π§ Product Owner Agent Specification¶
π― Purpose¶
The Product Owner Agent acts as the custodian of the Product Backlog inside the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory.
Its core purpose is to:
-
Transform structured Product Plans (produced by the Product Manager Agentγpreviously designedγ)
into a granular, prioritized, and ready-for-development Backlog. -
Decompose Features into detailed, actionable User Stories.
-
Define Acceptance Criteria and Refinement Notes for each backlog item β
ensuring downstream agents (Architects, UX/UI Designers, Backend/Frontend/Mobile Developers) have everything needed to execute autonomously. -
Prioritize backlog items intelligently (impact, urgency, dependencies).
-
Ensure traceability from Vision β Product Plan β User Stories β Developed Services.
π In Short:¶
The Product Owner Agent bridges the gap between product vision and technical execution β
by creating a refined, prioritized, traceable Backlog that feeds all engineering flows inside ConnectSoft Factory.
ποΈ Position in the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory Lifecycle¶
flowchart TD
VisionArchitectAgent -->|VisionDocument| ProductManagerAgent
ProductManagerAgent -->|ProductPlan, MVP, Editions| ProductOwnerAgent
ProductOwnerAgent -->|UserStories, BacklogItems| UXDesignerAgent
ProductOwnerAgent -->|UserStories, BacklogItems| EnterpriseArchitectAgent
ProductOwnerAgent -->|UserStories, BacklogItems| BackendDeveloperAgent
ProductOwnerAgent -->|UserStories, BacklogItems| FrontendDeveloperAgent
- Upstream Input: Structured Product Plan artifacts (Feature Catalog, MVP Definition, Editions, Roadmap).
- Downstream Outputs:
- Detailed Product Backlogs (Stories, Tasks, Acceptance Criteria).
- Events:
BacklogReady,StoryCreated,AcceptanceCriteriaDefined.
π Key Goals of the Product Owner Agent¶
| Goal | Description |
|---|---|
| Granular Decomposition | Break features into user-focused, independent, testable user stories (INVEST principle). |
| Acceptance Definition | Define what success means for each story (Acceptance Criteria). |
| Prioritized Workflows | Organize stories based on business value, urgency, and technical dependencies. |
| Traceable Lineage | Maintain direct traceability back to the originating Vision Document and Product Plan. |
| Ready for Development | Ensure user stories are detailed, scoped, and clear enough for downstream agents to pick up without clarification loops. |
π Example Flows the Product Owner Agent Enables¶
| Scenario | Supported? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Decomposing "Appointment Scheduling" into 8 user stories | β | Patient selects date, Doctor confirms, Admin reschedules, etc. |
| Mapping stories to MVP scope | β | Only critical flows included in MVP iteration. |
| Assigning Acceptance Criteria to each story | β | "Appointment must sync to calendar within 30 seconds." |
| Prioritizing based on dependencies | β | "User registration must precede appointment scheduling." |
| Preparing backlog across multiple editions (Free, Pro, Enterprise) | β | Tagging backlog items accordingly. |
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Alignment |
|---|---|
| Domain-Driven Decomposition | Stories map cleanly to bounded contexts, aggregates, and entities. |
| Event-Driven Readiness | Story readiness events trigger UX/Architecture/Dev flows. |
| Observability and Traceability | Each story is linked to a Vision + Product Plan lineage. |
| Multi-Tenant SaaS Readiness | Backlog is edition-aware if applicable (different stories for Free vs Enterprise editions). |
| Resilience and Scalability | Supports large backlog creation across multi-product portfolios. |
π Responsibilities¶
The Product Owner Agent is responsible for turning high-level Product Plans into fine-grained, executable artifacts β
guaranteeing smooth and autonomous execution across ConnectSoft engineering flows.
Each responsibility ensures that the Backlog is:
- Clear (user-focused language)
- Structured (INVEST-aligned stories)
- Traceable (linked to Vision and Product Plan)
- Prioritized (based on business value and technical feasibility)
- Ready for Engineering (no clarification cycles needed)
π οΈ Primary Responsibilities¶
| Responsibility | Description |
|---|---|
| Feature Decomposition | Break each feature from Product Plan into independent, small, testable User Stories (INVEST principle: Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable). |
| User Story Authoring | Write each User Story in user-centric, clear language: "As a [persona], I want [goal], so that [benefit]". |
| Acceptance Criteria Definition | Define 2β5 acceptance criteria per User Story β clear, testable success conditions. |
| Backlog Structuring | Organize User Stories into a structured Product Backlog, scoped by MVP/Phase/Roadmap alignment. |
| Backlog Prioritization | Assign priority scores using MoSCoW (Must have, Should have, Could have, Won't have) or RICE models. |
| Traceability Embedding | Every User Story must include traceability back to the original Vision Document, Product Plan feature, and strategic goal. |
| Edition Awareness | Identify if specific backlog items apply to Free, Pro, or Enterprise editions. |
| Backlog Readiness Validation | Validate the completeness, clarity, and testability of all User Stories before marking backlog "ready". |
| Artifact Storage | Store the generated Backlog in artifact storage (Blob, Database, Git, Azure DevOps, or other) β backend pluggableγyour recent clarificationγ. |
| Event Emission | Emit structured events: BacklogReady, StoryCreated, AcceptanceCriteriaDefined. |
π§© Responsibilities to Artifact Mapping¶
| Artifact | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| User Story Document | Feature Decomposition, Story Authoring, Traceability |
| Acceptance Criteria Document | Acceptance Criteria Definition |
| Prioritized Backlog Artifact | Backlog Structuring and Prioritization |
| Traceability Map | Embedding Vision β Product Plan β Story lineage |
| Edition Mapping Table (Optional) | Edition Awareness tagging |
ποΈ Visual: Responsibilities Flow¶
flowchart TD
ProductPlanIntake --> FeatureDecomposition
FeatureDecomposition --> UserStoryAuthoring
UserStoryAuthoring --> AcceptanceCriteriaDefinition
AcceptanceCriteriaDefinition --> BacklogStructuring
BacklogStructuring --> Prioritization
Prioritization --> ValidationAndCorrection
ValidationAndCorrection --> StorageAndEmission
π Example Responsibilities in Action¶
| Responsibility | Example Output |
|---|---|
| Feature Decomposition | "Appointment Scheduling" becomes 8 independent User Stories. |
| User Story Authoring | "As a Patient, I want to select an appointment date, so that I can schedule my visit conveniently." |
| Acceptance Criteria | - "Patient must select available date slots." - "Doctor must confirm within 24 hours." |
| Prioritization | MVP stories marked "Must Have", reporting features marked "Could Have". |
| Edition Awareness | "Multi-clinic Management" story tagged as Enterprise-only. |
π Critical Success Metrics (Agent Internal KPIs)¶
| KPI | Target |
|---|---|
| Story Completeness Rate | 100% of MVP features decomposed into INVEST-compliant stories. |
| Traceability Coverage | 100% of stories linked to Vision and Product Plan. |
| Backlog Readiness Time | Produce full MVP backlog within agent time budget (configurable). |
| Validation Pass Rate | > 95% stories pass structural and semantic validation on first attempt. |
| Event Emission Success Rate | 100% backlog-related events emitted without error. |
π§© Alignment to ConnectSoft Platform Principles¶
| Principle | Responsibility Reflection |
|---|---|
| Domain-Driven Modeling | Stories map to bounded contexts and aggregates. |
| Cloud-Native Artifact Management | Backlog artifacts pluggable to different storage backendsγyour clarified requirementγ. |
| Event-Driven Architecture | Readiness notifications and story publications emitted via events. |
| Observability and Traceability | Story lineage fully observable and linkable. |
| SaaS Editions Support | Backlogs can vary by product edition (Free/Pro/Enterprise). |
π₯ Inputs¶
The Product Owner Agent requires a structured, event-driven, and artifact-backed set of inputs
to accurately decompose product features into actionable user stories.
Each input ensures that story authoring, prioritization, and acceptance criteria definition
remain aligned with the original business vision, strategic goals, and feature plans.
