๐๏ธ ConnectSoft AI Software Factory: System Components¶
๐ฏ Introduction¶
The ConnectSoft AI Software Factory is a modular, event-driven, AI-augmented platform designed to automate the software production lifecycle โ from vision, through design and development, to deployment and evolution.
This document presents a deep internal breakdown of the platform's core system components, service clusters, microservices, supporting infrastructure, and external integrations.
Each component is crafted with modularity, scalability, security, and observability in mind.
The platform spans multiple domains, including:
- Intelligent agent orchestration
- Event-driven communication
- Semantic memory and AI augmentation
- Artifact governance and lifecycle management
- Scalable cloud-native infrastructure
- Secure external system integrations
- Fully automated GitOps-driven deployment
๐บ๏ธ High-Level System Boundary Diagram¶
flowchart TB
User(Platform Users)
Admin(System Administrators)
subgraph ExternalSystems [External Systems]
AzureDevOps(Azure DevOps)
GitHub(GitHub / GitLab)
OpenAI(Azure OpenAI / OpenAI API)
NotificationSystems(SendGrid / Twilio / Webhooks)
end
subgraph ConnectSoftAI[ConnectSoft AI Software Factory]
APIGateway(API Gateway / Public and Internal APIs)
ControlPlane(Control Plane Services)
EventBus(Event Bus: Azure Service Bus + MassTransit)
AgentClusters(Agent Microservices Clusters)
ArtifactStorage(Blob Storage + Git Repositories)
VectorDB(Vector Databases: Azure Cognitive Search / Pinecone)
Observability(Observability Stack: OTel + Prometheus + Grafana)
IdentityService(Identity and Access Management)
CI_CD_Pipelines(CI/CD and GitOps Pipelines)
RedisCaches(Caching Layer: Redis Clusters)
SecretsManager(Secrets and Config Management)
DeploymentAutomation(GitOps Controllers: ArgoCD / FluxCD)
ExternalIntegrations(External Integration Services)
end
User --> APIGateway
Admin --> APIGateway
APIGateway --> ControlPlane
APIGateway --> AgentClusters
AgentClusters --> EventBus
ControlPlane --> EventBus
AgentClusters --> ArtifactStorage
ControlPlane --> ArtifactStorage
AgentClusters --> VectorDB
Observability --> AgentClusters
Observability --> ControlPlane
IdentityService --> APIGateway
RedisCaches --> AgentClusters
SecretsManager --> AgentClusters
SecretsManager --> ControlPlane
CI_CD_Pipelines --> DeploymentAutomation
DeploymentAutomation --> AKSClusters(AKS Kubernetes Clusters)
ArtifactStorage --> ExternalSystems
ExternalSystems --> ControlPlane
ExternalSystems --> Notifications(NotificationSystems)
๐ง Key Viewpoints from Diagram¶
- Boundary separation: ConnectSoft Factory is fully modular but integrates securely with external systems.
- User and Admin access: Controlled through API Gateway.
- Event-Driven Messaging Core: Event Bus as the main internal communication backbone.
- Agent Specialization: Agents clustered by role and responsibility.
- CI/CD and Deployment Automation: Fully GitOps-driven lifecycle.
- Observability, Security, Secrets, and Caching: First-class citizens across the platform.
๐๏ธ System Physical Boundaries and Kubernetes Cluster Layout¶
The ConnectSoft AI Software Factory is deployed across multiple Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) clusters, with a clear separation of responsibilities between core infrastructure, agent execution pools, API services, and observability.
๐ฆ Cluster Design Overview¶
| Cluster | Purpose |
|---|---|
| System Infrastructure Cluster | Hosts platform control plane services, API Gateway, Event Bus, Identity Services, Observability Stack. |
| Agent Execution Clusters | Host agent microservices in scalable, isolated pools organized by agent specialization (Vision, Architecture, Development, Deployment agents). |
| GitOps Management Cluster | Hosts ArgoCD / FluxCD controllers for continuous deployment automation. |
| Observability/Monitoring Cluster (Optional) | For very large deployments, observability tooling (Prometheus, Grafana, Jaeger) can be offloaded to a separate cluster. |
๐ ๏ธ Namespaces Within Clusters¶
| Namespace | Purpose |
|---|---|
| infra-system | Core infrastructure services (API Gateway, Event Bus, Identity Services, GitOps Controllers). |
| control-plane | Control Plane microservices (Project Manager, Orchestrators, Artifact Governance). |
| agent-cluster-vision | Vision-related agent microservices (Vision Architect, Product Manager). |
| agent-cluster-architecture | Architecture modeling agents (Solution Architect, Event Flow Designer, API Modeler). |
| agent-cluster-development | Development agents (Backend Developer, Frontend Developer, Mobile Developer). |
| agent-cluster-deployment | Deployment agents (Deployment Orchestrator, Release Manager). |
| observability | OpenTelemetry Collectors, Prometheus, Grafana, Loki, Jaeger. |
| secrets-config | Configuration management, feature toggles, secrets provisioning. |
| external-integration | Adapters for external systems (OpenAI, GitHub, Azure DevOps). |
๐ Networking Topology¶
- Private Networking:
- Internal services communicate via private endpoints and service meshes where needed.
- Sensitive services (e.g., databases, vector stores) are behind private VNET endpoints.
- Ingress Controllers:
- Public access points only via the API Gateway ingress controller.
- API exposure strictly controlled via authentication and RBAC.
- Service Mesh (optional):
- For advanced deployments, use of service mesh technologies (Istio / Linkerd) is planned for mTLS encryption and observability improvements.
๐บ๏ธ Kubernetes Logical Cluster Map¶
flowchart TD
SystemCluster(AKS System Infrastructure Cluster)
AgentClusterVision(AKS Vision Agent Execution Cluster)
AgentClusterArchitecture(AKS Architecture Agent Execution Cluster)
AgentClusterDevelopment(AKS Development Agent Execution Cluster)
AgentClusterDeployment(AKS Deployment Agent Execution Cluster)
GitOpsCluster(GitOps Management Cluster)
ObservabilityCluster(Observability Cluster - optional)
SystemCluster --> EventBus
SystemCluster --> ControlPlane
SystemCluster --> IdentityService
SystemCluster --> APIGateway
SystemCluster --> SecretsConfig
SystemCluster --> ExternalIntegrations
AgentClusterVision --> EventBus
AgentClusterArchitecture --> EventBus
AgentClusterDevelopment --> EventBus
AgentClusterDeployment --> EventBus
GitOpsCluster --> AllClusters(Syncs Deployments to All Clusters)
ObservabilityCluster --> CollectsTelemetryFrom(AllClusters)
๐ฅ Key Takeaways¶
- Dedicated agent execution clusters allow independent scaling and isolation of different workload types.
- GitOps-managed deployments ensure traceable, versioned, and auditable system changes.
- Observability everywhere โ metrics, traces, logs captured across clusters.
- Security first โ private networking, ingress restrictions, RBAC, token-based API access.
๐ค Core Agent Microservices Cluster โ Internal Deep Dive¶
The Agent Microservices Cluster is the operational heart of the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory โ
where specialized agents autonomously process tasks, generate artifacts, validate outputs, and collaborate asynchronously through event-driven flows.
Agents are organized into logical sub-clusters based on functional domains.
๐งฉ Agent Cluster Logical Grouping¶
| Sub-Cluster | Main Agent Types |
|---|---|
| Visioning Agents | Vision Architect Agent, Product Manager Agent, Product Owner Agent |
| Architecture Agents | Solution Architect Agent, Event-Driven Architect Agent, API Designer Agent |
| Development Agents | Backend Developer Agent, Frontend Developer Agent, Mobile Developer Agent |
| Deployment and DevOps Agents | Deployment Orchestrator Agent, Release Manager Agent, Infrastructure Engineer Agent |
| Specialized Utility Agents | Artifact Validator Agent, Event Dispatcher Agent, Semantic Embedder Agent, Recovery Manager Agent, Observability Coordinator Agent |
Each logical group is deployed into a dedicated Kubernetes namespace and autoscaling pool, allowing for fine-grained resource control, scaling policies, and resilience strategies.
๐ ๏ธ Internal Structure of a Standard Agent Microservice¶
flowchart TD
EventConsumer(Event Subscription Handler)
ContextLoader(Task Context Loader)
SkillPlanner(Skill Planner / Selector)
SkillExecutor(Skill Execution Engine)
ArtifactComposer(Artifact Composition and Metadata Enrichment)
ValidationModule(Validation and Correction Layer)
ArtifactPublisher(Artifact Storage + Versioning Client)
EventProducer(Next Event Publisher)
TelemetryEmitter(Tracing, Metrics, Structured Logs)
EventConsumer --> ContextLoader
ContextLoader --> SkillPlanner
SkillPlanner --> SkillExecutor
SkillExecutor --> ArtifactComposer
ArtifactComposer --> ValidationModule
ValidationModule --> ArtifactPublisher
ArtifactPublisher --> EventProducer
AllServices --> TelemetryEmitter
๐ ๏ธ Key Internal Components per Agent¶
| Component | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Event Subscription Handler | Subscribes to specific system events and triggers activation. |
| Context Loader | Loads input artifacts, prior decisions, semantic memory, and configuration metadata. |
| Skill Planner | Dynamically selects skills or plans skill execution chains based on input goals. |
| Skill Execution Engine | Executes modular skills โ native code functions, AI-powered calls (e.g., OpenAI), or composite reasoning workflows. |
| Artifact Composer | Structures the output into artifacts (documents, specifications, codebases) enriched with traceability metadata. |
| Validation and Correction Layer | Enforces semantic, structural, and compliance validation rules before publishing artifacts. |
| Artifact Publisher | Persists artifacts into Blob Storage, Git Repositories, and Vector Databases for long-term governance. |
| Next Event Publisher | Emits follow-up events indicating artifact readiness, task completion, or new task opportunities. |
| Telemetry Emitter | Emits spans, logs, metrics โ every important execution phase is observable. |
๐ฆ Agent Microservice Characteristics¶
- Stateless by Design:
- Every task execution is idempotent and self-contained.
- Internal Short-Term Cache:
- Redis-backed optional cache for short-term session state if needed.
- Semantic Memory Enrichment:
- Agents embed knowledge into vector databases post-task for future RAG retrievals.
- Internal Auto-Correction:
- Agents attempt to correct minor validation failures before escalation or human intervention.
- Structured Error Handling:
- Errors classified as retryable (network issues) vs terminal (invalid input, contract violation).
โ Every agent follows this common architectural model โ
but domain-specific agents (e.g., Semantic Embedder Agent, Event Dispatcher Agent) will have small variations and extensions we'll cover later.
๐งฉ Specialized Software Utility Agents โ Internal Design¶
In addition to core functional agents (e.g., Vision Architect, Backend Developer), the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory leverages specialized utility agents โ
responsible for system-wide tasks such as validation, semantic memory enrichment, event dispatching, and operational recovery.
These agents enhance modularity, system resilience, artifact quality, and overall factory autonomy.
