---|
| Module registry | Every output is uniquely tagged, traced, versioned |
| Trace-based execution | Each module/service has its own traceId, logs, spans, events |
| Agent isolation | Agents generate per-scope, with skill gating and replay support |
| Test coverage tracking | Centralized test metrics per module |
| Cost and observability segmentation | Tenant-aware telemetry with low-overhead tagging |
| Dependency graph | Blueprint-linked service trees + module diffs |
| Auto-partitioned pipelines | Modules built/tested in isolation or orchestration units |
| Studio visualization | Navigate thousands of components by domain, tenant, agent, trace |
π Output Tracing at Scale (Example)¶
{
"moduleId": "payments-refunds-service",
"version": "1.6.2",
"tenantId": "client-431",
"traceId": "trace-78df91",
"agentId": "backend-developer",
"spanCount": 18,
"outputCost": 0.92
}
This trace is one of 120 generated in a single orchestrated blueprint run.
π Studio Scaling Features¶
- Module heatmaps by update frequency, cost, agent errors
- Per-tenant trace and usage segmentation
- Large blueprint diff viewer across hundreds of generated modules
- High-scale test and validation summary dashboards
- Intelligent grouping by domain, purpose, environment, and source blueprint
β Summary¶
- Scaling to 3000+ services is a product requirement, not an afterthought
- ConnectSoft was designed with modularity, observability, and traceability as foundational tools for scale
- Without this design, you get spaghetti microservices, tech debt, and chaos
π Factory State and Evolution: Traces, Lineage, and Replay¶
ConnectSoft is not a one-shot generator. It's a stateful, evolving factory that keeps track of every execution, blueprint, version, and outcome β forming a longitudinal memory of the software it produces. That memory enables safe regeneration, trace diffing, and feedback-driven evolution.
βYou donβt just build software β you build its history.β
This section explains how execution traces, versioned blueprints, and lineage graphs make the factory stateful, self-aware, and auditable.
π§ What Is Factory State?¶
Factory state is the complete memory of what was built, when, how, by whom, and why.
It includes:
- Blueprints and their versions
- Trace IDs and execution metadata
- Agent runs and skill outputs
- Tests, validations, failures, retries
- Feedback signals (human + automated)
- Deployment versions and rollback diffs
π Example: Trace Metadata Snapshot¶
{
"traceId": "trace-01927fa",
"blueprintId": "appointments-v2",
"version": "2.3.4",
"executedBy": ["planner-agent", "backend-developer", "qa-engineer"],
"outputs": ["AppointmentsService", "OpenAPI.yaml", "SpecFlowTests"],
"status": "Success",
"durationMs": 6283,
"feedbackScore": 4.7
}
β This trace becomes a permanent record of that software version.
π§© Key Evolution Features¶
| Capability | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Trace replay | Regenerate outputs from the same blueprint and compare |
| Blueprint diffing | See how two versions changed, and what was regenerated |
| Skill regression detection | Spot when agents emit lower-quality or inconsistent outputs |
| Failure lineage | Trace back to the skill, agent, or blueprint change that caused a failure |
| Test coverage drift | Observe when newly generated modules lack test parity |
| Version audit | Reconstruct the exact code, trace, and deployment for any release |
π Evolution-Driven Feedback Loops¶
- Poor
feedbackScoreβ prompt tuning - Trace regression β skill reassignment
- Trace delta β triggers
AgentExecutionRequestedfor updated scope - Missing tests β
QA Agentactivated with diff map - Cost or performance regressions β trigger optimization workflow
π Studio: Factory Evolution Views¶
- Trace timeline browser
- Blueprint version diff viewer
- Feedback heatmap per agent or module
- Skill flakiness tracker (retry rate Γ score Γ validation failures)
- Drift alerts: βModule X has diverged from blueprint definitionβ
π§ Why This Matters¶
Without state and version control:
- AI-generated software becomes untraceable
- Debugging turns into guesswork
- Change management is impossible
- You canβt safely regenerate or reuse
- Compliance and audits become blind spots
With factory state:
β You get reproducibility, traceability, and continuous improvement.
β Summary¶
- ConnectSoft treats every execution as a versioned, observable trace
- It maintains factory state over time β enabling audit, rollback, replay, and regression detection
- This makes the AI software factory safe, iterative, and evolutionary
π₯ Vision Across Personas: Stakeholder Value¶
ConnectSoft is not just for developers. Its vision spans every role involved in delivering and maintaining SaaS β from product managers and architects to security, QA, DevOps, and executives. The platform is designed to provide structured value to every persona through traceability, automation, and clarity.
βThe software factory doesnβt just write code β it speaks everyoneβs language.β
This section explains how ConnectSoft delivers tailored benefits to each stakeholder while maintaining a shared source of truth via blueprints and traces.