π List of Primary Inputs¶
| Input Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Product Plan Document | Produced by Product Manager Agent; includes Feature Catalog, MVP definition, Editions mapping, and Roadmapγprevious specγ. | Markdown/JSON artifact link. |
| ProductPlanCreated Event | Event notifying that Product Plan is available, with traceability metadata. | event_type: ProductPlanCreated, artifact_uri, trace_id. |
| Feature Catalog Artifact | Structured list of all features, with mappings to personas and strategic goals. | JSON array of features. |
| MVP Feature List | List of features that must be included in the initial product release (MVP). | JSON object with feature names. |
| Editions Mapping Artifact | Mapping of features to SaaS editions (Free, Pro, Enterprise). | JSON object linking features to editions. |
| Vision Document (Reference Only) | Original Vision Document produced by Vision Architect Agent, used for traceability and context. | URI to stored artifact. |
| Semantic Memory (Optional) | Previously created Backlogs or Story Decompositions from similar domains retrieved via semantic search (vector DBs or MCP Serversγyour clarified model β backend flexibleγ). | Similar Healthcare SaaS MVP backlog from past project. |
| Strategic Objectives List | Business goals extracted from Vision and Product Plan β used to align and prioritize stories. | "Reduce churn", "Improve engagement", "Launch by Q2 2026". |
| Edition Constraints (Optional) | Specific instructions if features or user stories must vary by edition. | "Multi-clinic management only available in Enterprise Edition." |
| Urgency/Delivery Constraints (Optional) | Deadlines, phases from Roadmap (MVP, Phase 2, Phase 3 targets). | "MVP features must be ready within 4 months." |
ποΈ Visual: Input Sources¶
flowchart TD
ProductManagerAgent -->|ProductPlanCreatedEvent| EventBus
EventBus --> ProductOwnerAgent
ArtifactStorage -->|Product Plan, Feature Catalog| ProductOwnerAgent
SemanticMemory -->|Retrieve Past Story Patterns| ProductOwnerAgent
VisionStorage -->|Vision Document (Reference)| ProductOwnerAgent
β
Inputs are multisource, but traceable and cloud-native.
β
Artifact storage flexible β could be Blob Storage, Git, Azure DevOps, Semantic DBs, MCP Serversγas per your instructionγ.
π Example Event Payload for Activation¶
{
"event_type": "ProductPlanCreated",
"trace_id": "vision-2025-04-27-001",
"artifact_uri": "https://storage.connectsoft.ai/products/product-plan-2025-04-27-001.md",
"version": "1.0",
"timestamp": "2025-04-27T23:00:00Z"
}
β This activates the Product Owner Agent with full metadata context.
π Example Extracted Input from Product Plan¶
| Field | Example |
|---|---|
| Feature | "Appointment Scheduling" |
| Personas | "Patient", "Doctor", "Admin" |
| Strategic Goals | "Improve appointment engagement by 25%" |
| MVP Inclusion | "Must be delivered in MVP" |
| Edition Target | "Available for Free and Pro editions" |
π§© Input-to-Output Mapping¶
| Input | Drives Output |
|---|---|
| Feature Catalog | User Story Decomposition |
| MVP Feature List | MVP-Tagged Stories |
| Editions Mapping | Edition-tagged Backlog Items |
| Strategic Objectives | Business-aligned Story Prioritization |
| Roadmap Phases | Sprint Planning Readiness |
| Semantic Memory | Enrichment of story patterns, acceptance criteria samples |
π§ Smart Behaviors Based on Inputs¶
| Behavior | Input Trigger |
|---|---|
| Semantic Enrichment | Similar past projects found in semantic memory. |
| MVP Filtering | Use MVP Feature List to focus only on core flows. |
| Edition-Specific Story Branching | If editions mapping suggests differentiated feature access. |
| Story Prioritization Adjustment | Strategic objective flags: higher priority for launch-critical goals. |
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Input Behavior Alignment |
|---|---|
| Event-Driven Activation | Listens for ProductPlanCreated events. |
| Multi-Backend Artifact Flexibility | Artifacts retrieved from storage layers (Blob, Git, SQL, Semantic DBs)γyour clarified modelγ. |
| Semantic Memory Augmentation | Similar plans enhance decomposition and story authoring. |
| Traceability and Observability | Inputs embedded with full lineage tracking (trace_id, project_id). |
π€ Outputs¶
The Product Owner Agent is responsible for producing clear, traceable, and engineering-ready outputs,
enabling autonomous execution by downstream agents like UX Designers, Solution Architects, Backend and Frontend Developers.
Every output is modular, semantically linked, traceable to the originating Vision,
and validated for completeness, testability, and prioritization readiness.
π Main Outputs Produced¶
| Output Type | Description | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Product Backlog Artifact | Full structured backlog containing User Stories, Priorities, Acceptance Criteria, Traceability. | Markdown Table + JSON Structured Artifact |
| Individual User Story Artifacts | For each story: description, acceptance criteria, traceability metadata, edition tags (if applicable). | Markdown + JSON per story |
| Acceptance Criteria Document | Aggregated acceptance conditions for all MVP and Phase 1 stories. | Markdown and/or JSON structure |
| Backlog Prioritization Matrix | Table or JSON indicating MoSCoW or RICE scoring for backlog items. | JSON Array |
| Traceability Map | Matrix linking: Vision β Product Plan Feature β User Story β Edition/Persona. | Markdown Table + JSON |
| Edition Mapping Tags (Optional) | If different editions (Free, Pro, Enterprise) require story tagging. | JSON field inside stories |
| Event Emissions | Structured events emitted to Event Bus notifying system of backlog readiness and story creation. | JSON Event Payloads |
ποΈ Visual: Output Artifact Generation Flow¶
flowchart TD
ProductPlanIntake --> DecomposeFeatures
DecomposeFeatures --> UserStories
UserStories --> AcceptanceCriteria
AcceptanceCriteria --> PrioritizationScoring
PrioritizationScoring --> BacklogAssembly
BacklogAssembly --> ArtifactStorage
BacklogAssembly --> EventEmission
β Outputs are progressively enriched and self-validated before being finalized.
π Example: Product Backlog Artifact (Markdown Structure)¶
# π Product Backlog - Appointment Management SaaS
## Traceability Metadata
- Project ID: healthcare-saas-2025
- Trace ID: vision-2025-04-27-001
- Product Plan Version: 1.0
## Backlog Items
| Story ID | Story | Priority | MVP | Edition | Acceptance Criteria |
|:---------|:------|:---------|:----|:--------|:--------------------|
| US-001 | As a Patient, I want to select an available appointment date, so that I can schedule easily. | Must Have | β
| Free, Pro | - Select available slot <br> - Confirm appointment <br> - Receive confirmation |
| US-002 | As an Admin, I want to reschedule appointments, so that no-shows can be minimized. | Should Have | β | Pro, Enterprise | - Update appointment <br> - Notify Patient |
β
MVP indicator
β
Edition mapping
β
Acceptance Criteria embedded
π¦ Example: Single User Story JSON Artifact¶
{
"story_id": "US-001",
"description": "As a Patient, I want to select an available appointment date, so that I can schedule easily.",
"trace_id": "vision-2025-04-27-001",
"linked_feature": "Appointment Scheduling",
"personas": ["Patient"],
"strategic_goals": ["Improve appointment engagement"],
"priority": "Must Have",
"mvp_scope": true,
"edition_tags": ["Free", "Pro"],
"acceptance_criteria": [
"Select available appointment slot",
"Confirm appointment",
"Receive notification of confirmation"
]
}
β
Downstream-ready
β
Traceable
β
Business-aligned
π£ Example: Event Emissions¶
| Event | Payload Contents |
|---|---|
BacklogReady |
Artifact URI, project ID, trace ID, backlog version. |
StoryCreated |
Story ID, traceability metadata, artifact URI. |
AcceptanceCriteriaDefined |
Story ID, acceptance criteria JSON. |
Example: BacklogReady Event
{
"event_type": "BacklogReady",
"trace_id": "vision-2025-04-27-001",
"artifact_uri": "https://storage.connectsoft.ai/backlogs/backlog-2025-04-27-001.md",
"version": "1.0",
"timestamp": "2025-04-28T01:00:00Z"
}
β Triggers downstream UX, Architect, Engineering Agents to pick up stories autonomously.
π§© Output Quality Standards¶
| Attribute | Validation Rule |
|---|---|
| Traceability | Every artifact must include trace_id, linked_feature, personas, strategic_goals. |
| Prioritization | Every backlog item must have MoSCoW or RICE score. |
| Testability | Every User Story must have 2β5 Acceptance Criteria. |
| Readiness | MVP-scope stories must be explicitly marked. |
| Edition Awareness | If editions mapping exists, stories must be tagged accordingly. |
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Output Reflection |
|---|---|
| Clean Modularization | Every story/artifact is modular and reusable. |
| Event-Driven Collaboration | Events drive downstream agent activations. |
| Observability | Events, storage actions, validation results are traced and logged. |
| Cloud-Native Scalability | Artifacts stored in Blob Storage, Git, SQL, or semantic storesγyour flexibility requirementγ. |
| Multi-Edition Support | Edition mappings handled naturally for SaaS scaling. |
π Knowledge Base¶
The Product Owner Agent is empowered by a rich, modular internal knowledge base
that allows it to:
- Write clear, user-centered User Stories
- Define rigorous, testable Acceptance Criteria
- Prioritize backlog items intelligently
- Align outputs to ConnectSoft SaaS standards
- Maintain semantic continuity and traceability
This ensures the agent operates predictably, autonomously, and scalably across the factory lifecycle.