๐ง Specialized Utility Agents Overview¶
| Agent | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Artifact Validator Agent | Performs structural, semantic, and compliance validation on produced artifacts before further processing. |
| Event Dispatcher Agent | Analyzes system events and dynamically routes them to appropriate agent(s) or workflows based on classification rules. |
| Semantic Embedder Agent | Generates vector embeddings for artifacts and inserts them into the semantic memory database for future retrieval. |
| Recovery Manager Agent | Detects agent task failures, orchestrates retries, escalations, or compensating actions. |
| Observability Coordinator Agent | Aggregates and standardizes telemetry (traces, metrics, logs) across agents for consistent observability. |
| Knowledge Base Manager Agent | Manages retrieval and enrichment of long-term semantic memory relevant to active projects and tasks. |
| Webhook Notification Dispatcher Agent | Manages outbound webhooks, notifications (e.g., via email, SMS, Slack) triggered by workflow states or critical events. |
๐ ๏ธ Internal Structure Example: Artifact Validator Agent¶
flowchart TD
EventListener(Event Listener: ArtifactProducedEvent)
ArtifactRetriever(Artifact Retriever from Storage)
ValidationEngine(Schema + Semantic Validator)
CorrectionAttempt(Autocorrection Module)
ValidationResultHandler(Validation Result Processor)
EventEmitter(ValidationPassed/ValidationFailed Events)
EventListener --> ArtifactRetriever
ArtifactRetriever --> ValidationEngine
ValidationEngine --> CorrectionAttempt
CorrectionAttempt --> ValidationResultHandler
ValidationEngine --> ValidationResultHandler
ValidationResultHandler --> EventEmitter
๐ ๏ธ Internal Structure Example: Semantic Embedder Agent¶
flowchart TD
EventListener(Event Listener: ArtifactReadyEvent)
ContentLoader(Load Artifact Content)
EmbeddingGenerator(Generate Semantic Embeddings)
VectorDBConnector(Insert Into Vector Database)
EventEmitter(Emit EmbeddingCompleted Event)
EventListener --> ContentLoader
ContentLoader --> EmbeddingGenerator
EmbeddingGenerator --> VectorDBConnector
VectorDBConnector --> EventEmitter
๐ง Key Architectural Patterns Applied¶
| Pattern | Usage |
|---|---|
| Event-Triggered Activation | Utility agents always activate upon specific system events. |
| Isolated Responsibilities | Each utility agent has a focused domain (validation, embedding, routing) for high cohesion. |
| Statelessness | Agents operate on event payloads and storage artifacts without maintaining session state. |
| Observability-First | Every utility agent emits spans, logs, and metrics for every execution phase. |
| Error Handling and Retries | Built-in retry strategies for transient errors; durable failure events emitted if irrecoverable. |
๐ก๏ธ Security and Access Control¶
- Utility agents access storage, vector databases, and event buses using managed identities and scoped RBAC policies.
- Secrets (e.g., database keys, webhook credentials) are retrieved securely from Azure Key Vault at runtime.
๐ Resulting Benefits¶
- Artifact Quality: Higher integrity of artifacts through automatic validation and autocorrection.
- Orchestration Flexibility: Dynamic event routing adapts to new workflows and agent types easily.
- Long-Term Memory Building: Richer semantic context over time through structured embeddings.
- Autonomous Recovery: Reduced manual intervention needed when errors occur in agent workflows.
๐ก Event Bus Messaging Infrastructure¶
At the core of the ConnectSoft AI Software Factoryโs coordination is the Event Bus, responsible for routing events between agents, control plane services, and utility services asynchronously and reliably.
The Event Bus ensures decoupling, scalability, observability, and resilience across all internal communications.
๐ ๏ธ Key Components of the Event Bus¶
| Component | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Event Topics | Logical channels where events are published and subscribed to by agents and services. |
| Subscriptions | Bind agents or services to specific event types based on filters or routing rules. |
| Dead-Letter Queues (DLQs) | Capture unprocessable or repeatedly failed events for later inspection and recovery. |
| Retry Policies | Configure automatic retries with exponential backoff for transient failures. |
| Event Envelope and Metadata | Standardized headers: trace ID, project ID, event type, emitter agent, version, timestamp. |
๐งฉ Event Topology Overview¶
flowchart TD
VisionEvents(Vision Event Topic)
ArchitectureEvents(Architecture Event Topic)
DevelopmentEvents(Development Event Topic)
DeploymentEvents(Deployment Event Topic)
SystemEvents(System Internal Topic)
DLQ(Dead-Letter Queue)
VisionEvents --> VisionAgents(Vision Agents Cluster)
ArchitectureEvents --> ArchitectureAgents(Architecture Agents Cluster)
DevelopmentEvents --> DevelopmentAgents(Development Agents Cluster)
DeploymentEvents --> DeploymentAgents(Deployment Agents Cluster)
SystemEvents --> UtilityAgents(Validator / Embedder / Dispatcher)
EventFailures --> DLQ
๐ ๏ธ Event Publishing Flow¶
flowchart TD
AgentTaskComplete(Agent Task Completed)
EventPublisher(Create Event Envelope)
EventRouter(Publish to Correct Event Topic)
Subscribers(Agents / Services Listening)
RetryMechanism(Retry on Failures)
DLQMove(Move to Dead-Letter Queue After Exhausted Retries)
AgentTaskComplete --> EventPublisher
EventPublisher --> EventRouter
EventRouter --> Subscribers
Subscribers --> RetryMechanism
RetryMechanism --> DLQMove
๐ Example Standard Event Envelope Structure¶
| Field | Purpose |
|---|---|
event_id |
Unique identifier for the event. |
event_type |
Logical event name (VisionDocumentCreated, ServiceImplementationCompleted, etc.). |
trace_id |
Trace ID linking related events and spans across services. |
correlation_id |
Used to group related operations in distributed tracing. |
project_id |
Identifier for the associated software project. |
originating_agent |
Name/type of agent that produced the event. |
version |
Event schema version. |
timestamp |
UTC timestamp when the event was created. |
artifact_uri (optional) |
URI of any related artifact stored in Blob Storage or Git. |
๐ก๏ธ Reliability and Fault Tolerance¶
| Strategy | Description |
|---|---|
| Exponential Backoff Retries | Retry delivery with increasing intervals after each failure. |
| Poison Message Handling | Invalid events (e.g., bad schema) immediately moved to DLQ without retries. |
| Dead-Letter Queue Monitoring | Events in DLQ are visible in dashboards and trigger alerts for inspection. |
| Compensating Workflows | Recovery agents triggered for certain DLQ event types (e.g., auto-reassignment). |
๐ฅ Key Implementation Notes¶
- Built on Azure Service Bus with MassTransit abstraction layer for .NET Core microservices.
- Full OpenTelemetry tracing embedded at event publishing and consuming points.
- Event schema evolution handled through versioned contracts and backward compatibility enforcement.
๐ Event Contracts and Schema Governance¶
In a fully event-driven platform like ConnectSoft AI Software Factory, event contracts are fundamental.
They define the structure, meaning, and compatibility of every message exchanged between agents, control plane services, and utilities.
Strict schema governance ensures:
- Loose coupling
- Backward and forward compatibility
- Strong system reliability
- Simplified debugging and observability
๐งฉ Event Contract Design Principles¶
| Principle | Description |
|---|---|
| Explicitness | Every event must have a clear, strongly typed structure. |
| Versioning | Schema versions must be explicitly tagged and backward compatibility carefully managed. |
| Minimalism | Events should carry only what is needed โ no large payloads or unrelated data. |
| Context Richness | Important metadata like trace_id, project_id, correlation_id, and originating_agent must be included. |
| Stability | Frequent breaking changes must be avoided; evolution must be additive where possible. |
๐ Event Contract Example: VisionDocumentCreated¶
{
"event_id": "uuid-1234-5678",
"event_type": "VisionDocumentCreated",
"trace_id": "trace-xyz-abc",
"correlation_id": "correlation-xyz-abc",
"project_id": "project-001",
"originating_agent": "VisionArchitectAgent",
"timestamp": "2024-04-27T15:30:00Z",
"artifact_uri": "https://storage.connectsoft.dev/projects/001/visions/v1.json",
"vision_summary": "Build AI-powered platform for dynamic document generation",
"version": "1.0"
}
๐ ๏ธ Schema Governance Lifecycle¶
flowchart TD
SchemaDesign(Design Initial Event Contract)
SchemaReview(Internal Review and Validation)
ContractPublication(Publish to Schema Registry)
EventValidation(Enforce Validation at Publish Time and Consumption)
VersionEvolution(Manage Backward-Compatible Evolutions)
SchemaDesign --> SchemaReview
SchemaReview --> ContractPublication
ContractPublication --> EventValidation
EventValidation --> VersionEvolution
๐ ๏ธ Schema Registry¶
-
Centralized Storage:
All event contracts are stored and versioned in a centralized Git repository (schema registry repo). -
Publication Pipeline:
- New event contracts are submitted via pull requests.
- Reviewed by platform architects and governance team.
- Validated for consistency, versioning strategy, and semantic correctness.
-
Validation at Runtime:
- At event production, payloads are validated against their published schemas.
- At event consumption, payloads are revalidated before agent activation.
๐ Event Contract Evolution Strategy¶
| Evolution Type | Allowed? | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Add New Fields | โ Allowed if optional/defaulted. | |
| Deprecate Fields | โ Allowed with transition period and backward compatibility. | |
| Change Field Type | โ Not allowed (breaking change). | |
| Remove Field | โ Not allowed (must deprecate first, then remove after major version bump). | |
| Change Semantics Without Versioning | โ Strictly forbidden โ semantic meaning must remain consistent. |
๐ง Benefits of Rigorous Event Contract Governance¶
- Strong decoupling across platform microservices
- Easier upgrades and rolling deployments
- Improved debugging, observability, and alerting
- Reduced system fragility during platform evolution
- Strong compatibility guarantees across multi-team development
๐ ๏ธ Control Plane Service Internals¶
The Control Plane in the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory acts as the central orchestrator, responsible for governing projects, coordinating agents, enforcing artifact standards, and ensuring operational traceability across the factory lifecycle.
It is a collection of tightly integrated but modular microservices.