π§ Persona Map¶
| Persona | What They Care About | What ConnectSoft Provides |
|---|---|---|
| π§ Product Manager | Feature delivery, time-to-market, clarity of scope | Prompt-to-blueprint flow, visual trace of work, feature decomposition |
| π§± Architect | Consistency, domain modeling, scalability | Domain-driven microservice generation, API alignment, agent system modeling |
| π¨βπ» Developer | Reuse, modularity, logic, testability | Scaffolding, DI, pre-tested infrastructure, reusable libraries |
| π§ͺ QA Engineer | Test coverage, regression control, safety | Agent-generated tests, coverage mapping, trace-linked failures |
| π‘ Security Officer | Access control, data protection, compliance | Policy-driven generation, observability, redaction enforcement, audit logs |
| π§ DevOps Engineer | CI/CD, infrastructure, deployment risk | Pipeline generation, secrets management, IaC scaffolds, health probes |
| π Executive / VP Engineering | Velocity, cost, compliance, coverage | Dashboards showing agent activity, trace volume, test coverage, cost/trace |
| π Documentation / Enablement | Onboarding, internal docs, tutorials | Markdown generation, OpenAPI docs, diagrams, usage guides |
| π Customer Success / Growth | Multi-tenant delivery, version control | Edition-aware modules, change diffing, feedback integration |
π§© Single Source of Truth: The Blueprint¶
Every role interfaces with the blueprint or its outputs:
- PMs define intent
- Engineers create/edit components
- Agents produce modules, tests, deployment plans
- Studio shows the trace and status of all execution
- Compliance teams review security & audit logs
β ConnectSoft is role-aware, but output-unified.
π Studio View by Persona¶
| Role | Default Dashboard |
|---|---|
| PM | Feature β module progress view, trace overview |
| Architect | Blueprint lineage + module topology |
| QA | Coverage tracker, trace-linked test explorer |
| DevOps | Pipeline health, runtime observability |
| Security | Redaction map, access violations, policy enforcement |
| Executive | Delivery velocity, trace success rates, module health reports |
π― Persona Empowerment in Practice¶
- Product manager creates a feature request
- Planner decomposes it into a multi-module blueprint
- Agents generate code, infra, docs, tests
- QA agent emits validation suite
- Observability agent ensures compliance
- Studio shows everyone the current trace, status, gaps, and cost
This enables cross-functional alignment with no extra coordination overhead.
β Summary¶
- ConnectSoft delivers shared value across all personas involved in software creation and operations
- Each role gets tailored insight, while all activity is trace-linked to a single blueprint
- This reduces ambiguity, boosts alignment, and makes software delivery collaborative by default
π§ Summary and Vision β Strategy β Execution Flow¶
The ConnectSoft Vision lays the foundation for a new model of software creation β one that is modular, traceable, autonomous, and adaptive. But vision alone is not enough. This final cycle connects the βwhyβ of ConnectSoft to its strategic goals and execution principles.
βVision defines direction. Strategy defines focus. Execution defines reality.β
π§ What Weβve Defined¶
| Element | Description |
|---|---|
| β What is ConnectSoft | An AI Software Factory for building SaaS systems autonomously |
| β Factory Metaphor | Modeled after real-world manufacturing, traceable and modular |
| β Lifecycle Overview | From blueprint input to running system, with feedback and evolution |
| β Role of Agents | Scoped, observable, autonomous collaborators across the lifecycle |
| β Software Creation Shift | From manual tooling to AI-orchestrated delivery at scale |
| β ConnectSoft as IDP | A self-aware, extensible internal platform β not just a dev tool |
| β Scalability Vision | Designed to handle 3000+ microservices with trace and cost control |
| β State + Replay | Full trace lineage, versioning, and feedback-driven evolution |
| β Stakeholder Alignment | Personas aligned around a single blueprint β trace β artifact model |
π From Vision to Strategy¶
This Vision informs a tightly-scoped strategy, which focuses on:
- Delivering end-to-end SaaS generation from AI agents
- Embedding modularity, observability, and compliance by design
- Scaling across multi-tenant and multi-domain architectures
- Enabling human-in-the-loop collaboration with traceable output
- Supporting continuous evolution of software via replay and feedback
π‘ Documented next in vision/strategic-goals.md
βοΈ From Strategy to Execution¶
The strategy is operationalized through Core Design Principles:
| Principle | Execution Layer |
|---|---|
| Modularization | Code, blueprints, agents, libraries |
| AI-First Development | LLM-based skills, prompt contracts, planner loops |
| Event-Driven Architecture | Loose coupling via events across agents/modules |
| Security-First | Secrets, redaction, policies built into generation |
| Observability-Driven | Spans, metrics, trace-linked validation |
| Cloud-Native Mindset | CI/CD, Kubernetes, Bicep, multi-cloud by default |
| DDD & Clean Principles | Blueprint modeling β microservice boundaries β maintainable output |
π‘ Documented in core-principles/*.md
β Summary¶
- The ConnectSoft vision defines how AI, modularity, and traceability can transform how we build SaaS
- This leads directly into our strategic focus areas and core engineering patterns
- Together, these documents serve as the foundation for the entire platform
π Navigation from Here¶
- π Next Step: Strategic Goals β
- π§ Then: Why AI Software Factory β
- π§± Then: Core Design Principles β
- π¬ Then: Platform Architecture β
- βοΈ Then: Agent System β