π Core Areas of the Knowledge Base¶
| Knowledge Area | Description |
|---|---|
| User Story Templates | Standardized formats for writing clear, INVEST-aligned User Stories (Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable). |
| Acceptance Criteria Frameworks | Techniques for defining 2β5 clear, binary acceptance conditions per story. |
| MoSCoW Prioritization Model | Framework for Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, Won't Have story scoring. |
| RICE Prioritization Model | Reach Γ Impact Γ Confidence Γ· Effort scoring method for feature/stories. |
| Traceability Embedding Rules | How to embed project ID, vision trace ID, product plan version into every story artifact. |
| Edition-Awareness Patterns | Best practices for tagging backlog items to Free, Pro, Enterprise editions. |
| Persona-Based Story Decomposition | Models for mapping stories tightly to identified personas. |
| Strategic Goal Alignment Techniques | Ensures every story supports at least one strategic objective (extracted from Vision). |
| Story Granularity Guidelines | How to split stories to fit within 1β3 day delivery window (ready for downstream agile teams). |
| Semantic Memory Access | Retrieval of prior backlog artifacts for similar domains/products (via Semantic DBs, Git, SQL, or MCP Servers if needed)γyour clarified multi-backend supportγ. |
ποΈ Knowledge Base Diagram¶
flowchart TD
KnowledgeBase --> StoryTemplates
KnowledgeBase --> AcceptanceCriteriaModels
KnowledgeBase --> PrioritizationFrameworks
KnowledgeBase --> TraceabilityStandards
KnowledgeBase --> EditionTaggingPatterns
KnowledgeBase --> StrategicGoalAlignmentModels
KnowledgeBase --> SemanticMemoryRetriever
β Ensures modular reasoning and best-practice adherence across all outputs.
π Example Knowledge Base Assets¶
| Asset | Example |
|---|---|
standard-user-story-template.md |
"As a [persona], I want [goal], so that [benefit]" |
acceptance-criteria-cheatsheet.md |
Clear, binary, testable β avoid subjective language. |
moscow-prioritization-rules.json |
Definitions for Must/Should/Could/Won't tags. |
rice-scoring-weights.json |
Default weightings for Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort. |
edition-tagging-guidelines.md |
How to annotate backlog items by SaaS edition. |
persona-decomposition-mapping.json |
Expected behavior mappings for common personas (Patient, Doctor, Admin, Customer, etc.). |
semantic-memory-query-patterns.md |
How to query "past backlogs similar to Healthcare SaaS MVP" from memory stores. |
π§ Semantic Memory (Optional Boost)¶
If backlog creation complexity increases (e.g., 100+ stories or cross-domain SaaS),
the Product Owner Agent optionally enriches itself by querying:
- Previous ConnectSoft SaaS Product Backlogs
- Related User Story patterns
- Acceptance Criteria examples
- Edition-aware decompositions
β Stored in Semantic Memory across MCP Servers, Azure Cognitive Search, SQL, or Blob/Git as per backend configurationγyour clarified modelγ.
π Example: Enrichment Behavior¶
| Scenario | Semantic Memory Role |
|---|---|
| Healthcare SaaS Product | Retrieve similar "Patient Appointment Booking" stories and criteria. |
| E-Commerce Loyalty App | Retrieve similar "Reward Points Management" user stories. |
| API-first Backend | Retrieve "API Authentication", "Rate Limiting" backlog examples. |
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Knowledge Base Alignment |
|---|---|
| Domain Expertise | User stories match domain needs, personas, and strategic goals. |
| Resilient Execution | Prioritization and story decomposition standards enforced. |
| Traceability-First | Every artifact linkable via IDs, project lineage. |
| Cloud-Native and Pluggable | Semantic memories fetched flexibly from available backends (Blob, Git, SQL, MCP, etc.). |
| Edition-Based SaaS Readiness | Story tagging for Free, Pro, Enterprise editions. |
π Process Flow¶
The Product Owner Agent follows a structured, modular, and observable execution pipeline
to transform Product Plans into fully structured Backlogs.
This process ensures:
- High-quality decomposition
- Prioritized, acceptance-ready stories
- Full traceability and semantic alignment
- Observability and recoverability at every step
π High-Level Phases of the Process Flow¶
| Phase | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Task Assignment | Agent activated via ProductPlanCreated event. Receives Product Plan URI, Trace ID, metadata. |
| 2. Information Intake | Downloads Product Plan, Feature Catalog, MVP Features, Editions Mapping; fetches semantic memory (optional). |
| 3. Decomposition | Breaks features into detailed User Stories (applying INVEST principle). |
| 4. Acceptance Criteria Definition | Drafts 2β5 acceptance criteria per story β clear, testable conditions. |
| 5. Prioritization | Applies MoSCoW or RICE scoring to backlog items based on business objectives and constraints. |
| 6. Edition Tagging | If editions mapping exists, tag stories accordingly (Free, Pro, Enterprise). |
| 7. Validation | Structural, semantic, traceability validation of all backlog items. |
| 8. Correction (if needed) | Auto-correct missing sections, retrigger validation. |
| 9. Artifact Storage | Store backlog and stories in flexible backends (Blob Storage, Git Repos, SQL DBs, etc.)γmulti-backend support as clarifiedγ. |
| 10. Event Emission | Emit structured events: BacklogReady, StoryCreated, AcceptanceCriteriaDefined. |
| 11. Observability Logging | Emit traces, structured logs, and Prometheus-compatible metrics for each critical step. |
ποΈ Visual: Product Owner Agent Process Flow Diagram¶
flowchart TD
TaskAssignment["Task Assignment (ProductPlanCreated Event)"]
--> InformationIntake["Download Artifacts + Semantic Enrichment"]
--> Decomposition["Decompose Features into User Stories"]
--> AcceptanceCriteria["Define Acceptance Criteria"]
--> Prioritization["Apply MoSCoW / RICE Prioritization"]
--> EditionTagging["Tag Stories per SaaS Editions (Optional)"]
--> Validation["Validate Artifacts"]
Validation -->|Pass| Storage["Store Artifacts"]
Validation -->|Fail| Correction["Auto-Correct and Retry"]
Correction --> RetryValidation["Re-Validate After Correction"]
Storage --> EventEmission["Emit Events to EventBus"]
EventEmission --> Observability["Emit Logs, Metrics, Traces"]
β Supports corrections, retries, and full observability across steps.
π Detailed Activities Inside Each Phase¶
π₯ 1. Task Assignment¶
- Listen for
ProductPlanCreatedevent. - Extract artifact URIs, trace_id, version metadata.
π 2. Information Intake¶
- Download Product Plan (Markdown + JSON).
- Parse Feature Catalog, MVP List, Editions Mapping.
- Retrieve relevant semantic memory examples (optional).
π§© 3. Decomposition¶
- Decompose each feature into multiple INVEST-compliant User Stories.
π§ 4. Acceptance Criteria Definition¶
- Attach 2β5 binary, testable conditions to each User Story.
π’ 5. Prioritization¶
- Apply MoSCoW (Must, Should, Could, Wonβt) tags or RICE scores.
π·οΈ 6. Edition Tagging¶
- Tag stories if different per SaaS edition.
β 7. Validation¶
- Ensure completeness, business alignment, persona linking, strategic goal alignment, traceability metadata.
π 8. Correction (if needed)¶
- Auto-fix missing priorities, missing trace_ids, missing acceptance criteria.
πΎ 9. Artifact Storage¶
- Save backlogs and individual stories in configured storage backends.
π£ 10. Event Emission¶
- Emit
BacklogReady,StoryCreated, andAcceptanceCriteriaDefinedevents with traceable payloads.
π 11. Observability Logging¶
- Emit OpenTelemetry traces, Prometheus metrics, and Serilog structured logs.
π Example Traceability Maintained¶
| Artifact | Linked Metadata |
|---|---|
| User Story | Story ID, Linked Feature ID, Trace ID, Project ID, MVP Flag, Edition Tags |
| Acceptance Criteria | Story ID, Acceptance Condition ID, Trace ID |
| Events | Artifact URI, Version, Trace ID, Timestamp |
β Maintains full lineage across the Factory.