๐ Main Control Plane Components¶
| Service | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Project Manager Service | Manages project metadata, lifecycles, statuses, deadlines, and artifact lineage graphs. |
| Task Orchestrator Service | Dynamically assigns events and artifacts to appropriate agents based on project needs and factory workflows. |
| Artifact Governance Service | Tracks, validates, and versions every produced artifact in the platform, ensuring compliance and traceability. |
| Workflow Coordinator Service | Defines dynamic multi-agent workflows based on project types (SaaS platform, API service, mobile app). |
| Resource Tracker Service | Monitors compute, storage, and event bus usage per project and agent type for operational visibility and billing (if SaaS monetization applies). |
| Security Policy Engine | Applies security controls like access policies, role management, feature toggle rules at the project and artifact levels. |
๐งฉ Control Plane Interaction Diagram¶
flowchart TD
APIRequest(API Request via API Gateway)
ProjectManager(Project Manager Service)
TaskOrchestrator(Task Orchestrator Service)
ArtifactGovernance(Artifact Governance Service)
WorkflowCoordinator(Workflow Coordinator)
ResourceTracker(Resource Tracker)
SecurityPolicy(Security Policy Engine)
APIRequest --> ProjectManager
APIRequest --> SecurityPolicy
ProjectManager --> TaskOrchestrator
TaskOrchestrator --> Agents(Agent Microservices)
Agents --> ArtifactGovernance
Agents --> WorkflowCoordinator
Agents --> EventBus
ArtifactGovernance --> EventBus
EventBus --> WorkflowCoordinator
ArtifactGovernance --> ResourceTracker
๐ ๏ธ Project Manager Service¶
| Function | Description |
|---|---|
| Project Creation | Initializes new projects with traceability metadata. |
| Project Update | Manages project status transitions (visioning, architecture modeling, development, deployment). |
| Version Control | Ties together multiple versions of the same project and associates artifacts per version. |
| Metadata Management | Tracks stakeholders, deadlines, goals, risk levels, priority scores. |
๐ ๏ธ Task Orchestrator Service¶
| Function | Description |
|---|---|
| Event Subscription | Subscribes to key events (artifact produced, validation passed, agent task completed). |
| Dynamic Assignment | Assigns tasks to agents based on project blueprint and runtime conditions. |
| Retry and Recovery Hooks | Coordinates with Recovery Manager Agent on retries and escalations. |
๐ ๏ธ Artifact Governance Service¶
| Function | Description |
|---|---|
| Artifact Metadata Injection | Automatically injects project ID, trace ID, artifact type, and validation status into every artifact. |
| Validation Record Keeping | Records validation results, corrections, and approvals. |
| Storage and Retrieval Coordination | Interfaces with Artifact Storage and Vector Databases for efficient version management and semantic lookup. |
๐ ๏ธ Workflow Coordinator Service¶
| Function | Description |
|---|---|
| Workflow Blueprint Loading | Loads dynamic execution plans per project type. |
| Next Step Determination | Based on current artifact and event, determines which agent(s) should activate next. |
| Flow Exception Handling | Triggers compensating flows or escalations on validation failures, missing artifacts, or timing failures. |
๐ Core Principles Enforced in Control Plane¶
| Principle | Application |
|---|---|
| Traceability | All artifacts, events, decisions tied back to project IDs and trace IDs. |
| Versioning | Every artifact, event schema, and project iteration is versioned. |
| Observability | Full OpenTelemetry integration with traces, metrics, structured logs. |
| Security First | Role-based controls at artifact and project levels, enforced dynamically. |
| Workflow Resilience | Built-in retries, escalations, reassignments for failed tasks. |
๐ฅ Key Outcomes¶
- Every project and artifact has a complete, auditable history.
- Agents are orchestrated dynamically based on project context and runtime conditions.
- System maintains high resilience and modularity even as agents and workflows evolve.
- Full observability and operational traceability from vision to production.
๐ก๏ธ Recovery and Retry Systems¶
The ConnectSoft AI Software Factory embeds robust recovery and retry mechanisms at both the agent and control plane levels โ
ensuring resiliency, minimal disruption, and graceful degradation across workflows when failures occur.
๐ฅ Core Recovery Components¶
| Component | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Retry Manager Agent | Handles retries of transient failures for event consumption, task execution, and artifact processing. |
| Dead-Letter Queue (DLQ) Monitor | Detects and categorizes failed events that exceeded retry limits. |
| Escalation Router Agent | Orchestrates escalation paths for manual intervention or higher-level recovery workflows. |
| Compensation Manager (future) | Will handle rolling back partial operations or applying compensating transactions (planned future enhancement). |
๐ Retry Flow Lifecycle¶
flowchart TD
EventFailure(Event Consumption/Task Execution Fails)
RetryAttempt(First Retry Attempt)
RetrySuccess(Retry Succeeds)
RetryFail(Retry Fails Again)
RetryAttempt2(Second Retry Attempt)
RetryFail2(Second Failure)
MoveDLQ(Move to Dead-Letter Queue)
Escalate(Escalate to Human Operator / Escalation Router)
EventFailure --> RetryAttempt
RetryAttempt --> RetrySuccess
RetryAttempt --> RetryFail
RetryFail --> RetryAttempt2
RetryAttempt2 --> RetrySuccess
RetryAttempt2 --> RetryFail2
RetryFail2 --> MoveDLQ
MoveDLQ --> Escalate
๐ ๏ธ Retry Manager Agent¶
| Function | Description |
|---|---|
| Retry Handling | Subscribes to retryable failure events, attempts retries with exponential backoff. |
| Classification | Distinguishes between transient errors (retryable) and terminal errors (non-retryable). |
| Retry Policies | Configurable retry counts, backoff intervals, and per-agent or per-task type settings. |
| Metric Emission | Emits structured metrics: retry counts, success rates, backoff durations, failures. |
๐ ๏ธ Dead-Letter Queue (DLQ) Monitor¶
| Function | Description |
|---|---|
| DLQ Consumption | Listens to DLQ topics/queues for failed events. |
| Categorization | Tags DLQ entries by project, agent, error type, severity. |
| Dashboard Feed | Feeds DLQ data into observability stack for dashboard visualization. |
| Automated Escalation | Triggers escalation router if critical thresholds are exceeded (e.g., many vision document failures in short time). |
๐ ๏ธ Escalation Router Agent¶
| Function | Description |
|---|---|
| Escalation Policy Application | Based on project criticality, error severity, and task type, chooses escalation path. |
| Notification Dispatch | Triggers webhook, email, or Slack notifications to designated project owners, technical leads, or on-call responders. |
| Fallback Actions | Optionally triggers compensating workflows or dynamic reassignment to other agent pools. |
๐ง Principles Behind Recovery System Design¶
| Principle | Application |
|---|---|
| Resilience by Default | Every failure path has a defined retry and escalation mechanism. |
| Graceful Degradation | Failures don't cascade uncontrolled โ retries and isolation protect the system. |
| Observability Integrated | Retry attempts, DLQ entries, and escalations are all logged, traced, and measured. |
| Human-in-the-Loop Where Needed | When automation cannot resolve an issue, humans are brought into the loop with actionable alerts. |
๐ฅ Typical Failure Recovery Timeline Example¶
| Phase | Typical Timing |
|---|---|
| First retry | Immediate after failure with small backoff. |
| Second retry | After exponential backoff (e.g., 30โ60 seconds). |
| Third retry | Longer backoff (e.g., 5โ10 minutes). |
| DLQ move | After final retry failure (configurable threshold). |
| Escalation trigger | Immediate after DLQ move for critical projects. |
๐ฆ Artifact Storage Subsystem Internals¶
The Artifact Storage Subsystem is responsible for persisting, versioning, and retrieving the artifacts produced by agents during the software development lifecycle.
It ensures high availability, integrity, and traceability of all artifacts, while seamlessly integrating with other platform components such as the event bus, control plane, and semantic memory.
๐งฉ Storage Components Overview¶
| Component | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Blob Storage | Stores large, unstructured artifacts (e.g., Vision Documents, Architecture Blueprints, Source Code). |
| Git Repositories | Stores version-controlled code, templates, and infrastructure-as-code (IaC) artifacts. |
| Metadata Store | Stores metadata and tracking information (trace IDs, project IDs, artifact versions). |
| Semantic Memory Store | Vector database (e.g., Azure Cognitive Search, Pinecone) stores semantic embeddings of artifacts for future retrieval-augmented generation. |
| Backup Service | Ensures periodic snapshots and data integrity checks, preventing loss or corruption of critical data. |
๐ง Artifact Lifecycle in Storage¶
flowchart TD
ArtifactCreated(Artifact Created by Agent)
MetadataInjection(Inject Metadata - TraceID, ProjectID, Versioning)
Validation(Validate Artifact Structure and Integrity)
BlobStorageSave(Save Artifact to Blob Storage)
GitRepoCommit(Commit to Git Repository if Code)
SemanticEmbedding(Embed Artifact into Semantic Memory Store)
Backup(Periodically Backup Artifact)
VersionControl(Manage Versioning)
ArtifactCreated --> MetadataInjection
MetadataInjection --> Validation
Validation --> BlobStorageSave
Validation --> GitRepoCommit
BlobStorageSave --> SemanticEmbedding
GitRepoCommit --> SemanticEmbedding
SemanticEmbedding --> Backup
Backup --> VersionControl
๐ ๏ธ Detailed Storage Components¶
1. Blob Storage¶
- Azure Blob Storage stores large artifacts (e.g., Vision Documents, blueprints, specifications, test results).
- Access Policies:
- Role-based access control (RBAC) ensures that only authorized agents can read/write specific artifact types.
- Versioning is enabled to keep track of all artifact revisions over time.
2. Git Repositories¶
- Stores version-controlled artifacts such as codebases, infrastructure templates, configuration files, etc.
- Utilizes Azure DevOps Repos or GitHub for integration with CI/CD pipelines.
- Commit History: Provides traceable commit hashes for every code update, allowing rollback to previous versions when necessary.
3. Metadata Store¶
- Stores metadata like:
- Artifact versioning information
- Trace IDs, project IDs
- Event source agent
- Creation timestamp
- Artifact status (validated, ready for deployment, etc.)
- Uses Azure SQL Database or PostgreSQL for relational metadata storage, ensuring structured query access for project managers.
4. Semantic Memory Store¶
- Uses Pinecone or Azure Cognitive Search for semantic memory, embedding artifact representations in vector databases.
- Memory Augmentation: Each artifactโs semantic embeddings are stored and can be retrieved for reasoning, query answering, or RAG tasks.
- Search and Retrieval: Provides intelligent search and retrieval of past artifacts based on content similarity (e.g., similar past projects, blueprints).
๐ง Storage Flow Example¶
| Event | Flow |
|---|---|
| Artifact Creation | Agent produces an artifact (e.g., Vision Document). |
| Metadata Injection | Metadata (trace ID, project ID, version) is injected into the artifact. |
| Validation | The artifact is validated structurally and semantically. |
| Storage | Valid artifacts are saved into Blob Storage, Git Repositories, or both. |
| Semantic Embedding | If the artifact requires memory augmentation, itโs vectorized and stored in the Semantic Memory Store. |
| Versioning | Version control and history tracking are managed within the system for future reference and rollback. |
๐ฅ Key Features of Artifact Storage¶
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Versioning | Every artifact is versioned and stored with its metadata for traceability. |
| Scalability | The system scales with the size and number of artifacts via Azure Blobโs elastic storage and GitHubโs repository handling. |
| Redundancy | Azure Blob Storage ensures artifact replication across multiple regions for high availability and durability. |
| Security | All sensitive artifacts and metadata are encrypted at rest and in transit, using Azure Key Vault for secrets management. |
| Compliance | The storage system is built to comply with regulations like GDPR, HIPAA (if required), ensuring secure data handling. |
๐ง Semantic Memory Systems: Embedding, Search, and Retrieval¶
Semantic memory is an essential component of the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory. It enables agents to access prior project contexts, relevant design patterns, and past artifact references to augment their decision-making and provide context-aware reasoning.
This system embeds artifacts into semantic vectors, enabling similarity searches and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for intelligent workflows.