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Process Step Alignment |
|---|---|
| Event-Driven Activation | Listens for upstream ProductPlanCreated events. |
| Cloud-Native and Pluggable Storage | Flexible backend artifact storage modelsγyour clarified modelγ. |
| Resilience and Recoverability | Validation + Auto-Correction before escalation. |
| Observability and Traceability | Full lifecycle instrumentation (logs, traces, metrics). |
| Multi-Edition SaaS Readiness | Edition-aware decomposition and tagging. |
π οΈ Technologies¶
The Product Owner Agent is designed with a modular, cloud-native, event-driven, and AI-augmented stack,
allowing it to autonomously process, structure, validate, and emit product backlog artifacts at industrial scale.
Key Architectural Goals:
- Semantic reasoning orchestration
- Multi-backend artifact storage flexibility (not MCP-only β per your clarification!)
- Event-driven lifecycle
- Full observability instrumentation
- Scalable, resilient, cloud-ready by default
π Core Technology Stack¶
| Technology | Purpose | Example Usage |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic Kernel (.NET) | Modular skill orchestration, function chaining, reasoning execution. | Decomposes features into stories, generates acceptance criteria, validates outputs. |
| OpenAI Models (Azure OpenAI or OpenAI API) | LLM-based reasoning and natural language generation. | Generates user stories, drafts acceptance criteria, enhances prioritization reasoning. |
| Flexible Artifact Storage (Blob Storage, Git Repositories, SQL DBs, Documentation Systems, etc.) | Store generated Backlogs, Stories, Traceability Maps. | Azure Blob, PostgreSQL DB, GitHub Repo, Azure DevOps Wiki, depending on project config. |
| Azure Event Grid / Kafka / RabbitMQ | Event-driven orchestration: listens for ProductPlanCreated, emits BacklogReady, StoryCreated, AcceptanceCriteriaDefined. | Event Bus integration for modular scaling. |
| OpenTelemetry + Serilog | Observability for traces, structured JSON logs, and metrics. | Track every skill execution, artifact validation, event emission. |
| Prometheus or Azure Monitor | Metric collection, backlog agent health monitoring. | Exposes story creation rates, validation failures, event emission successes. |
| Semantic Memory Retrieval (Optional, Configurable) | Retrieve relevant past backlogs, stories, acceptance criteria from vector DBs or other semantic stores. | Azure Cognitive Search, Pinecone, Redis Vector, or custom vector-enabled storage. |
ποΈ Technologies Component Diagram¶
flowchart TD
EventBus -->|Event: ProductPlanCreated| TaskIntakeController
TaskIntakeController --> SemanticKernelOrchestrator
SemanticKernelOrchestrator -->|Invoke| DecompositionSkills
SemanticKernelOrchestrator -->|Invoke| ValidationSkills
SemanticKernelOrchestrator -->|Invoke| CorrectionSkills
DecompositionSkills --> ArtifactStorageManager
ValidationSkills --> ArtifactStorageManager
CorrectionSkills --> ArtifactStorageManager
ArtifactStorageManager -->|Save Artifacts| StorageBackend[(Blob, Git, SQL, Doc Systems)]
ArtifactStorageManager --> EventEmitter
EventEmitter --> EventBus
AllModules -.-> ObservabilityStack(OpenTelemetry + Serilog + Prometheus)
β Full event-driven, modular, observable pipeline.
π¦ Artifact Storage Strategy¶
| Storage Option | Supported? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Azure Blob Storage | β | Default for blob artifacts. |
| Git Repository (Azure DevOps, GitHub) | β | For markdown story documents and backlog repositories. |
| PostgreSQL DB | β | For structured JSON backlog storage. |
| Azure DevOps Wiki | β | For backlog publication directly into documentation systems. |
| MCP Servers (optional) | β | If cross-platform semantic access needed β optional, not mandatory. |
β Storage backend is pluggable and configurable per project β no lock-in to MCP only!
π Example Integration Behaviors¶
| Integration | Example |
|---|---|
| Semantic Kernel Skills | Feature Decomposition, Story Creation, Acceptance Criteria Definition, Prioritization. |
| OpenAI Completion Models | Drafting high-quality user-centered stories and testable acceptance criteria. |
| Event Bus Publishing | BacklogReady, StoryCreated, AcceptanceCriteriaDefined. |
| Artifact Upload | Backlog artifact to Azure Blob β Story artifacts to Git Repo β Traceability map to SQL DB. |
| Telemetry Emission | Every major execution phase logged and traced (OpenTelemetry spans, Serilog logs). |
| Semantic Memory Search | Retrieve previous similar healthcare SaaS backlog examples for enrichment. |
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Technologies Supporting It |
|---|---|
| Cloud-Native Scalability | Azure Blob, Event Grid, OpenTelemetry, Git, SQL, Semantic Stores. |
| Event-Driven Architecture | Azure Event Grid, Kafka, RabbitMQ for modular triggering. |
| Observability First | Full OpenTelemetry and Prometheus metrics for internal and external monitoring. |
| Semantic Continuity | Optional semantic enrichment via flexible memory backends. |
| Multi-Edition SaaS Support | Tags, fields, and traceability for Free, Pro, Enterprise versions. |
π System Prompt (Initialization Instruction)¶
When the Product Owner Agent is bootstrapped,
it receives a structured system prompt defining:
- Its role and domain boundaries
- Expectations for modular outputs
- Quality standards it must enforce
- ConnectSoft-specific principles it must follow (traceability, SaaS-edition awareness, business alignment, etc.)
This prompt is critical to guarantee predictable, scalable, resilient autonomous behavior inside the AI Software Factory.
π Full System Prompt Text¶
π§ You are a Product Owner Agent inside the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory.
Your mission is to transform a structured Product Plan into a ready-for-development Product Backlog, composed of clear, traceable, prioritized User Stories and testable Acceptance Criteria.
You must: - Decompose each feature into multiple INVEST-compliant User Stories. - Write User Stories following:
"As a [persona], I want [goal], so that [business benefit]." - Define 2β5 clear, binary Acceptance Criteria per story. - Tag stories by MVP Phase, Edition Mapping (Free/Pro/Enterprise) if applicable. - Apply MoSCoW or RICE prioritization to backlog items. - Embed traceability metadata (trace_id, linked_feature, personas, strategic_goals) in every output. - Structure outputs in Markdown and compact JSON formats.π Rules and Expectations: - Every User Story must link back to its parent feature and strategic business objective. - Every artifact must be fully self-validating and testable. - Outputs must be ready for immediate downstream consumption by UX, Architecture, Backend, Frontend, and Mobile Developer Agents. - Observability is mandatory: emit logs, metrics, and traces during your execution. - Operate assuming a cloud-native, SaaS-first environment (Free/Pro/Enterprise models by default). - Flexible Artifact Storage: use configured Blob Storage, Git, SQL, Doc Systems, or MCP Servers if available.
π Operational Philosophy: - Maximize business alignment at every decision point. - Minimize ambiguity. - Always optimize for modularity, traceability, and continuous flow across the Factory.
π§ Purpose of System Prompt¶
| Objective | Why It's Critical |
|---|---|
| Define Clear Role Boundaries | Ensures agent doesn't drift into UX design, architecture, or coding. |
| Enforce ConnectSoft Principles | Clean Modularization, Traceability, Cloud-Native, SaaS awareness. |
| Guarantee Observability | Logging, tracing, and metric exposure embedded by default. |
| Ensure Downstream Readiness | Outputs are directly usable without human clarifications. |
| Support Multi-Edition SaaS | Artifacts tagged accordingly if feature access varies per tier. |
| Flexible Backend Awareness | Not tied to MCP only β supports Blob, Git, SQL, Document Storesγyour flexibility noteγ. |
π Key Behavioral Directives Embedded¶
| Directive | Impact |
|---|---|
| INVEST Story Standards | Independent, small, testable user stories created. |
| Traceability Enforcement | Stories mapped to Vision β Product Plan β Feature β Persona β Strategic Goal. |
| Business Alignment | All decomposition decisions tie back to business KPIs. |
| Prioritization Application | MVP-focused, goal-oriented prioritization of backlog items. |
| Edition Mapping Sensitivity | SaaS Edition tagging applied if needed. |
| Self-Validation First | No unvalidated artifacts allowed into downstream flows. |
| Event Emission Readiness | Emitting BacklogReady, StoryCreated, AcceptanceCriteriaDefined events properly. |
ποΈ Visual: System Prompt Behavioral Model¶
flowchart TD
ProductPlanInput --> FeatureDecomposition
FeatureDecomposition --> UserStoryWriting
UserStoryWriting --> AcceptanceCriteriaDrafting
AcceptanceCriteriaDrafting --> PrioritizationScoring
PrioritizationScoring --> TraceabilityEnrichment
TraceabilityEnrichment --> Validation
Validation --> EventEmission
β All behaviors flow systematically from the System Prompt instructions.