๐งฉ Key Components of the Semantic Memory System¶
| Component | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Embedding Service | Converts artifacts into vector embeddings (e.g., using BERT, GPT, or custom models). |
| Vector Database | Stores vector embeddings for efficient similarity search (e.g., Pinecone, Azure Cognitive Search). |
| Semantic Search API | Exposes querying capabilities to agents, enabling them to search for semantically similar artifacts. |
| Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) | Uses stored artifacts as context to generate new content (e.g., documents, reports) based on past knowledge. |
| Vector Indexing Service | Manages the indexing of vector embeddings for efficient search and retrieval. |
๐ Embedding and Retrieval Flow¶
flowchart TD
ArtifactProduced(Artifact Created by Agent)
ArtifactToEmbedding(Embed Artifact into Semantic Vector)
VectorDB(Vector Database - Pinecone or Azure Cognitive Search)
RetrievalQuery(Send Retrieval Query to Semantic Memory)
EmbeddingMatch(Find Semantically Similar Artifacts)
RAGGeneration(Generate Content Using Retrieved Artifacts)
ArtifactProduced --> ArtifactToEmbedding
ArtifactToEmbedding --> VectorDB
RetrievalQuery --> VectorDB
VectorDB --> EmbeddingMatch
EmbeddingMatch --> RAGGeneration
๐ Embedding Process¶
-
Artifact Ingestion:
- Agents produce artifacts such as documents, blueprints, APIs, or code.
-
Vectorization:
- The artifactโs textual content (e.g., a vision document or an API spec) is converted into a dense vector using embedding techniques.
- Common models: BERT, GPT, or domain-specific embeddings.
-
Storage in Vector DB:
- The resulting vectors are stored in a Pinecone or Azure Cognitive Search instance.
- Metadata (artifact ID, project ID, version, etc.) is attached for later search and retrieval.
-
Search and Retrieval:
- When new agents or workflows need context, they query the vector database for semantic similarity.
- Similar artifacts are fetched to aid decision-making and reasoning.
๐ Example Semantic Search Query Flow¶
| Query | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|
| "Retrieve past architecture blueprints for SaaS platforms" | Returns similar architecture documents based on semantic similarity to the query. |
| "Find previous machine learning models for fraud detection" | Retrieves model specifications, training data artifacts, and associated decisions. |
๐ง Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)¶
- RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) is a core component where agents use the context of retrieved semantic memory to generate new content.
- For example, a Vision Architect Agent might retrieve historical vision documents and use this context to suggest new ideas or generate an updated document with added insights.
๐งฉ Benefits of Semantic Memory Integration¶
| Benefit | Description |
|---|---|
| Contextual Decision-Making | Agents reason based on past knowledge, increasing accuracy and reliability in decisions. |
| Scalability | As the platform grows, the semantic memory scales automatically, supporting increasing amounts of data. |
| Knowledge Retention | Retains knowledge across sessions, even if agents are reset or reinitialized, ensuring continuous context. |
| Enhanced AI Capabilities | With semantic context, AI models can leverage prior outputs and decisions, enhancing their generative abilities. |
๐ Future Enhancements in Semantic Memory¶
| Enhancement | Description |
|---|---|
| Federated Semantic Memory | Enable sharing of semantic memory across multiple projects while maintaining privacy and security. |
| Cross-Agent Memory Sharing | Allow different agents to leverage each other's memories and knowledge โ enhancing collaboration. |
| Advanced Retrieval Techniques | Integrate AI-based contextual search to improve relevance and reduce query times for complex tasks. |
๐ API Gateway and Internal APIs¶
The API Gateway serves as the central ingress point for all external and internal communication within the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory.
It handles routing, authentication, rate limiting, and security enforcement, ensuring that requests reach the right services while maintaining a secure and governed interaction model.
๐ ๏ธ Core Responsibilities of the API Gateway¶
| Responsibility | Description |
|---|---|
| Routing Requests | Directs incoming requests (REST, gRPC) to the appropriate backend services and agents. |
| Authentication and Authorization | Validates incoming API calls using OAuth2 and RBAC policies to enforce secure access. |
| Rate Limiting | Controls the volume of incoming traffic to prevent service overload and maintain performance. |
| Request Validation | Ensures that all incoming data conforms to predefined API schemas (OpenAPI/AsyncAPI). |
| Load Balancing | Distributes traffic across available agent microservices and control plane services. |
| API Versioning | Handles versioned API routes to ensure backward compatibility as the system evolves. |
๐งฉ API Gateway Communication Diagram¶
flowchart TD
UserRequest((User Request))
APIGateway(API Gateway)
AuthService(Identity and Access Management)
AgentMicroservices(Agent Microservices Cluster)
EventBus(Event Bus)
Observability(Observability Stack)
UserRequest --> APIGateway
APIGateway --> AuthService
AuthService --> APIGateway
APIGateway --> AgentMicroservices
AgentMicroservices --> EventBus
AgentMicroservices --> Observability
APIGateway --> Observability
๐ ๏ธ Internal APIs in the Platform¶
While the API Gateway handles external requests, internal APIs coordinate services and agents within the platform:
| API Service | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Agent API | Exposes interfaces for agents to communicate with the control plane, event bus, and other agents. |
| Artifact API | Handles CRUD operations for artifacts (documents, codebases, models), ensuring consistency and versioning. |
| Project API | Manages project metadata, status updates, task assignments, and orchestrates agent interactions. |
| Event API | Publishes and subscribes to platform events, allowing agents to react and evolve autonomously. |
| Control Plane API | Provides administrative access to control plane services, allowing project managers to track and oversee agent actions and artifact histories. |
๐ API Security¶
-
OAuth2 Authentication:
- APIs are secured using OAuth2 Bearer tokens with RBAC (Role-Based Access Control).
- Services and agents use Azure AD B2C or internal IdentityServer for identity management.
-
TLS Encryption:
- All data in transit is encrypted with TLS 1.2+ to protect sensitive communication.
-
API Gateway Rate Limiting:
- All incoming requests are monitored and throttled to prevent abuse and overload.
๐ Internal API Flow Example¶
- A Vision Document is created by the Vision Architect Agent.
- The Artifact API stores the document in Blob Storage and associates metadata with it.
- The Project API updates the projectโs status to "Visioning Complete".
- The Event API emits a
VisionDocumentCreatedevent to notify downstream agents like the Product Manager Agent. - Observability Stack records the full interaction for metrics and diagnostics.
๐ง Future API Features¶
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Dynamic API Generation | APIs will be generated dynamically based on the event type and agent specialization. |
| GraphQL Support | Provide GraphQL API access to enable more flexible querying of artifacts and metadata. |
| Service Mesh Integration | Seamless integration with Istio or Linkerd for enhanced security and telemetry across internal API calls. |
๐ Public/Private API Surface Management¶
In the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory, managing the public and private API surfaces ensures secure and controlled exposure of internal services while maintaining flexibility for external integrations.
This separation of concerns is key to ensuring that internal microservices are protected from unauthorized access, while public APIs provide necessary functionalities to external users.
๐ ๏ธ API Exposure Strategies¶
| Strategy | Description |
|---|---|
| Public API Endpoints | Expose essential APIs for external user interactions (e.g., vision submission, agent status updates). |
| Internal APIs | Internal communication APIs between agents and control plane services, not exposed publicly. |
| API Gateway as Reverse Proxy | All public requests go through the API Gateway, which routes them to the correct microservice or agent. |
| Access Control via OAuth2 | Public APIs enforce authentication and authorization policies, using OAuth2 tokens validated by Azure AD or IdentityServer. |
| Versioned API Routes | Exposed APIs are versioned using OpenAPI or AsyncAPI standards, ensuring backward compatibility. |
๐ API Security Layers¶
-
API Gateway:
- Acts as the single entry point for external API calls, ensuring rate limiting, IP filtering, authentication, and authorization.
-
Internal API Communication:
- Microservices communicate internally over private VPC with service-to-service authentication using client certificates or OAuth2 tokens.
-
API Rate Limiting:
- External APIs are limited in usage to prevent DoS attacks or excessive resource consumption.
๐ Key Public API Endpoints¶
| API Endpoint | Method | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| /api/vision/create | POST | Submit new vision documents to the platform for processing. |
| /api/project/{id}/status | GET | Retrieve the current status of a specific project. |
| /api/agent/{id}/task-status | GET | Check task completion status and agent progress for a given project. |
| /api/notification/send | POST | External system notification trigger (e.g., email, SMS). |
| /api/artifact/{id}/retrieve | GET | Retrieve an artifact (e.g., vision document, blueprint) by its ID. |
๐ ๏ธ Internal API Endpoint Examples¶
| API Endpoint | Method | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| /internal/agent/execute | POST | Command internal agents to execute tasks based on project requirements. |
| /internal/project/validate | POST | Validate project metadata or incoming artifact against defined schema. |
| /internal/semantic/memory-query | POST | Query semantic memory for previous related projects or artifacts. |
| /internal/event/broadcast | POST | Publish internal events like ArtifactCreated, VisionCompleted. |
| /internal/observability/metrics | GET | Retrieve internal telemetry metrics from all microservices and agents. |
๐งฉ Internal vs External API Communication Flow¶
flowchart TD
UserRequest((User Request))
APIGateway(API Gateway)
ExternalAPI(External Public API)
InternalService(Internal Agent Service)
EventBus(Event Bus)
ControlPlane(Control Plane)
APIRequest(Internal API Request)
UserRequest --> APIGateway
APIGateway --> ExternalAPI
ExternalAPI --> InternalService
InternalService --> EventBus
InternalService --> ControlPlane
InternalService --> APIRequest
InternalService --> Observability
๐ API Versioning and Deprecation¶
-
Versioning:
Every public API is versioned using Semantic Versioning (e.g.,/api/v1/vision/create). This ensures backward compatibility across updates and removes breaking changes. -
Deprecation Strategy:
- Deprecated APIs are maintained for one major release cycle with clear warnings in documentation.
- Migration paths and guides will be provided for external users to transition to new versions.
๐ Security for Public API Exposure¶
-
OAuth2 Authentication:
- All public APIs require OAuth2 Bearer Tokens for secure access, ensuring that external clients are properly authenticated before accessing services.
-
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC):
- External users can only access APIs they have explicit permissions for (e.g., vision submission, task status checks).
-
Rate Limiting:
- Public API requests are rate-limited to prevent DoS attacks and ensure system resources are not exhausted.
-
API Logging:
- Every public API request and response is logged for auditability, with correlation IDs to trace actions back to specific users or events.
๐ญ Observability Stack Internals¶
The Observability Stack is a core component of the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory, ensuring that the entire system is transparent, measurable, and diagnosable.
It provides real-time insights into agent activities, system health, event flows, and performance metrics, enabling proactive issue detection and optimization.
๐งฉ Observability Components¶
| Component | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| OpenTelemetry Collector | Collects traces, logs, and metrics from all services and agents. |
| Prometheus | Scrapes and stores time-series metrics for monitoring service performance. |
| Grafana | Provides real-time dashboards for visualizing metrics and traces. |
| Jaeger | Distributed tracing tool used to visualize execution flows and detect bottlenecks. |
| Loki | Centralized log aggregation service, helping to capture and search logs across services. |
| Alert Manager | Sends alerts based on predefined thresholds or anomalies in system behavior. |
๐ ๏ธ Event-Driven Observability¶
The ConnectSoft platform is event-driven, and observability spans all event types, agent actions, and artifacts. Every event, skill execution, and task generates telemetry to track system health.