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Embedded In System Prompt |
|---|---|
| Event-Driven Activation and Handoff | Mandatory event emissions. |
| Modular Outputs | Stories and artifacts structured independently and clearly. |
| Observability-First Execution | OpenTelemetry, Metrics, Structured Logging. |
| Semantic Continuity | Stories maintain semantic links to business goals, features, personas. |
| Cloud-Native Pluggable Storage | Configurable backend support (Blob, Git, SQL, Docs, MCP)γyour flexibility modelγ. |
π₯ Input Prompt Template¶
Upon receiving an assigned task (usually triggered by a ProductPlanCreated event),
the Product Owner Agent builds a structured internal input prompt that:
- Injects all critical context
- Establishes task goals clearly
- Prepares the agentβs semantic reasoning path
- Guarantees consistent, modular, and traceable story decomposition
This template ensures that every decomposition is business-driven, persona-centered, and cloud-native SaaS-ready.
π Standard Input Prompt Template¶
## Input Information
Vision Summary:
{vision_summary}
Strategic Objectives:
{strategic_objectives_list}
Personas Identified:
{persona_list}
Feature Catalog:
{feature_catalog_list}
MVP Features:
{mvp_feature_list}
Edition Mapping (Optional):
{edition_mapping}
Project Metadata:
- Project ID: {project_id}
- Vision Trace ID: {vision_trace_id}
- Product Plan Version: {product_plan_version}
- MVP Deadline: {mvp_deadline} (Optional)
---
## Task for Product Owner Agent
Using the provided context:
1. **Decompose** each feature into one or more **INVEST-compliant User Stories**.
2. **Write User Stories** using the format:
"_As a [persona], I want [goal], so that [business benefit]._"
3. **Define Acceptance Criteria** (2β5) for each User Story β must be binary and testable.
4. **Prioritize** each User Story using MoSCoW (Must, Should, Could, Won't) or RICE model.
5. **Tag** stories appropriately if they belong to MVP Scope.
6. **Tag** stories by Edition (Free, Pro, Enterprise) if editions mapping is applicable.
7. **Embed Traceability Metadata**:
- Linked Feature ID
- Linked Strategic Goal(s)
- Trace ID
- Persona(s)
8. **Structure Outputs** in:
- Markdown format (primary artifact)
- JSON format (secondary artifact)
9. **Emit** the following events:
- `BacklogReady`
- `StoryCreated` (for each story)
- `AcceptanceCriteriaDefined` (for each story)
---
## Style Guide
- Clear, modular sections.
- Business benefit clearly articulated in User Stories.
- Acceptance Criteria must be measurable and binary (no vague language).
- Outputs must be directly consumable by downstream agents.
- Maintain cloud-native SaaS orientation by default.
- Maintain observability-first execution: log key actions, emit traces and metrics.
π§ Example Runtime Parameterized Values¶
| Placeholder | Example |
|---|---|
{vision_summary} |
"A SaaS platform to manage healthcare appointment scheduling." |
{strategic_objectives_list} |
"Reduce no-shows by 25%; Launch MVP in 4 months." |
{persona_list} |
"Patient", "Doctor", "Admin Staff" |
{feature_catalog_list} |
"Appointment Scheduling", "Billing Management", "Notifications System" |
{mvp_feature_list} |
"Appointment Scheduling", "Basic Notifications" |
{edition_mapping} |
"Free: Basic Scheduling; Pro: Advanced Reminders; Enterprise: Analytics Dashboard" |
{project_id} |
"healthcare-saas-2025" |
{vision_trace_id} |
"vision-2025-04-27-001" |
{product_plan_version} |
"1.0" |
{mvp_deadline} |
"2025-08-31" |
ποΈ Visual: Input Prompt Construction Flow¶
flowchart TD
ProductPlanIntake --> VisionParsing
VisionParsing --> ContextAssembly
FeatureCatalogParsing --> ContextAssembly
MVPParsing --> ContextAssembly
EditionsMappingParsing --> ContextAssembly
ContextAssembly --> StructuredInputPrompt
β All inputs come together into a standardized structured internal prompt.
π Input Prompt Directives Summary¶
| Directive | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Story Decomposition | Ensure each feature becomes multiple detailed user stories. |
| MVP Awareness | Stories that belong to MVP are marked. |
| Prioritization Enforcement | Prioritize backlog items consistently (MoSCoW or RICE). |
| Traceability | Every story linked to feature, persona, strategic goal, project, and vision. |
| Edition Awareness | Tag stories with SaaS editions if applicable. |
| Observability Embedding | Emit telemetry at each critical step. |
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Input Prompt Alignment |
|---|---|
| Domain-Driven Story Decomposition | Mapping stories to features, personas, bounded contexts. |
| Event-Driven Execution | Prepares output that triggers downstream agent events. |
| Cloud-Native Scalability | Edition-aware, SaaS-ready backlog decomposition. |
| Observability and Resilience | Input template embeds telemetry expectations. |
π€ Output Expectations¶
The Product Owner Agent must generate high-quality, modular, AI-consumable, traceable artifacts
that allow downstream UX Designers, Architects, Backend, Frontend, Mobile Engineers to work autonomously without clarification.
Each output must meet strict ConnectSoft standards for:
- Structure
- Completeness
- Testability
- Traceability
- Observability
This guarantees smooth, scalable, autonomous flow across the Software Factory.
π Primary Output Artifacts and Expectations¶
| Artifact | Description | Required Structure |
|---|---|---|
| Product Backlog Artifact | Full list of decomposed User Stories, acceptance criteria, prioritization scores, traceability links. | Markdown + JSON |
| Individual User Story Artifacts | Each story stored with description, traceability metadata, acceptance criteria, prioritization score. | Markdown + JSON |
| Acceptance Criteria Artifact | Aggregated acceptance criteria, mapped to each User Story. | Markdown + JSON |
| Prioritization Matrix | Table of stories with MoSCoW or RICE scoring. | JSON List |
| Traceability Map | Links Vision β Product Plan β Feature β User Story β Edition β Persona. | Markdown Table + JSON |
ποΈ Example: Product Backlog Artifact (Markdown)¶
# π Product Backlog - Healthcare Appointment Management SaaS
## Traceability Metadata
- Project ID: healthcare-saas-2025
- Vision Trace ID: vision-2025-04-27-001
- Product Plan Version: 1.0
- Artifact Version: 1.0
## User Stories
| Story ID | Description | Priority | MVP Scope | Editions | Personas | Acceptance Criteria |
|:---------|:------------|:---------|:----------|:---------|:---------|:--------------------|
| US-001 | As a Patient, I want to select an available appointment date, so that I can schedule easily. | Must Have | β
| Free, Pro | Patient | - Select available slot <br> - Confirm appointment <br> - Receive notification |
| US-002 | As a Doctor, I want to approve appointment requests, so that I can manage my calendar efficiently. | Must Have | β
| Pro, Enterprise | Doctor | - Review requests <br> - Accept/Reject request <br> - Sync to personal calendar |
β Clear separation of MVP scope, Edition targeting, Traceability Metadata, Acceptance Criteria.
π¦ Example: Single User Story JSON¶
{
"story_id": "US-001",
"description": "As a Patient, I want to select an available appointment date, so that I can schedule easily.",
"priority": "Must Have",
"mvp_scope": true,
"editions": ["Free", "Pro"],
"personas": ["Patient"],
"linked_feature": "Appointment Scheduling",
"strategic_goals": ["Improve appointment engagement"],
"trace_id": "vision-2025-04-27-001",
"acceptance_criteria": [
"Patient can view available appointment slots.",
"Patient can confirm an appointment in under 60 seconds.",
"Patient receives immediate confirmation notification."
]
}
β
Fully modular
β
Traceable
β
Directly testable by QA/Automation agents
π£ Example: Event Emissions Expectations¶
| Event Type | Triggered After | Payload Details |
|---|---|---|
BacklogReady |
Full Backlog validated and stored | Artifact URI, trace_id, version, timestamp |
StoryCreated |
Each User Story stored | Story ID, Artifact URI, trace_id |
AcceptanceCriteriaDefined |
Each Story's Acceptance Criteria defined | Story ID, Acceptance Criteria JSON |
Example Event Payload:
{
"event_type": "StoryCreated",
"story_id": "US-001",
"trace_id": "vision-2025-04-27-001",
"artifact_uri": "https://storage.connectsoft.ai/backlogs/stories/us-001.json",
"timestamp": "2025-04-28T02:00:00Z"
}
β Triggers downstream UX, Architecture, Development agent flows automatically.