Key Event-Driven Observability Metrics¶
| Metric | Description |
|---|---|
| Event Processing Time | Time taken to consume, process, and produce an event. |
| Task Execution Duration | Duration from task initiation to successful completion or failure. |
| Artifact Validation Results | Validation statuses for artifacts (pass/fail, success rate). |
| Agent Failures | Count and type of agent failures (task retries, validation errors). |
| Resource Utilization | Metrics like CPU, memory, storage, and network usage by agents. |
๐ Observability Flow¶
flowchart TD
EventProduced(Event Produced)
EventConsumed(Event Consumed)
TaskStarted(Task Execution Started)
TaskEnded(Task Execution Finished)
ArtifactValidated(Artifact Validated)
MetricsGenerated(Metrics Collected)
LogsGenerated(Logs Emitted)
TelemetryAggregator(Telemetry Aggregator)
ObservabilityDashboard(Grafana Dashboard)
EventProduced --> EventConsumed
EventConsumed --> TaskStarted
TaskStarted --> TaskEnded
TaskEnded --> ArtifactValidated
ArtifactValidated --> MetricsGenerated
ArtifactValidated --> LogsGenerated
MetricsGenerated --> TelemetryAggregator
LogsGenerated --> TelemetryAggregator
TelemetryAggregator --> ObservabilityDashboard
๐ ๏ธ Detailed Observability Workflow¶
1. Event Production and Consumption¶
- Every event published to the Event Bus (e.g.,
VisionDocumentCreated,ArtifactValidated) automatically triggers tracing spans and log entries. - Metrics for event processing times are recorded for visibility into system latency.
2. Task Execution¶
- Each agent executes tasks, processes events, and produces artifacts.
- Task durations and status logs (success/fail) are captured for observability.
- Errors or failures are immediately logged with error codes, task IDs, and relevant metadata.
3. Artifact Validation¶
- Every artifact goes through validation before being stored.
- Validation results are logged and versioned for later reference.
4. Metrics and Logs¶
- Performance metrics (CPU, memory, request rate) and logs (structured, searchable) are generated for every service interaction.
- Logs and metrics are sent to Loki and Prometheus, and visualized in Grafana.
5. Telemetry Aggregation¶
- All telemetry data is aggregated via OpenTelemetry into a central processing pipeline.
- Visualized in real-time on Grafana dashboards for tracking performance trends and detecting anomalies.
๐ Grafana Dashboards and Alerts¶
- Dashboards track:
- Event flows: track event lifecycle from producer to consumer.
- Task execution health: shows success/failure rates for agents.
- System health: CPU, memory, storage usage.
- Alerts are triggered when thresholds are crossed (e.g., high event failure rate, low task success rate, resource exhaustion).
๐ Observability Best Practices¶
| Practice | Description |
|---|---|
| Granular Logging | Log as much contextual information as possible (trace IDs, project IDs, agent types). |
| Real-Time Dashboards | Create customizable Grafana dashboards tailored to project requirements (e.g., agent performance). |
| Distributed Tracing | Use Jaeger to trace every event and task in the system, making bottlenecks visible across services. |
| Automated Anomaly Detection | Use machine learning techniques in Prometheus to automatically detect system behavior deviations. |
| Centralized Log Aggregation | Store logs in Loki to enable fast searches for critical issues, particularly after failures. |
๐จ Alerting and Incident Management¶
- Alert thresholds are configurable for each agent, microservice, and event type.
- Alert Manager integrates with tools like PagerDuty, OpsGenie, or Slack for real-time incident escalation.
- Alerts are triggered for:
- Event processing failures
- Task execution timeouts or errors
- Artifact validation failures
- Resource thresholds (CPU, memory, disk)
๐ก Monitoring and Alerting Systems¶
The Monitoring and Alerting systems in ConnectSoft AI Software Factory are designed to provide real-time health metrics, anomaly detection, and automatic issue escalation across the entire platform.
This ensures that potential problems are detected early, minimizing system downtime and providing actionable insights for quick remediation.
๐ฏ Monitoring Goals¶
| Goal | Description |
|---|---|
| Proactive Issue Detection | Detect failures or performance issues before they impact users. |
| Operational Health Tracking | Continuously measure the health and resource usage of every component and service. |
| Real-Time Alerts | Immediate notifications on anomalies, critical errors, or downtime events. |
| Service-Level Tracking | Measure and ensure that services meet SLA targets (response times, uptime, task success rates). |
๐ ๏ธ Key Monitoring Components¶
| Component | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Prometheus | Time-series metrics collection, including resource usage (CPU, memory, disk) and event metrics (tasks, agent failures, retries). |
| Grafana | Visualizes Prometheus metrics, provides interactive dashboards for platform health and agent performance. |
| Jaeger | Distributed tracing to track event flows, task execution time, and service interactions. |
| Loki | Centralized log collection for structured logs from all agents, services, and microservices. |
| Alert Manager | Monitors thresholds, raises alerts, and integrates with external tools (e.g., PagerDuty, Slack). |
| OpenTelemetry | Full-stack telemetry collection and processing (spans, metrics, logs). |
๐ Monitoring and Metrics¶
Metrics Tracked Across the Platform¶
| Metric | Description |
|---|---|
| Event Consumption Time | Time taken for agents to consume and process events (from reception to task execution). |
| Task Execution Duration | Time taken for agents to complete their assigned tasks, from initiation to final output. |
| Artifact Validation Success Rate | Percentage of successfully validated artifacts out of total attempts. |
| Agent Task Failures | Count of failures per agent during task execution or validation. |
| System Resource Utilization | CPU, memory, disk, and network usage across the platformโs services. |
| API Latency and Throughput | Response times and the number of API calls per service per minute. |
| Service Uptime | Availability and uptime tracking of agents, services, and platform infrastructure. |
๐ง Observability Best Practices¶
| Best Practice | Description |
|---|---|
| Structured Metrics | Use structured and high-granularity metrics to track every important system and agent behavior. |
| Automated Anomaly Detection | Leverage Prometheus Alertmanager to automatically detect system behavior anomalies based on defined thresholds. |
| Tracing and Correlation | Use Jaeger for distributed tracing and OpenTelemetry to ensure seamless traceability across microservices and agents. |
| Health Check Integration | Integrate health checks at the agent and service level, providing immediate visibility into component health. |
| Centralized Logging | Use Loki to aggregate logs from all platform components, making them searchable and ensuring fast debugging. |
๐จ Alerting Mechanisms¶
Alert Thresholds are set across multiple dimensions:
| Alert Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Service Latency | Alerts when API response times exceed predefined thresholds. |
| Task Failures | Alerts on failed tasks, retries, or invalid artifacts during execution. |
| Resource Saturation | Alerts triggered if CPU, memory, or storage limits are exceeded. |
| Event Queue Backlog | Alerts when the number of unprocessed events exceeds safe levels. |
| Service Downtime | Alerts when a microservice becomes unavailable or experiences critical errors. |
Example Alert Configuration¶
| Metric | Threshold | Alert Level |
|---|---|---|
| API Latency | > 300ms | High |
| Task Failures | > 5 failures per minute | Critical |
| Event Processing | Queue length > 500 events | Medium |
| CPU Usage | > 85% usage | High |
โ ๏ธ Incident Management and Notification Flow¶
-
Alert Trigger:
- An event exceeds its predefined threshold (e.g., 5 task failures in a minute).
-
Notification Dispatch:
- Alert Manager triggers an alert and sends a notification to the appropriate stakeholders (Slack, email, PagerDuty).
-
Issue Investigation:
- Grafana Dashboards display metrics related to the issue (e.g., event backlog, task duration).
- Loki Logs provide detailed error messages and stack traces.
-
Resolution:
- Issue is addressed by the team (either through automated recovery actions or manual intervention).
-
Post-Incident Review:
- Root Cause Analysis performed to prevent future occurrences and update system thresholds if necessary.
๐ Future Enhancements¶
| Future Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Anomaly Detection via ML | Use machine learning models to predict anomalies and prevent failures before they occur. |
| Advanced Predictive Monitoring | Predict system resource utilization and scale ahead of demand using historical data and ML-based forecasting. |
| Cross-Platform Monitoring | Integrate monitoring for cross-cloud deployments, ensuring consistent visibility across Azure, AWS, GCP. |
๐ Identity and Access Management (IAM)¶
Identity and Access Management (IAM) in the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory ensures that all users, agents, and services are authenticated, authorized, and accountable for their actions.
It is a critical component for maintaining security, governance, and compliance across the entire platform.
๐งฉ Key IAM Components¶
| Component | Purpose |
|---|---|
| OAuth2 Authentication | Securely authenticates users and services via token-based access. |
| Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) | Granular access control based on roles, limiting permissions to necessary actions. |
| User Federation | Integrates with external identity providers (e.g., Azure AD, Google, GitHub) for seamless authentication across platforms. |
| Access Auditing | Tracks and logs all access requests, token issuance, and user activities for compliance and security audits. |
| Policy Enforcement | Ensures users and agents can only access specific artifacts, tasks, and services based on their roles and responsibilities. |
๐ ๏ธ IAM Flow Overview¶
flowchart TD
UserRequest((User Makes API Request))
APIGateway(API Gateway - Entry Point)
AuthService(Identity and Access Management)
RoleValidation(Role-Based Access Control)
AccessAllowed(Access Allowed to Resources)
AccessDenied(Access Denied - Unauthorized)
ArtifactRequest(Artifact or Service Request)
UserRequest --> APIGateway
APIGateway --> AuthService
AuthService --> RoleValidation
RoleValidation --> AccessAllowed
RoleValidation --> AccessDenied
AccessAllowed --> ArtifactRequest
๐ ๏ธ Key IAM Features¶
1. OAuth2 Authentication¶
- Flow:
- Users authenticate via OAuth2 providers (Azure AD B2C, Google, GitHub) and receive Bearer Tokens.
- Tokens are validated by the Identity Service for every API request and agent interaction.
2. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)¶
-
User Roles:
- Platform Users: Can access external-facing APIs and project management tools.
- Admins: Have access to sensitive platform management endpoints and full project visibility.
- Agents: Have specific, role-based access to artifacts, event streams, and internal APIs (e.g., Vision Architect Agent can access vision documents).
-
Permissions:
- Each role is assigned permissions that dictate access to specific resources (e.g., creating, reading, or modifying vision documents).
3. User Federation¶
- Allows users to log in via external identity providers such as Azure AD, Google, GitHub, etc., enabling single sign-on (SSO) across platforms.
4. Access Auditing and Logging¶
- Every request to an API or internal service is logged and tied to the requesting user and their role.
-
Audit trails include the timestamp of access, action taken, the artifact accessed, and the source IP address.
-
Audit Examples:
- User accessed vision document.
- Agent performed a validation check on an artifact.
5. Policy Enforcement¶
- Access Policies are dynamically applied to ensure that each user or service can only access specific tasks, agents, or projects they are authorized for.
- Policies are enforced via the API Gateway, Event Bus, and Control Plane, making sure there are no unauthorized interactions between agents or external systems.
๐ ๏ธ Security and Token Management¶
-
Token Lifetime:
- Tokens are issued with limited lifetimes (e.g., 1 hour for short-lived, 30 days for refreshable tokens).
- Refresh tokens are used to extend access without re-authenticating.
-
Token Scopes:
- Tokens include scopes that define what resources and operations the token bearer can access.
-
Token Validation:
- All tokens are validated against the Identity Service for every interaction with the API Gateway or microservices.
๐งฉ IAM Integration Diagram¶
flowchart TD
UserRequest((User Makes API Request))
APIGateway(API Gateway)
IdentityService(Identity and Access Management)
TokenValidator(Validate Token)
RoleCheck(Role-Based Access Control)
AccessAllowed(Grant Access)
Denied(Access Denied)
UserRequest --> APIGateway
APIGateway --> IdentityService
IdentityService --> TokenValidator
TokenValidator --> RoleCheck
RoleCheck --> AccessAllowed
RoleCheck --> Denied
AccessAllowed --> UserServiceAccess(User Requests Services/Resources)
๐ ๏ธ Access Control Policies¶
| Policy | Description |
|---|---|
| Read-Only Access | Users or agents can view artifacts, documents, or statuses, but cannot modify them. |
| Editor Access | Users or agents can create, modify, and delete artifacts (e.g., create new Vision Documents). |
| Admin Access | Full access to all platform services, project metadata, agent coordination, and artifact management. |
| Guest Access | Limited access to specific resources (e.g., read access to public documents only). |
๐ฅ Future IAM Enhancements¶
| Enhancement | Description |
|---|---|
| Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) | Add an extra layer of security for admin and sensitive operations. |
| Identity Federation with Enterprises | Allow corporate identity integration for large enterprises with strict compliance requirements. |
| Self-Service User Management | Allow admins to grant or revoke user access rights directly via a self-service interface. |
๐ Secrets and Configuration Management¶
Effective management of secrets, configuration data, and feature toggles is critical for maintaining security, scalability, and flexibility across the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory.
This system enables dynamic configuration management, secure secrets access, and feature flagging for real-time operational adjustments.
๐ ๏ธ Key Components of Secrets and Configuration Management¶
| Component | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Azure Key Vault | Secure storage and management of secrets such as API keys, connection strings, credentials. |
| Feature Flag Service | Provides real-time toggle of platform features or agent behaviors to enable gradual rollouts and A/B testing. |
| Configuration Management | Manages platform-wide settings (e.g., environment-specific variables, agent configurations, external system API keys). |
| Secrets Access API | Exposes API for securely retrieving secrets, with access control policies based on roles. |
๐ Secrets Management Workflow¶
flowchart TD
SecretsRequest(Agent or Service Requests Secret)
KeyVaultAccess(Azure Key Vault Access)
SecretsProvider(Secrets Provider Service)
SecretsReturned(Retrieve Secret and Return)
EventPublisher(Publish Event After Access)
SecretsRequest --> KeyVaultAccess
KeyVaultAccess --> SecretsProvider
SecretsProvider --> SecretsReturned
SecretsReturned --> EventPublisher
๐ Azure Key Vault Integration¶
-
Secrets Storage:
All critical secrets (API keys, database credentials, tokens) are stored securely in Azure Key Vault, ensuring encrypted storage and access control. -
Managed Identities:
Managed identities for Azure resources are used by agents and services to access secrets without embedding any credentials in the code. -
Access Control:
Fine-grained access control using RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) and Azure Policies ensures that only authorized services can read or update secrets. -
Secrets Rotation:
Regular secrets rotation policies are enforced to minimize exposure risk.
โ๏ธ Configuration Management¶
-
Centralized Configuration Store:
- Azure App Configuration stores dynamic configurations and feature toggles.
-
Configuration Consumption:
- Services, agents, and workflows pull configuration data at runtime using secure API calls to Azure App Configuration.
-
Environment-Specific Configurations:
- Configuration management is environment-aware, ensuring different setups for development, staging, and production environments.
-
Auto-Reloadable Configs:
- Changes to configurations (e.g., new database connection string, change of API endpoint) are automatically picked up by services in real-time without downtime.
๐งฉ Feature Flag Management¶
| Flag Type | Description |
|---|---|
| System-Wide Flags | Control large features across the platform (e.g., enable/disable AI-based agent reasoning). |
| Agent-Specific Flags | Dynamically toggle agent behaviors (e.g., turn on/off automatic retries for certain agents). |
| User-Specific Flags | Personalize experiences for end-users (e.g., beta features for specific user groups). |
- Flags and Configurations are stored in Azure App Configuration and controlled by agents.
- Flags can be set to control SaaS edition features, AI model integrations, or specific service behaviors.
๐ ๏ธ Secrets and Configuration Management Flow¶
flowchart TD
ConfigRequest(Agent/Service Requests Configuration)
AppConfigAccess(Azure App Configuration Access)
ConfigRetrieved(Agent Retrieves Config)
FeatureFlagCheck(Feature Flags Checked)
ConfigApplied(Apply Configuration and Feature Flags to Service)
ConfigRequest --> AppConfigAccess
AppConfigAccess --> ConfigRetrieved
ConfigRetrieved --> FeatureFlagCheck
FeatureFlagCheck --> ConfigApplied
๐ง Best Practices for Secrets and Configuration Management¶
| Best Practice | Description |
|---|---|
| Least Privilege | Only give agents and services access to the minimal set of secrets and configurations they need. |
| Secrets Rotation | Automate periodic secret rotation and force services to fetch updated secrets without downtime. |
| Environment-Specific Configs | Store environment-specific configurations and feature flags separately to avoid cross-environment leakage. |
| Centralized Management | Use Azure Key Vault and App Configuration for all platform-related secrets and configurations. |
| Auditability | Enable logging and auditing for secrets access, config changes, and feature flag updates to ensure full traceability. |
๐ Future Enhancements¶
| Enhancement | Description |
|---|---|
| Self-Healing Secrets Management | Automatic recovery for missing or invalid secrets with fallback to a secure temporary environment. |
| Federated Configuration | Allow users to federate and sync configuration settings across multiple environments or cloud platforms. |
| Advanced Feature Flagging | Support multi-layered feature flags that can control individual agent behaviors, workflow processes, and user experiences dynamically. |
๐ CI/CD and GitOps Infrastructure¶
The CI/CD and GitOps Infrastructure forms the backbone for automating the build, validation, deployment, and scaling of the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory platform.
It ensures that every agent, microservice, and workflow is continuously integrated, deployed, and tested, enabling smooth evolution and scaling.
๐ ๏ธ Key Components of CI/CD Infrastructure¶
| Component | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Azure DevOps Pipelines | Automates the build, validation, and deployment processes for services, agents, and infrastructure. |
| GitOps Controllers | Uses ArgoCD or FluxCD to sync configurations, manifests, and Kubernetes resources with Git repositories. |
| Docker Build and Push | Every microservice (including agents) is containerized using Docker, with images pushed to Azure Container Registry (ACR) or DockerHub. |
| Terraform / Pulumi | Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tools used for defining, provisioning, and managing cloud infrastructure (e.g., Azure resources). |
| Git Repositories | Centralized source control for configuration files, code, infrastructure manifests, and deployment pipelines. |
| Automated Testing | Ensures that every commit passes unit tests, integration tests, and compliance checks before deployment. |
๐ ๏ธ CI/CD Pipeline Overview¶
flowchart TD
CodeChange(Developer Pushes Code or Config)
GitRepo(Git Repository - Azure DevOps / GitHub)
PipelineTrigger(CI/CD Pipeline Triggered)
BuildStage(Build, Lint, Validate, Unit Test)
DockerImageBuild(Docker Image Build and Push)
ArtifactBuild(Artifact Build - YAML, Helm Charts)
ArtifactPush(Artifact Push to Container Registry)
KubernetesDeploy(Kubernetes Deployment)
HealthCheck(Automated Health Checks)
Observability(Attach Tracing, Metrics, Logs)
CodeChange --> GitRepo
GitRepo --> PipelineTrigger
PipelineTrigger --> BuildStage
BuildStage --> DockerImageBuild
BuildStage --> ArtifactBuild
DockerImageBuild --> ArtifactPush
ArtifactBuild --> ArtifactPush
ArtifactPush --> KubernetesDeploy
KubernetesDeploy --> HealthCheck
HealthCheck --> Observability
๐ ๏ธ Key CI/CD Pipeline Steps¶
1. Code Commit¶
- Developers push changes to Git repositories (either Azure DevOps or GitHub).
- Branching Strategy: Feature branches are merged into main or develop branches using pull requests (PRs).
2. Pipeline Trigger¶
- Every commit or PR triggers the CI pipeline.
- The pipeline includes stages for linting, unit tests, build validation, and Docker image creation.
3. Docker Image Build¶
- Each microservice and agent is containerized using Docker.
- Docker images are built and pushed to the Azure Container Registry (ACR) or DockerHub.
4. Artifact Build¶
- Non-Docker artifacts (e.g., YAML files, Helm charts) are built.
- GitOps-managed configuration files are built, versioned, and prepared for deployment.
5. Kubernetes Deployment¶
- Once the Docker image and artifacts are built, Kubernetes deployments are triggered via ArgoCD or FluxCD.
- New artifacts and images are synced with Kubernetes clusters automatically.
6. Automated Health Checks¶
- Health checks are performed against Kubernetes-managed services, ensuring they are ready to accept traffic.
- Services that fail health checks are automatically rolled back.
7. Observability Integration¶
- OpenTelemetry traces and Prometheus metrics are automatically attached to all deployed services.
- Real-time observability data (logs, metrics, traces) are fed into Grafana dashboards for monitoring.
๐ง GitOps and Deployment Automation¶
| Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Infrastructure as Code (IaC) | Infrastructure is managed as code using Pulumi, Terraform, or Bicep to define cloud resources, virtual networks, AKS clusters, and storage accounts. |
| GitOps Workflow | Every change to infrastructure or service manifests (Kubernetes YAML files, Helm charts) is managed in Git repositories. Changes are automatically deployed when merged, ensuring consistency. |
| Versioned Deployments | Docker images, Kubernetes configurations, and infrastructure templates are all versioned to ensure traceability and rollback capabilities. |
๐ Security and Compliance in CI/CD¶
| Security Measure | Description |
|---|---|
| Image Scanning | Docker images are scanned for vulnerabilities before being pushed to container registries. |
| Automated Testing | Every commit undergoes unit tests, integration tests, and compliance checks (e.g., security rules, service-level agreements). |
| Environment-Specific Secrets | Azure Key Vault is used to securely manage secrets for development, staging, and production environments. |
| Token Validation | OAuth2 tokens are validated for every CI/CD trigger and Kubernetes deployment to ensure that only authorized actions are taken. |
๐ CI/CD Best Practices¶
| Practice | Description |
|---|---|
| Automated Testing | Ensure that code is always validated with unit, integration, and end-to-end tests before deployment. |
| Feature Toggles | Use feature flags to safely deploy new features and roll them back if necessary without redeploying. |
| Continuous Integration | Every commit triggers a full validation pipeline, ensuring that the codebase is always in a deployable state. |
| Rolling Deployments | Deploy changes gradually across services, ensuring that there is no downtime. |
๐ Integration with External Systems¶
The ConnectSoft AI Software Factory is designed to integrate with external systems, expanding its capabilities and allowing external services to augment the platform's intelligent workflows.