π§© Output Validation Requirements¶
| Validation Area | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Traceability | Every artifact linked to Project ID, Vision Trace ID, Product Plan Version. |
| Completeness | Each feature fully decomposed into 1+ User Stories. |
| Acceptance Criteria | 2β5 binary conditions per story. |
| Prioritization | All stories assigned MoSCoW or RICE scores. |
| Testability | Acceptance Criteria must be clearly binary/testable (no vague language). |
| Edition Awareness | If Edition Mapping exists, stories must have edition tags (Free, Pro, Enterprise). |
| Observability | Every major action traced/logged with success/failure status. |
π Common Mistakes Guarded Against¶
| Mistake | Prevented By |
|---|---|
| No acceptance criteria | Internal validation step on story generation. |
| Missing MVP markers | Automated checking during story creation. |
| Trace ID mismatch | Validation against assigned task metadata. |
| Edition tag omission | Edition Mapping cross-checking. |
| Unstructured story output | Mandatory Markdown and JSON output format enforcement. |
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Output Compliance |
|---|---|
| Event-Driven Factory | Outputs trigger system events and activate downstream agents. |
| Traceability-First | Every artifact can be traced back through full lineage. |
| Cloud-Native Scalability | Outputs stored in flexible backends and scalable formats. |
| SaaS Edition Readiness | Outputs reflect multi-edition SaaS product decompositions. |
| Observability Embedded | Full OpenTelemetry traces, logs, and metrics for every output phase. |
π§ Memory Management Overview¶
The Product Owner Agent uses a dual-memory strategy:
- Short-Term Memory (STM) β To manage current task context during backlog decomposition.
- Long-Term Semantic Memory (LTM) β To learn from previous similar decompositions, enhance quality, and increase output consistency.
This design ensures the agent operates effectively both:
- Within a single project (short-term reasoning)
- Across multiple projects (long-term strategic learning)
π Short-Term Memory (Context Window)¶
| Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Scope | Limited to current backlog generation task. |
| Stored Content | Project Metadata (trace_id, project_id, deadlines), Vision Summary, Strategic Objectives, Personas, Feature Catalog, MVP features, Editions Mapping. |
| Purpose | Ensure contextual consistency across all user stories in a single execution. |
| Storage | In-process memory (Semantic Kernel execution context). |
| Lifetime | Cleared once backlog artifacts are validated and events emitted. |
β Short-term memory ensures contextual consistency within a session without overloading the LLM token window.
π Long-Term Semantic Memory (Vector-Based Retrieval)¶
| Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Storage | Semantic vector database (e.g., Azure Cognitive Search, Pinecone, Redis Vector, SQL + Embeddings, optionally MCP Serversγyour clarified flexibilityγ). |
| Stored Content | Past Product Backlogs, User Stories, Acceptance Criteria, Prioritization Matrices, Story Templates by Domain/Industry. |
| Retrieval Method | Semantic similarity search (e.g., "Find similar healthcare SaaS backlogs"). |
| Usage | Enrich story decomposition, align acceptance criteria with prior successful examples, apply domain-specific best practices. |
| Update Strategy | After successful backlog validation and emission, embeddings are created and stored back for future enrichment. |
β Long-term memory enables continuous learning, semantic enrichment, and future-proof evolution of agentic behaviors.
ποΈ Memory Flow Diagram¶
flowchart TD
ProductPlanIntake --> ShortTermContextCreation
ShortTermContextCreation --> DecompositionSkills
DecompositionSkills --> SemanticMemoryLookup
SemanticMemoryLookup -->|Optional Enrichment| DecompositionSkills
DecompositionSkills --> Validation
Validation --> ArtifactStorage
ArtifactStorage --> SemanticMemoryUpdate
β Semantic Memory is queried opportunistically and updated proactively.
π Example: Memory Storage Contents¶
| Memory Type | Example Content |
|---|---|
| Short-Term | "vision_summary": "Healthcare Appointment Scheduling SaaS", "mvp_features": ["Appointment Booking", "Notification System"] |
| Long-Term | User Story: "As a Patient, I want to book an appointment via mobile app..." Acceptance Criteria Templates: "Booking must complete in <60 seconds" Backlog Prioritization Patterns: Healthcare SaaS best practices. |
π Smart Memory Behaviors¶
| Scenario | Memory Behavior |
|---|---|
| Complex Feature (e.g., Billing System) | Query past billing-related story decompositions to enrich output. |
| New Industry Domain (e.g., EdTech) | Pull semantic patterns from EdTech semantic memory corpus. |
| Missing Persona Details | Find matching persona-to-feature behavior mappings from previous similar products. |
π§ Memory Management Safeguards¶
| Risk | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| Semantic Drift | Always align enriched outputs with current project metadata and vision goals. |
| Stale Memory Usage | Limit semantic retrieval based on artifact freshness (e.g., only last 18 months by default). |
| Conflicting Domain Standards | Use domain matching scoring (e.g., healthcare backlogs shouldn't enrich a fintech product). |
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Memory Alignment |
|---|---|
| Elastic Scaling | Short-term memory lightweight per task. |
| Semantic Learning | Long-term memory enables cross-project evolution. |
| Cloud-Native Modularity | Memory backends configurable: Blob, SQL, Semantic DBs, MCP (optional). |
| Resilient Reasoning | Fall back to base templates if semantic memory retrieval fails. |
| Observability | Memory retrieval actions logged and traced for transparency. |
β Validation Strategy¶
Before any backlog artifact is stored or any event is emitted,
the Product Owner Agent must perform strict internal validation to ensure:
- Structural completeness
- Semantic correctness
- Traceability compliance
- Prioritization and MVP coverage
- Edition tagging correctness (if applicable)
Validation is mandatory β
β
No unvalidated artifact is allowed to move downstream.
π Validation Types and Purposes¶
| Validation Type | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Structural Validation | Ensure all required fields (story ID, description, acceptance criteria, trace IDs, prioritization) exist. |
| Semantic Validation | Ensure that user stories are INVEST-compliant (Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable). |
| Acceptance Criteria Validation | Every story must have 2β5 binary acceptance criteria (clear pass/fail conditions). |
| Traceability Validation | Ensure story links to Feature ID, Persona, Strategic Goal, Trace ID, and Project ID. |
| Prioritization Validation | Ensure every story has MoSCoW or RICE prioritization. |
| Edition Tagging Validation (if applicable) | If editions mapping provided, ensure stories carry correct edition tags (Free, Pro, Enterprise). |
| Event Emission Validation | Ensure artifacts and payloads for BacklogReady, StoryCreated, AcceptanceCriteriaDefined are complete. |
| Observability Validation | Ensure all steps produce logs, metrics, and traces for telemetry. |
ποΈ Validation Flow Diagram¶
flowchart TD
DraftArtifacts --> StructuralValidation
StructuralValidation -->|Pass| SemanticValidation
SemanticValidation -->|Pass| TraceabilityValidation
TraceabilityValidation -->|Pass| AcceptanceCriteriaValidation
AcceptanceCriteriaValidation -->|Pass| PrioritizationValidation
PrioritizationValidation -->|Pass| EditionTaggingValidation
EditionTaggingValidation -->|Pass| EventEmissionValidation
EventEmissionValidation -->|Pass| MarkArtifactAsValid
EventEmissionValidation -->|Fail| CorrectionAttempt
AnyFail --> CorrectionAttempt
CorrectionAttempt --> RetryValidation
β If any step fails, a correction loop is automatically triggered.
π Detailed Validation Rules¶
π Structural Validation¶
- Story ID must follow
{prefix}-{sequence}format (e.g.,US-001). - Description must follow "As a [persona], I want [goal], so that [benefit]" pattern.
- At least one persona must be associated.
- Acceptance criteria must be present.
π§ Semantic Validation¶
- Story must be:
- Independent: not tightly coupled to others.
- Negotiable: not a fixed spec.
- Valuable: delivers business value.
- Estimable: small enough to estimate.
- Small: deliverable in 1β3 days.
- Testable: measurable via acceptance criteria.
β Acceptance Criteria Validation¶
- 2β5 criteria per story.
- No vague statements ("easy to use", "fast performance").
- Each condition should be binary: pass/fail.
π§© Traceability Validation¶
- Story must embed:
trace_idlinked_featurelinked_personalinked_strategic_goalartifact_version
π’ Prioritization Validation¶
- Each story must have:
- MoSCoW tag (Must, Should, Could, Wonβt) OR
- RICE score fields (
reach,impact,confidence,effort).
π·οΈ Edition Tagging Validation (if applicable)¶
- If editions mapping exists:
- Story must specify applicable editions.
- Editions must match configured tiers (Free, Pro, Enterprise).
π£ Event Validation Rules¶
Each event (BacklogReady, StoryCreated, AcceptanceCriteriaDefined) must:
| Field | Requirement |
|---|---|
event_type |
Correct and standardized. |
trace_id |
Matches the originating Vision Document. |
artifact_uri |
Correct storage link. |
story_id (for StoryCreated) |
Must be unique per project. |
acceptance_criteria (for AcceptanceCriteriaDefined) |
Must match the linked story. |
timestamp |
ISO 8601 UTC time. |
π Observability Validation¶
| Emitted | Mandatory |
|---|---|
| OpenTelemetry Traces | β For story generation, validation, correction, storage, and event emission. |
| Structured Logs (Serilog) | β Success/Failure per action. |
| Prometheus Metrics | β Story generation rates, validation failures, retries triggered. |
β Ensures every backlog flow is fully observable and auditable.
π Examples of Invalid vs Valid Cases¶
| Case | Validation Result |
|---|---|
| Story with no Acceptance Criteria | β |
| Story without Persona linked | β |
| Story description not following format | β |
| Story missing trace_id | β |
| Story with non-binary Acceptance Criteria ("easy to use") | β |
| Fully traceable, modular, binary-tested Story | β |
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Validation Enforced |
|---|---|
| Self-Validating Agents | No invalid outputs proceed to downstream flows. |
| Modular Outputs | Every artifact validated independently. |
| Traceability | Full Vision β Plan β Feature β Story lineage. |
| Observability-First Execution | Every critical step emits traces, logs, metrics. |
| Business-Goal Alignment | Semantic validations enforce business relevance. |
π Retry and Correction Flow¶
The Product Owner Agent is designed with an autonomous self-healing capability β
if any validation step fails, it attempts corrections internally before considering escalation.
This ensures:
- High system resilience
- Minimal human intervention
- Smooth autonomous Factory execution
π Correction Strategy Overview¶
| Error Type | Correction Attempt | Retry Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| Missing Fields | Auto-fill missing fields (e.g., missing trace IDs, linked features) from short-term memory context. | Immediate validation retry. |
| Incorrect Story Format | Reformat description to match "As a [persona], I want [goal], so that [benefit]" pattern. | Retry story validation. |
| Missing Acceptance Criteria | Regenerate binary acceptance criteria based on story description. | Retry validation immediately. |
| No Prioritization Tag | Auto-assign using default MoSCoW or fallback RICE scoring model. | Retry prioritization validation. |
| Edition Tag Omission | Infer editions from Feature or Product Plan if available; otherwise default to all editions. | Retry validation. |
| Event Emission Failure | Retry event submission with exponential backoff. | Up to 3 retries. |
ποΈ Correction and Retry Flow Diagram¶
flowchart TD
ValidationFailure --> AutoCorrectionAttempt
AutoCorrectionAttempt --> RetryValidation
RetryValidation -->|Pass| ArtifactStorage
RetryValidation -->|Fail| SecondCorrectionAttempt
SecondCorrectionAttempt --> RetryValidation2
RetryValidation2 -->|Pass| ArtifactStorage
RetryValidation2 -->|Fail| HumanInterventionTrigger
β Up to two full correction attempts are made automatically before escalating.
π Example Correction Techniques¶
| Technique | Example |
|---|---|
| Context Rehydration | Re-inject project_id, trace_id, vision_summary from session memory. |
| Fallback Template Insertion | If missing Acceptance Criteria β use standard pattern templates (e.g., "User must be able to complete [action] within [timeframe]"). |
| Semantic Retry | Re-run decomposition for problematic story based on updated context. |
| Edition Inference | If edition mapping missing β infer based on similar features using semantic search. |
π Human Intervention Triggers (Fallback)¶
| Situation | Immediate Escalation? |
|---|---|
| Validation fails after 2 auto-corrections | β |
| Critical semantic drift detected (e.g., story no longer aligned to original strategic goals) | β |
| Storage system unavailable after retries | β |
| EventBus communication failure after retries | β |
When escalation happens: - Human operator is notified via escalation event. - Context snapshot is provided (failed artifacts, validation errors, correction attempts).
β Auditable escalation flow maintains Factory trust and transparency.
π Observability of Correction Flow¶
| Observability Metric | Purpose |
|---|---|
product_owner_agent_validation_failures_total |
Total number of initial validation failures. |
product_owner_agent_corrections_attempted_total |
How often auto-corrections were triggered. |
product_owner_agent_successful_retries_total |
Number of retries that succeeded without human intervention. |
product_owner_agent_escalations_total |
Number of escalations to human operators. |
β OpenTelemetry traces and Prometheus metrics monitor all correction attempts.
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Correction Alignment |
|---|---|
| Resilient Execution | Built-in retries and auto-corrections. |
| Minimal Human Dependency | Autonomous healing prioritized. |
| Observability First | Corrections, retries, and escalations fully logged and traced. |
| Governed Escalation | Human intervention only if intelligent retries fail. |
| Elastic Scalability | Correction flows operate in parallel across large backlog decompositions. |
π οΈ Skills Overview¶
The Product Owner Agent is composed of a modular skill system built using Semantic Kernel Functions.
Each Skill focuses on a specific sub-task inside the backlog decomposition lifecycle,
enabling dynamic, composable, and recoverable execution.
β Skills are independent, observable, retryable, and enhance agent scalability.
π Full Skills Catalog¶
| Skill Name | Purpose | Example Internal Prompt |
|---|---|---|
| Feature Decomposer | Breaks Product Plan features into granular, INVEST-compliant User Stories. | "Decompose 'Appointment Scheduling' into multiple clear user stories." |
| User Story Author | Writes each story in "As a [persona], I want [goal], so that [benefit]" format. | "Draft a story for the Patient to select an appointment slot." |
| Acceptance Criteria Generator | Drafts 2β5 binary acceptance criteria for each User Story. | "Define clear, testable success criteria for selecting appointment slot." |
| Prioritization Scorer | Applies MoSCoW or RICE prioritization model to backlog items. | "Score each story based on business urgency and effort." |
| Edition Mapper | Tags stories according to SaaS Editions (Free, Pro, Enterprise) if applicable. | "Map 'Multi-clinic Management' story to Enterprise Edition only." |
| Traceability Enricher | Embeds full traceability metadata into each artifact. | "Inject trace_id, linked_feature_id, personas, strategic_goals into each story." |
| Story Validator | Performs structural, semantic, prioritization, and traceability validation of artifacts. | "Validate that Story US-001 has correct structure, acceptance criteria, and traceability." |
| Correction Synthesizer | Attempts auto-correction if validation fails (missing sections, wrong formatting). | "Fix missing acceptance criteria and reformat description." |
| Semantic Memory Retriever | Retrieves examples of similar stories, acceptance criteria, and backlog patterns. | "Fetch past Healthcare SaaS backlog structures for reference." |
| Event Preparer and Emitter | Prepares and sends events (BacklogReady, StoryCreated, AcceptanceCriteriaDefined) to the Event Bus. |
"Emit StoryCreated event for US-001 with full metadata." |
ποΈ Skills Categories¶
| Category | Skills |
|---|---|
| Decomposition and Authoring | Feature Decomposer, User Story Author |
| Definition and Refinement | Acceptance Criteria Generator, Edition Mapper, Traceability Enricher |
| Prioritization and Optimization | Prioritization Scorer |
| Validation and Correction | Story Validator, Correction Synthesizer |
| Memory and Enrichment | Semantic Memory Retriever |
| Collaboration and Emission | Event Preparer and Emitter |
π§ Example Internal Skill Prompts¶
π Feature Decomposer¶
Decompose the following Product Feature into clear, INVEST-compliant user stories.
Feature: "Appointment Scheduling"
Personas: Patient, Doctor
Strategic Objectives: Improve engagement, reduce no-shows
Output format: Markdown + JSON
π User Story Author¶
Write a user story using the format:
"As a [persona], I want [goal], so that [business benefit]."
Persona: Patient
Goal: Select an available appointment date
Benefit: Schedule visits conveniently
π Acceptance Criteria Generator¶
Define 2β5 binary, testable acceptance criteria for the user story:
"As a Patient, I want to select an available appointment date, so that I can schedule conveniently."
ποΈ Skills Orchestration Diagram¶
flowchart TD
FeatureDecomposer --> UserStoryAuthor
UserStoryAuthor --> AcceptanceCriteriaGenerator
AcceptanceCriteriaGenerator --> PrioritizationScorer
PrioritizationScorer --> EditionMapper
EditionMapper --> TraceabilityEnricher
TraceabilityEnricher --> StoryValidator
StoryValidator -->|Pass| EventPreparerAndEmitter
StoryValidator -->|Fail| CorrectionSynthesizer
CorrectionSynthesizer --> StoryValidator
β Skills are dynamically chained inside the Semantic Kernel planner.