External integrations provide seamless communication with services like OpenAI, GitHub, Azure DevOps, and notification systems.
๐งฉ Key External Integrations¶
| System | Purpose |
|---|---|
| OpenAI (via Azure OpenAI Service) | Provides large language models for reasoning, content generation, and data augmentation tasks. |
| GitHub | Manages source code repositories, pull requests, and integrates into CI/CD pipelines for automated deployments. |
| Azure DevOps | Handles source control, CI/CD pipelines, artifact management, and project tracking. |
| Notification Systems (SendGrid, Twilio, Webhooks) | Delivers notifications via email, SMS, Slack, or custom webhooks to end-users or admins. |
| Azure Cognitive Services | Enhances agents with capabilities like text analysis, computer vision, translation, and more. |
| Payment Gateways | Manages payments for SaaS products, subscription management, and invoicing for enterprise clients. |
๐ External Integration Flow¶
flowchart TD
UserRequest((User Request))
APIGateway(API Gateway)
ExternalSystems(External Systems Integration Layer)
OpenAIAPI(OpenAI API - GPT Models)
GitHubAPI(GitHub API - Source Control and Repos)
AzureDevOpsAPI(Azure DevOps API - CI/CD)
NotificationService(Notification API - SendGrid, Twilio, Webhooks)
UserRequest --> APIGateway
APIGateway --> ExternalSystems
ExternalSystems --> OpenAIAPI
ExternalSystems --> GitHubAPI
ExternalSystems --> AzureDevOpsAPI
ExternalSystems --> NotificationService
๐ ๏ธ Integration Details¶
1. OpenAI Integration:¶
- Role: Provides natural language understanding, content generation, and complex reasoning capabilities for agents.
- Usage:
- Agents use OpenAI models for tasks like vision document writing, code generation, API documentation, and semantic reasoning.
- ConnectSoft uses Azure OpenAI Service for secure, scalable inference.
2. GitHub Integration:¶
- Role: Source control, collaboration, and version management.
- Usage:
- Agents (e.g., Backend Developer, Mobile Developer) push generated code to GitHub.
- CI/CD integration: Every code push or PR triggers automated build, test, and deployment workflows via Azure DevOps or GitHub Actions.
3. Azure DevOps Integration:¶
- Role: Automated build, testing, and deployment pipelines.
- Usage:
- CI/CD Pipelines: Agent code is built, tested, and deployed using Azure DevOps pipelines, triggered by code changes or artifact updates.
- Artifacts: ConnectSoft stores artifacts in Azure DevOps Artifacts or Azure Blob Storage.
4. Notification Systems:¶
- Role: External communication via email, SMS, Slack, and webhooks.
- Usage:
- Notifications are triggered by agent events (e.g., task completion, agent failure, new artifact creation).
- SendGrid for emails, Twilio for SMS, and webhooks for third-party integrations.
๐ Secure Communication and Authentication for External Systems¶
-
OAuth2 Authentication:
- All external API integrations (GitHub, OpenAI, Azure DevOps) require OAuth2 authentication with access tokens for secure service interaction.
-
API Rate Limiting:
- External APIs (OpenAI, GitHub, Azure DevOps) are rate-limited to avoid hitting service limits or overloading the platform.
-
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC):
- Platform users and agents have role-based permissions when interacting with external services to restrict access and enhance security.
๐งฉ External API Integration Flow Example¶
- External System Request:
-
A user submits a request via the Web Portal (e.g., โCreate Vision Documentโ).
-
Event Emission:
-
The Vision Architect Agent receives the task, triggers an event to start the task, and queries OpenAI via Azure OpenAI Service to generate content for the vision document.
-
GitHub Interaction:
-
The agent commits relevant code or documentation into GitHub, triggering a build in the Azure DevOps pipeline.
-
CI/CD Pipeline:
-
The Azure DevOps pipeline builds the service, runs tests, and deploys it to the appropriate Kubernetes Cluster.
-
Notification:
- Upon completion, a SendGrid notification is sent to the user informing them that their vision document is ready.
๐ Future External Integrations¶
| Integration | Description |
|---|---|
| AI/ML Services (Azure ML, AWS SageMaker) | Plug in custom models or training pipelines for specialized tasks beyond OpenAI. |
| Payment Gateways (Stripe, PayPal) | For SaaS editions or premium features, integrate with payment gateways for subscription and billing management. |
| ERP and CRM Integrations | Sync ConnectSoft data with external ERP or CRM systems for business operations and customer management. |
๐ง Caching Layer (Redis Clusters, Temporary Artifact Caches)¶
The caching layer is designed to accelerate operations, reduce redundant processing, and speed up system response times.
It is especially important in a microservice architecture where agents and services frequently need to retrieve state or data that doesn't change often.
๐งฉ Key Components of the Caching Layer¶
| Component | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Redis Clusters | Stores transient, frequently-accessed data like session states, tokens, task statuses, and intermediate computation results. |
| Temporary Artifact Caches | Caches temporary artifacts or computation results generated by agents before final validation and storage. |
| Distributed Caching | Shared across multiple services or agents to maintain high availability and low-latency data retrieval. |
| Cache Eviction and TTL Policies | Controls cache size, ensuring unused or stale data is evicted based on time-to-live (TTL) settings. |
๐ Key Use Cases for Caching¶
| Use Case | Description |
|---|---|
| Session Management | Temporary storage of user or agent session data, reducing database load for active user or agent sessions. |
| Token Caching | OAuth2 or API token storage for faster access and reducing redundant authorization calls. |
| Artifact Lookup | Cache common artifacts (e.g., Vision Documents, API blueprints) that do not change often to speed up retrieval times. |
| Event Deduplication | Cache recently processed events to avoid redundant event consumption or processing. |
| Feature Flag States | Store the current state of feature flags to quickly retrieve whether a particular feature is enabled. |
๐ ๏ธ Redis Caching Architecture¶
flowchart TD
AgentRequest(Agent Request to Cache)
RedisCache(Redis Cache Cluster)
CacheHit(Cache Hit: Data Found in Cache)
CacheMiss(Cache Miss: Data Not Found)
ArtifactStore(Artifact Storage - Blob Storage / Git Repositories)
ArtifactRetrieval(Retrieve from Artifact Storage)
ArtifactCache(Artifact Stored in Cache)
AgentRequest --> RedisCache
RedisCache --> CacheHit
CacheHit --> AgentRequest
RedisCache --> CacheMiss
CacheMiss --> ArtifactRetrieval
ArtifactRetrieval --> ArtifactCache
ArtifactCache --> RedisCache
๐ง Caching Strategies¶
| Strategy | Description |
|---|---|
| Read-Through Cache | If data is not found in the cache, it is fetched from the original data source (e.g., Artifact Storage) and then added to the cache. |
| Write-Through Cache | Data is written to the cache and the original data store simultaneously when a new artifact is created or updated. |
| Cache Expiration (TTL) | Set time-to-live (TTL) for cache entries to automatically expire after a set time, ensuring stale data is evicted. |
| Cache Invalidation | Manually or automatically clear specific cache entries when the underlying data changes (e.g., a Vision Document update triggers cache invalidation). |
๐ Redis Cluster Deployment and Scaling¶
-
High Availability:
- Redis clusters are configured to ensure high availability with master-slave replication, automatic failover, and persistence.
- Redis Sentinel is used for automatic failover in case of node failures.
-
Scalability:
- Redis can be horizontally scaled by partitioning data across multiple Redis shards.
- Cache sharding ensures that large datasets are split across Redis nodes, improving both speed and capacity.
-
Persistence Options:
- Redis offers RDB snapshots and AOF (Append Only File) persistence strategies for durability, depending on the use case.
๐งฉ Example Cache Usage in an Agent¶
-
Agent Initialization:
An agent starts processing and checks the Redis cache for any prior data related to its current task (e.g., a previously processed Vision Document). -
Cache Miss:
If the data is not in the cache, the agent retrieves the artifact from Blob Storage or Git Repositories and processes it. -
Cache Write:
After processing, the agent writes the result back into the Redis cache for future use by other agents or workflows. -
Cache Expiration:
After the configured TTL, the cached artifact is automatically evicted from the cache, ensuring that only fresh data is used in future requests.
๐ฅ Key Benefits of Caching in ConnectSoft AI Software Factory¶
| Benefit | Description |
|---|---|
| Reduced Latency | By caching frequently accessed artifacts and session data, response times for agents and API requests are dramatically reduced. |
| Decreased Load on Storage | Caching reduces redundant access to Blob Storage and other data stores, minimizing resource consumption. |
| Scalability | The distributed nature of Redis allows seamless scaling of cache resources, ensuring high availability and low latency even as the platform grows. |
| Cost Efficiency | By caching intermediate data and reducing database and storage calls, the platform lowers operational costs. |
๐ Multicluster Strategy¶
As the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory grows, managing deployments across multiple clusters, regions, and environments becomes essential for scalability, availability, and disaster recovery.
The multicluster strategy allows us to segment workloads, distribute system load, and ensure high availability in different geographical regions or environments.
๐ ๏ธ Multicluster Strategy Overview¶
| Cluster Type | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Development Clusters | Contain isolated environments for ongoing development, experimentation, and feature testing. |
| Staging Clusters | Replicate production environments to test new releases before they are deployed in the live system. |
| Production Clusters | The active environments that serve live customer traffic, split into different regions or availability zones. |
| Disaster Recovery Clusters | Backup clusters in different geographic locations that can be used for failover in case of primary cluster failure. |
๐ Global Availability and Load Balancing¶
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Geo-Distributed Clusters | Clusters deployed in multiple regions (e.g., North America, Europe, Asia) to provide low-latency access for users worldwide. |
| Cross-Region Load Balancing | Azure Traffic Manager or Global Load Balancer routes user traffic to the nearest active cluster based on proximity and availability. |
| High Availability | Active-active or active-passive cluster configurations ensure minimal downtime in case of failures. |
| Edge Computing | Leverage edge clusters for latency-sensitive applications or to process data closer to the source (e.g., user devices or IoT). |
๐ ๏ธ Cluster Communication¶
flowchart TD
EventBus(Event Bus - Azure Service Bus / Kafka)
ClusterA(Cluster A - North America)
ClusterB(Cluster B - Europe)
ClusterC(Cluster C - Asia)
TrafficManager(Global Load Balancer)
UserTraffic(User Traffic Routed via Traffic Manager)
UserTraffic --> TrafficManager
TrafficManager --> ClusterA
TrafficManager --> ClusterB
TrafficManager --> ClusterC
ClusterA --> EventBus
ClusterB --> EventBus
ClusterC --> EventBus
EventBus --> AllClusters
๐ Cross-Cluster Event Coordination¶
- Event Bus (Azure Service Bus or Kafka) serves as the communication backbone between clusters.
- Event-driven communication ensures loosely coupled interactions between services in different regions, allowing tasks to be processed across clusters without direct dependencies.
Key Steps in Cross-Cluster Event Flow:¶
- Event Emission: An event (e.g.,
VisionDocumentCreated) is emitted by a service or agent in one cluster. - Event Routing: The event is routed through the Event Bus to the correct cluster, depending on event type and agent configuration.