π Skill Best Practices¶
| Best Practice | Description |
|---|---|
| Minimal Chain Size | Keep chains small (2β5 skills per logical phase) to minimize retries. |
| Retry on Atomic Skill Level | Only retry the failing skill, not the entire chain. |
| Observability at Skill Level | Each skill emits its own OpenTelemetry traces. |
| Semantic Enrichment Optional | Semantic memory queries are invoked if confidence is low or complexity is high. |
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Skill System Alignment |
|---|---|
| Modularity | Each skill is independently improvable and extendable. |
| Resilience | Retry and correction flows embedded at skill level. |
| Observability | Traces and metrics emitted per skill execution. |
| Cloud-Native Extensibility | Skills can be scaled horizontally inside microservices. |
| Autonomous Reasoning | Each skill advances the agent's state intelligently, without manual intervention. |
π Collaboration Interfaces¶
The Product Owner Agent collaborates through:
- Event-Driven Communication (primary method)
- Artifact Storage (flexible β Blob, Git, SQL, Documentation Systems, optionally MCP)
- Observability Streams (traces, logs, metrics)
It does not call downstream agents directly β
β
It emits events and produces artifacts they autonomously consume.
π Collaboration Interfaces Overview¶
| Interface Type | Purpose | Downstream Consumer |
|---|---|---|
| Event Emission | Notify downstream agents that backlog items are ready for consumption. | UX Designer Agent, Enterprise Architect Agent, Frontend Developer Agent, Backend Developer Agent, QA/Test Automation Agent. |
| Artifact Storage | Store Backlog, Stories, Acceptance Criteria, Traceability Maps in cloud-native or documentation systems. | Artifact Retrieval Services, GitHub/GitOps Agents, DevOps Pipelines, Manual Readers. |
| Semantic Memory Update | Save validated backlogs into semantic vector stores for future enrichment. | Future Product Owner Agents, Analysis Agents. |
| Observability Hooks | Emit real-time telemetry to ConnectSoft Observability Stack. | DevOps Teams, Factory Health Dashboards, Control Plane Audits. |
ποΈ Event Emission Diagram¶
flowchart TD
ProductOwnerAgent -->|BacklogReady Event| EventBus
ProductOwnerAgent -->|StoryCreated Event (one per story)| EventBus
ProductOwnerAgent -->|AcceptanceCriteriaDefined Event (one per story)| EventBus
EventBus --> UXDesignerAgent
EventBus --> EnterpriseArchitectAgent
EventBus --> FrontendDeveloperAgent
EventBus --> BackendDeveloperAgent
EventBus --> QAEngineerAgent
β
Events allow full parallelization of downstream agent workflows β
β
No bottleneck, no synchronous dependencies.
π¦ Artifact Storage Strategies¶
| Storage Type | Notes |
|---|---|
| Azure Blob Storage | Default for storing large backlog documents (Markdown, JSON). |
| Git Repositories (Azure DevOps, GitHub) | For structured, versioned backlogs and traceability artifacts. |
| SQL Databases (PostgreSQL, Azure SQL) | Structured story storage (optional for querying). |
| Documentation Systems (e.g., Azure DevOps Wiki) | For exposing backlog to human stakeholders. |
| MCP Servers (optional) | If semantic federated access across systems is needed. |
β
Configurable backend β
β
No storage lock-in β flexibility based on project needs (per your clarified design).
π Observability Hooks¶
| Observability Layer | Technology | Metrics/Traces/Logs |
|---|---|---|
| Tracing | OpenTelemetry | Span per skill execution, decomposition, validation, correction, storage, and event emission. |
| Logging | Serilog (structured JSON) | Logs for every major operation (story creation, correction attempts, event emissions). |
| Metrics | Prometheus-compatible exporters | Counters, Gauges, Histograms for backlog generation health. |
β Fully integrated into ConnectSoft Observability-First Platform.
π Example Metrics Emitted¶
| Metric Name | Purpose |
|---|---|
product_owner_agent_tasks_started_total |
Total Product Plan decomposition tasks started. |
product_owner_agent_stories_created_total |
Total number of user stories generated. |
product_owner_agent_validation_failures_total |
Number of initial validation failures detected. |
product_owner_agent_corrections_attempted_total |
Number of automatic corrections triggered. |
product_owner_agent_successful_retries_total |
Successful auto-corrections without human intervention. |
product_owner_agent_events_emitted_total |
Number of backlog-related events emitted successfully. |
π§ Real-Time Observability Flow Example¶
flowchart TD
DecompositionSkill -->|Trace Span| OpenTelemetryCollector
ValidationSkill -->|Structured Log| SerilogSink
CorrectionSkill -->|Metric Update| PrometheusGateway
ArtifactStorage -->|Success Event| EventBus
β
Every major agent activity is observable.
β
Failures are visible immediately, with root cause traced through spans.
π Collaboration Safeguards¶
| Risk | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| Event Emission Failure | Retry emission with exponential backoff (up to 3 times). |
| Storage Unavailability | Retry save operation or switch to alternate backend if configured. |
| Telemetry Emission Drop | Local buffering + retry on connection restoration. |
| Story Incompleteness | Correction flow before any event or artifact emission. |
π§© ConnectSoft Platform Principles Alignment¶
| Principle | Collaboration Reflection |
|---|---|
| Event-Driven Software Factory | Full event-based decomposition and triggering. |
| Loose Coupling | No tight service-to-service dependency. |
| Cloud-Native Artifact Management | Storage layer is pluggable: Blob, Git, SQL, Documentation. |
| Observability-First | Full tracing, structured logging, and Prometheus-compatible metrics. |
| Resilient and Self-Recovering | Built-in retries, fallback mechanisms. |
π‘οΈ Human Intervention Hooks¶
Although the Product Owner Agent is built for full autonomy,
controlled human intervention is supported for exceptional cases.
This guarantees:
- High trustworthiness
- Governance compliance
- Resilient operation even under failure scenarios
π When Human Intervention is Triggered¶
| Situation | Reason for Escalation | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Persistent Validation Failure | After two full auto-correction cycles, artifacts still invalid. | Story missing traceability or acceptance criteria even after retries. |
| Severe Semantic Drift | Stories no longer aligned with Vision's strategic objectives. | "Add Billing System" story added when not present in original scope. |
| Storage System Unavailable | After 3 retry attempts to save artifacts in configured storage. | Blob/Git/SQL backend failure. |
| Event Bus Communication Failure | After 3 retry attempts to emit BacklogReady or StoryCreated. |
Event Grid outage or disconnection. |
| Critical Input Corruption | Product Plan or Vision Artifact invalid, preventing decomposition. | Empty feature catalog, missing personas. |
π§ Human Escalation Workflow¶
flowchart TD
ValidationFailure --> CorrectionAttempt
CorrectionAttempt -->|Fails Twice| EscalationTrigger
EscalationTrigger --> HumanOperatorAlert
HumanOperatorAlert --> ManualReview
ManualReview -->|Fix Issue| RetryProcessing
β Escalation triggers a human operator alert (email, dashboard alert, or ticket).
β
The agent provides full context:
- Trace ID
- Failed artifacts
- Correction attempts history
- Error logs and traces
π Escalation Metrics Exposed¶
| Metric Name | Purpose |
|---|---|
product_owner_agent_human_escalations_total |
Total escalations triggered. |
product_owner_agent_failed_retries_total |
Retry failures before escalation. |
β Metrics emitted for auditability and platform observability.
π§© Human Intervention Points in Platform¶
| Platform Layer | Hook |
|---|---|
| Observability Dashboards (Grafana, Kibana) | Escalation alerts displayed. |
| Artifact Storage System | Flagged artifacts marked for human review. |
| Event Bus Monitoring | Escalation events published for ops teams. |
| Control Plane Governance | Escalations logged into Factory governance records. |
ποΈ Final System Diagram: Product Owner Agent in Factory Flow¶
flowchart TD
VisionArchitectAgent -->|VisionDocumentCreated| ProductManagerAgent
ProductManagerAgent -->|ProductPlanCreated| ProductOwnerAgent
ProductOwnerAgent -->|BacklogReady Event| EventBus
ProductOwnerAgent -->|StoryCreated Events| EventBus
ProductOwnerAgent -->|AcceptanceCriteriaDefined Events| EventBus
EventBus --> UXDesignerAgent
EventBus --> EnterpriseArchitectAgent
EventBus --> FrontendDeveloperAgent
EventBus --> BackendDeveloperAgent
EventBus --> QAEngineerAgent
β Seamlessly integrates into ConnectSoft autonomous Factory execution model.