- Cross-Cluster Task Assignment: The corresponding agent in the other cluster consumes the event, processes it, and triggers downstream actions.
๐ ๏ธ Kubernetes Cluster Configuration¶
Each cluster is configured to scale independently based on demand, using Horizontal Pod Autoscalers (HPA), Kubernetes Ingress, and Kubernetes Network Policies to ensure secure, high-performance workloads.
Cluster Configuration Details:¶
- Separate Namespaces per environment (dev, staging, prod) to maintain clear isolation.
- Cross-cluster replication for critical storage (using Azure Blob Storage, Redis for caching, PostgreSQL for metadata).
- Multi-Region Service Mesh (if implemented) enables service-to-service communication across clusters, ensuring low-latency interaction and reliability.
๐ Key Features of the Multicluster Strategy¶
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Fault Tolerance | Each region can continue operating independently in case of failures in another region. |
| Load Balancing | Requests from users are automatically routed to the nearest active cluster to minimize latency. |
| Scalability | Each cluster can scale independently based on regional demand, providing a global scaling model. |
| Resilience | Automatic failover and disaster recovery policies ensure minimal downtime. |
| Geofencing | Data residency policies and local regulations can be enforced by routing traffic to the appropriate region. |
๐ Future Evolution for Multicluster Strategy¶
| Evolution | Description |
|---|---|
| Multi-Cloud Strategy | Expand beyond Azure to include AWS, GCP, or hybrid clouds for fault tolerance and vendor diversification. |
| SaaS Granularity | Each SaaS edition could be deployed in its own isolated cluster for tenancy segregation and custom performance. |
| Edge Integration | Enhance edge computing capabilities for real-time AI or data processing at the edge, with dynamic cluster scaling based on traffic patterns. |
โ๏ธ Cloud Infrastructure Backbone¶
The cloud infrastructure in the ConnectSoft AI Software Factory is designed to provide high availability, scalability, and security.
It leverages Azure cloud services for resource provisioning, management, and monitoring, ensuring that the platform remains resilient, adaptable, and capable of handling large-scale deployments.
๐งฉ Core Cloud Infrastructure Components¶
| Component | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) | Hosts containerized microservices and agents, providing scalable, managed Kubernetes environments. |
| Azure Blob Storage | Durable, scalable storage for large artifacts, backups, and database blobs. |
| Azure Service Bus | Event-driven messaging for communication between services and agents across clusters. |
| Azure Key Vault | Secure management of sensitive data, such as API keys, certificates, and database credentials. |
| Azure Cognitive Services | Provides AI services for advanced processing (e.g., NLP, image recognition) in specific agents. |
| Azure SQL Database | Managed relational database for project metadata, artifact indexing, and agent state persistence. |
| Azure Monitor | End-to-end monitoring for infrastructure health, resource usage, and application performance. |
| Azure Redis Cache | Distributed caching for frequently accessed data and session management. |
| Azure Active Directory (AAD) | Manages user authentication, authorization, and identity governance for platform users and services. |
| Azure Load Balancer | Provides public access to application services while distributing traffic evenly across the infrastructure. |
๐ Core Cloud Services Diagram¶
flowchart TD
AKSCluster(AKS Cluster - Hosting Microservices)
BlobStorage(Azure Blob Storage)
ServiceBus(Azure Service Bus - Messaging)
KeyVault(Azure Key Vault - Secrets Management)
CognitiveServices(Azure Cognitive Services)
SQLDatabase(Azure SQL Database - Project Data)
RedisCache(Azure Redis Cache)
Monitor(Azure Monitor)
LoadBalancer(Azure Load Balancer)
AAD(Azure Active Directory)
AKSCluster --> BlobStorage
AKSCluster --> ServiceBus
AKSCluster --> RedisCache
AKSCluster --> SQLDatabase
AKSCluster --> CognitiveServices
AKSCluster --> Monitor
AKSCluster --> LoadBalancer
LoadBalancer --> AKSCluster
AAD --> AKSCluster
KeyVault --> AKSCluster
KeyVault --> BlobStorage
๐ ๏ธ Cloud Infrastructure Details¶
1. Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)¶
- Role: AKS provides the scalable container orchestration platform where ConnectSoft's microservices and agents are deployed.
- Configuration: Each microservice is deployed as a Kubernetes Pod with auto-scaling policies for workload demands.
- Services: Integrates Horizontal Pod Autoscaling (HPA) for scaling services based on demand (e.g., CPU usage, memory load).
2. Azure Blob Storage¶
- Role: Stores large artifacts (e.g., Vision Documents, Architecture Blueprints, source code).
- Scalability: Automatically scales as needed, with tiered storage options (hot, cool, archive) for cost optimization.
- Data Integrity: Azure's RA-GRS (Read-Access Geo-Redundant Storage) ensures high availability across multiple regions.
3. Azure Service Bus¶
- Role: The backbone of event-driven communication across microservices, managing asynchronous communication between agents and services.
- Event Topics: Services can subscribe and publish to specific topics to ensure loose coupling and dynamic service orchestration.
4. Azure Key Vault¶
- Role: Manages and securely stores sensitive data such as API keys, connection strings, secrets, and certificates.
- Integration: Services retrieve secrets at runtime using managed identities for Azure resources, ensuring no credentials are hardcoded.
5. Azure Cognitive Services¶
- Role: Provides advanced AI services, including text analysis, image recognition, and language processing.
- Integration: Certain agents (e.g., Vision Architect Agent) can interact with Azure Cognitive Services for semantic reasoning and context-aware document generation.
6. Azure SQL Database¶
- Role: Stores metadata, such as project IDs, agent states, and artifact relationships.
- Scalability: Uses Azure SQL Databaseโs elastic pools to scale capacity based on workload demands and available storage.
7. Azure Redis Cache¶
- Role: Provides distributed caching for commonly accessed data (e.g., active session data, temporary states).
- Latency Reduction: Significantly reduces read latency by storing frequently accessed data in memory.
8. Azure Monitor¶
- Role: Monitors system health, agent execution, and platform performance across AKS clusters.
- Alerting: Automatically triggers alerts based on thresholds for metrics like CPU usage, memory consumption, and event failure rates.
9. Azure Load Balancer¶
- Role: Ensures high availability by distributing incoming API requests to the most appropriate Kubernetes node in the cluster.
- Health Probes: Uses health probes to verify the availability of services before directing traffic.
10. Azure Active Directory (AAD)¶
- Role: Manages identity, authentication, and authorization for platform users, agents, and external services.
- Integration: Supports OAuth2 and RBAC for granular permissions across platform components.
๐ Key Benefits of the Cloud Infrastructure Backbone¶
| Benefit | Description |
|---|---|
| Scalability | Dynamic resource provisioning, based on demand, using AKS and Azure services. |
| Resilience | Built-in redundancy, cross-region failover, and high availability via Azureโs global infrastructure. |
| Security | Secrets, data, and user access are encrypted, authenticated, and authorized according to best practices. |
| Cost Efficiency | Use of Azureโs pay-as-you-go model ensures cost optimization for resources, storage, and compute power. |
| Full Observability | End-to-end monitoring and alerting for performance, availability, and operational issues via Azure Monitor, Prometheus, Grafana. |
๐ Conclusion¶
The ConnectSoft AI Software Factory is a fully integrated, scalable, resilient, and secure platform for autonomous software development.
From vision and architectural design to deployment and evolution, the platform is built to automate and optimize every step of the software lifecycle, leveraging modular agents, event-driven flows, and state-of-the-art AI integrations.
๐งฉ System Components Recap¶
The platform's core components have been described in detail, covering the following key areas:
- Agent Microservices: Autonomous agents specialized for various software development tasks (vision, architecture, development, deployment, etc.).
- Event Bus Infrastructure: Core communication mechanism that enables asynchronous, event-driven collaboration between agents.
- Control Plane Services: Orchestrates tasks, manages projects, governs artifacts, and ensures smooth operation across the platform.
- Artifact Storage and Governance: Durable storage of artifacts with versioning, traceability, and validation capabilities.
- Observability Stack: Real-time tracking of performance metrics, logs, and traces for all platform components.
- Identity and Access Management (IAM): Ensures secure, role-based access to all platform resources, agents, and services.
- CI/CD and GitOps Infrastructure: Automates build, validation, and deployment processes across microservices.
- External Systems Integration: Facilitates communication with external platforms like OpenAI, GitHub, Azure DevOps, and more.
- Secrets and Configuration Management: Secure storage and dynamic management of secrets, configurations, and feature flags.
- Cloud Infrastructure Backbone: Azure services powering the platform with Kubernetes (AKS), Blob Storage, Service Bus, Redis, and more.
๐ง How It All Works Together¶
The platform follows a modular architecture, ensuring that each agent can operate autonomously, yet communicate seamlessly across the entire ecosystem.
Key Interactions:¶
- Agents process tasks by subscribing to events, validating artifacts, and generating outputs.
- Event Bus facilitates communication between agents, passing events (e.g.,
ArtifactCreated,TaskFailed) for task coordination. - Control Plane orchestrates and tracks all project activities, ensuring governance, versioning, and validation.
- API Gateway exposes secure external APIs, handling access control, routing, and monitoring for public-facing services.
- Observability Stack ensures that all activities โ from task execution to system health โ are fully monitored and traceable.
- External Integrations (e.g., OpenAI, GitHub, Azure DevOps) enrich agent capabilities with advanced AI, version control, and CI/CD pipelines.
- Secrets Management ensures sensitive information, such as API keys and access tokens, is securely stored and managed.
๐ ๏ธ System Component Dependency Graph¶
flowchart TB
EventBus(Event Bus)
ControlPlane(Control Plane Services)
Agents(Agent Microservices)
APIRequests(API Requests via Gateway)
ArtifactStorage(Artifact Storage)
RedisCache(Redis Cache)
ExternalSystems(External Integrations)
Observability(Observability Systems)
SecretsConfig(Secrets and Config Management)
GitOps(GitOps Automation)
CI_CD(CI/CD Pipelines)
EventBus --> Agents
Agents --> EventBus
Agents --> ArtifactStorage
Agents --> RedisCache
Agents --> Observability
ArtifactStorage --> EventBus
ArtifactStorage --> Observability
ArtifactStorage --> RedisCache
ControlPlane --> ArtifactStorage
ControlPlane --> Observability
ControlPlane --> EventBus
APIRequests --> ControlPlane
ExternalSystems --> Agents
ExternalSystems --> ControlPlane
CI_CD --> GitOps
GitOps --> Agents
GitOps --> ControlPlane
๐ฎ Looking Ahead¶
This foundational architecture paves the way for future enhancements:
- Adaptive Agents that learn from past actions and refine their workflows.
- Federated Multi-Agent Systems that allow agents across different platforms to collaborate in real time.
- Global Scaling via multi-cloud infrastructure for handling projects across regions.
- Automated Self-Healing where agents dynamically recover workflows from transient failures.
- Continuous AI Integration to add new skills and capabilities to agents without disrupting existing systems.
With ConnectSoft AI Software Factory, the future of autonomous software production is here, enabling businesses to build, deploy, and scale software at unprecedented speeds and with unparalleled quality.